Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Sociological Jurisprudence Journal MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Jurnal Pengabdian Ilung (Inovasi Lahan Basah Unggul) DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM General Ledger : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Akuntansi dan Keuangan Notary Law Journal West Science Law and Human Rights Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah RechtIdee Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum International Journal of Sociology and Law Open Access DRIVERset
Ahmad Syaufi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Dominus Litis Principle and the Public Prosecutor's Interest in Case Control Achmad Yani; Mispansyah Mispansyah; Ahmad Syaufi
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): May : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i2.789

Abstract

The Public Prosecutor holds a central role in the criminal justice system as the primary controller of the prosecution process. This authority is based on the fundamental principle of Dominus Litis, which literally translates to "master of the case." This paper aims to deeply analyze the implementation of the Dominus Litis principle and to examine the various interests underlying the Public Prosecutor's authority in controlling a criminal case. Using a normative juridical research method with a literature and conceptual approach, this study investigates how the principle legitimizes the prosecutor's power to determine whether a case is suitable for trial, to terminate it, or to resolve it through alternative mechanisms. The analysis reveals that the prosecutor's interest in case control is not merely limited to technical-juridical aspects but also encompasses broader considerations such as the public interest, law enforcement efficiency, and the achievement of restorative justice. While granting significant discretion, this absolute authority also raises discourse on the importance of effective oversight mechanisms to prevent potential abuse of power and ensure accountability. It is concluded that the implementation of the Dominus Litis principle must always be balanced with transparency and objectivity to ensure that case control by the prosecutor genuinely aims to achieve substantive justice
Protecting Digital Society: Policies for Criminalizing Illegal Smartphone Applications Through Cyber Law Frameworks Tokan, Kity; Amin, Muhammad Erham; Syaufi, Ahmad; Mispansyah , Mispansyah
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1055

Abstract

This research aims to contribute to the development of criminal law policies addressing the widespread distribution of smartphone applications, both APK and iOS, that are used as tools for unauthorized online loan activities, online fraud, threats, and intimidation. These applications often disguise themselves as legitimate online loan platforms, wedding invitation apps, and parcel delivery services. Upon download, they illicitly debit mobile banking accounts or present themselves as government auction platforms for criminal goods at discounted prices, posing significant threats to consumers, debtors, and the general public. Theoretical framework: The foundation of this research lies in cyber law theory, which endeavors to create legal strategies to address cybercrimes and safeguard the digital community. This study utilizes a multidisciplinary approach, integrating legal analysis, policy assessment, and collaboration with stakeholders. Methods: This study utilized the normative juridical method to examine digital policies by criminalizing illegal smartphone applications through cyber law policies. This approach involves a systematic legal analysis of current regulations, assessing their effectiveness, and suggesting formal legal measures to address new threats posed by unauthorized applications, with an emphasis on protecting digital society from harm. Results and Conclusions: This indicates a pressing need for comprehensive criminal law policies specifically designed to effectively combat these unauthorized applications. Such policies are crucial in preventing and mitigating the harms caused by these applications before they impact society. The author's contribution lies in proposing formal offenses against the creators and disseminators of these applications. malicious applications, thereby bridging the current gap in legal measures to counteract digital criminal activities. Originality/Value: This research underscores the urgency of formulating and implementing cyber law policies to safeguard the public from the detrimental effects of illicit smartphone applications. Its originality lies in proposing innovative legal strategies to proactively address emerging digital threats.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum Melalui Diversi Putri, Sukmandari; Syaufi, Ahmad; Faishal, Achmad
JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 8, No 4 (2023): Agustus, Social Religious, History of low, Social Econmic and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jimps.v8i4.26664

Abstract

Diversi adalah pengalihan penyelesaian perkara anak dari proses peradilan pidana ke proses di luar peradilan pidana. Fokus permasalahan yang diangkat dalam tesis ini adalah Bagaimana penyelesaian perkara anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum melalui diversi ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan Apakah syarat-syarat pelaksanaan diversi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak memenuhi rasa keadilan bagi Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum. Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, diversi merupakan salah satu mekanisme penyelesaian perkara anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum yang berfokus pada pemulihan dan reintegrasi anak, dengan melibatkan berbagai pihak terkait dan memperhatikan perlindungan hak-hak anak. Diversi bertujuan untuk mencegah penghukuman pidana yang berlebihan, memberikan kesempatan kepada anak untuk memperbaiki. Adanya syarat diversi yang kemudian memunculkan batasan terhadap pelaksanaan diversi dapat dikatakan tidak sesuai dengan konsep keadilan restoratif yang diadopsi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak serta tujuan SPPA Yang mana nilai utama Keadilan Restoratif adalah penyembuhan, pemulihan keadaan dan bukan pembalasan, pembelajaran moral, pengampunan dan tanggung jawab dan tujuan SPPA yang dibuat untuk lebih melindungi Hak-Hak Anak baik sebagai pelaku maupun korban.
Problems of Mangrove Forest Deporestation with the Status of Other User Areas for the Development of Residential Areas and Pond Activities in Kotabaru Regency From A Criminal Perspective Kity, Kity Tokan; Amin, Muhammad Erham; Syaufi, Ahmad; Mispansyah, Mispansyah
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.79

Abstract

The purpose of carrying out this journal is to find out that deforestation of mangrove forests in Kotabaru Regency carried out by the community is an environmental crime and they want to know the sanctions that can be imposed on perpetrators of mangrove forest deforestation in Kotabaru Regency which cause damage to the mangrove forest ecosystem. The results of this writing are that the act of deforestation of mangrove forests in Kotabaru Regency, South Kalimantan Province is caused by the local government's RTRWK inventory process being less than thorough because there are still mangrove forests that are included in residential areas and fisheries cultivation areas. Furthermore, the act of mangrove deforestation is a criminal act of environmental destruction because it pollutes and destroys the surrounding environment, destroying mangrove forests, and destroying the mangrove ecosystem. Normative research type, doctrinal legal research type using philosophical thinking by finding a concept, research approach, statutory approach, and conceptual approach. Prescriptive nature of research types and primary secondary and tertiary research. There are still mangrove forest plants based on the author's research which are located on the sea coast of Silver Street, Semayap Village, Kotabaru Regency which extends to the Semayap Village housing complex which is a residential area in the RTRWK Kotabaru Regency is located in a residential area, so the author can conclude that the regional government's inventory process in the RTRW process is not thorough enough and the need for the RTRWK to be revised again, as well as the sea coast area, city boundaries, the village of Stagen District. Kotabaru with the presence of fish and shrimp ponds included in the RTRWK for cultivation areas, the writer can conclude that the regional government inventory process in the RTRW process is not thorough enough and the RTRWK needs to be revised again so that the writer concludes that the local regional government is also responsible for the deportation carried out by residential business actors. and pond cultivation on the side of Silver Street, Semayap Village, Kotabaru Regency up to the Semayap housing complex as well as fish pond cultivation on the coast at the city limits of Stagen Village, Kec. North Sea Island District. new city. The current impact is that this location often floods when the sea water is at high tide. The act of deforestation of mangrove forests in Kotabaru Regency, South Kalimantan Province is an environmental crime. Sanctions that can be imposed on the perpetrators are Article 98 paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of the Environment Article 35 Letter e of the Republic of Indonesia Law Indonesia Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands and article 73 letter b of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands and the regional government should be asked for criminal liability in article 112 and article 113 UUPPLH.
Corporate Liability for Conducting Mining Activities in Forest Areas Without Ministerial Permission Under the Environmental Protection and Management Law Salin, Salin; Syaufi, Ahmad; Ifrani, Ifrani; Saprudin, Saprudin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v4i2.124

Abstract

The responsibility of corporations engaged in mining activities within forest areas without the Minister's permit is an important issue in the context of environmental protection and management in Indonesia. Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH) regulates the obligation of all parties, including corporations, to conduct business activities while considering environmental sustainability. In this case, corporations that engage in mining activities without the Minister's permit are considered to violate existing regulations, which may lead to both criminal and administrative sanctions. This study aims to examine the extent of corporate responsibility for environmental damage caused, as well as the implications for law enforcement and environmental protection. The research uses a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach, focusing on the analysis of Article 89 Paragraph (2) letter (a) of the P3H Law and its implementation in the enforcement of law related to corporate crimes in the mining sector. Furthermore, the study will discuss how existing policies and regulations can improve corporate accountability in carrying out environmentally friendly mining activities. Through this analysis, it can be concluded that Article 89 Paragraph (2) letter (a) of the P3H Law does not clearly specify who is responsible, preventing the corporate management from being held criminally accountable. This undermines the purpose of the law to provide certainty, justice, and benefits. As a result, the law fails to achieve its goals of criminal punishment and legal protection for the welfare of society and environmental preservation.
Co-Authors Achmad Yani Amin, Muhammad Erham Anggraini*, Novita Diana, Sophia Nur Erbianti, Rizka Dwi Ericson, Juan Fellix F. Dirun, Wikarya Faishal, Achmad Fradella, Ajrina Hadin Muhjad, Muhammad Haifa Haifa Haiti, Diana Haiti, Diana Haryanto Haryanto Helmi Helmi Ichsan Anwary, Ichsan Ifrani, Ifrani Kity, Kity Tokan Mispansyah Mispansyah , Mispansyah Mispansyah Mispansyah Mispansyah, Mispansyah Muhammad Abrori Wirandy Musfa, Nurul Huda De Phalosa, Nydia Azaria Prahesti, Rika Nur Widya Putri, Sukmandari Rudy Indrawan Salin, Salin Sandi, Meidy Yanto Saprudin Saprudin, Saprudin Siti Rena Maulida Suci Utami, Suci Suprapto Suprapto Tokan, Kity Yani, Akhmad Zidan Ramadhan