Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Indonesia’s Capital Relocation: A Normative-Juridical Review of Governmental, Criminal Law, and State Stability Ananda Selly Manila Wati; Setiyawan, Deni
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8471

Abstract

The relocation of the National Capital has become a strategic issue and a legal urgency in Indonesia due to its impact on governmental stability, legal order, and national security. Emerging issues include the government's authority in determining the location of the National Capital, potential legal conflicts between national and international regulations, and the risk of criminal law violations in land acquisition and project implementation. This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of the National Capital relocation by integrating perspectives from administrative law, criminal law, and the stability of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). The research employs a normative-juridical method with legislative, case study, and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that the relocation of the National Capital must consider legality based on Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the National Capital, principles of good governance, and the prevention of criminal acts related to land acquisition and development. The integration of administrative and criminal law is crucial for maintaining political, social, and economic stability. In conclusion, the relocation of the National Capital is legally valid if carried out with strict adherence to legal compliance, transparent oversight, and effective mechanisms for mitigating criminal risk, thereby supporting the sustainable stability of the Republic of Indonesia.
The Terrorism Death Penalty Controversy in Indonesia from the Perspective of Law and Human Rights Kharisma, Ikhlashul Amal; Setiyawan, Deni
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8556

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the application of the death penalty for terrorism-related crimes in Indonesia from the perspectives of criminal law and human rights. The primary focus is to assess whether capital punishment can be justified as a proportionate law enforcement instrument while remaining consistent with the protection of the right to life as a non-derogable right. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory, case-based, and conceptual approaches to examine national legal provisions, judicial decisions, and contemporary theories of punishment in conjunction with international human rights standards. The findings indicate that the death penalty retains juridical legitimacy within Indonesia's positive legal system, particularly following the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, which introduces a conditional death penalty framework. Nevertheless, the justification of capital punishment based on deterrence theory lacks strong empirical support and raises serious concerns regarding proportionality and the protection of the right to life. This study recommends that the death penalty be strictly positioned as an ultimum remedium, applied in a highly selective manner with rigorous due process guarantees, and complemented by non-penal counterterrorism strategies emphasizing prevention, deradicalization, and a more humane justice-oriented approach.
Diversion Reform in Juvenile Criminal Law Based on Prophetic Restorative Justice Setiyawan, Deni; Ananda Afit Oktavian; Naufal Andra Maghara Yoga Tama Putra; Muhammad Azimuddin Mohamed
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8865

Abstract

Restorative justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System remains predominantly shaped by pragmatic and secular approaches, limiting its capacity to support substantive character formation among children in conflict with the law. This study examines the integration of prophetic legal values into diversion and rehabilitation processes to strengthen the ethical and transformative dimensions of restorative justice. Using a normative juridical method, the study analyzes the weaknesses of conventional restorative justice practices within the Indonesian juvenile justice framework. The findings indicate that diversion is largely implemented as a formal conflict resolution mechanism through peace agreements, with limited attention to character development and deep value internalization. In response, this study proposes a prophetic restorative justice model grounded in the values of humanization, liberation, and transcendence, offering a more holistic approach to juvenile rehabilitation. The integration of ethical and transcendental dimensions repositions diversion as a structured process of character rehabilitation and sustainable social relationship reconstruction rather than mere case settlement. This study contributes conceptually and normatively by reconstructing restorative justice through a prophetic legal paradigm, while also providing policy-oriented implications for strengthening regulations and technical guidelines to institutionalize prophetic restorative justice within Indonesia's Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (Di NO) Case of Annulment of Marriage Due to an Arranged Marriage Sari, Anggun Purnama; Setiyawan, Deni
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.2695

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the decision of Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (NO) or the inadmissibility of the case in the case of marriage annulment based on an arranged marriage agreed by the parties, as well as to examine the legal basis, the judge's considerations, and the legal implications for the protection of the rights of the parties harmed in the marriage. The phenomenon of arranged marriages still often occurs in society for reasons of custom, economics, or family honor. However, when the marriage is filed for annulment to the religious court, it is not uncommon for the application to be declared Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard because it is considered not to meet the formal and material requirements according to the provisions of civil procedural law and Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach and a statute approach, through an analysis of court decisions that declare the case inadmissible. The results of the study indicate that the main reasons for the judge to issue an NO decision are the failure to fulfill the legal standing requirements, the incompleteness of the object of the lawsuit, and formal defects in the petition for annulment. Furthermore, the agreement to an arranged marriage by the parties to the marriage is considered voluntary, thus failing to meet the element of coercion that constitutes the basis for annulment. The NO ruling has the legal implication that the case was not examined to its core, allowing the parties to resubmit the lawsuit with formal amendments. In conclusion, the Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard ruling in the case of annulment of a marriage based on an arranged marriage does not mean the marriage is fully valid, but rather indicates an inaccuracy in the lawsuit filing procedure that must be improved to achieve legal certainty and protect individual rights in marriage.
Edukasi Arisan Bodong dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Kepada Anggota Ranting Aisyiyah Parengan Lamongan Setiyawan, Deni; Oktavian, Ananda Afit; Maghara Yoga Tama Putra, Naufal Andra
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Edisi Januari - April
Publisher : Lembaga Dongan Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jpkmn.v7i1.7730

Abstract

Maraknya investasi dan arisan bodong di kalangan perempuan Aisyiyah Parengan Lamongan menunjukkan rendahnya literasi hukum dan keuangan. Program pengabdian ini bertujuan meningkatkan pemahaman hukum pidana, keterampilan verifikasi legalitas investasi, serta membangun kader pencegahan penipuan berbasis komunitas. Metode yang digunakan adalah Participatory Community Education melalui sosialisasi hukum, studi kasus, pelatihan verifikasi digital, pre–post test, dan pendampingan kader. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan: skor pengetahuan hukum naik dari 39% menjadi 82%, literasi keuangan dari 36% menjadi 81%, dan kemampuan verifikasi legalitas dari 41% menjadi 86%. Sebanyak 96% peserta mampu memeriksa izin entitas keuangan secara mandiri, dan 12 kader (24%) terbentuk untuk melakukan edukasi lanjutan. Pendampingan menghasilkan enam laporan investasi mencurigakan yang berhasil dicegah. Program ini efektif meningkatkan ketahanan komunitas perempuan terhadap penipuan keuangan serta menciptakan mekanisme keberlanjutan melalui kaderisasi.