Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.42
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-Daulah SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Siyasatuna Jurnal Ilmiyah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syariyyah Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Shar-E: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Hukum Syariah SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Abdul Halim Talli
Dosen dan Ketua Jurusan Peradilan Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Alauddin Makassar
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PROGRAM BANTUAN MODAL BERBASIS DUSUN DAN RUKUN WARGA PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH SYAR’IYYAH Masyita, Masyita; Talli, Abdul Halim
Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar'iyyah Vol 3 No 2 (2022): SIYASATUNA
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah Syariyyah) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the provision of Hamlet-Based Capital Assistance and Community Associations in Bantaeng Regency. The writing method used is qualitative writing with a juridical and normative syar'i approach. The results showed that the Hamlet-Based Capital Assistance program and Community Pillars are regulated in Regent Regulation Number 20 of 2019, and the process starts from the stage of exploring dominant businesses in each hamlet /community harmony, deliberation at the hamlet / community harmony level, factual verification by the village / kelurahan government, deliberation at the village / kelurahan level, entrepreneurship training held by the Village Community Empowerment Office, and the last process is the distribution of funds carried out by the Cooperative Service. In the perspective of siyasah syar'iyyah, the program is a noble effort and Islam obliges the government to strive to alleviate poverty and unemployment, so that the program is very relevant and in line with the principle of benefit.
Pembagian Harta Warisan Ampikale dalam Konsep Maslahah pada Masyarakat Bugis Bone Heriana, Heriana; Talli, Abdul Halim; Halimang, St; Sultan, Lomba; Hamsir, Hamsir
SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAI Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52266/sangaji.v9i1.4421

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pembagian harta warisan Adat Ampikale dalam konteks konsep Maṣlaḥah di kalangan masyarakat Bugis. Tiga submasalah yang diangkat meliputi: (1) pelaksanaan pembagian harta warisan Adat Ampikale dalam masyarakat, (2) pandangan tokoh masyarakat dan tokoh agama mengenai problematika yang muncul, dan (3) analisis konsep Maṣlaḥah terhadap praktik pembagian tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif-deskriptif dengan pendekatan sosiologis dan teologis-normatif (syar’i), yang dilaksanakan di Kabupaten Bone. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif-deskriptif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tradisi ampikale dilaksanakan sebagai bentuk penghargaan kepada ahli waris yang merawat pewaris, meskipun praktiknya sering kali tidak sejalan dengan ketentuan syariat, terutama dalam hal pembagian yang adil. Tokoh masyarakat dan agama berpendapat bahwa meskipun tradisi ini mengandung kebaikan, pelaksanaannya perlu disesuaikan untuk menghindari ketimpangan. Dalam perspektif maslahah, ampikale diakui sebagai kearifan local bugis yang sejalan dengan maqasid syariah yang mencakup pemeliharaan jiwa, keturunan dan harta. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa pembagian harta warisan ampikale merupakan tradisi yang perlu untuk dipertahankan nilainya dengan menyusun ulang pelaksanaannya sehingga tidak terjadi ketimpangan dikemudian hari oleh para ahli waris.
Model of Islamic Governance and Judicial Independence: A Study of the Separation of Powers in the Era of Khulafaur Rasyidin I'tishan, Bani Adam; Affandi, Ahmad Zulkifli; Talli, Abdul Halim; Asni, Asni
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v4i11.888

Abstract

The separation of powers is a fundamental principle for ensuring justice and preventing the abuse of authority within a governance system. In the context of Islamic history, particularly during the Rashidun Caliphate, the need to distinguish between executive and judicial authority emerged as essential to uphold legal integrity and the rule of justice. This study aims to analyze the early development (embryo) of the separation of powers during the Rashidun era, identify the socio-historical factors that influenced it, and evaluate its impact on the effectiveness and integrity of the Islamic judicial system. This research employs a socio-historical approach, utilizing content analysis of classical Islamic texts and historical documents, as well as historical comparison of governance practices of the period. The findings indicate that the institutionalization of judicial independence began under the leadership of Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab through the appointment of independent qadis, provision of stable salaries, and the establishment of judicial oversight mechanisms. Factors such as urbanization, territorial expansion, increasing societal complexity, and the need for administrative efficiency were central to these reforms. The study concludes that the separation of powers in the Rashidun era was not only a pragmatic solution to governance challenges but also a reflection of core Islamic principles of justice. This historical model offers a valuable precedent for strengthening judicial independence and ethical governance, and remains relevant as a reference for contemporary judicial reform in Muslim-majority societies.
The Position of Choice of Forum and Alternative Dispute Resolution Principles in Contemporary Sharia-Based Property Dispute Pratama, Abdul Hakim; Paserangi, Hasbir; Mufrih, Adi Nurhani; Talli, Abdul Halim; Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10140

Abstract

This study explores the legal position and implications of forum selection clauses and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in contemporary sharia-based property disputes. Although statutory regulations have governed the forum for Sharia economic dispute resolution—generally designating Religious Courts or Sharia Arbitration—practical implementation still raises interpretative challenges, particularly in cases involving third parties or property rights. Using a qualitative method with statutory, comparative, and case study approaches, the research reveals that forum choice clauses in sharia contracts are legally valid and binding, as supported by Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 4 of 2016. However, in practice, disputes involving secondary agreements or third-party claims over property often shift jurisdiction from the Religious Court to the District Court. This occurs especially when the primary issue concerns ownership or property rights tied to sharia-based transactions, such as murabahah, ijarah, or rahn contracts. The findings underscore a dissonance between normative legal frameworks and judicial practice, leading to overlapping authorities and legal uncertainty. The study also identifies a tendency among judges to prioritize the object of dispute (e.g., property or collateral) over the contractual nature, thereby affecting the determination of appropriate forum jurisdiction. This research contributes academically by offering a clearer understanding of how forum selection clauses operate within Indonesia's dual court system and by advocating for a more integrated legal interpretation that aligns Islamic legal principles with national procedural law. Ultimately, it highlights the urgency of harmonizing jurisdictional boundaries to strengthen the enforcement and credibility of sharia economic law in resolving property-related disputes.
Co-Authors Affandi, Ahmad Zulkifli Akram, Andi Alimuddin Arif, Alfiani Arminsyah Asni Asni Dahlan Dahlan Habib, Muhammad Taufiq Halimang, St Hamsir Hamsir Hardian Iskandar Harjana, Dwi Hasbir Paserangi Heriana, Heriana I'tishan, Bani Adam Lomba Sultan Lukman Hakim Maloko, M Thahir Masyita Masyita Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri Mufrih, Adi Nurhani Muhamad Hasan Sebyar Muhammad Tahir Nurhidayat, Muhammad Pratama, Abdul Hakim Ramli, Arif Rahman Saleh Ridwan, Saleh Sinelele, Ashar Sumper Mulia Harahap, Sumper Mulia Tabran, Muhammad Turnip, Ibnu Radwan siddik