Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Personal Data Protection in Political Party Information Systems in the Organization of General Elections: Concept and Law Reform Recommendations Rahim, Erman I.; Dukalang, Mohamad Afriyansyah; Tome, Abdul Hamid; Achir, Nuvazria; Ezzerouali, Souad
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.12942

Abstract

Exploiting citizens’ personal data by political parties within the Political Party Information System (SIPOL) database during the 2024 General Election has adversely affected the public. This paper examines the exploitation of citizens’ personal data by political parties via identity fraud from a legal standpoint, while also suggesting a framework for personal data protection and legal change. The primary aim is to offer conceptual proposals for safeguarding people’s personal data inside SIPOL and to suggest legal revisions to the Election Law and Political Party Law, therefore integrating requirements for personal data protection into the Personal Data Protection Law. This study utilized normative legal research methodologies, including a statute, case, and conceptual approach, to address the legal issues under examination. The research findings indicated that the illicit utilization of citizens’ personal data for political party membership adversely affects the individuals involved and constitutes a legal infraction. This article provides a framework for safeguarding people’s personal data within the SIPOL, alongside legal revisions to the Election Law and Political Party Law, which policymakers can address.
Ambivalensi Putusan Hakim: Tantangan dalam Upaya Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum Pilkades di Indonesia Nur Valin Ismail; Fence M. Wantu; Abdul Hamid Tome
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1731

Abstract

Penegakan hukum dalam sengketa Pemilihan Kepala Desa (Pilkades) di Indonesia menghadapi tantangan serius akibat ambivalensi putusan hakim pada tingkat pertama. Ketidakjelasan, ketidaktegasan, dan inkonsistensi dalam putusan berdampak pada ketidakpastian hukum, terhambatnya keadilan substantif, serta melemahnya legitimasi pemerintahan desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor penyebab ambivalensi putusan hakim, dampaknya terhadap efektivitas upaya hukum lanjutan, serta merumuskan solusi sistemik untuk memperkuat regulasi dan kelembagaan hukum di tingkat lokal. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, data dikaji secara kualitatif terhadap norma hukum positif, asas-asas pemerintahan yang baik, dan praktik peradilan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ambivalensi putusan dipicu oleh kekaburan norma, tumpang tindih kewenangan, lemahnya argumentasi hakim, serta tekanan sosial-politik. Implikasinya, diperlukan reformasi regulasi, pembentukan lembaga penyelesaian sengketa yang independen, penguatan kapasitas hakim dan aparat desa, serta pendidikan hukum masyarakat agar tercipta sistem demokrasi desa yang adil dan akuntabel
Kajian Yuridis Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Pinjaman Dana Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional (PEN) oleh Pemerintah Daerah Winata, I Kadek Ari; Tome, Abdul Hamid
Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : PT. Meja Ilmiah Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70308/adagium.v3i2.236

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal aspects and dispute resolution models in the implementation of the National Economic Recovery (PEN) loan program by local governments. The main questions in this study are: (1) what are the legal provisions governing the PEN loan mechanism by local governments, and (2) how are disputes arising from its implementation resolved? The method used is a normative legal approach with descriptive-analytical analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and case studies related to the implementation of PEN loans in several regions. Data were collected through literature review and analyzed through deductive legal logic interpretation. The research findings reveal that the implementation of PEN loans is based on various regulations, including Law No. 17 of 2003, Law No. 2 of 2020, Government Regulation No. 43 of 2020, Minister of Finance Regulation No. 105/PMK.07/2020, and Government Regulation No. 56 of 2018. However, in its implementation, various disputes have arisen due to breach of contract, weak supervision, and differences in contract interpretation. Dispute resolution can be pursued through litigation or non-litigation channels, including through the LAPS SJK. This study highlights the importance of strengthening contractual regulations and institutional frameworks for local governments to ensure more accountable management of public loans and minimize the potential for disputes in a systematic and effective manner.