Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

A Comparative Study of MobileNetV2 and ResNet50 for Multi-Class AI- Generated and Real Image Classification Pramudita, I Gusti Ngurah Agus Ega Patria; Sudipa, I Gede Iwan; Fittryani, Yuri Prima; Iswara, Ida Bagus Ary Indra; Aristamy, I Gusti Ayu Agung Mas
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Article Research January 2026
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15682

Abstract

This study aims to classify AI-generated and real images using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture by comparing the performance of MobileNetV2 and ResNet50. Previous studies on AI-generated image detection have primarily focused on binary classification without explicitly analyzing object-level context in multi-class scenarios, leaving a gap in understanding model performance across diverse visual categories. The dataset consists of 23,941 images divided into two main classes of real and fake and five subclasses of human, animal, art, view, and vehicle. The training process employs data augmentation and a K-Fold Cross Validation strategy on the training and validation set to maintain balanced class proportions, while a separate unseen test set is used exclusively for final performance evaluation. Model evaluation is performed based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics on test data. The results showed that MobileNetV2 achieved the best accuracy of 89% at the 10th epoch, but experienced a decline in performance at the 30th and 50th epochs, indicating overfitting. In contrast, ResNet50 showed the most stable performance with the highest accuracy of 93% at the 30th epoch and consistently high precision, recall, and F1-score values. Thus, ResNet50 was found to be the most effective architecture for classification of AI-generated and real images on multi-class datasets, while MobileNetV2 remains relevant for implementation on devices with computational limitations.
Public Response on X to the Revocation of Indonesia’s 3-Kg LPG Retail Ban: A Support Vector Machine Study Wahyuni, Ni Nyoman Asti Sri; Sudipa, I Gede Iwan; Sastaparamitha, Ni Nyoman Ayu J.; Willdahlia, Ayu Gede; Aristamy, I Gusti Ayu Agung Mas
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v6i3.349

Abstract

This study examines public responses on X to the 3-Kg LPG retail ban implemented on February 1, 2025, and revoked on February 4, 2025, which caused widespread shortages, long queues, and limited access, particularly for citizens living far from official distribution points. A total of 2,524 Indonesian-language tweets were collected via crawling and systematically processed through text cleaning, tokenization, normalization, stopwords removal, and stemming, followed by automatic labeling using the Indonesian Sentiment (InSet) Lexicon. After removing 229 neutral tweets, 1,405 tweets (61.2%) were classified as negative and 890 tweets (38.8%) as positive, with the study focusing on these two sentiment classes. Text features were extracted using TF-IDF, and classification was conducted using a linear-kernel Support Vector Machine (C = 0.1) with an 80:20 train-test split. The model achieved an overall accuracy of 84%, with precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.82, 0.94, and 0.88 for the negative class, and 0.87, 0.68, and 0.76 for the positive class. Results indicate that negative sentiment was dominated by criticism related to LPG shortages and insufficient policy communication, while positive sentiment reflected user relief over restored supply and hopes for fairer distribution in the future. These findings suggest that revoking the ban did not fully restore public perception, highlighting the necessity for more effective policy dissemination and stricter monitoring of 3-Kg LPG distribution. The study also emphasizes the importance of leveraging social media, particularly X, as a real-time source for monitoring public opinion and evaluating the effectiveness of energy distribution policies in Indonesia.
Comparison of Naïve Bayes and Random Forest in Sentiment Analysis of State-Owned Banks Management by Danantara on X and YouTubeComparison of Naïve Bayes and Random Forest in Sentiment Analysis of State-Owned Banks Management by Danantara on X and YouTube Ni Wayan Indah Juliandewi; Kusuma, Aniek Suryanti; Putri, Kompiang Martina Dinata; Indrawan, I Gusti Agung; Aristamy, I Gusti Ayu Agung Mas
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v6i3.366

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has increased public engagement in expressing opinions and responding to issues on social media platforms such as X and YouTube. A prominent topic of recent public debate concerns Danantara's management of state-owned banks. This study analyzes public sentiment regarding this issue by comparing the performance of the Naïve Bayes and Random Forest classification methods. A dataset comprising 25,565 entries was collected from both platforms between January 2025 and May 2025. The data underwent text pre-processing, labeling with the InSet Lexicon, and feature weighting using term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). The dataset was split at 80:20, and class imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) prior to classification. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The results demonstrate that Random Forest performed stably, achieving 84% accuracy both before and after sampling. In contrast, Naïve Bayes achieved 74% accuracy before sampling, which increased to 79% after sampling. These findings suggest that Random Forest is more robust to data imbalance than Naïve Bayes, which is more susceptible to bias toward the majority class.