Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.131
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Social Science JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Keadilan POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Law Development Journal Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora LAWYER: Jurnal Hukum Keadilan HUMANIORASAINS Journal of Law and Justice Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Law and Communication Journal Law Studies and Justice Journal
Appe Hutauruk
Universitas Mpu Tantular
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 61 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 61 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
KONSTRUKSI KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK PEREMPUAN DAN ANAK PADA SENGKETA PERCERAIAN TRANSNASIONAL Natan, Antonius; Hutauruk, Appe; Sinambela, Hotman
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Law Studies and Justice Journal
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/h9qrmc92

Abstract

Perceraian dalam ekuilibrium perkawinan transnasional di Indonesia mengonstruksi kompleksitas Hukum Perdata Internasional (HPI) yang secara persisten memarjinalisasi hak-hak fundamental perempuan dan anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi manifestasi keadilan substantif melalui instrumen perlindungan hak perempuan dan anak dalam konstelasi hukum positif Indonesia dan praksis hukum progresif. Mengadopsi pendekatan kualitatif dengan paradigma normatif-yuridis, studi ini menganalisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor 198/Pdt.G/2024/PN Mtr sebagai lokus kajian utama. Hasil penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa implementasi prinsip keadilan substantif oleh majelis hakim mampu mendekonstruksi rigiditas formalisme hukum dalam mengadjudikasi sengketa lintas yurisdiksi. Integritas yudisial yang berlandaskan pada perlindungan hak asasi manusia teridentifikasi sebagai determinan krusial dalam mengeliminasi defisiensi sistem hukum internasional. Studi ini mengkonklusikan bahwa transformasi peran hakim, dari sekadar corong undang-undang (la bouche de la loi) menjadi arsitek keadilan substantif, merupakan imperatif mutlak guna menjamin preskripsi martabat manusia dan kepentingan terbaik anak (the best interest of the child) di tengah dinamika hukum global yang problematis.
REDEFINISI BATAS KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGELOLA APARTEMEN DALAM PEMUTUSAN UTILITAS DASAR DALAM PERSPEKTIF CONSUMER PROTECTION DAN HUMAN RIGHTS Robert L Simanungkalit; Ruby W H Oktolina Samosir; Edmon Derson Simamora; Appe Hutauruk; Hotman Sinambela
Jurnal Humaniora & Sosial Sains Vol 3 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis keabsahan tindakan tersebut melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan pisau analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK), hukum perjanjian, dan hukum pidana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan utilitas vital sebagai “alat sandera” merupakan bentuk penyalahgunaan relasi kuasa (abuse of power) dan dikategorikan sebagai tindakan main hakim sendiri (eigenrichting). Klausula dalam House Rules yang melegitimasi tindakan tersebut dinyatakan batal demi hukum karena melanggar larangan klausula baku dalam Pasal 18 UUPK dan bertentangan dengan asas kepatutan. Penulisan ini merekomendasikan perlunya intervensi regulator untuk melakukan standardisasi tata tertib hunian guna menjamin hak dasar konsumen tanpa menegasikan hak finansial pengelola melalui mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang lebih beradab dan proporsional.
Pre-trial Review of Preliminary Evidence Examination in Tax-Related Criminal Offenses Following the Enactment of the New Criminal Procedure Code Adalin Ali; Appe Hutauruk; Hotman Sinambela; Mutia Sakti
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.873-888

Abstract

Preliminary evidence examination (pemeriksaan bukti permulaan or bukper) in Indonesian taxation is conducted before a case is elevated to investigation and aims to obtain preliminary evidence of an alleged tax crime. In practice, several actions taken by examiners particularly the borrowing of documents and the acquisition of electronic data, resemble coercive measures under criminal procedural law. This study analyses the legality of bukper procedures, the legal status of evidence borrowing, and the implications for pretrial review following the enactment of Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), effective since 2 January 2026. It employs normative legal research using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, examining nine pretrial rulings and two Constitutional Court decisions. The findings show that bukper is normatively equivalent to inquiry and should contain no coercive measures; that evidence borrowing not genuinely based on the taxpayer's voluntary consent qualifies as a seizure-like action requiring district court authorization; and that the lex specialist argument cannot justify derogation from KUHAP where the legal basis is merely a ministerial regulation. Constitutional Court Decision Number 83/PUU-XXI/2023 declared both paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of Article 43A of the General Tax Provisions Law (UU KUP) conditionally unconstitutional, so that even the delegation of bukper procedures to a ministerial regulation may not concern coercive measures. The new KUHAP reinforces this position. The study recommends regulating bukper at the statutory level with judicial control mechanisms.
ANALYSIS OF THE POLICY ON RESTRICTIONS ON REMISSIONS FOR CORRUPTION CRIMINAL OFFENDERS Andri Kurnia; Muh. Amin Saleh; Muhenri Sihotang; Appe Hutauruk
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.692

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the policy of limiting remissions for corruption convicts in the Indonesian legal system, particularly regarding the consistency between the rehabilitative objectives of the correctional system and the special treatment of corruption as an extraordinary crime. The main focus of this study is to evaluate whether the tightening of remission requirements in Government Regulation Number 99 of 2012 is in line with the principles stipulated in Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach (statute-government-regulation approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual-government-regulation approach). Data were collected through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including an analysis of Sahardjo’s correctional theory and Romli Atmasasmita’s extraordinary crime theory. The results show that limiting remissions for corruptors through additional requirements such as justice collaborator status and payment of compensation reflects a differentiated dimension in criminal policy to strengthen the deterrent effect. However, legally, this policy creates a tension between norms and the rights of prisoners guaranteed by the Corrections Law, which prioritizes rehabilitation. The implementation of this policy represents the state’s effort to uphold substantive justice for the wider community due to the impact of systemic corruption. This study concludes that although corruption requires extraordinary measures, the policy of limiting remissions must maintain a balance between the deterrent aspect and the primary goal of corrections, namely social reintegration. Regulatory harmonization is needed so that special treatment for corruptors does not negate the basic human rights of inmates.
PROBLEMS OF PROVIDING AND LEGALITY OF EVIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF TRAFFICKING NARCOTICS CLASS I NON-PLANT Aswin Suwardi; Appe Hutauruk; Hotman Sinambela; Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.696

Abstract

The crime of trafficking in Class I narcotics, not plants, is an extraordinary crime and poses significant obstacles for law enforcement officials in the criminal evidence process. This study aims to examine and analyze the evidentiary process and the legality of evidence in this crime, as well as to identify strategies to improve investigators’ skills in collecting and analyzing evidence to address the dynamics of illicit drug trafficking networks. The research method used is a normative method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The legal sources used include primary legal materials in the form of narcotics-related legislation and criminal procedure law, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of scientific literature and books. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively to produce systematic conclusions. The results show that the evidentiary system for trafficking in Class I narcotics, not plants, combines the general provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (the negative wettelijk principle) with the special provisions (lex specialis) of Law Number 35 of 2009. This regulation broadens the scope of evidence by recognizing electronic information and documents as valid indicative evidence. In addition, to overcome the dynamic modus operandi, investigators’ skills must be improved through mastery of digital forensics, strengthening cross-institutional cooperation (National Police, National Narcotics Agency, Prosecutor’s Office, Forensic Laboratory), and optimizing special investigative techniques such as wiretapping, undercover buying, and controlled delivery so that the fulfillment of a minimum of two valid pieces of evidence that guarantee legal certainty, justice, and the protection of human rights can be realized.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT TOWARDS LEGAL CERTAINTY AND JUSTICE IN AN AGREEMENT Tumpal Haojahan Sihombing; Muh Amin Saleh; Muhenri Sihotang; Appe Hutauruk
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.701

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the principle of freedom of contract in Indonesian positive law and its implications for legal certainty and justice for the parties in an agreement. The main focus of this study is directed at how to balance individual autonomy (party autonomy) with legal protection for parties with weaker bargaining power, especially in the use of standard contracts. The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data were collected through a literature study of primary legal materials such as the Civil Code and relevant secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the principle of freedom of contract as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code has provided legal certainty through the principle of pacta sunt servanda. However, in practice, this legal certainty is often formalistic and tends to benefit parties who are economically and informationally dominant. Substantive justice is often neglected when freedom of contract is used as an instrument of exploitation through disproportionate exoneration clauses. This study concludes that freedom of contract is not absolute, but must be limited by the principles of good faith, propriety, and public order in order to create a balance of rights and obligations that is just for all parties.
EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD PROTECTION IMPLEMENTATION IN HANDLING SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IN INDONESIA Muhammad Nasir; Appe Hutauruk; Hotman Sinambela; Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.705

Abstract

Child sexual exploitation is a form of human rights violation that has serious impacts on children’s physical, mental, and social development. Although the government has enacted Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection as the primary legal instrument for protecting children, the practice of child sexual exploitation continues to show alarming figures. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The data used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature studies. All legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods to obtain an overview of the conformity between legal provisions and their application in practice. The results of the study indicate that Law Number 35 of 2014 has regulated legal protection for child victims of sexual exploitation comprehensively through provisions regarding prevention, special protection, the imposition of criminal sanctions on perpetrators, and the restoration of victims’ rights. However, its implementation has not been running optimally because there are still various obstacles, including limited coordination between agencies, low capacity of law enforcement officers, lack of courage among victims to report, and minimal rehabilitation facilities and psychosocial support.
Reconstructing Standards for the Assessment of Electronic Evidence in Indonesian Civil Procedure from the Perspective of ISO/IEC 27037:2012 Appe Hutauruk; Adalin Ali; Hotman Sinambela
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.15704

Abstract

Article 5 of Indonesia’s Electronic Information and Transactions Law recognizes electronic evidence as legally valid. However, civil procedure, which still relies on the Herzien Inlandsch Reglement/Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (HIR/RBg), lacks procedural standards to ensure the integrity of electronic evidence. Unlike criminal proceedings supported by investigators and forensic laboratories, civil litigants independently collect, store, and submit electronic evidence, creating risks of manipulation and inconsistent judicial assessment. This study examines the normative gap concerning the chain of custody of electronic evidence and proposes ISO/IEC 27037:2012 as a framework for judicial evaluation. Employing normative juridical research with statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches, the study analyzes Decision No. 258/Pdt.G/2023/PN Blb, supported by Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 as its doctrinal foundation. The findings reveal that the court assessed WhatsApp screenshots using the doctrine applicable to documentary photocopies rather than Articles 5 and 6 of the ITE Law, admitting even photocopies of photocopies without examining the original electronic data. The absence of acquisition and preservation standards leaves the evidentiary value of electronic evidence dependent on judicial discretion, creating the potential for inconsistent decisions. To address this deficiency, the study proposes a three-pillar framework: imposing a bewijsvoering obligation on the submitting party, adopting the four stages and four principles of ISO/IEC 27037:2012 as judicial assessment criteria, and strengthening the role of accredited digital forensic experts. Consistent with Federal Rules of Evidence Rules 902(13)–902(14) and the doctrine of spoliation of evidence, this framework can be implemented through a Supreme Court Regulation, shifting judicial assessment from evaluating only electronic content to examining the integrity of evidence acquisition, preservation, and authentication.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA CYBER CRIME DALAM BENTUK PENGHINAAN DI INDONESIA Stanisius Leo; Appe Hutauruk; Hotman Sinambela; Sendi Sanjaya
COURT REVIEW Vol 6 No 03 (2026): ILMU HUKUM
Publisher : COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY (KELOMPOK KOMUNITAS LABORATORIUM PENELITIAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69957/cr.v6i03.3000

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan internet telah mendorong meningkatnya kejahatan siber (cyber crime), khususnya tindak pidana penghinaan dan pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan tindak pidana cyber crime dalam bentuk penghinaan di Indonesia dan penerapannya dalam praktik penegakan hukum. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual, dengan bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan pengadilan yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan tindak pidana penghinaan, baik dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional (UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023) maupun dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik beserta perubahannya, masih belum memberikan ukuran yang jelas mengenai batas antara kritik dan penghinaan, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan multitafsir dan disalahgunakan untuk membatasi kebebasan berekspresi. Dalam praktiknya, sebagaimana tercermin dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 1058/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt.Utr, penegakan hukum terhadap delik ini masih menghadapi kendala pembuktian, khususnya terkait keabsahan dan kekuatan bukti elektronik. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya revisi regulasi untuk memberikan parameter yang lebih jelas serta penguatan penerapan teori pembuktian elektronik dalam proses peradilan pidana.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA DI LINGKUNGAN TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA ANGKATAN LAUT Nana Kurnia; Appe Hutauruk; Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean; Sunarno
COURT REVIEW Vol 6 No 03 (2026): ILMU HUKUM
Publisher : COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY (KELOMPOK KOMUNITAS LABORATORIUM PENELITIAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69957/cr.v6i03.3001

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di lingkungan TNI Angkatan Laut, dengan merujuk pada Putusan Pengadilan Militer III-12 Surabaya Nomor 123-K/PM.III-12/AL/VIII/2024. Permasalahan bertolak dari dualisme hukum yang berlaku bagi anggota TNI AL, yaitu UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan KDRT sebagai hukum pidana umum, dan UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer beserta KUHPM sebagai hukum pidana khusus militer, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian forum peradilan yang berwenang. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara materiil KDRT oleh prajurit TNI AL tetap tunduk pada UU PKDRT sebagai lex specialis, sedangkan secara formil yurisdiksi mengadili beralih ke Pengadilan Militer berdasarkan asas personalitas. Unsur pertanggungjawaban pidana terpenuhi pada terdakwa, namun yurisdiksi militer membawa pertimbangan kepentingan dinas yang memperlunak sanksi dan membatasi restitusi korban. Penelitian merekomendasikan harmonisasi regulasi dan mekanisme penanganan KDRT yang berorientasi pada korban.
Co-Authors Abizar Algifari Adalin Ali Adzim Munawali Afriandi Azhar Akhmad Ramadhan Harahap Ananda, Selvira Paulina Andri Kurnia Anwar Aswin Suwardi Ayahandono Kussetyadi Baihaqi Ramadhan Cliff Fabian Maliangkay Daniel Mari Hot Nababan Dede Ardiansyah Dedi Saputra Dimas Arifianto Suryo Ebit Kartono Mandala Putra Edmon Derson Simamora Edy Susanto Eko Dwi Suryanto Eko Wahyu Pramono Faizal Imam Muharam Fauzi Jamal Fendi Maruba Parlindungan Hutahaean Franky Bangkit Sumardi Gunawan Hadi Nugroho Hermawan Wibisono Putra Heru Mario Hotman Sinambela Hotman Sinambela Indra Jaya Indra Jaya Indriastuti, Desy Indryani Jaozi Jaya, Setia Jody Agy Napitupulu Jois Candra Panjaitan Kharismawati Lamhot Hutahaean M. Amin Saleh Mardiman Sane Martua Manik Muchamad Ariyanto Pradana Muh Amin Saleh Muhammad Amin Saleh Al-Habsy Muhammad Nasir Muhenri Sihotang Mutia Sakti Nana Kurnia Natan, Antonius Ngatiyono Nurkenda Okky Mara Utama Rahmad David Djauhari Rasman Rasman Ricky Kurniawan Suriana Robert L Simanungkalit Rompas, Jopie Tommy Rony Hutahaean Ruby W H Oktolina Samosir Sane, Mardiman Selamat Rapama Sihombing Sendi Sanjaya Shinta Maharani Sihotang, Muhenri Simanungkalit, Robert L Simanungkalit, Robert L. Sinambela, Hotman Stanisius Leo Suharyono Sunarno Sunarno Sunarno Suyud Margono Taberima, Victor Arthur Taufik Maulana, Taufik Tricia Elisabeth Napitupulu Tridianto, Ari Tumpal Haojahan Sihombing Yandri Sinlaeloe Yulianto Kiswocahyono Yusuf Chornia