Articles
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET DI PD. BPR NTB MATARAM (STUDI PD. BPR NTB MATARAM) ]]>
<![CDATA[Aghna Vitra Baradi]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (500.287 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v1i2.263
<![CDATA[This research aims are to know the credit provision in PD. BPR NTB Mataram and its dispute settlement mechanism. This research is empirical legal research which applies statute, conceptual and sociological approaches. Source and type of legal materials are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which collected by library research with qualitative method. Steps of credit provision in PD. BPR Mataram are credit request submission, debtor’s data analysis, credit decision, debtor’s cash disbursement. However, the settlement of bad credit steps are collecting of debt from the debtors, sending letters of warning 1, 2 and 3 and finally, the handover the guarantee voluntarily.]]>
<![CDATA[PERAN HAKIM MEDIATOR DALAM PROSES MEDIASI PADA KASUS PERCERAIAN: (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Praya Lombok Tengah) ]]>
<![CDATA[Irpan Manik Pujiana]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (117.938 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v1i3.417
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini berutujuan mengetahui proses pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Praya Lombok Tengah dan kendala-kendala yagn terjadi dalam proses mediasi di Pengadilan agama Praya Lombok Tengah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hokum normatif empiris. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan sosiologis. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan berupa studi kepustakaan dan studi lapangan. Sedangkan analisis data yang digukanakan adalah metode analisis kualitatif. Peran hakim mediator dalam proses mediasi pada kasus perceraian memiliki beberapa proses yaitu tahapan pramediasi, pembentungan forum, pendalaman masalah, penyelasaian akhir dan penentuan hasil kesepakatan. Selain itu, ada juga kendala yang dihadapi pada saat proses mediasi pada kasus perceraiannya di Pengadilan Agama Praya Lombok Tengah seperti kurangnya tenaga hakim mediator, keinginan para pihak yang sangat kuat untuk bercerai, adanya campur tangan pihak ketiga dan jarak tempuh yang sangat jauh.]]>
<![CDATA[Sistem Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Sebelum dan Sesudah Berlakunya UUPA Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Abstract dan Causal System ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>;
<![CDATA[Sahruddin Sahruddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Zaenal Arifin Dilaga]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (408.066 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v2i1.575
<![CDATA[Peralihan hak atas tanah di indonesia merupakan persoalan klasik yang sampai saat ini belum memiliki pengaturan yang tidak begitu jelas dalam sistem hukum positif di Indonesia. berkaitan dengan hal itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untk untuk menelusuri sejarah pengaturan dan perkembangan terkait peralihan hak atas tanah di Indonesia dengan coba menjawab perumusan masalah: Bagaimanakah perbedaan mekanisme peralihan hak atas tanah melalui perjanjian baik sebelum dan sesudah diberlakukan UUPA? Dan Bagaimanakah sistem peralihan hak atas tanah jika dilihat dari abstract system dan causal system peralihan hak kebendaan sebelum dan sesudah berlakunya UUPA?. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach, analytical approach, dan comparative approach. Peralihan Hak atas tanah sebelum diberlakukan UUPA, khususnya pada saat zaman pendudukan Belanda, pengaturan peralihan hak atas tanah secara tertulis tunduk kepada ketentuan Overschrijvings Ordonantie 1834. Untuk peralihan hak atas tanah, perpindahan/balik namanya harus melalui overschrijving ambtenaar. Jika melihat konsep dan pola yang diterapkan dalam peralihan hak atas tanah sebelum diberlakukan UUPA maka sangat jelas pola yang diterapkan dalam menentukan keabsahan peralihan hak atas tanah adalah pola campuran mix causal-abstract system. Berbeda dengan hal tersebut, setelah diberlakukan UUPA, peralihan hak atas tanah secara normatif mengacu pada PP Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 yang menegaskan bahwa peralihan hak atas tanah hanya dapat dibuktikan dengan akta PPAT sehingga konsepnya ini lebih dekat dengan konsep abstract system.]]>
<![CDATA[Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan Hotel: (Studi Putusan Nomor : 263/ Pdt. G/2014/ PN. Mtr) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rifqi Khaeratul Ihsan]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (360.642 KB)
<![CDATA[This study is a normative one with statute, conceptual, and case approach. The study is conducted by analyzing issues-related cases that are settled already with permanent legal force. Sources and materials in this study are secondary ones, which are laws and regulations related to the case and issue, obtained through literature study. Results of this study identify indicators as judges’ consideration material in deciding the act of abusing the law, in particular, in the cooperation agreement of hotel management (A Study of Decision No : 263/ pdt. G/2014/ PN. Mtr).]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Pembagian Harta Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perdata : Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor; 0752/Pdt.G/2015/PA.JB ]]>
<![CDATA[Novitaningsih Dwi Trisnawati]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (362.793 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v2i2.1161
<![CDATA[This study aimed to find out the marriage wealth distribution based on Islamic law and Civil law in verdict number 0752/Pdt.G/2015/PA.JB. The research used a normative research method with the law, conceptual, and case approaches. The research results of the judge's decision decided that the plaintiff's lawsuit was partially granted by stating that the plot of land and the building that became the object of the lawsuit was the defendant's innate property while the cost of renovating the house was the plaintiff's innate property. The object of dispute in this lawsuit was not Joint Property (Gono-Gini) because of Article 35 of Law Number 1 of 1974 jo, Article 1 letter (f) Compilation of Islamic Law, which meant the joint property was wealth obtained from husband and wife during their marriage bond. The distribution of marital wealth could be determined otherwise if both parties had a marriage agreement, either before or after the marriage took place. The marriage agreement was made in writing and ratified by the marriage registrar or notary. This marriage agreement applied as law for those who created it and also applied to third parties as long as they were involved.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Kawin Dalam Perkawinan Campuran : Studi Penetapan No. 599/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Mlg ]]>
<![CDATA[Ramona Milenia Rohadi]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (328.629 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v2i2.1171
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the basis of the judge's legal considerations associated with the determination of the Malang District Court Number 599/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Mlg and the making a marriage agreement according to Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. This type of research is normative research with a statutory approach (Statue Approach), a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach), and a case approach (Case Approach) and uses qualitative analysis. The results of this study, the basis of the judge's legal considerations in Decision Number 599/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Mlg is due to the marriage agreement deed made before a Notary based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU /XIII/2015, that the marriage agreement can be made after the marriage performed. While the time of making the marriage agreement based on the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 stipulates that the marriage agreement can be made before it is held or during the marriage bond can and ratified by the Marriage Registrar or Notary.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Sosiologis Tentang Perjanjian Pinjaman Tanpa Jaminan Di Unit Pengelola Kegiatan (UPK) Di Suela, Lombok Timur ]]>
<![CDATA[Baiq Annisya Desti Aulia]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v2i3.1564
<![CDATA[The aims of this study is to identify and analyze unsecured loan agreements, especially in the Activity Management Unit (UPK). This study uses an empirical normative research method with conceptual approach, statute approach, and sociological approach. The agreement without any guarantee is one of the Community Empowerment Trust Fund (DAPM) programs in poverty reduction efforts. Based on the results of the research, the problems that arise are default in the form of bad loans and transfer of loan payments that occur due to several factors. The solution is to carry out several stages without giving a fine to the debtor.]]>
<![CDATA[Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Lahan Antara Pemilik Dengan Pihak Bumdes Di Kawasan Wisata Senggigi Tanjung Bias ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>;
<![CDATA[Sahruddin Sahruddin]]>;
<![CDATA[H. Zaenal Arifin Dilaga]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v2i3.1631
<![CDATA[The utilization of the coastal border area for business in Senteluk Village Batulayar District usually make a conflict, especially between the businessman and the people who claim to be land owners, in a lease agreement legal relationship. Based on this case, the study's purpose is to find out the status of the land or lease agreement object in the coastal border area. The research method in this research is normative-legal research. The result of this study showed that first, land or lease agreement objects in Tanjung Bias could be analyzed based on two perspectives. In the first perspective, If we analyze the legislation, the land is a coastal border, it is meant that the area should be possessed and managed by the state. In the second perspective, the coastal border is the private land owner and not the state owner because the owner has a certificate or authentic evidence to prove her land. The court decision showed that the land or lease agreement object at the coastline border area is the owner of the plaintiff or individual rights. If the party default so the lessee or the landowner has the right to null and void the lease agreement or they could make another legal action based on the legislation]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pengelolaan Hutan Oleh Masyarakat Di Kawasan Geopark Rinjani: (Studi Di Hutan Benang Kelambu Lombok Tengah) ]]>
<![CDATA[Khairuddin Khairuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2196
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out the legal basis for communities that carry out forest management in the Rinjani Geopark area and how the government plays a role in supervising community actions on forest management in the Rinjani Geopark area, especially in the Benang Kelambu forest area. This type of research is empirical legal research, with a statutory approach, a sociological approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study show that (1) the legal basis for the community to manage, namely forests, refers to the Decree (SK) of the Minister of Forestry No. 436 / Menhut-II / 07 concerning the Determination of Community Forest Work Areas and is strengthened by the rules that legalize these activities. (2) The role of the government in forest management is: the role to control, manage, regulate and play a role to supervise so that forest sustainability can be maintained properly.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2020 Atas Perkara Ingkar Janji Menikah Sebagai Dasar Perbuatan Melawan Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Wildan Sugandi]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Yazid Fathoni]]>
<![CDATA[ Private Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Private Law Universitas Mataram ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2207
<![CDATA[This study aims are to know agreement law on propose according to Civil Law, Marriage Law, Islamic Law Compilation, indigenous law and to know ratio decidendi of supreme court verdict Number 1644 K/PDT/2020 in the case of marriage broken promises as the foundation of act against the law. Type of this research is normative legal research and applies statute, conceptual and case approaches. Result of this study shows that marriage broken promise is an act against the law which refer to Article 1365 Civil Law in general meaning. Judge consideration which used in the case Number 1644 K/PDT/2020 is interpretation on the concept of act against the law in general meaning, which including actions that against the decency and propriety in the society values. Marriage broken promise cause material and non-material loses thus in judge decision obligate the defendant to pay loses as Rp. 150.000.000,- to the plaintiff as consequences of defamation which he had done to the platiff.]]>
