Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.173
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jambe Law Journal WAJAH HUKUM ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Khazanah Hukum
Adithiya Diar
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
SENTENCING DISPARITY IN CORRUPTION CASES IN JAMBI CITY: AN ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REASONING Adithiya Diar
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Differences in corruption sentences raise questions about equality, proportionality, and the exercise of judicial discretion. However, unequal sentences do not necessarily demonstrate unjustified disparity because legally relevant differences between cases may warrant different outcomes. This article examines the normative framework for evaluating sentencing disparity and judicial reasoning in corruption proceedings within the institutional setting of Jambi City. It employs normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by scholarship available through 2023. Particular attention is given to Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020, whose sentencing guidelines concern Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law. The analysis identifies offence classification, financial harm, individual culpability, participation, benefits, and aggravating or mitigating circumstances as essential considerations in a legally meaningful comparison. It argues that the quality of judicial explanation is central to distinguishing justified differentiation from inconsistent punishment. The article proposes a comparative framework that separates imprisonment, fines, and additional penalties while accounting for procedural differences. Its contribution is a normative method for examining Jambi City cases without presuming an empirically established local disparity. Consistency requires comparable cases, accurate factual findings, and transparent reasons connecting sentencing factors with the punishment imposed.
Co-Authors A Zarkasi A Zarkasi Abd Aziz, Saidatul Nadia Albi Ternando Alendrad Alendrad Alifri, Aqshal Habibillah Amanda Dea Lestari Arfai Beny Saputra Billy Bintang, Muhammad Dimas Tri Wicaksono Fauzi Syam Febrian Chandra Ferdricka Nggeboe Fitri Handayani Friyandi Prasetya Harmaini HARTATI Hartati Hartati Helmi Iskandar Zulkarnain M.Havidz Aima Muhammad Syahlan Samosir Munandar, Tri Imam Nella Octaviany Siregar Niken Putri Lestari Qurochman, Taufik Raga Rahman Ridha Kurniawan Rr. Rina Antasari Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz Sayuti Sayuti Thomfi Loho Zarkasi