Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

REKONSEPTUALISASI DISKRESI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA: ANALISIS KRITIS TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN NASIONAL Arifin, Firdaus
Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 4, No 01 (2025): Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jaeap.v4i01.3867

Abstract

Penerapan diskresi dalam administrasi pemerintahan di Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, menghadapi tantangan signifikan terkait konsistensi, akuntabilitas, dan potensi penyalahgunaan wewenang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis kritis dan memberikan batasan konkret bagi penerapan diskresi agar selaras dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum administrasi yang baik. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan undang-undang, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi kelemahan regulasi dan kekosongan hukum yang berdampak pada efektivitas dan kepercayaan publik terhadap keputusan administratif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kurangnya parameter yang jelas membuka peluang interpretasi subjektif oleh pejabat publik, yang dapat menghasilkan keputusan inkonsisten dan merugikan prinsip kepastian hukum serta keadilan. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah perlunya revisi regulasi untuk menyusun standar operasional prosedur yang terstruktur dan mekanisme pengawasan yang lebih ketat. Dengan penerapan rekomendasi ini, diharapkan tata kelola pemerintahan dapat menjadi lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan responsif terhadap kepentingan publik.
Surveillance of Regional Public Service Authorities: Analysis of Regulation and Its Impact on Public Service Efficiency Arifin, Firdaus
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 9 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v9i2.1538

Abstract

The oversight of the Regional General Service Agency (BLUD) in Indonesia has faced various challenges in terms of effectiveness and implementation, which may hinder the achievement of the objectives of transparency and accountability in the management of public finances. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BLUD surveillance by identifying factors that affect regulatory compliance and BLUD performance in the provision of public services. Using a mixed methodological approach, the study combines normative and empirical analysis, as well as using comparative and socio-legal methods to dig up qualitative and quantitative data from various regions in Indonesia. The results of the study show that although the regulatory framework has been adequate, the implementation of surveillance still faces obstacles such as limited resources and less effective inter-agency coordination, which ends with variations in BLUD compliance and performance. The findings reaffirm the importance of strengthening surveillance capacity as well as revising policies that are adaptive to local conditions. Implications of this study include recommendations for enhanced, more integrated, technology-based supervision to support better public finance governance.
Indonesia's identity politics and populism: Disruption to national cohesion Arifin, Firdaus; Tedjabuwana, Rosa; Wiyono, Subelo; Abdullah, Mohd. Kamarulnizam Bin
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The principle of unity in diversity in Indonesia is increasingly challenged by the rise of identity politics and populism. These dynamics emerge as a confluence of pragmatic political strategies and the mobilisation of sectarian groups, often leveraging religious and ethnic sentiments during election campaigns. While effective in garnering popular support, such tactics undermine national unity and social cohesion, serving as a shortcut to power at the cost of societal harmony. This issue is particularly pronounced in district head elections, where the politicisation of tribal, religious, racial, and inter-community identities has become pervasive. These elections, intended to reflect democratic principles, are frequently overshadowed by divisive identity-based politics. This paper examines how identity politics and populism significantly threaten social cohesion, especially during general elections. Employing a normative research methodology, it analyses legal norms and ethical theories to argue against the use of identity politics and populism at any level of political campaigns. The findings reveal that practical politics in Indonesia often relies on these divisive strategies for electoral success, exacerbating pre-existing societal tensions. The paper posits that identity politics can be overcome with reinterpreting it and referring to Pancasila as a principle to attain better policy.
Recognition of Customary Norms Within the Framework of Indonesian Legal Positivism Arifin, Firdaus; Astawa, I Gde Pantja; Maarif, Ihsanul; Sulastri, Dewi; Abdullah, Mohd Kamarulnizam
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Khazanah Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v7i1.39409

Abstract

The recognition of customary norms within Indonesia’s legal system continues to face challenges due to the dominance of legal positivism, which emphasizes legal certainty through codified regulations. Although Article 18B (2) of the 1945 Constitution acknowledges the existence of indigenous legal communities, its implementation within the national legal system remains limited and conditional, leading to legal uncertainty for indigenous groups. This study aims to analyze how customary norms are recognized within Indonesia’s positive legal system and to identify the challenges and opportunities in harmonizing these two legal frameworks. This research employs a normative legal method with a conceptual and statutory approach, analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical framework. The findings reveal that customary law remains marginalized within the national legal system due to inconsistencies in regulations and court rulings, as well as the absence of a clear harmonization mechanism. The implications of this study emphasize the need for more inclusive legal reforms, enhanced capacity-building for law enforcement officials, and a stronger role for Indigenous communities in legal policymaking. These measures are expected to strengthen the recognition of customary law within the national legal system, contributing to greater substantive justice for Indigenous communities.
Pengawasan Preventif Melalui Harmonisasi Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Terhadap Eksistensi Regulasi Muatan Lokal Dalam Otonomi Daerah Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul
ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024): ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38459

Abstract

The harmonization process in the formation of regional regulations in Indonesia is designed to ensure alignment between local regulations and national law. However, the centralistic approach often adopted in this harmonization process tends to limit the flexibility of local governments in formulating regulations that suit local needs. This issue raises concerns that the constitutionally granted authority of local governments to create localized regulations may be eroded. This study aims to analyze the impact of a centralistic harmonization approach on the effectiveness of regional autonomy, particularly in the context of local regulation. Using a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, this research evaluates legislation, legal documents, and related literature to understand the implications of harmonization on local regulations. The findings indicate that overly centralistic harmonization can hinder innovation and adaptation of local regulations, reducing the capacity of local governments to respond to the needs of their communities. These findings emphasize the need for a more flexible and inclusive harmonization procedure to ensure that local regulations can still function effectively within the national legal framework. The implications of this study suggest that a more balanced approach between centralization and decentralization is necessary to maintain sustainable, adaptive, and responsive regional autonomy.
Reforming Indonesia’s Electoral System: Legal and Policy Considerations Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul; Bunyamin, Bunyamin; Bahri, Robi Asadul; Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/home.v8i1.501

Abstract

The regulatory fragmentation between the Election Law and the Regional Election Law has created overlapping policies, misaligned oversight, and administrative inefficiencies that undermine the legitimacy of democracy in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal and policy challenges in integrating the electoral and regional election systems to improve efficiency, transparency, and accountability in democratic governance. The research employs a normative legal approach through legislative analysis, conceptual exploration, and comparative studies of integrated electoral systems in the Philippines and Mexico. The findings indicate that integrating electoral and regional election systems can reduce operational costs, strengthen oversight mechanisms, and enhance public trust in election outcomes. However, this requires regulatory harmonization, the strengthening of information technology infrastructure, and capacity-building for electoral management bodies. The implications of this research include recommendations for holistic legal reforms to align election regulations and the implementation of evidence-based policies involving various stakeholders in the policymaking process. This study contributes to constitutional law and democratic governance in Indonesia by analyzing the legal inconsistencies between the Election Law and the Regional Election Law and proposing a harmonization framework to improve regulatory coherence and institutional effectiveness
NAVIGATING LEADERSHIP TRANSITIONS: THE CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS OF INTERIM AUTHORITY IN INDONESIAS REGIONAL GOVERNANCE Arifin, Firdaus; Farma, Mella Ismelina; Maarif, Ihsanul; Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu; Prihartanto, Yudi
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 27, No 1: April 2025: Customary Law and development in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v27i1.41841

Abstract

The limitations placed on the authority of interim Regional Heads, as outlined in Indonesian Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Governance, present significant challenges to the continuity of strategic decision-making during leadership transitions. The ambiguity surrounding the scope of interim authority often results in stagnation in public policy implementation, adversely impacting regional development and governance. This study examines the philosophical underpinnings and legal foundations of interim authority, while also evaluating the tangible effects of these limitations on the functioning of regional government. Utilizing a normative legal methodology that incorporates both statutory and conceptual approaches, this research is grounded in a thorough review of primary and secondary legal sources. The findings indicate that interim authority should be viewed as a constitutional mandate designed to ensure the seamless operation of government, despite its temporary nature. However, in practice, stringent normative constraints can lead to a significant leadership vacuum and create opportunities for political interference. These findings underscore the necessity for regulatory reform that provides interim Regional Heads with appropriate flexibility in making strategic decisions, all while maintaining the principles of accountability and oversight. Such policy reforms are essential for sustaining an effective and responsive regional government in the face of political dynamics and leadership transitions.
Sustainability of National Development Program During Transition of Leadership In Indonesia Arifin, Firdaus
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 8 No 1 (2024): 2024
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v8i1.4319

Abstract

The sustainability of national development programs in Indonesia is often hindered by leadership transitions, which create uncertainty in the implementation of long-term policies. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of the existing legal framework, particularly Law No. 59 of 2024 concerning the National Long-Term Development Plan (RPJPN), in ensuring the continuity of development programs amidst political dynamics. A normative approach with qualitative juridical analysis was employed, examining relevant legislation and literature. The findings reveal that the current legal framework needs to be more robust to protect strategic programs from policy changes caused by government transitions. Additionally, the lack of flexibility within the legal instruments makes it difficult to adapt to political changes. This study recommends more responsive and adaptive legal reforms and enhances synergy between central and regional governments to ensure policy stability. These findings contribute to the theoretical development of development law and have practical implications for policymakers in Indonesia, particularly in designing a more robust and stable legal framework to support long-term development.
Position and Authority of the Constitutional Court as a Guardian of the Constitution Arifin, Firdaus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (July-August 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i5.630

Abstract

The provisions of Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution have given the Constitutional Court the authority of the Constitutional Court as an institution that resolves cases related to the Indonesian constitution, which makes the Constitutional Court a guardian of the constitution. A special feature of the Constitutional Court is the authority to conduct judicial review. The role of the Constitutional Court as a guardian of the constitution is seen as incomplete because there is no regulation of constitutional questions. This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, secondary data is obtained through a library study and then analyzed qualitatively juridically. The results of the study state that the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution is positioned as a constitutional state organ with the philosophical basis of the authority of the Constitutional Court based on substantive justice. The realization of the Constitutional Court as a guardian of the constitution will be sharper if there is a constitutional question mechanism. Therefore, it is necessary to change the legal basis related to the authority of the Constitutional Court which includes the constitutional question as the authority of the Constitutional Court.
Hybrid Dispute Resolution in Administrative Law: Toward an Integrated Model for Government Conflict Management Subrata, Rusli; Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i1.10462

Abstract

The increasing complexity of citizen–government interactions in administrative law has revealed the limitations of litigation-based dispute resolution, which is often criticized for its rigidity, inefficiency, and lack of procedural inclusiveness. This study aimed to develop a conceptual model of Hybrid Dispute Resolution (HDR) that integrates judicial procedures with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to enhance fairness, participation, and institutional responsiveness in resolving administrative disputes. A normative juridical method was employed, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal frameworks and institutional practices in Singapore, China, and Poland were examined to identify key elements for HDR adaptation within the context of Indonesian administrative law. These findings indicate that HDR, particularly through models such as Med-Arb and Arb-Med, can effectively combine the legal certainty of litigation with the flexibility and participatory benefits of ADR. However, successful implementation requires a robust legal framework, trained mediators, institutional readiness, and public accountability mechanisms. HDR not only provides procedural alternatives but also contributes to the democratization of public administration by enabling citizens to directly engage with the state in resolving disputes. This reflects a paradigm shift toward more adaptive and humanistic governance. The HDR offers a viable framework for reforming administrative dispute resolution systems, with broad implications for access to justice, regulatory innovation, and the enhancement of citizen–state relations in democratic governance.