Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.994
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen Arena Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Jurnal HAM Undang: Jurnal Hukum Jambura Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Infrastruktur Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Law and Policy Transformation JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Padjadjaran Law Research and Debate Society Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Mei Susanto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

 1 
The Preamble Of The Constitution As A Constitutional Touchstone: Indonesian Practices Deden Rafi Syafiq Rabbani; Ali Abdurahman; Mei Susanto
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01502.7

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an analysis of two important things: First, the conception and use of the preamble to the constitution can be a constitutional touchstone. Second, the use of the preamble to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as a constitutional touchstone in practice in Indonesia. This normative juridical research uses statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The result is that as a constitutional touchstone, not only the values ​​in the preamble to the constitution are reflected in every constitutional provision, but are also used as a basis for constitutional interpretation, as well as a tool to test the validity of the law in resolving conflicting norms. Furthermore, in Indonesia the use of the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution as a constitutional touchstone is related to the legal position and status of the Preamble to the 1945 NRI Constitution as an integral part of the constitution as well as a foundation in establishing a constitution. The preamble to the 1945 Constitution is often used as a source of constitutional rights in the practice of judicial review at the Constitutional Court, as well as a tool in testing the legal validity of a statute.
KEBIJAKAN PIDANA MATI DALAM RKUHP DITINJAU DARI ASPEK POLITIK HUKUM DAN HAM Ajie Ramdan; Rully Herdita Ramadhani; Mei Susanto
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01003.10

Abstract

AbstractThe conflicts between groups to abolish and retains the death penalty seek to be mediated by a death penalty moderation model contained in the Draft of Criminal Code (RKUHP) currently discussed by the House of the Representatives (DPR) and the Government. This article is a normative juridical research using statute, conceptual and philosophical approach. The results showed that the death penalty policy in RKUHP is in accordance with the national legal policy both permanent and temporary. The model of death penalty policy adopted by RKUHP is deemed not to be contradictory to Human Rights because although it does not abolish the death penalty, RKUHP places death penalty in the formulation as a special criminal punishment and is threatened alternatively. AbstrakPertentangan antara kelompok yang hendak menghapuskan pidana mati (abolisionis) dan yang mempertahankan pidana mati (retensionis) berupaya ditengahi dengan model moderasi pidana mati yang terdapat dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP) yang saat ini dibahas DPR dan Pemerintah. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan filosofis (philosophical approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kebijakan pidana mati dalam RKUHP telah sesuai dengan politik hukum tetap dan temporer. Model kebijakan pidana mati yang dianut RKUHP dipandang tidak bertentangan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia karena walaupun tidak menghapuskan pidana mati, RKUHP menempatkan pidana mati dalam rumusan sebagai pidana pokok yang bersifat khusus dan diancamkan secara alternatif.
Co-Authors Abdurahman, Ali Abdurrahman, Ali Adhihernawan, Muhammad Yoppy Ajie Ramdan Ajie Ramdan Ali Abdurahman Ali Abdurahman Ali Abdurahman Ali Abdurahman Ali Abdurrahman Bagir Manan Bagir Manan Bayu Aryanto Deden Rafi Syafiq Rabbani Handayani, Novia Hernadi Affandi Hernawan, Muhammad Yoppy Adhi Ilham Fajar Septian Ilham Fajar Septian Indra Perwira Indra Perwira, Indra Inna Junaenah, Inna Lailani Sungkar Manan, Firman Muhamad Amirulloh, Muhamad Muhammad Yoppy Adhihermawan Muldan Halim Pratama Muldan Halim Pratama Pratama, Muldan Halim Pujiyanto, Eko Rahayu Prasetianingsih Retno Wulan Damayanti Rully Herdita Ramadhani Savitri, Zandra Azelia Susi Dwi Harijanti Teguh Tresna Puja Asmara Yassar Aulia