Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Sikap Ilmiah Melalui Eksperimen Berbasis Arduino Dwi Fajar Saputri; Adi Pramuda; Soka Hadiati; Syarifah Fadillah; Eko Setyadi Kurniawan; Matsun
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 10 (2025): October
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12700

Abstract

In science learning, students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and scientific attitudes are still low. Problems become increasingly complex when the COVID-19 pandemic minimally transforms students' interactions with their community environment. Innovation is needed to obtain an experimental model integrated with the Arduino Internet of Things to enhance HOTS and scientific attitudes. This research aims to obtain a valid and practical Arduino-based experiment model and its effect on HOTS and scientific attitudes. This research and development refers to Borg and Gall consisting of research and collecting of information, planning, initial product development, initial testing, main product revision, main field testing, operational product revision, operational field testing, final product revision, and dissemination. The research subjects involved were physics lecturers, education practitioners, and physics education students in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Enhancing HOTS after implementing an experiment is calculated using the Multivariate Analysis of Variance. The arduino based experiments model has proven feasible, practical, and effectively applied to improve students' HOTS and scientific attitudes. The results become an innovative alternative laboratory work model to be used as a policy recommendation in higher education.
The thinking processes of prospective mathematics teachers in reversibly translating nets into geometric shapes Sandie Sandie; Syarifah Fadillah; Dewi Risalah; Al-Iman Nuryadin
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education
Publisher : CV. FOUNDAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/jasme.v6i1.1102

Abstract

Background: Spatial reasoning is a fundamental component of geometry learning, particularly in translating between two-dimensional nets and three-dimensional geometric shapes. For prospective mathematics teachers, the ability to perform such spatial translations is essential because it influences conceptual understanding and future instructional practices. However, correct answers in spatial tasks do not always indicate genuine conceptual understanding. Aims: This study aims to explore and describe the thinking processes of prospective mathematics teachers when translating spatial representations, specifically from nets to geometric shapes and from geometric shapes to nets. The scope focuses on identifying qualitative characteristics of their thinking processes in spatial translation tasks. Methods: This research employed a qualitative approach involving 12 prospective mathematics teachers enrolled in the Mathematics Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Technology, Universitas PGRI Pontianak. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through spatial translation tasks followed by semi-structured interviews. Interview data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed qualitatively to identify patterns in participants’ thinking processes. Result: The findings revealed five distinct characteristics of thinking processes: (1) correct and understanding the concept, (2) correct but not understanding the concept, (3) correct through reflection, (4) wrong but understanding the concept, and (5) wrong and not understanding the concept. The results indicate that answer correctness does not necessarily reflect conceptual understanding, and that reflection plays a crucial role in reconstructing spatial concepts. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the importance of conceptual understanding and reflective thinking in geometry instruction and provides insights for mathematics teacher education programs in designing learning experiences that develop prospective teachers’ spatial reasoning skills.
Analysis of junior high school students' critical mathematical thinking ability in solving similarity problems Evin Susanti; Syarifah Fadillah; Jamilah Jamilah
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 13 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v13i3.19759

Abstract

This research seeks to elucidate students' critical thinking abilities about comparable content. This study is descriptive in nature and employs a qualitative methodology. This study employs a case study methodology. The obtained data comprises critical thinking ability exam results, which include two problems and interviews. The obtained data is assessed according to the critical thinking skill indicators established by the researcher, which include: 1) investigating; 2) recognizing and justifying ideas; 3) generalizing; 4) clarifying and resolving. This research employs data analysis methodologies from Miles and Huberman, including data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing/verification. The triangulation approach ensures the authenticity of the data used in this investigation. The data analysis findings categorize students' cognitive capacities into three groups: 11.11% (4 students) are classified as high, 27.78% (10 students) as medium, and 61.11% (22 students) as low. From the perspective of critical thinking capacity, 100% of students explored the topic, 55.56% identified and justified the notion, 16.67% generalized, and 11.11% clarified and resolved the issue. These findings demonstrate that students’ overall critical thinking abilities in solving similarity problems are still low, particularly in generalizing and resolving problems. The study contributes theoretically by reinforcing the significance of critical thinking in mathematics education, particularly geometry; methodologically by integrating test and interview data to analyze thinking processes; and practically by offering insights for teachers to develop instructional strategies that foster students' ability to think critically and solve problems effectively.
Analysis of Junior High School Students’ Learning Obstacles on Polyhedron Material Reviewed from the Pirie–Kieren Theory Safuan Safuan; Syarifah Fadillah; Dewi Risalah
Journal of Educational Sciences Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Journal of Educational Sciences
Publisher : FKIP - Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/jes.10.5.p.36-50.

Abstract

This study is motivated by the low level of junior high school students’ understanding of three-dimensional geometry (solid shapes) and the need for a theoretical framework capable of explaining the dynamics of conceptual development more comprehensively. This research aims to analyze learning obstacles and the growth trajectory of students’ understanding using the Pirie–Kieren theory. The study employed a qualitative approach involving diagnostic tests, clinical interviews, observations, and analyses of student learning artifacts, validated through source triangulation, methodological triangulation, and expert confirmation. The findings show that students’ understanding develops non-linearly, with most students remaining at the Property Noticing level, characterized by difficulties in 2D–3D visualizations, conceptual reasoning, and multimodal coordination. The phenomenon of folding back consistently appears as a mechanism for reconstructing understanding when students encounter representational or conceptual conflicts. The analysis indicates the predominance of representational, epistemological, and didactic obstacles that hinder students’ transition toward formal understanding. In conclusion, the Pirie–Kieren theory effectively maps the development of students’ understanding and reveals the root causes of learning barriers in geometry. The study’s implications highlight the importance of representation-based learning design, reasoning scaffolding, and facilitating productive folding back to support deeper geometric understanding.
The Mathematical Thinking Profiles Of Junior High School Students At SMP Negeri 1 Sukadana In Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Problems On Statistics sulastriani; Syarifah Fadillah Al - Hadad; Buchari Buchari
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JIPP) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JIPP) Juli 2026
Publisher : LPD Universitas PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Mathematical thinking is a critical cognitive skill that enables students to interpret, analyze, evaluate, and draw conclusions when solving mathematical problems, particularly those demanding higher-order reasoning. In statistics learning at the junior high school level, students commonly show considerable variation in their mathematical thinking processes, especially when interpreting statistical data and determining appropriate solving strategies for Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems. This study aimed to analyze the mathematical thinking profile of eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Sukadana in solving HOTS problems on statistics, focusing on their ability to identify given and asked information, select relevant concepts or formulas, arrange systematic solution steps, and verify and conclude their answers. A qualitative descriptive method with a case study design was used. Data were collected through diagnostic tests and in-depth interviews with six students purposively selected from class VIII G, representing high, moderate, and low mathematical-ability categories (two students per category); the test instrument was validated by two mathematics education lecturers and one subject teacher, and data credibility was ensured through triangulation. The results showed distinct differences in mathematical thinking profiles across ability levels. High-ability students accurately identified problem information, selected correct concepts, constructed systematic and logical solution steps, and consistently verified their answers. Moderate-ability students understood most of the given information but had difficulty fully interpreting the problem and made minor procedural errors. Low-ability students frequently failed to identify complete information, applied incorrect concepts, made computational errors, and rarely re-checked their final answers. Overall, the findings indicate that the higher a student's mathematical ability, the more systematic and complete their thinking process in understanding, planning, executing, and evaluating solutions to statistics-based HOTS problems. These findings suggest that teachers should strengthen contextual, story-based problem practice, habituate systematic solution-writing, and emphasize answer-checking strategies to improve students' higher-order mathematical thinking in statistics..
PENGENALAN PERMAINAN TRADISIONAL GASING SEBAGAI UPAYA PELESTARIAN IDENTITAS BUDAYA PULAU LEMUKUTAN Adhitya Prihadi; Suriani Sari; Syarifah Fadillah; Mesterianti Hartati; Henry Maksum; Yenni Rizal
GERVASI: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): GERVASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : LPPM IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31571/gervasi.v10i2.10655

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah memberikan dampak signifikan terhadap pola bermain anak-anak di wilayah pedesaan pesisir. Kondisi ini menyebabkan permainan tradisional sebagai bagian dari kearifan lokal semakin terlupakan. Pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk merevitalisasi permainan tradisional melalui kegiatan sosialisasi kepada anak-anak di RW 02 Dusun Lemukutan Besar, Desa Lemukutan, Kabupaten Bengkayang. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi tiga tahapan utama, yaitu: (1) persiapan melalui koordinasi dengan pemerintah desa, tokoh adat, ketua RW, dan sekolah dasar; (2) eksekusi kegiatan berupa pengenalan, praktik, dan refleksi permainan tradisional; dan (3) evaluasi menggunakan form kesan peserta dan dokumentasi visual. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa anak-anak tidak lagi mengenal permainan gasing, galah asin, dan engklek sebelum program dilaksanakan. Namun, setelah intervensi, terlihat antusiasme tinggi, peningkatan interaksi sosial, serta tumbuhnya pemahaman anak terhadap nilai budaya lokal. Kegiatan ini berhasil menjadi sarana konservasi budaya dan mendorong partisipasi masyarakat untuk pelestarian permainan tradisional secara berkelanjutan.