Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.636
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Pembaharuan Hukum Syntax Idea Jurnal Kepariwisataan Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Journal of Social And Economics Research Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Rechtsnormen Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Honeste Vivere Journal of Law and Social Politics Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Leges Privatae
Hulman Panjaitan
Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implikasi Hukum dan Kebijakan terhadap Perlindungan Pekerja Platform Digital dalam Sistem Jaminan Sosial di Indonesia Rima Patricia Marintan; Hulman Panjaitan; Rr. Ani Wijayati
Rechtsnormen Jurnal Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Edisi Februari
Publisher : Ilmu Bersama Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56211/rechtsnormen.v4i2.1540

Abstract

Perkembangan ekonomi digital telah melahirkan kerja berbasis platform yang mengubah pola hubungan kerja konvensional. Pekerja platform digital berperan penting dalam mendukung aktivitas ekonomi, khususnya di sektor transportasi dan logistik. Namun, kontribusi tersebut belum diimbangi dengan perlindungan hukum dan jaminan sosial yang memadai. Permasalahan utama terletak pada ketidakjelasan status hukum pekerja platform digital serta kebijakan jaminan sosial yang masih berorientasi pada hubungan kerja formal. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum dan kebijakan terhadap perlindungan pekerja platform digital dalam sistem jaminan sosial di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa klasifikasi pekerja platform digital sebagai pekerja bukan penerima upah menyebabkan perlindungan jaminan sosial belum optimal dan tanggung jawab perusahaan platform belum diatur secara tegas. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan reformulasi kebijakan yang menegaskan peran negara dan perusahaan platform guna mewujudkan perlindungan jaminan sosial yang adil dan inklusif.
TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG PENERAPAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEPATUHAN ETIS PRAKTIK HUKUM BISNIS DI INDONESIA Oktar Hasudungan; Hulman Panjaitan; Paltiada Saragi
Journal of Social and Economics Research Vol 7 No 2 (2025): JSER, December 2025
Publisher : Ikatan Dosen Menulis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jser.v7i2.1075

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peran akselerasi teknologi informasi (TI) — seperti Legal Technology (LegalTech), Regulatory Technology (RegTech), blockchain, dan smart contract — dalam memperkuat kepatuhan etis dan transparansi sistem hukum bisnis di Indonesia. Kemajuan teknologi ini diharapkan dapat menekan praktik tidak etis seperti pungutan liar, premanisme hukum, serta korupsi yang selama ini melemahkan sistem hukum nasional. Secara normatif, penguatan dasar hukum bagi penerapan TI tercermin dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UU ITE, yang mempertegas validitas dokumen elektronik, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP), yang menegaskan prinsip perlindungan data pribadi sebagai hak konstitusional warga negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan konseptual (conceptual approach). Penelitian ini berupaya menelusuri keterkaitan antara norma hukum positif dan inovasi teknologi informasi dalam praktik hukum bisnis modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat kesenjangan regulasi (regulatory lag) dalam penerapan AI dan smart contract, peluang penerapan TI terhadap reformasi hukum sangat besar — terutama dalam mewujudkan good corporate governance, transparansi hukum, serta efisiensi administratif melalui otomatisasi regulasi (RegTech).
The Missing Asset Recovery Practitioner: Comparative Lessons for Indonesia’s Asset Forfeiture Law Johannes Ronald Elyeser Roparulian Hutagalung; Hulman Panjaitan; Tomson Situmeang; Inri Januar
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.158

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s Draft Asset Forfeiture Law authorizes the Attorney General’s Body for Asset Recovery (BPA) to trace, manage, and liquidate criminal assets. Despite generating Rp19.6 trillion in non-tax state revenue in 2025 under Article 30A of Law No. 11 of 2021, the draft’s three proposed practitioner categories—Asset Recovery Prosecutor, Government Assessor Official, and Evidence Custodian—lack functional-position status under Law No. 20 of 2023. The Civil Curator under PermenPAN-RB No. 15 of 2020 remains an uncertain institutional analogue. Objective: This study assesses whether the Civil Curator framework accommodates the pro justitia functions of the BPA and identifies relevant comparative lessons from the United States, Australia, France, and the United Kingdom. Methods: Using a qualitative comparative socio-legal approach, this study examines legislation, the Draft Law, the BPHN Academic Paper, and the BPA’s 2026 institutional position paper. Statutory, conceptual, and comparative analyses apply Ambtenleer, Gulick’s specialization theory, and Friedman’s legal-system framework to evaluate institutional mandates, investigative and custodial roles, functional positions, and accountability mechanisms. Results: The Civil Curator is designed for reactive, court-ordered civil functions under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, rendering it structurally incompatible with the BPA’s proactive asset recovery mandate. All four comparator jurisdictions separate investigative functions from custodial and asset management responsibilities. Conclusion: The separation of investigative and curatorship functions is an institutional necessity. The Draft Law should include a lex specialis provision establishing Asset Recovery Practitioner functional positions within the Attorney General’s Office to address this rechtsleemte.
Reconstruction of Criminal Asset Regulations in Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Bankruptcy Proceedings to Prevent the Decline of Bankruptcy Estate Value: A Justice and Legal Certainty Perspective Bontor Octavianus; Dhaniswara K. Harjono; Hulman Panjaitan; Tomson Situmeang
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 12 (2026): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities (Issue in Progres)
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v4i12.777

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the normative conflict between criminal seizure and general seizure within the context of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang [PKPU]) and bankruptcy proceedings, its impact on the decline in the value of the bankruptcy estate (boedel pailit), and the urgency of regulatory reconstruction from the perspectives of justice and legal certainty. This research employed a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were collected through library research involving legislation, legal literature, and relevant court decisions, and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings revealed that the regulation of criminal seizure and bankruptcy seizure remained characterized by normative disharmony, resulting in jurisdictional conflicts between law enforcement authorities and bankruptcy trustees (kurator) over the same assets. This condition prevented assets that had become part of the bankruptcy estate from being managed optimally due to their status as objects of criminal seizure. Consequently, the economic value of the bankruptcy estate declined due to asset depreciation, maintenance costs, and the loss of economic opportunities during the criminal process. Such circumstances reduced the estate’s capacity to satisfy creditor claims and created injustice for good-faith creditors. The absence of clear regulations governing the relationship between criminal seizure and bankruptcy seizure created legal uncertainty. Therefore, regulatory reconstruction was needed to clarify the legal status of seized assets within the bankruptcy estate, strengthen coordination between law enforcement authorities and bankruptcy trustees (kurator), and establish asset management mechanisms to preserve economic value during criminal proceedings. This reconstruction was expected to support the principles of justice and legal certainty by ensuring that criminal enforcement objectives and creditor protection within bankruptcy proceedings could be balanced.
The Per Se Illegal and Rule of Reason Approaches in the Judicial Practice of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission from the Perspective of Legal Certainty Kamser Lumbanradja; Dhaniswara K Harjono; Hulman Panjaitan; Bernard Nainggolan
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 12 (2026): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities (Issue in Progres)
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v4i12.778

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the application of the per se illegal and rule of reason approaches in the adjudicative practice of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha [KPPU]) and their implications for legal certainty in Indonesian competition law enforcement. The research problem was motivated by differences in the characteristics of these approaches in examining competition cases, which in practice continued to create uncertainty regarding the boundaries of their application. This condition potentially resulted in differing interpretations, inconsistent decisions, and uncertainty for business actors in distinguishing between permitted and prohibited conduct. This research employed a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were obtained through literature studies involving relevant legislation, KPPU decisions, legal literature, and academic sources. The analysis was conducted qualitatively to examine the consistency between legal provisions and their implementation in adjudicative practice. The results showed that both approaches served different functions: the per se illegal approach was applied to conduct that was inherently anti-competitive, while the rule of reason approach was applied to conduct requiring an assessment of economic impacts and market conditions. However, the implementation of these approaches in KPPU practice still faced challenges due to the absence of clear and consistent parameters, which affected legal certainty. Therefore, clearer implementation guidelines were required to ensure that both approaches could be applied proportionally and provide greater legal certainty in Indonesian competition law enforcement.
Women Fishers’ Access to Economic Resources from the Perspectives of Gender Equality and Legal Justice Ied Veda Sitepu; Hulman Panjaitan; Paltiada Saragi
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3043

Abstract

Women Fishers’ Access to Economic Resources from the Perspectives of Gender Equality and Legal Justice discusses systemic marginalization despite women fishers’ significant contribution to fisheries through post-harvest work, small-scale industries, and even active fishing. This exclusion limits their access to economic resources, and consequently, health services, small-scale fishermen’s loan or even state protection. The objectives of the paper is to examine how patriarchal cultural norms and information asymmetries marginalize women from being recognized as fishers, restrict their access, and how exclusionary legal definitions of “fisher” systematically limit women’s economic participation.The study  uses normative legal research method (normative juridical) with statutory analysis and a sociological legal research method (sociological juridical) to seek and identify the relationship between abstract legal concepts and reality by reviewing legal products that are not gender-responsive and cultural practices that reinforce inequality and discriminatory regulations, patriarchal traditions, and poor access to information collectively hinder women’s economic participation. Achieving gender equality in coastal areas requires reforms in legal recognition, education, and policy implementation to ensure women’s rights as fishers are upheld, thereby advancing social justice and inclusive maritime development.
Co-Authors Abu Hena Mostofa Kamal Andi Arif Wijaya Andrew Betlehn Angelina Cinthia Diana Sinaga Anita Sabara Sutphin Armunanto Hutahaean Bernard Nainggolan Bontor Octavianus Dhaniswara K Harjono Dhaniswara K. Harjono Diana R.W Napitupulu Evri Evri Gratia Wirata Laksmi Hendra Susanto Hendri Jayadi Hendri Jayadi Pandiangan Hendrico Dolok Ied Veda Sitepu Inri Januar Johannes Ronald Elyeser Roparulian Hutagalung John Pieris Kamser Lumbanradja Lonna Yohanes Lengkong Moermahadi Soerjadjanegara Oktar Hasudungan Paltiada Saragi Pardosi Donnia Rima Patricia Marintan Rr. Ani Wijayati Setyo Sardjono Suwarno Suwarno Tomson Situmeang Tumanggor Tumanggor