Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.745
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal El-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica PESHUM
Chaerul Shaleh
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Tinjauan Siyasah Maliyah Tentang Pengawasan Keuangan Negara Melalui Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Al Haura Millani; Beni Ahmad Saebani; Chaerul Shaleh
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i4.2216

Abstract

An Unqualified Opinion is one of the prestigious achievements sought by government officials who use public funds in the performance of their duties. An Unqualified Opinion is not the sole indicator of sound financial management, nor does it guarantee freedom from corruption. This study aims to examine whether the Unqualified Opinion aligns with the objectives of oversight and the principles of fiscal policy in efforts to achieve sound financial governance and advance the public interest. Data were collected through a literature review using content analysis, which involves analyzing the content and interpreting various legal provisions and relevant concepts to address the research questions. The results of the study indicate that the unqualified audit opinion (WTP) is fundamentally consistent with the principles of fiscal policy, particularly the principle of trust and the objectives of state financial oversight in safeguarding public assets. Nevertheless, the WTP opinion cannot serve as an absolute guarantee that an entity is free from corruption due to the limited scope of the audit and the nature of financial statement examinations, which are not specifically designed to uncover acts of corruption. Nevertheless, the unqualified opinion (WTP) retains strategic value as an instrument of state financial oversight because it plays a preventive role in enhancing accountability, minimizing the potential for irregularities, and supporting the realization of good governance.
Co-Authors Aji Saptaji Al Haura Millani Bobang Noorisnan Pelita Eef Abdul Aziz Farah Salma Rubbiyanti Fathan Nabiel Febriani Nurul Awaliah Gojali, Dudang iwan setiawan Mualimin Mochammad Sahid Muhammad Rafi Nur Akbar Nurul Fuadha Siregar Rama Raihan Faturrohman Ridwan Eko Prasetyo Saebani, Beni Ahmad Salva Safira Salsabila Suntana, Ija Taufiq Alamsyah