Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of Law and Legal Reform Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies International Proceeding On Religion, Culture, Law, Education, And Hindu Studies
Kiki Kristanto
Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Palangka Raya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Effectiveness Of Implementing Parallel Investigations In Handling TPPU Cases Original From Forestry And Environmental Crimes Kiki Kristanto; Joanita Jalianery; Fransisco; Heriamariaty
International Proceeding On Religion, Culture, Law, Education, And Hindu Studies Vol. 1 (2024): International Proceeding On Religion, Culture, Law, Education, And Hindu Studies
Publisher : IAHN-TP Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33363/internasional-seminar.v1i.316

Abstract

Parallel investigation is an investigation method carried out simultaneously by various law enforcement agencies in handling money laundering (TPPU) cases originating from forestry and environmental crimes. This study examines the effectiveness of implementing parallel investigations in this context, with the aim of identifying the advantages, challenges and impact of implementing this method on case handling. Overall, parallel investigation has proven to be an effective approach in handling TPPU cases originating from forestry and environmental crimes. This method is able to accelerate the investigation process, increase the accuracy of law enforcement, and support more comprehensive crime suppression, although it requires improvements in coordination and regulatory aspects.
A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF SURROGATE MOTHERS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW Sintia Siregar; Kiki Kristanto; Karlinae D. Bangas; Agus Mulyawan
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18994003

Abstract

The practice of surrogacy is a solution for infertile couples, but it creates legal problems in Indonesia. This normative juridical research analyzes Indonesian criminal law regulations regarding the practice of surrogacy and the criminal liability of doctors involved. The results show that although Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Ministerial Regulation No. 2 of 2025 prohibit the practice of womb borrowing, these provisions only regulate administrative sanctions without clear criminal threats, thus creating a vacuum in criminal law norms. To anticipate this legal vacuum, the Law on the Eradication of the Crime of Human Trafficking and the Law on Child Protection can be implemented through legal interpretation. The criminal liability of doctors is based on the principle of personal liability through articles in the Criminal Code, as well as professional sanctions based on the Indonesian Code of Medical Ethics. This research concludes that Indonesia needs special regulations that integrate proportional criminal sanctions to provide legal certainty and protect all parties involved.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR ILLEGAL TRADE IN PROTECTED WILDLIFE (KASONGAN PN DECISION NUMBER 48/PID.B/LH/2019/PN KSN) Ifa Lorenza; Aristoteles; Hilyatul Asfia; Kiki Kristanto
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19080563

Abstract

The illegal trade in protected wildlife constitutes a form of environmental crime that poses serious threats to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem balance. Indonesia, as a country with one of the highest levels of biodiversity in the world, faces significant challenges in enforcing the law against persistent wildlife trafficking practices. This study aims to analyze the legal framework and the application of criminal liability for perpetrators of illegal trade in protected wildlife, as reflected in the Decision of the Kasongan District Court Number 48/Pid.B/LH/2019/PN Ksn. The research employs a normative legal method using a statutory approach and a case approach. The findings indicate that the regulation of protected wildlife trade in Indonesia has been comprehensively established through Law Number 5 of 1990, reinforced by Law Number 32 of 2024, with Government Regulation Number 7 of 1999 serving as its implementing regulation. The analysis further shows that criminal liability is imposed on the offender on an individual basis, based on the fulfillment of criminal elements in the form of intentional trading of protected wildlife without the required authorization. However, the sentence imposed in the case is relatively lenient when compared to the maximum penalties specified by law. This situation reflects a gap between normative legal provisions and sentencing practices, which may undermine the effectiveness of law enforcement and the achievement of sustainable wildlife protection objectives.
The Convergence of Drug Trafficking and Terrorism: Uncovering the Dynamics of Narco-Terrorism Kiki Kristanto; Zico Junius Fernando; Ridwan Arifin; Anis Widyawati
Yustisia Vol 13, No 3: December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v13i3.81599

Abstract

Drug trafficking and terrorism have seriously threatened many countries' global stability and national security. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing trend of convergence between drug trafficking and terrorism, forming a phenomenon known as narco-terrorism. The article seeks to reveal the relationship between narcotics trafficking and terrorism, a phenomenon often called narco-terrorism. This study's normative legal research method utilizes conceptual and comparative approaches. The results reveal that the convergence between drug trafficking and terrorism seriously impacts security, economy, and social stability. The drug trade provides a substantial source of income for terrorist groups, enabling them to expand their networks, purchase weapons, and launch terror attacks. Conversely, terrorist groups provide drug traffickers protection, infrastructure, and access to drug markets. This study provides important insights for governments, law enforcement agencies, and international organizations in designing effective strategies and policies to counter narco-terrorism. By understanding the dynamics and mechanisms of convergence between drug trafficking and terrorism, appropriate preventive and countermeasures can be taken to mitigate the threats faced by the global community.
Knitting Democracy, Separating Restraints: Legal Reform and a Critical Analysis of Article 256 of the New Criminal Code and its Impact on Freedom of Speech Zico Junius Fernando; Kiki Kristanto; Ariesta Wibisono Anditya
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Justice and Law Reform in Various Perspectives
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.vol5i2.1670

Abstract

In Indonesia's democratic landscape, the presence of Article 256 of the Criminal Code has become a crucial point in discussions on freedom of expression and human rights. This article, with its criminal provisions for demonstration organisers who do not give prior notice to the authorities, poses a significant dilemma. The threat of imprisonment for up to six months and/or a maximum fine of Rp10 million raises deep questions about the space given to citizens to express their opinions in public spaces. This research uses normative legal research methods using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and futuristic approaches. The nature of this research is descriptive-prescriptive. The data that has been collected is analysed using the content analysis method. This research conducts an in-depth exploration of the implications of Article 256 of the current Criminal Code, which threatens criminal sanctions for organisers of unannounced demonstrations. This research investigates how this regulation has the potential to curb individual freedom of expression in public spaces, as well as its impact on the quality of democracy and the maintenance of human rights in Indonesia. The findings of this research confirm that Article 256 of the Criminal Code is a step backward in democratic practice and jeopardises freedom of expression. The research underscores the urgency of revising this regulation to ensure that the right to express opinions in public, as mandated by Law No. 9 of 1998, is protected as a key element in democracy and human rights. This reflects the importance of maintaining public space as an arena for free discussion and criticism, which is at the core of a healthy democratic system.
Criminal Law Policy On Corruption Criminal Acts: Considering The Death Penalty In The Framework Of Restorative Cension Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Kiki Kristanto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.7510

Abstract

Corruption offenses in Indonesia are positioned as extraordinary crimes that generate systemic impacts on state finances, the national economy, and public trust, thereby necessitating firm and effective criminal law policies. One of the punitive instruments normatively regulated is the death penalty, as specified in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, particularly when corruption is committed under certain circumstances. Nevertheless, in law enforcement practice, this provision has almost never been applied, giving rise to issues concerning its relevance, rationality, and consistency with the objectives of punishment, especially from the perspective of restorative sentencing and human rights protection. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the death penalty in corruption offenses functions more as a symbolic normative threat than as an applicable sentencing instrument and is less aligned with the orientation toward restoring state financial losses. Therefore, this research emphasizes the need to reform corruption-related criminal law policies by balancing strict law enforcement with the strengthening of restorative sentencing, in order to achieve substantive justice, effective corruption eradication, and the sustainability of the national legal system
HANDLING CASES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY THE CENTRAL KALIMANTAN REGIONAL POLICE Norjanah; Kiki Kristanto; Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21862463

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Law Number 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (KDRT) in handling domestic violence cases by law enforcement officers in Palangka Raya and to explore the challenges and obstacles faced by social institutions and law enforcement in protecting victims. This research uses an empirical juridical approach with a descriptive method to illustrate the handling process of domestic violence and evaluate the effectiveness of victim protection. The findings show that although law enforcement has followed the procedures outlined in the Domestic Violence Law, significant challenges remain, such as low case continuation after reporting, social stigma against victims, and limited resources such as safe houses and internal psychologists. Furthermore, coordination between law enforcement and social institutions is not optimal, hindering the effectiveness of victim protection. Therefore, this study recommends enhancing law enforcement training, strengthening social institutions, and expanding public education about the rights of domestic violence victims to improve legal protection and case continuity.
Co-Authors Agus Mulyawan Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono Anis Widyawati Aristoteles Fabiyana Dasoge Fernando, Zico Junius Fransisco Harvest Magabetua Sinaga Hilyatul Asfia Ifa Lorenza Jhosef Deniro Tampubolon Joanita Jalianery Jumiati Jumiati Karlinae D. Bangas Louise Theresia Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah Mrs. Heriamariaty Muhamad Adystia Sunggara Noor, Syamhudian Norjanah Novea Elysa Wardhani Nur Saleha Paskatu Hardinata Pita Permatasari Rico Septian Noor Ridwan Arifin Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang Rizki Setyowibowo Sangalang Ronaldi Sulang Satriya Nugraha Setiawan Noerdajasakti Sintia Siregar Thea Farina Theon Charles Vicko Taniady Yongky Yongky