Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.218
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora Jurnal Media Hukum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Kosmik Hukum JUSTISI SIGn Jurnal Hukum KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Paulus Law Journal Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran JHCLS Jurnal Fundamental Justice COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Lex Scientia Law Review
Sigid Suseno
Fakultas Hukum Univesitas Padjajaran
Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Permufakatan Jahat Melakukan Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Prespektif Tujuan Hukum Muhammad Rusli Arafat; Sigid Suseno; Widiati Wulandari
Kosmik Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v23i2.18361

Abstract

Law enforcement against narcotics trafficking is certainly a significant element in efforts to eradicate narcotics crimes. So it is interesting to observe the extent to which the perpetrators who cooperated in committing criminal acts of buying and selling narcotics were arrested, prosecuted and tried. This study aims to answer the problem of accountability of each perpetrator who cooperates in committing a criminal act of buying and selling narcotics and regarding the occurrence of criminal disparities in the case of cooperating to commit narcotics crimes by analyzing the legal considerations of the panel of judges, as well as answering the problem of criminal disparities in cases of cooperating to commit narcotics crimes based on the perspective of legal objectives. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results showed that, in the case of criminal acts of buying and selling narcotics with the inclusion of responsibility of the perpetrators, it must be proven whether as a pleger  (the main perpetrator), or  a medepleger (a person who participates). Because if it is not proven in the trial, it will have an impact on the unaccountability of the perpetrator. So the situation does not reflect justice and legal certainty. the concrete form of criminal liability is the imposition of punishment by the Panel of Judges in the form of imprisonment and fines, defendants who commit the same crime or the level of seriousness that can be equalized, are still sentenced to varying or different crimes. So that disparity in conviction becomes a phenomenon of injustice if the judge does not clearly provide a strong reason for distinguishing the sentence for the defendant in the case of cooperating in the criminal act of buying and selling narcotics.Keywords: Disparity, Conviction, Narcotics, Inclusion
Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Policy Through the Classification of Fines in the Indonesian National Criminal Code (Attributed to Fines Sanctions in Law Number 63 Year 2024 on Immigration) Purwanti, Maidah; Suseno, Sigid; Idris, Idris; Chandra, Erika Magdalena
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.21929

Abstract

After the Dutch colonial occupation, for 78 years Indonesia still used Wetboek van Strafrecht as the law that regulates criminal law until finally in 2023 Indonesia has a National Criminal Code. The National Criminal Code emphasizes the ultimum remedium character by changing fines into one of the main punishments. The formulation of fine as one of the main punishments is part of the effort to overcome the overcapacity in correctional institutions caused by imprisonment which has always been the main choice in the punishment system in Indonesia and is perceived increasingly ineffective. Fines that have been contained in the Criminal Code are also a reference for the determination of fines in special laws outside the Criminal Code, one of which is the Immigration Law which in its application faces many obstacles. This qualitative research uses normative juridical method that analyzes the norms of fine sanctions and its classification in the Indonesian National Criminal Code. Although there are still findings, the fine clause in the National Criminal Code raises new homework for legislators and implementers, related to special laws outside the National Criminal Code that also formulate fines in their criminal sanctions, the research found that the classification of fines in the National Criminal Code is formulated as a new Indonesian punishment policy that has a more ultimum remedium character and prioritizes the principle of justice over legal certainty, can be a guideline for imposing administrative fines for special laws and regulations such as Immigration Law
Understanding the Characteristics of Pig Butchering Scams: Impact on Victims and Challenges for Law Enforcement in Indonesia Aissyach, Aissyach Noor Chairinovadanti; Sigid, Sigid Suseno; Budi, Budi Arta Atmaja
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v19i2.3788

Abstract

The pig butchering scam mode or "Sha Zhu Pan (杀猪盘), is a form of cyber-based investment fraud that is highly manipulative and has grown rapidly in Indonesia since the COVID-19 pandemic. This scam combines elements of romance and investment fraud (hybrid romance-investment scam) by building an emotional relationship and trust of the victim through social media or dating apps, before finally exploiting them to hand over funds to fake investment platforms. This study discusses the characteristics, schemes and tactics of pig butchering fraud, as well as the impact and challenges faced by law enforcement in dealing with this crime. The case study involved three fraud schemes that occurred in Indonesia: crypto investments, fake job postings, and romance scams, with significant losses ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of rupiah. The study found that low public understanding, limited law enforcement and the complexity of transnational networks are the main obstacles in eradicating this crime. Therefore, a more adaptive legal approach and an increase in people's digital literacy are needed to mitigate the impact of pig butchering fraud crimes in Indonesia.
Tax Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Administrative vs Criminal Sanctions Eka Putra, Fariz; Suseno, Sigid; Santoso, Topo; Muttaqin, Zainal
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/home.v8i1.522

Abstract

Legal issues arising from violations of tax provisions are resolved through administrative law mechanisms. Tax legislation grants the state broad authority to collect taxes, making tax law a part of public law, and regulating the legal relationship between the state and individuals or legal entities obligated to pay taxes. The existence of criminal provisions in Tax Legislation, called administrative penal law (Verwaltungs Strafrecht), which is included in the framework of public welfare offenses (Ordnungswidrigkeiten), is defined as all legislative products in the form of laws within the administrative sphere that have criminal sanctions. In cases of tax crimes experienced by taxpayers who have been sentenced to criminal penalties, the convict (taxpayer) is still required to pay his tax administration obligations, resulting in the imposition of double sanctions (criminal and administrative) for the same act (double sanction) which is contrary to legal certainty and a sense of justice, and is not in line with the ratio legis of the Taxation Law. As a doctrinal legal research, this article investigates how the administrative and criminal sanctions are applied in taxation in Indonesia and how legal certainty is guaranteed in the tax law. It is found that criminal and administrative sanctions are applied according to the actions taken based on the qualifications outlined in the articles violated. The procedure for enforcing tax law varies and is applied on a case-by-case basis. Further, administrative sanctions are the precursor to criminal sanctions. While administrative sanctions are the primum remedium applied in tax administration violations, which are carried out to obtain payment, criminal tax sanctions are applied as the ultimum remedium, taking into account the objective conditions related to the act
ANALISIS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA YANG DILAKUKAN DALAM LINGKUP PINJAMAN ONLINE ILEGAL DI INDONESIA Manayra Aisha Putri Indradjaja; Sigid Suseno; Rully Herdita Ramadhani
Paulus Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Maret 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkembangan era digital khususnya dalam aspek teknologi, telah memunculkan berbagai inovasi dalam bidang layanan keuangan salah satunya adalah Financial Technology. Adapun jenis Financial Technology yang banyak diminati dan sering digunakan, yaitu Financial Technology Lending atau layanan pinjam meminjam uang berbasis teknologi informasi atau dikenal juga dengan pinjaman online. Financial Technology Lending dewasa ini dijadikan sebagai alternatif investasi dan sumber pendanaan yang praktis bagi masyarakat. Seiring dengan perkembangan yang terjadi, kemudahan yang diberikan oleh layanan Financial Technology Lending juga menimbulkan terjadinya perbuatan-perbuatan yang dapat dikualifikasi sebagai tindak pidana khususnya dalam aspek siber. Walaupun pada praktiknya penegakan hukum terkait tindak pidana yang dilakukan dalam lingkup pinjaman online ilegal ini telah dilakukan. Namun, kenyataannya pinjaman online ilegal masih marak terjadi di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penegakan hukum dan kendala terkait penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan dalam lingkup pinjaman online ilegal di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, sumber data sekunder kemudian akan dianalisis secara kualitatif, maka diperoleh hasil penelitian sebagai berikut: (1) Penjabaran terkait faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum telah diterapkan dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana yang dilakukan dalam lingkup pinjaman online ilegal; (2) Walaupun penegakan hukum telah dilakukan, tetapi pada praktiknya masih terdapat kendala-kendala yang mengakibatkan belum dapat diberantasnya tindak pidana yang terjadi dalam lingkup pinjaman online ilegal.
Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator Sautma, Anggiat; suseno, Sigid Suseno; cahyadini, Amelia Cahyadini
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i1.3849

Abstract

Criminal fines in the case of issuance of tax invoices that are not based on actual transactions (TBTS) aim to recover losses of state revenue, but in the event that there is more than one perpetrator, the fines applied cannot be applied equally to each perpetrator because the fines applied become multiple. This writing is prepared to analyze the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices involving more than one perpetrator in the perspective of legal objectives. The research method used is normative legal research with a case study approach and a conceptual approach using the reference of Development Law Theory. This research is a new contribution to legal development in the application of criminal fines in the criminal offense of issuing TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator. This writing concludes that the application of criminal fines in the case of issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is carried out proportionally and objectively according to the benefits or benefits obtained by each perpetrator in order to fulfill the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency. The absence of rules regarding the mechanism for the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is an obstacle to efforts to apply criminal fines as a recovery for losses of state revenue.
State Loss Settlement Policies in the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance Case Hasbullah, Hasbullah; Adolf, Huala; Suseno, Sigid
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v6i1.798

Abstract

Despite extensive policy and legal responses to the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance (BLBI) program, existing scholarship has predominantly concentrated on macroeconomic stabilization measures, institutional accountability, and post-crisis regulatory reform. However, these studies have paid limited attention to the mechanisms of fund misappropriation at the implementation level and to the normative gaps in supervisory and legal frameworks that enabled state financial losses.   This study examines legal and structural causes of ineffective BLBI loss recovery, evaluates comparative crisis resolution frameworks, and formulates an ideal legal model ensuring certainty, asset recovery, and public interest protection. The research adopts a normative legal methodology employing legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The findings demonstrate that, first, the BLBI dispute exposes systemic deficiencies in Indonesia’s law enforcement system, particularly weaknesses in substantive legal norms, institutional capacity, and legal culture, which collectively prolonged dispute resolution and imposed a substantial fiscal burden on the state. Second, comparative analysis shows that countries such as Thailand and South Korea effectively managed banking liquidity through independent, coherent, and responsive legal frameworks, while Indonesia continues to encounter structural constraints that impede effective BLBI settlement. Third, effective recovery of state losses requires the reconstruction of an integrated legal framework that prioritizes legal certainty, asset-focused enforcement, institutional independence, legal culture reform, and clearly defined national procedures, supported by robust inter-agency coordination and international cooperation to prevent the recurrence of structural impediments.
Co-Authors Aissyach, Aissyach Noor Chairinovadanti Ajie Ramdhan Atmaja, Budi Arta Azenia Tamara Davina Budi Arta Atmaja Budi, Budi Arta Atmaja cahyadini, Amelia Cahyadini Djernih Sitanggang Efa Laela Fakhriah Efa Laela Fakhriah Eka Putra, Fariz Erika Magdalena Chandra Fardiansyah, Ahmad Irzal Fina Agustina Suhyana Hasbullah Hasbullah Huala Adolf Idris Idris Ihwan Sutiawan Ijud Tajudin Indradjaja, Manayra Aisha Putri Lies Sulistiani Maidah Purwanti, Maidah Manayra Aisha Putri Indradjaja Maret Priyanta Mien Rukmini Mien Rukmini, Mien Muhammad Al Riyadh Muhammad Permana Shidiq Muhammad Rusli Arafat Mustofa Haffas Nadhif Abdiel Widatha Nella Sumika Putri Purba, Brian Sairado Rezkyta Pasca Abrini Daeng Ngiji Rina Perwitasari Rukmini, Mien Rully Herdita Ramadhani Sautma, Anggiat Sitanggang, Djernih Suhyana, Fina Agustina Syarif A. Barmawi Tasya Safiranita Tasya Safiranita Ramli Tasya Safiranita, Tasya Topo Santoso Widiati Wulandari Yesmil Anwar Zainal Muttaqin