Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : MLJ

AKIBAT HUKUM PERNIKAHAN SIRI Awaliah, Awaliah; Nur Qalbi, Vivi; Isnawidiawinarti Achmad , Andi Nurul Isnawidiawinarti Achmad; Allang, Achmad
Maleo Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/mlj.v6i1.2398

Abstract

God created humans in pairs of their own kind to continue their offspring through legal marriage. In practice, marriages are not carried out in accordance with applicable regulations and are recognized by the state. There are still many people who carry out unregistered marriages which have both legal, social and psychological consequences. The purpose of this paper is to determine the understanding and knowledge of the legitimacy and legal consequences of unregistered marriages in the Uswatum Khasanah study group about unregistered marriages. The results showed that before the counseling was carried out they had the same perception about unregistered marriage and registered marriage because the point was to avoid adultery, after counseling they knew and understood the weaknesses of unregistered marriage, especially regarding the position of women and their offspring. This means that people do not understand the status of unregistered marriages, so intensive counseling is needed regarding unregistered marriages to community groups, especially those who are vulnerable to conducting unregistered marriages
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN KASASI NO. 2296 K/PID.SUS/2024 YANG MENYIMPANGI KETENTUAN PIDANA MINIMUM KHUSUS: PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN KASASI NO. 2296 K/PID.SUS/2024 YANG MENYIMPANGI KETENTUAN PIDANA MINIMUM KHUSUS Ramadani, Fahima; Awaliah, Awaliah; Hasnawati, Hasnawati
Maleo Law Journal Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Volume 10, Nomor 1, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/mlj.v10i1.10657

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the basis of the Supreme Court judges' considerations in the deviation. This study uses a normative legal research method. The results of the study indicate that the Supreme Court corrected the judex facti decision by changing the application of the article from Article 114 paragraph (1) to Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the change in the application of the article by the Supreme Court was based on the failure to fulfill the elements of a sales intermediary due to the absence of relevant witnesses. However, in the aspect of criminalization, the Supreme Court imposed a prison sentence below the special minimum limit without adequate consideration of the reasons for the deviation, while the fine was still imposed according to the provisions of the law. This condition indicates a weak construction of the argumentation for punishment which has the potential to cause disparity in punishment, as well as create uncertainty in the application of the special minimum criminal provisions in judicial practice. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive and argumentative considerations by judges in every deviation from the special minimum criminal provisions in order to maintain justice and legal certainty.