Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

PROGRAM BANTUAN MODAL BERBASIS DUSUN DAN RUKUN WARGA PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH SYAR’IYYAH Masyita, Masyita; Talli, Abdul Halim
Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar'iyyah Vol 3 No 2 (2022): SIYASATUNA
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah Syariyyah) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the provision of Hamlet-Based Capital Assistance and Community Associations in Bantaeng Regency. The writing method used is qualitative writing with a juridical and normative syar'i approach. The results showed that the Hamlet-Based Capital Assistance program and Community Pillars are regulated in Regent Regulation Number 20 of 2019, and the process starts from the stage of exploring dominant businesses in each hamlet /community harmony, deliberation at the hamlet / community harmony level, factual verification by the village / kelurahan government, deliberation at the village / kelurahan level, entrepreneurship training held by the Village Community Empowerment Office, and the last process is the distribution of funds carried out by the Cooperative Service. In the perspective of siyasah syar'iyyah, the program is a noble effort and Islam obliges the government to strive to alleviate poverty and unemployment, so that the program is very relevant and in line with the principle of benefit.
Pembagian Harta Warisan Ampikale dalam Konsep Maslahah pada Masyarakat Bugis Bone Heriana, Heriana; Talli, Abdul Halim; Halimang, St; Sultan, Lomba; Hamsir, Hamsir
SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAI Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52266/sangaji.v9i1.4421

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pembagian harta warisan Adat Ampikale dalam konteks konsep Maṣlaḥah di kalangan masyarakat Bugis. Tiga submasalah yang diangkat meliputi: (1) pelaksanaan pembagian harta warisan Adat Ampikale dalam masyarakat, (2) pandangan tokoh masyarakat dan tokoh agama mengenai problematika yang muncul, dan (3) analisis konsep Maṣlaḥah terhadap praktik pembagian tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif-deskriptif dengan pendekatan sosiologis dan teologis-normatif (syar’i), yang dilaksanakan di Kabupaten Bone. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif-deskriptif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tradisi ampikale dilaksanakan sebagai bentuk penghargaan kepada ahli waris yang merawat pewaris, meskipun praktiknya sering kali tidak sejalan dengan ketentuan syariat, terutama dalam hal pembagian yang adil. Tokoh masyarakat dan agama berpendapat bahwa meskipun tradisi ini mengandung kebaikan, pelaksanaannya perlu disesuaikan untuk menghindari ketimpangan. Dalam perspektif maslahah, ampikale diakui sebagai kearifan local bugis yang sejalan dengan maqasid syariah yang mencakup pemeliharaan jiwa, keturunan dan harta. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa pembagian harta warisan ampikale merupakan tradisi yang perlu untuk dipertahankan nilainya dengan menyusun ulang pelaksanaannya sehingga tidak terjadi ketimpangan dikemudian hari oleh para ahli waris.
Model of Islamic Governance and Judicial Independence: A Study of the Separation of Powers in the Era of Khulafaur Rasyidin I'tishan, Bani Adam; Affandi, Ahmad Zulkifli; Talli, Abdul Halim; Asni, Asni
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v4i11.888

Abstract

The separation of powers is a fundamental principle for ensuring justice and preventing the abuse of authority within a governance system. In the context of Islamic history, particularly during the Rashidun Caliphate, the need to distinguish between executive and judicial authority emerged as essential to uphold legal integrity and the rule of justice. This study aims to analyze the early development (embryo) of the separation of powers during the Rashidun era, identify the socio-historical factors that influenced it, and evaluate its impact on the effectiveness and integrity of the Islamic judicial system. This research employs a socio-historical approach, utilizing content analysis of classical Islamic texts and historical documents, as well as historical comparison of governance practices of the period. The findings indicate that the institutionalization of judicial independence began under the leadership of Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab through the appointment of independent qadis, provision of stable salaries, and the establishment of judicial oversight mechanisms. Factors such as urbanization, territorial expansion, increasing societal complexity, and the need for administrative efficiency were central to these reforms. The study concludes that the separation of powers in the Rashidun era was not only a pragmatic solution to governance challenges but also a reflection of core Islamic principles of justice. This historical model offers a valuable precedent for strengthening judicial independence and ethical governance, and remains relevant as a reference for contemporary judicial reform in Muslim-majority societies.
The Position of Choice of Forum and Alternative Dispute Resolution Principles in Contemporary Sharia-Based Property Dispute Pratama, Abdul Hakim; Paserangi, Hasbir; Mufrih, Adi Nurhani; Talli, Abdul Halim; Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10140

Abstract

This study explores the legal position and implications of forum selection clauses and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in contemporary sharia-based property disputes. Although statutory regulations have governed the forum for Sharia economic dispute resolution—generally designating Religious Courts or Sharia Arbitration—practical implementation still raises interpretative challenges, particularly in cases involving third parties or property rights. Using a qualitative method with statutory, comparative, and case study approaches, the research reveals that forum choice clauses in sharia contracts are legally valid and binding, as supported by Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 4 of 2016. However, in practice, disputes involving secondary agreements or third-party claims over property often shift jurisdiction from the Religious Court to the District Court. This occurs especially when the primary issue concerns ownership or property rights tied to sharia-based transactions, such as murabahah, ijarah, or rahn contracts. The findings underscore a dissonance between normative legal frameworks and judicial practice, leading to overlapping authorities and legal uncertainty. The study also identifies a tendency among judges to prioritize the object of dispute (e.g., property or collateral) over the contractual nature, thereby affecting the determination of appropriate forum jurisdiction. This research contributes academically by offering a clearer understanding of how forum selection clauses operate within Indonesia's dual court system and by advocating for a more integrated legal interpretation that aligns Islamic legal principles with national procedural law. Ultimately, it highlights the urgency of harmonizing jurisdictional boundaries to strengthen the enforcement and credibility of sharia economic law in resolving property-related disputes.
The Implementation of Justice (al-Adl and al-Qisth) in Court Decisions from a Historical–Juridical Perspective Lidinirrahman, Muh Saad Said; Talli, Abdul Halim; Mustafa, Zulhas'ari
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 12 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18137218

Abstract

This article examines the implementation of justice in court decisions from a historical–juridical perspective by analyzing the interrelationship between Islamic law, national law, and international human rights instruments. Justice in the judicial process is understood as a fundamental principle that must be realized from the investigation stage to the execution of court decisions. This study employs a qualitative method with normative-historical and juridical approaches through an analysis of Qur’anic verses, Hadith, the views of classical and contemporary Islamic jurists, as well as statutory regulations and international human rights documents. The findings indicate that Islamic law had established the principles of a fair trial long before the concept was formally recognized in modern legal systems. These principles include legality, the presumption of innocence, judicial independence and impartiality, open court proceedings, equality of the parties, the right to legal representation, the prohibition of undue delay, the right to remain silent, and the prohibition of torture. These principles are consistent with the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Therefore, the concept of justice in Islamic law has strong relevance to modern judicial systems and can serve as an ethical and juridical foundation for realizing justice that upholds human dignity.
Questioning the Legal Considerations of Interfaith Marriage from the Perspective of Islamic Law and Positive Law in Indonesia Najib, Muhammad; Marilang, Marilang; Talli, Abdul Halim
Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): Bilancia: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/blc.v19i2.4593

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal considerations of interfaith marriage in Indonesia in the perspective of Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia. The author uses a normative juridical approach. This research is classified as library research, the data collected is analyzed usingcontent analysis of representative literature and has relevance to the issues discussed, then compared usingcomparative analysis, then reviewed, and concluded. The results show that interfaith marriage has no legal basis in either Islamic law or the Marriage Law. The consideration of the legalization of interfaith marriage in the form of the applicant's human rights to the claim of a legal vacuum is an erroneous legal consideration. Allowing interfaith marriages in Indonesia tends to potentially cause various problems. Therefore, the prohibition of interfaith marriage is more in line with the reality and needs in Indonesia. The study of interfaith marriage needs to receive more attention because the law can change according to changes in time and place. In addition, the prohibition of interfaith marriage needs to be socialized to the public in a simple and easy-to-understand language because the negative impact of different opinions on interfaith marriage often arises in the midst of ordinary people.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Suami Istri Melalui Mediasi dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hadis Fausya, Annisa; Talli, Abdul Halim; Mustafa, Zulhas’ari
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18376555

Abstract

This study examines how mediation is used to resolve marital disputes from the perspectives of the Qur’an and Hadith. Qur’an Surah an-Nisā’ (4):35 serves as the primary basis for appointing two hakam (arbitrators) as mediators to prevent divorce, while the Prophet’s ﷺ Hadith provides moral guidance in the form of justice, respectful communication, and the preservation of confidentiality. Using a literature review method, this study shows that mediation in Islam not only functions to reduce conflict but also to restore relationships at a deeper level. In the context of modern households, the Islamic mediation model remains relevant as a peaceful solution before taking legal action.
Transformasi Nilai Silaturahmi dalam Era Digital: Telaah Kontekstual Perspektif Islam Harjana, Dwi; Fajri, Ahmad Khairul; Aprianti, Sheila; Talli, Abdul Halim
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i1.4019

Abstract

This study aims to examine the transformation of the value of silaturahmi (social bonding) in the digital era from an Islamic perspective. Silaturahmi, as a fundamental teaching in Islam, encompasses deep spiritual, social, and moral dimensions. Amidst technological advancements and shifting patterns of social interaction, the practice of silaturahmi has evolved from direct physical contact to virtual communication. This research employs a qualitative approach with contextual analysis of normative Islamic sources and contemporary social phenomena. The findings indicate that although the form of silaturahmi has changed, its essence remains intact as long as the core principles of Islamic ethics—such as sincere intention, compassion, and mutual respect—are upheld. Digital media, including instant messaging and social platforms, can serve as legitimate and effective tools for strengthening interpersonal relationships when used ethically and responsibly. Therefore, silaturahmi remains relevant and applicable in modern social life as part of preserving ukhuwah (brotherhood) and communal harmony.
Analisis Perbandingan Mazhab tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi dengan Media Telekonferensi Dewi, Nurul Aulia; Talli, Abdul Halim
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mh.v2i2.17818

Abstract

This article seeks to present a comparison of mediation with teleconference media, both within the PERMA and the scholars of the sect. Mediation is an attempt to resolve conflicts by engaging neutral mediators who do not have the authority to make decisions that help the parties in dispute to reach a resolution or solution accepted by both parties. The multidisciplinary approach used in this article is a juridical, sociological, theological-normative and managerial approach. This article is library research, a study by writing, clarifying, and making data obtained from various written sources. The method of data collection is to use document techniques (library studies). Quoting and analyzing data with document techniques is intended to collect related data contained in documents in the form of books, journals, and research results in the form of thesis, thesis, and dissertation. The results found that the most notable differences regarding the limits of mediation with teleconference media were found in the dissent of the Sect scholars. The Shafi and Hanbali sects argue that the ideal age in marriage is 15 years, while Abu Hanfah argues that the age of maturity comes at 19 years of age for women and 17 years for men, as is the case with Imam Malik arguing that the ideal age of manhood is 18 years for both men and women. The differences between the Imams of the Sect are influenced by the environment and culture in which they live. However, in Islamic law itself there is never a very firm limit, but the most basic thing about the age limit of marriage is that it is already in place