Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Terhadap Bahaya Dan Sanksi Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Herman, KMS; Wardhani, Dwi Kusumo; Taufan, Ridwan A.; Effendy, D. Andry; Egosono, Gianto
IKRA-ITH ABDIMAS Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): IKRAITH-ABDIMAS Vol 10 No 1 Maret 2026
Publisher : Universitas Persada Indonesia YAI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37817/ikra-ithabdimas.v10i1.6207

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga merupakan permasalahan sosial dan hukum yang masih sering terjadi di masyarakat dan berdampak serius terhadap korban, keluarga, serta lingkungan sosial. Rendahnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat mengenai bahaya kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dan sanksi hukum yang mengaturnya menjadi salah satu faktor utama terjadinya kasus tersebut. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini dilakukan dengan tujuan meningkatkan kesadaran hukum masyarakat terhadap bahaya dan sanksi kekerasan dalam rumah tangga sebagai upaya pencegahan dan perlindungan hukum. Metode pengabdian yang digunakan adalah penyuluhan hukum dengan pendekatan edukatif dan partisipatif, yang meliputi penyampaian materi hukum, diskusi interaktif, serta sesi tanya jawab dengan peserta. Materi yang diberikan mencakup pengertian kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, bentuk-bentuk kekerasan, dampak yang ditimbulkan, serta sanksi hukum berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pemahaman dan kesadaran hukum masyarakat terkait hak dan kewajiban dalam rumah tangga serta konsekuensi hukum dari tindakan kekerasan. Kegiatan ini penting sebagai langkah preventif dalam membangun budaya sadar hukum dan diharapkan mampu berkontribusi dalam menekan angka kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di masyarakat.
Legal Implications of Restorative Justice in Narcotics Crimes: Integrating Accountability and Rehabilitation Marquez, Neilpon Yulinar; Herman, KMS
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.433

Abstract

Drug crimes are a form of crime that has a systemic impact on public health, security, and order. The conventional criminal justice system, which tends to emphasize imprisonment, has not been fully effective in addressing the root causes of drug abuse, especially for users. In light of this, the restorative justice concept has surfaced as a substitute that seeks to rebuild the community, victims, and offenders via communication and rehabilitation. This study examines the legal implications of implementing restorative justice for drug crimes to realize restorative justice and rehabilitation for perpetrators. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2010, Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code are examined using a normative method. The study's findings suggest that restorative justice is only appropriate for drug users who fulfill specific requirements, such as not being recidivists and having a limited amount of evidence. The implementation of this approach has had a positive impact on reducing overcrowding in correctional institutions and fulfilling offenders' human rights to rehabilitation. However, obstacles remain, such as limited explicit regulations in the Narcotics Law and a lack of adequate rehabilitation facilities. Policy reform and strengthening synergy between law enforcement agencies are crucial steps in expanding the comprehensive implementation of restorative justice in the future.
Strengthening Notary Reporting Obligations to Prevent Money Laundering in Property Transactions Hartati, Titin; Herman, KMS
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.452

Abstract

Money laundering through property transactions poses a significant threat to Indonesia’s legal system and economic integrity due to the high value and complex nature of real estate dealings. Notaries, as public officials authorized to draft authentic deeds and verify legal transactions, occupy a strategic position in detecting and preventing money laundering activities. This study aims to analyze the role of notaries in preventing money laundering in property transactions through the reformulation of reporting obligations. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering, Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Position of Notaries, and PPATK Regulation Number 3 of 2021 concerning reporting procedures for certain professions. The findings reveal that although the legal framework clearly establishes notaries as reporting parties, implementation remains ineffective due to internal obstacles such as limited technical understanding and conflicts with professional secrecy, as well as external obstacles including weak coordination with PPATK and insufficient legal protection for reporting notaries. This study concludes that reformulating reporting obligations is necessary through clearer normative positioning of notaries, simplified and digitized reporting mechanisms, strengthened legal protection, and continuous professional training. Optimizing these aspects will enhance the preventive function of notaries and significantly contribute to national efforts to combat money laundering in the property sector.