Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.679
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Borneo Law Review Journal UNTAG Law Review Palmyra Fiber as Additional Materials on Solid Concrete Brick of Aggregate International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Lex Publica Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Kajian Budaya dan Humaniora (JKBH) Unifikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum J-CEKI Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services
Eman Suparman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
PENDISTRIBUSIAN KEADILAN OLEH PENGADILAN SERTA BUDAYA HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA Eman Suparman
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.399-416

Abstract

Handle civil disputes in general, for many the sense how the courts considered too laden with procedures, formalistic, rigid, and slow to make a decision on a dispute. Presumably these factors can not be separated from the judge's perspective on a very rigid laws and normative-procedural law in doing concretization. While a judge should be able to be living interpretator captures the spirit of fairness in society and not bound by the normative-procedural rigor present in a legislation, because the judge is no longer a la bouche de la loi (law funnel). There are indications that the judge did not have enough courage to make decisions that are different from the normative provisions of the law, so that substantial justice is always difficult to achieve through a court verdict, because the judges and the courts will only give formal justice. Assessment of fairness in general terms only from one side only, ie those who receive treatment. The seekers of justice in general, defeated parties in the case, will always provide an assessment that the unjust verdict. It can not be denied is one result of the function and role of the trial run has been oriented towards the success of efforts to support and programs set by the government or the executive. Keywords: normative procedural, formal justice, substantial justice
VERPLICHTE PROCUREURSTELLING UNTUK PERADILAN YANG SEDERHANA, CEPAT, DAN BIAYA RINGAN Suparman, Eman
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v5i1.3288

Abstract

Civil law suits according to law should be performed in a simple, quick, cost efficient manner.  Notwithstanding that, it is generally known that the procedure of filing and completing a civil law suit is not as easy as it seems. Understandably even the Civil Procedural Law made specifically for the Indonesian population (Het Herziene Indonesich Reglement) made available the ruling that parties may appoint legal counsel to represent them before court.  The author addresses this practice before Indonesian civil court. Data was collected through observation and interviews.  One finding is that almost 90% of all civil court cases registered involves the use of legal counsels.
Kedudukan dan Pembagian Waris Bagi Ahli Waris yang Mengubah Status Jenis Kelamin Dikarenakan Kelamin Ganda (Khuntsa) Ditinjau dari Hukum Islam Aurell Safira Izzati; Eman Suparman; Djanuardi Djanuardi
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 1: Desember 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i1.6362

Abstract

Manusia terlahir sebagai laki-laki atau perempuan, namun ada kondisi tertentu disebut ambiguous genitalia atau khuntsa, di mana status kelamin tidak jelas. Ulama Fiqih membagi khuntsa menjadi dua jenis: Khuntsa Musykil, yang sulit ditentukan jenis kelaminnya meskipun dengan berbagai cara, dan Khuntsa Ghairu Musykil, yang status kelaminnya masih dapat diketahui. Ketidakjelasan ini berdampak hukum, terutama dalam menentukan hak waris. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis melalui studi pustaka dan lapangan. Analisis data dilakukan secara yuridis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak dan kewajiban ahli waris khuntsa mengikuti kecondongan jenis kelaminnya. Fatwa MUI No. 2 Tahun 1980 dan No. 3/MUNAS-VII/2010 mendukung operasi kelamin bagi khuntsa untuk mempertegas identitas kelamin. Pembagian waris khuntsa yang telah melakukan operasi penyesuaian kelamin dan memperoleh kejelasan status kelamin mengikuti ketentuan QS. An-Nisa ayat 11 dan Pasal 176 KHI. Jika status kelamin tetap diragukan, Mazhab Syafi’i mengusulkan pemberian bagian terkecil dengan menyimpan sisanya, sementara Mazhab Maliki menawarkan pembagian dengan dua kemungkinan yang dihitung dan dibagi dua. Pendekatan ini memastikan hak waris dapat diberikan tanpa menunda pembagian, meskipun status kelamin belum sepenuhnya jelas.
Harmonization of Indonesian Aviation Regulations and the Challenges of Implementing Open Sky Policy in ASEAN Single Aviation Market Anugrah, Dikha; Neni Ruhaeni; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Eman Suparman
Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 01 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/unifikasi.v12i01.911

Abstract

Regional integration through ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Single Aviation Market (ASAM) is characterized by a complex landscape of opportunities and challenges for Indonesia, particularly considering its status as a vast archipelagic nation with intricate and evolving aviation needs. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively analyze Indonesian position in ASAM, as well as identify any legal and institutional barriers to the implementation of the Open Sky Policy with a focus on regulatory harmonization in ASEAN aviation sector. It also aims to examine the extent to which domestic policies, specifically those protecting national airlines, interact with regional liberalization efforts. In order to achieve the stated objectives, a normative juridical approach was adopted, incorporating a conceptual and regulatory approach. The obtained results showed that the geographical characteristics of Indonesia, infrastructural disparities, and the tendency toward regulatory protectionism were the primary factors contributing to the caution in liberalizing the aviation market. Despite formal commitment to ASAM agreement, implementation in the field remains uneven due to sectoral interests and limited institutional capacity. Preventive and corrective efforts have been made through gradual policy reforms and bilateral agreements. However, the absence of a binding supranational authority was observed to significantly weaken the enforcement mechanism. Based on the observations made during the course of this exploration, an inference was made that Indonesia plays an essential but cautious role in ASAM, requiring strategic policy synchronization, infrastructure strengthening, and gradual market opening to gain benefits from regional aviation liberalization without sacrificing national interests.
Presidential Partisanship in Indonesian Elections: A Legal and Ethical Analysis Zuhdi, Achmad; Suparman, Eman; Perwira, Indra; Nguindip, Nana Charles
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i1.1635

Abstract

Presidential involvement in electoral contests in Indonesia has increasingly raised concerns regarding the neutrality and integrity of democratic processes. Instances such as the politicization of social assistance programs, the strategic appointment of acting governors, and the active participation of ministers in campaign activities have highlighted the pervasive use of state resources for partisan interests. This study examines the permissibility of presidential political partiality in electoral contests from legal and ethical perspectives. Employing a normative legal research method with a statute and analytical approach, the study analyzes primary legal sources, including the 1945 Constitution and relevant electoral regulations, as well as secondary scholarly materials. The findings reveal that presidential partisanship is legally and ethically unjustifiable. Legally, procedural mechanisms, such as the requirement for mandatory leave during campaign activities, fail to guarantee factual neutrality and enable covert partisanship. A systematic and teleological interpretation of Article 299 paragraph (1) of the Election Law demonstrates that the right to campaign applies exclusively to presidents running as candidates, not to incumbents who are not contesting. Ethically, presidential partiality violates principles of impartiality and moral legitimacy, undermining the president’s role as a unifying symbol of national integrity. The study emphasizes the urgent need for regulatory reforms and ethical standards to reinforce fairness and uphold public trust in Indonesia’s electoral process.
Beyond Confidentiality: Advocates’ Reporting Duties in the War Against Money Laundering Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna; Rahmawati, Ema; Suparman, Eman; Sutiyoso, Bambang; Hamzah, Rosyidi; Woodward, John
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): The Global Challenges on Advocacy and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v7i1.21893

Abstract

The Principle of Recognizing Service Users (Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa, PMPJ), as outlined in Article 3 of Government Regulation No. 61 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on Whistleblowers in the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes, underscores the role of advocates as mandatory whistleblowers. This creates legal challenges regarding its implementation, resulting in a dialectical tension with the central argument that while PMPJ obligations are firmly grounded in normative legal frameworks, advocates—who are explicitly required to uphold these provisions—find no compelling legal basis for such duties in Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates (the Advocate Law). The principle of Lex Superior Derogat Legi Inferior further complicates this issue, as it suggests that the Advocate Law, being of a higher legal order, supersedes the obligations imposed by PMPJ. The primary objective of this study is to critically analyze the implementation of PMPJ, specifically focusing on the supporting and inhibiting factors in the context of preventing and combating money laundering crimes. The findings highlight that the failure to optimally implement PMPJ within the advocate profession is largely due to the unresolved legal dialectic surrounding the obligations of advocates. This issue has not been addressed in prior studies, representing a novel contribution of this research. Consequently, this study proposes the need for a reformulation of the Advocate Law, emphasizing the explicit inclusion of advocates' obligations regarding the implementation of PMPJ principles.
Normative Gaps in Indonesia’s Capital Relocation: Constitutional Implications of State Function Transition to Nusantara Saputra, Edi; Suparman, Eman; Muttaqin, Zainal; Ablamskyi, Serhii
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 8 No 2 (2024): 2024
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v8i2.4440

Abstract

The relocation of Indonesia’s capital is a strategic constitutional decision with significant legal consequences. While Law Number 3 of 2022 formally designates Nusantara as the new capital, it fails to regulate the transition of core state functions. This research aims to identify the normative gaps in the law, focusing on the absence of two key indicators: a legally defined effective date of relocation and the formal transfer of executive, legislative, and judicial functions. This research specification is descriptive in nature and employs a normative legal method as type of research. The conceptual approach is applied to explore legal doctrines to provide a broader legal perspective, the research also employs a comparative approach. Data is collected through a literature review, and analyzed qualitatively through interpretive reasoning and legal argumentation to formulate normative conclusions relevant to the issues discussed. The lack of transitional provisions undermines legal certainty and the legitimacy of government actions taken in Nusantara. The article argues for an urgent reformulation of transitional instruments to restore coherence between political declarations and constitutional order.
Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Ditinjau Dari Asas Contradictiore Delimitatie Akbar , Alfin Mochammad; Suparman, Eman; Rubiati, Betty
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i3.2373

Abstract

Pendaftaran tanah merupakan program pemerintah dengan tujuan untuk menjamim kepastian hukum subjek dan objek hak atas tanah dengan diterbitkannya sertifikat, namun pada kenyataannya seringkali ditemukan adanya keterangan yang tidak benar terkait data fisik maupun data yuridis yang mengakibatkan terjadinya suatu bidang tanah yang tumpang tindih. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendapatkan gambaran penerapan asas contradictoire delimitatie dalam pendaftaran tanah dan mendapatkan gambaran tindakan hukum untuk menyelesaikan sengketa akibat adanya sertifikat hak atas tanah yang tumpang tindih berdasarkan asas contradictoire delimitatie. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis. Tahap penelitiannya yaitu studi kepustakaan dan lapangan. Metode analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah metode analisis yuridis kualitatif, karena data yang diperoleh melalui penelitian lapangan maupun penelitian kepustakaan disusun sistematis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa, penerapan asas contradictoire delimitatie sebagai dasar adanya kepastian hukum dengan didasarkan atas kesepakatan para pihak yang berkepentingan terhadap letak batas tanah yang bersangkutan dengan dipasangnya patok atau tanda bata oleh pemilik yang bersangkutan.
Juridical Review of the Status of Children of Polygamous Marriages Not Approved by the First Wife Under Islamic Law and Indonesian Legislation Zulfa Sulasno, Inas; Suparman, Eman; Djanuardi, Djanuardi
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 7 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v2i7.115

Abstract

Polygamy without the consent of the first wife can have legal consequences regarding the marital status of polygamy between husband and second wife and the status of children born to the second wife as a result of sexual intercourse before marriage (pregnant marriage). The purpose of this research was to determine the status of polygamous and the legal status of children born from second wife that were not approved by the first wife. This research uses a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive research spesifications by conducting literature studies through laws, regulations, and interviews with relevant sources. The analytical method used is juridical qualitative. The result of this research show that the polygamous marital status between the Applicant and the second wife in a state of pregnancy without the consent of the first wife based on Islamic law and laws and regulations in Indonesia is a valid marriage if it meets the conditions, gets along, and there is no prohibition on marriage. The legal status of children born to the second wife in a polygamous marriage in a state of pregnancy that is not approved by the first wife, there is a difference between Islamic Law and the Marriage Law and the KHI. Islamic law uses the minimum gestational age parameter, which is 6 months. If the birth is less than 6 months, then the child is an adulterous child, so it is not confided to the father and uses the guardian of the judge as the guardian of the marriage. Meanwhile, the Marriage Law and IHL states that the status of the child is a legal child without a gestational age limit. The child can be declared to his father and the marriage guardian who can marry the child, namely wali nasab.
PENDISTRIBUSIAN KEADILAN OLEH PENGADILAN SERTA BUDAYA HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA Suparman, Eman
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1 No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.399-416

Abstract

Handle civil disputes in general, for many the sense how the courts considered too laden with procedures, formalistic, rigid, and slow to make a decision on a dispute. Presumably these factors can not be separated from the judge's perspective on a very rigid laws and normative-procedural law in doing concretization. While a judge should be able to be living interpretator captures the spirit of fairness in society and not bound by the normative-procedural rigor present in a legislation, because the judge is no longer a la bouche de la loi (law funnel). There are indications that the judge did not have enough courage to make decisions that are different from the normative provisions of the law, so that substantial justice is always difficult to achieve through a court verdict, because the judges and the courts will only give formal justice. Assessment of fairness in general terms only from one side only, ie those who receive treatment. The seekers of justice in general, defeated parties in the case, will always provide an assessment that the unjust verdict. It can not be denied is one result of the function and role of the trial run has been oriented towards the success of efforts to support and programs set by the government or the executive. Keywords: normative procedural, formal justice, substantial justice
Co-Authors Abdullah ABDULLAH Ablamskyi, Serhii Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna Agustus Sani Nugroho & Ema Rahmawati Heryaman, Agustus Sani Nugroho & Akbar , Alfin Mochammad Amin Purnawan Andi LALA Anis Mashdurohatun Anis Mashdurohatun Aurell Safira Izzati Aurell Safira Izzati Bambang Sutiyoso Betty Rubiati Christina N M Tobing Dikha Anugrah Djanuardi, Monica L. EDI SAPUTRA Elpina Elpina Ezzerouali, Souad Hamzah, Rosyidi Haris Budiman Hasanah, Hetty Hazar Kusmayanti Hiariej, Edward Omar Sharif Indra Perwira, Indra Isis Ikhwansyah Jelly Leviza Lenny Nadriana Mariah S.M. Purba Muchtar, Helitha Novianty Muhamad Amirulloh Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Naibaho, Padot Agustinus Neni Ruhaeni Neni Sri Imaniyati Nguindip, Nana Charles Nyulistiowati Suryanti R. Benny Riyanto Ridwan Arifin Soerjati , Enni Wicaksana, Gede Agung Patra Windiantina, Wiwin Wintarsih Woodward, John Yuda Anrova Zainal Muttaqin Zuhdi, Achmad Zulfa Sulasno, Inas