Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Hubungan Lokasi Ovitrap Atraktan Fermentasi Air Cucian Beras terhadap Keberadaan Telur Aedes Rio, Muhammad; Ramayanti, Indri; Rohani, Siti; Prameswarie, Thia; Saraswati, Nia Ayu
MESINA (Medical Scientific Journal) Vol 6, No 1 (2025): Medical Scientific Journal (MESINA)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32502/msj.v6i1.9334

Abstract

Aedes merupakan vektor utama penyebab Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) yang masih menjadi masalah kesehatan di Indonesia, salah satu upaya pengendaliannya dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan ovitrap dengan penambahan atraktan yaitu fermentasi air cucian beras yang terbukti menghasilkan senyawa ammonia, karbon dioksida dan asam sitrat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan penempatan ovitrap dengan keberadaan telur nyamuk Aedes. Desain penelitian ini dengan quasy experiment posttest only. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik purposive sampling, yang didaparkan 6 rumah warga di RT 46, Kelurahan Sukajaya, Kecamatan Sukarami yang merupakan wilayah endemis DBD di Kota Palembang dengan kriteria inklusi yaitu rumah dengan halaman yang cukup luas serta banyak perpohonan. Ovitrap dengan atraktan fermentasi air cucian beras pada penelitian ini diletakkan di luar dan di dalam rumah warga konsentrasi 10%, 30% dan 60% dengan tiga kali ulangan. Analisis data yang digunakan dengan dan Chi-square. Hasil penelitian didapatkan tidak terdapat hubungan antara letak ovitrap dengan keberadaan telur nyamuk Aedes. 
Alignment of the Blueprint and Item Analysis as Indicators of the Validity of the Multiple Choice Test Instrument Nia Ayu Saraswati; Miranti Dwi Hartanti; Ni Made Elva Mayasari; Rury Tiara Oktariza; Ratih Pratiwi
MESINA (Medical Scientific Journal) Vol 6, No 2 (2026): Medical Scientific Journal (MESINA)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32502/msj.v6i2.11035

Abstract

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are widely used as cognitive assessment tools in medical education due to their efficiency and objectivity. The quality of MCQs is strongly influenced by the alignment between examination planning through blueprinting and the empirical performance of test items evaluated using item analysis. This study aimed to examine the alignment between the examination blueprint and item analysis results as indicators of MCQ instrument validity. This study employed a descriptive observational quantitative design with a retrospective approach. Data were obtained from examination blueprint documents and MCQ test results from the most recent block examination conducted at the Medical Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang. A total of 150 MCQ items were analyzed using statistical software to calculate difficulty index, discrimination index, and internal reliability measured by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The results demonstrated that most items were classified within the moderate difficulty category (47.33%), with relatively balanced proportions of difficult and easy items. Item discrimination analysis revealed that 70.67% of items showed good discrimination (?0.30), although 29.33% of items demonstrated fair to poor discrimination. The internal reliability of the examination instrument was very high, with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.91. In conclusion, the alignment between the examination blueprint and item analysis findings supports the validity and reliability of the MCQ assessment instrument. Nevertheless, continuous evaluation and revision of items, particularly those with low discrimination indices, are recommended to enhance the overall quality of assessment.