Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAHKAMAH

G Benefits of Leased Objects Renting Through the Boterindriver Application Perspective of MUI Fatwa No/09/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 Siregar, Gindo; Zahara, Fatimah
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 June (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v8i1.3191

Abstract

In accordance with technological developments, many applications provide transportation services for the community, especially in driver applications. Many people want to become driver partners because the requirements are easy and it's also free when joining as a driver. This makes the online motorcycle taxi's income to be small. The impact of these conditions resulted in unhealthy competition between drivers. One of them is by adding features, namely the boteridriver application. The boteridriver application is an illegal application made by someone to earn more income by manipulating data, location, and distance. The focus of this research is to find out the practice of using the driver application in the city of Medan and the views according to the MUI fatwa No/09/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 regarding the practice of renting driver applications in the city of Medan. This type of research is qualitative research using field methods and by conducting interviews with online motorcycle taxi drivers and the public. The results of this study will conclude that the practice of using the boteridriver application only provides a few advantages for users and receives many disadvantages for users of the boteridriver application, the public, companies and drivers who do not use the application. The Boteridriver application rental prices vary, where the practice of renting the Boteridriver application used by online motorcycle taxi drivers is not in accordance with Islamic sharia provisions placing its placement in MUI fatwa No/09/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 which applies to the public.
Disparity in Supreme Court Decisions and Medan Religious Court Decisions Regarding the Determination of Heirs Syam, Syafruddin; Zahara, Fatimah; Pulungan, Madinah
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol. 8 No. 2 December (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v8i2.3927

Abstract

The Supreme Court, through Decision Number 485 K/Ag/2013, issued a decision regarding determining the inheritance rights of non-Muslim heirs through the 'aṣabah sababiyah route. The legal basis regarding 'aṣabah sababiyah is not contained in the marriage law or the compilation of Islamic law. In its decision, the Supreme Court referred to the 'aṣabah sababiyah theory of Egyptian inheritance law. This decision is a legal effort based on the decision of the Medan Religious Court Number 751/Pdt.G/2011/PA.MDN, which stated that, in inheritance law, the number of ulama agreed to require that heirs and heirs must have the same religion, namely Islam. This problem is interesting to study in more depth through the views of the Medan Religious Court judges and analyze based on a progressive legal perspective. This research is empirical legal research with a qualitative approach, and data collection in this research uses observation, interview techniques, and then analysis. This research found that 'aṣabah sababiyah is an asabah in the class of heirs, which occurs because of freeing both male and female slaves. The views of the Medan Religious Court judges regarding Supreme Court decision Number 485 K/AG/2013 concerning the Determination of the Heirs of 'Ashabah Sababiyah are in two groups, namely accepting the decision and rejecting the decision. If the disparity in the decisions of the Supreme Court and the Medan Religious Court in determining heirs of different religions is viewed based on progressive law, then Supreme Court Decision Number 485 K/AG/2013 is closer to the value of legal progressivity because one form of application of progressive law by judges is to realize social justice through the method of legal discovery by placing social justice in society above statutory regulations.