Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Media Iuris

ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PROSES MEDIASI PERKARA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN Ajrina Yuka Ardhira; Ghansham Anand
Media Iuris Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (246.104 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v1i2.8821

Abstract

Mediation is a duty which must be taken by the parties wishing to settle its dispute in the Court as specified in the Civil Procedure Code and in accordance with Article 130 HIR and 154 RGB. To improve the regulation of mediation in the Court, the Supreme Court shall issue its Regulation, namely the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in the Court. Where the regulations on mediation as stipulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 use good faith in its formal conditions. And with such a condition the Supreme Court expects the success rate of mediation in the first level to increase so as to reduce the number of cases accumulated at the Supreme Court. Good faith as a duty to the parties in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 is made clear in Article 7 paragraph (1), where there are legal consequences for parties that are considered not having good intentions by doing things listed in Article 7 paragraph (2) , namely Article 22 for the plaintiff and Article 23 for the defendant. 
Exit Plan Terhadap Clerical Eror Pada Putusan Yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap: Sebuah Upaya Preventif Terwujudnya Putusan Non-Executable Ghansham Anand; Xavier Nugraha
Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.36402

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to firstly analyze clerical errors in court decisions that have permanent legal force and secondly analyze related legal remedies for clerical errors in court decisions that have permanent legal force. This research is a doctrinal research with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results of this study are that first, a clerical error in a court decision that has permanent legal force is an error that is minor in nature or in the form of an accident and is not related to the substance of the judge’s legal considerations and this error can be corrected by the court, even after the judge makes a decision. . Second, legal remedies that can be filed against typos in decisions that have legal force consist of various kinds, but generally the right one is through an application. It is based on nature, complexity, time, cost, and evidentiary.Keywords: Clerical Eror; Non-Executable Judgement; Legal Action. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk pertama menganalisis kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) dalam putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap dan kedua menganalisis terkait permohonan terhadap adanya kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) dalam putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum (doctrinal research) dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pertama kekeliruan pengetikan (clerical eror) pada putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap adalah kesalahan yang sifatnya ringan atau berbentuk ketidaksengajaan dan tidak berkaitan dengan substansi pertimbangan hukum hakim dan kesalahan ini dapat diperbaiki oleh pengadilan, meskipun setelah hakim menjatuhkan putusan. Kedua, exit plan yang dapat diajukan terhadap adanya kekeliruan pengetikan pada putusan yang berkekuatan hukum terdiri dari beraneka ragam, namun umumnya yang tepat adalah melalui permohonan. Hal ini didasarkan pada hakikat, kompleksitas, waktu, biaya, dan pembuktian. Kata Kunci: Clerical Eror; Putusan Non-Executable; Exit Plan.