Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

The Concept of Reconstruction of Cohabitation Regulations in the National Criminal Code Based on the Principle of Legal Certainty Muntini, Muntini; Suhartono, Slamet; Mangesti, Yovita Arie; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 21 Nomor 2 Agustus 2025
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v21i2.12685

Abstract

Provisions regarding living together as husband and wife outside of marriage, known as cohabitation, were introduced in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (National Criminal Code). However, the regulation has many problems, including philosophical, sociological and juridical problems, as well as inappropriate norms, not reflecting justice and ignoring religious and customary norms. This research aims to analyze and find a reconstruction of the formulation of cohabitation norms in the National Criminal Code based on principle of legal certainty. The formulation of the problem proposed is How to reconstruct the formulation of cohabitation norms in the National Criminal Code, based on the principle of legal certainty. The research method uses normative legal research, namely a process of finding legal rules, legal principles and legal doctrines to answer the legal issues faced. The approaches used are the statutory approach, the comparative approach and the conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results obtained from this research, Article 412 of the National Criminal Code needs to be reconstructed regarding cohabitation norms, namely living together not as husband and wife because it is not based on a legal marriage, the cohabitation offense is also not a complaint offense but is an ordinary offense, and because cohabitation behavior is not in accordance with The spirit of Pancasila is contrary to religious customs and norms, so we must receive heavier sanctions so that between criminal penalties and fines are accumulative punishments.
Hakikat Pengembalian Aset Sitaan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Hasil dari Binary Option Melalui Platform Binomo (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Nomor : 117/PID.SUS/2022/PT.BTN.) Putri, Irma Oktaviani Biantoro; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 1 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v7i2.524-535

Abstract

Binomo, platform trading online, menawarkan investasi dalam berbagai aset seperti saham, emas, dan perak. Namun, investasi ini merenggut banyak nyawa, dengan kerugian mencapai miliaran. Ada mungkin berhasil serta kalah untuk para penanam modal yang menempatkan uangnya di web trading Binomo. Tujuan riset ini merupakan guna menganalisa hakikat pengembalian aset sitaan perbuatan kejahatan pencucian uang hasil dari Binary Option. Prosedur riset yang digunakan dalam riset ini adalah metode penelitian normatif. Penelitian ini pada dasarnya mengamati Ratio Decidendi dalam putusan pengadilan Nomor : 117/PID.SUS/2022/PT.BTN terhadap  hakikat pengembalian asset sitaan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Hasil riset yaitu hakikat pengembalian aset sitaan perbuatan pidana pencucian uang hasil dari binary option digunakan untuk memastikan bahwa keuntungan yang diperoleh secara ilegal tidak dibiarkan beredar di masyarakat dan untuk menghukum pelaku kejahatan tersebut. Dengan mengembalikan aset yang diperoleh secara ilegal, pemerintah juga dapat mengurangi dampak negatif dari tindakan kejahatan tersebut dan mendorong terciptanya keadilan ekonomi yang lebih baik. Selain itu, pengembalian aset sitaan juga berfungsi sebagai sanksi yang efektif dan memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku kejahatan serta sebagai langkah pencegahan untuk melindungi masyarakat dari praktik pencucian uang yang merusak integritas sistem keuangan.
Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews Kongres, Evi; Sugianto, Fajar; Setyorini, Erny Herlin; Kokpan, Bariyima Sylvester; Zhang, Sheng
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 3 December (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v6i3.35508

Abstract

Consumers who post negative reviews of products on social media often face defamation claims by business entities. Such lawsuits have had a chilling effect on the right to freedom of expression, which is protected by law. In adjudicating consumer cases, judges have generally failed to apply the concept of common interest as a consideration, despite the potential benefits and awareness such reviews provide to prospective consumers. The common interest concept, as stipulated in defamation laws, can serve as a form of legal protection for consumers who post reviews on social media, provided the reviews are truthful, reflect actual conditions, and are made in good faith. By implementing the common interest concept and conducting its proper assessment, legal protection can be ensured for both consumers and businesses. Consumers would be shielded from unwarranted defamation claims, while businesses would be protected from malicious reviews by bad-faith consumers that result in financial or reputational harm. This study aims to dissect the legal safeguard afforded to consumers through the prism of common interest when confronting social media-based complaints or reviews ensnared in defamation litigations instigated by corporate entities. Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research amalgamates legislative analysis with conceptual frameworks. The research findings accentuate the significance of invoking the public interest doctrine in consumer-related litigation, thereby fortifying legal defenses against defamation allegations.
Alat Bukti Tidak Langsung (Circumstantial Evidence) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana Wicaksana, Satria Ardyrespati; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
LITERATUS Jurnal Ilmiah Internasional Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v6i1.1561

Abstract

A judge in imposing criminal sanctions against a defendant will always use the provisions of Article 183 of the KUHAP as a guide. This provision essentially stipulates that the judge in sentencing must be based on a minimum of 2 (two) valid and convincing pieces of evidence that the defendant has committed a criminal act. In the provisions of Article 184 of the KUHAP, it regulates 5 (five) pieces of evidence, namely: a). Witness Statement; b). Expert Statement; c). Letter; d). Instruction; e). Defendant's statement. However, in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number: 777/Pid.B/2016/PN.Jkt.Pst, the judge used circumstantial evidence which is not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. In accordance with this description, the researcher is interested in conducting research with the title "Indirect Evidence (Circumstantial Evidence) in the Perspective of Criminal Law" with the formulation of the problem of the Position of indirect evidence (circumstantial evidence) in the perspective of criminal procedural law and the Ratio decidendi of the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court No. 777/Pid.B/2016/PN.Jkt.Pst regarding circumstantial evidence. This research aims to explain and analyze the position of circumstantial evidence in the perspective of criminal procedural law, as well as explain and analyze the ratio decidendi of the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court No. 777/Pid.B/2016/PN.Jkt.Pst regarding circumstantial evidence. The research method used is normative with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results of this research indicate that circumstantial evidence is not regulated in the KUHAP. The use of indirect evidence (circumstantial evidence) is based on a doctrine that is in fact contrary to the KUHAP and the principles of criminal law and has a big risk of deviating from the legal aim of realizing legal certainty.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pelaku Tindak Pidana oleh Penderita Gangguan Disabilitas Intelektual Alzheimer Antoneo, Brian Rico Teddy; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 12 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18154392

Abstract

The New Criminal Code (Article 39 of Law of 2023) states that perpetrators of criminal acts who, due to severe mental disorders or impaired thinking, are unable to realize the consequences of their actions, will not be punished. This study examines the application of this provision to murder perpetrators suffering from Alzheimer's. Due to its neurodegenerative nature, moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease organically eliminates mens rea, thus fulfilling the grounds for expungement. However, if there is prior negligence (neglect for treatment while still conscious), liability based on culpa can still be imposed. The study found disparities in judges' decisions due to loose interpretations and inconsistent psychiatric post-mortem examinations. It is recommended: (1) official guidelines for the interpretation of Article 39, (2) standardization of forensic examinations, and (3) the application of therapeutic sanctions in the form of mandatory treatment plus security (maatregel TBS) as an alternative to imprisonment, in order to achieve a balance of justice between the protection of ODGJ and the rights of victims.
Pelarangan LGBT Ditinjau dalam Perspektif Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia Firmansyah, M. Zulkarnain; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 12 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18170280

Abstract

This study examines the prohibition of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) practices from the perspective of Human Rights. The background of this research is based on the LGBT phenomenon, which is perceived as conflicting with moral values, religious norms, and public order in Indonesia, as regulated in Article 28J paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This provision allows for the limitation of human rights in order to safeguard security and public interests. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that within the framework of human rights, there are rights that may be limited or reduced (derogable rights). The prohibition of LGBT practices is categorized as a form of limitation of human rights that falls under derogable rights and does not constitute non-derogable rights, which are rights that cannot be restricted under any circumstances, such as the right to be free from torture, the right to life, and the right to freedom of religion. Furthermore, the prohibition of LGBT practices within the military environment is considered legitimate insofar as it remains within the limits of human rights, given that the military possesses distinctive characteristics and discipline that are deemed incompatible with LGBT practices. However, the criminalization of LGBT actors within the military context still requires more explicit criminal law regulations to prevent legal disparities and to ensure that the principles of non-discrimination and equality before the law are upheld.
Tanggung Jawab Platform dan Negara dalam Pengendalian Konten Live Streaming yang Melanggar Norma Kesopanan Bevinda, Shifra Adline; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): November - January
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4262

Abstract

Live streaming berkembang sebagai salah satu bentuk komunikasi digital yang dominan, memungkinkan interaksi real-time dan penyebaran konten tanpa batas melalui berbagai platform media sosial. Perkembangan ini memperluas ruang ekspresi dan partisipasi publik, namun sekaligus menimbulkan tantangan regulasi yang signifikan, terutama terkait konten berpakaian seksi, tampilan yang bersifat sugestif, serta potensi eksploitasi visual terhadap kelompok tertentu. Artikel ini mengkaji kerangka hukum yang mengatur konten live streaming di Indonesia serta mengevaluasi efektivitas mekanisme pengawasan yang berlaku dalam menanggulangi pelanggaran tersebut. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran, Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, serta regulasi turunannya, di samping meninjau pedoman komunitas yang diterapkan oleh platform media sosial. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa live streaming berada dalam zona abu-abu regulatif karena sifatnya yang menyerupai penyiaran konvensional tetapi beroperasi dalam logika konten digital yang terdesentralisasi dan dihasilkan pengguna. Kondisi ini menyebabkan pengawasan negara tidak selalu sejalan dengan kecepatan produksi konten, sehingga menimbulkan ketidaksesuaian penegakan dan kesulitan dalam menangani pelanggaran yang terjadi seketika. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa model pengawasan yang efektif memerlukan penguatan koordinasi antarlembaga, penerapan pemantauan berbasis risiko, serta integrasi sistem deteksi algoritmik dengan pengawasan manusia. Kejelasan regulasi juga diperlukan untuk melindungi kelompok rentan dari konten eksploitasi visual sekaligus menjaga hak konstitusional atas kebebasan berekspresi dan memperoleh informasi. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menegaskan urgensi pengawasan yang adaptif, transparan, dan responsif terhadap dinamika ekosistem live streaming.
Ethical and Legal Aspects in the Implementation of the Triage System in Extraordinary Events and Outbreaks after Covid-19 in Indonesia Putro, Antonius Kuncup Wisnu Baroto Sutrisno; Suhartono, Slamet; Mangesti, Yovita Arie; Setyorini, Erny Herlin
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 16, No 1 (2025): JNH VOL NO 1 JUNI 2025
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v16i1.4847

Abstract

The Intensive Care Unit triage system is an option in disaster management efforts amidst limited human health resources. This study aims to analyze the ethical and legal aspects of implementing the triage system in a disease outbreak disaster. The method in this study is normative juridical. The study’s results indicate that although triage aims to save as many lives as possible, its practice often causes ethical problems, especially when choosing the most important patients. The technical guidelines for triage have been legally regulated, but legal protection for health workers is still limited, and the objective criteria for the triage process are unclear. This study found that strengthening ethical elements and legal protection in the triage system is very important so that its implementation does not cause injustice or violation of patient rights. Therefore, current regulations should be supplemented with more in-depth ethical guidelines and clear mechanisms for determining who is responsible for carrying out triage. The study recommends ethical training, regulatory alignment with bioethics standards, and integration of ethical reviews to enhance future triage system resilience.AbstrakSistem triase Intensive Care Unit menjadi pilihan dalam upaya penanggulangan bencana di tengah keterbatasan sumber daya manusia kesehatan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis aspek etis dan legal penerapan sistem triase pada kondisi bencana wabah penyakit. Metode dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun triase bertujuan untuk menyelamatkan sebanyak mungkin nyawa, praktiknya sering kali menyebabkan masalah etis, terutama ketika memilih pasien mana yang paling penting. Pedoman teknis triase telah diatur secara hukum, tetapi pelindungan hukum tenaga kesehatan masih terbatas dan kriteria objektif proses triase belum jelas. Studi ini menemukan bahwa penguatan elemen etis dan pelindungan hukum dalam sistem triase sangat penting agar pelaksanaannya tidak menyebabkan ketidakadilan atau pelanggaran hak pasien. Oleh karena itu, peraturan saat ini harus dilengkapi dengan pedoman etis yang lebih mendalam dan mekanisme yang jelas untuk menentukan siapa yang bertanggung jawab atas pelaksanaan triase. Studi ini merekomendasikan pelatihan etika, penyelarasan peraturan dengan standar bioetika, dan integrasi tinjauan etika untuk meningkatkan ketahanan sistem triase di masa mendatang.