Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.181
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An Nisa' Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Lokal An Idea Nursing Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Fatmawati F, Fatmawati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Lafaz Muṭlaq dan Muqayyad dalam Perspektif Uṣūliyyah: Telaah Makna, Penerapan dalam Nas, dan Implikasi Hukum Akbar, Nico; F, Fatmawati; Amin, Abd. Rauf Muhammad
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18144689

Abstract

The Qur’an, as the primary source of Islamic law, employs a rich, diverse, and nuanced language. Among the forms of expression found within it are muṭlaq (unrestricted) and muqayyad (restricted) terms. A proper understanding of these concepts is essential, as legal rulings in the Qur’an and Hadith are often conveyed either in an unrestricted (muṭlaq) or a restricted (muqayyad) form. Classical scholars of uṣūl al-Fiqh have long examined the interaction between these two types of expressions, particularly when two legal texts address the same issue but differ in formulation one being muṭlaq and the other muqayyad. Scholarly debates also arise in cases where the legal ruling is the same but the underlying cause differs, or conversely, where the cause is the same but the ruling differs. This demonstrates the complexity of the methodology of Islamic legal derivation, which requires careful analysis of linguistic expressions, contextual considerations, and supporting evidences. Therefore, understanding muṭlaq and muqayyad is not only crucial in the theoretical domain of uṣūl al-Fiqh, but also carries practical implications in fiqh, particularly in the process of legal ijtihād that remains relevant to the evolving needs of the Muslim community.
Co-Authors A, Ansori A, Merdekawaty Akbar, Nico Ami, Abd. Rauf Muhammad Amin, Abd. Rauf Amin, Abd. Rauf Muhammad Aprianto, Iwan Arijati, Disty Gusvalinda Eriza, Echa F, Faisal Fathoni, Wildan Fausya, Annisa Gazali, Muh. Rakasiwi A. H, Hardani Haq, Fitri Maylan Ikram, Muhammad Furqanul J, Jamrizal J, Jumriani Kadir, Muh.Awaluddin Kartono, Arsy Fathir Karunia, Khaerunnisa Kasful Anwar Lizri, Kurniati Ramadhani Lomba Sultan M, Misbahuddin Madina, Siti Marwah, Andi Mubarak, Muhammad Hilal N, Nikmah Novita, Yulia Nurul Fatimah Rahayu, Wiji Rian Hidayat Rohim, M. Yusuf Nur Sanusi, Muh. Nur Taufik Saputri, Chandra Ariani Suhra, Syarifah Sultan, Loma Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq Syavika, Nur Taher, Muhammad Rafli HI W, Wawan Wahyuni, Tuti Wulandari, Ulfah Yunita Yuwantika, Diva Zaenal Abidin