Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

State Responsibility and Food Safety Supervision in the Free Nutritious Meal Program: A Constitutional and Health Law Analysis Sugiarti, Taty; Arifin, Firdaus; Maarif, Ihsanul
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v61.30885

Abstract

Food safety is a critical component of public health governance, particularly in large-scale food programs where inadequate hygiene and sanitation can increase the risk of foodborne disease. In Indonesia, the Free Nutritious Meal Program relies on catering services whose compliance with food hygiene standards is essential to protect beneficiaries, especially school-aged children. This study examines the legal and institutional supervision of catering hygiene and sanitation within the program from a constitutional and health law perspective. Using normative juridical research supported by a socio-legal approach, the study operationally analyzes statutory regulations, policy frameworks, and institutional practices through library research and document analysis of national laws, technical regulations, and international food safety standards. Qualitative interpretative analysis was employed to evaluate regulatory effectiveness, supervisory mechanisms, and governance challenges. The findings reveal that Indonesia possesses a relatively comprehensive food safety regulatory framework; however, the effectiveness of supervision remains constrained by limited institutional capacity, fragmented inter-agency coordination, and inconsistent compliance among food service providers. This study identifies a persistent gap between regulatory norms and practical enforcement, emphasizing the need for integrated regulatory enforcement, risk-based supervision, and stronger institutional collaboration. The research contributes to health law scholarship by strengthening the conceptual understanding of food safety governance in public food programs. Limitations include reliance on normative and policy analyses without direct field observation, suggesting the need for future empirical studies of implementation practices at local operational levels
Cryptocurrency as a Means of Gratification: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Digital Gratification in Islamic Criminal Law Priyono, Erwan Adi; Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi; Rustamaji, Muhammad; Fernando, Zico Junius; Arifin, Firdaus
al-'adalah Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v231.28296

Abstract

This study investigates whether cryptocurrency-based gratification can be legally classified as risywah under Islamic criminal law and analyzes how its characteristics differ from those of conventional gratification. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study utilizes statutory, conceptual, comparative, and prescriptive approaches. The statutory approach involves examining anti-corruption norms, Islamic criminal law principles, contemporary fatwas, and legal doctrines related to bribery and digital assets. The conceptual approach assesses cryptocurrency as māl and as an object of unlawful benefit, while the comparative approach evaluates conventional and digital gratification in terms of object, transfer mechanism, concealment pattern, evidentiary challenges, and legal consequences. Legal content analysis is conducted by interpreting classical fiqh doctrines, qawā‘id fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in the context of contemporary crypto-based transactions. The findings indicate that cryptocurrency gratification meets the substantive elements of risywah when it possesses economic value, is provided to influence public authority or judicial decision-making, and results in unfair advantage, even if transferred through intangible and decentralized digital mechanisms. The primary distinction between conventional and digital gratification lies in technological form, anonymity, cross-border nature, and evidentiary complexity, rather than legal nature. Consequently, crypto-based gratification should be treated as equivalent to conventional bribery under Islamic criminal law, based on the principle that legal consideration is determined by substance rather than form. The study contributes by proposing a functional-equivalence model of risywah that extends classical Islamic criminal law to digital gratification, thereby enhancing the relevance of fiqh jināyah in addressing corruption in the blockchain era.