p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.007
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Gizi Widyagogik : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL PGSD FIP UNIMED REFLEKSI EDUKATIKA Media Penelitian Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan AKSIOLOGIYA : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Jurnal Basicedu International Journal of Community Service Learning JURNAL INOVASI EDUKASI Journal of Primary Education Jurnal Abdimas PHB : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Progresif Humanis Brainstorming Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika Jurnal Komunitas: Jurnal Pengabidian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Perseda : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar LOSARI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Global Accounting, Management, Education, and Entrepreneurship (IJGAME2) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (ABDIRA) Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Joong-Ki : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Basicedu JGK (Jurnal Guru Kita) Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia JISPE Journal of Islamic Primary Education Eastasouth Journal of Positive Community Services Jurnal Pengabdian Kolaborasi dan Inovasi IPTEKS JANACITTA: Journal of Primary and Children's Education Joong-Ki Tradition and Modernity of Humanity Ngudi Waluyo Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Joong-Ki PAEDAGOGIE
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : PAEDAGOGIE

Hubungan Minat Belajar dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sekolah Dasar Amalina, Gita Febby; Suryani, Ela
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 1 (2026): (Issue in progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.15889

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between learning interest and science process skills of fourth-grade elementary school students. The study uses a quantitative approach with a correlational design involving 89 fourth-grade students in the Melati Cluster, Sumowono District. Learning interest data were collected using a Guttman scale questionnaire, while science process skills were measured through objective tests that had met validity and reliability tests. Data analysis techniques used descriptive statistics and Pearson Product Moment correlation tests after the data met the prerequisites of normality and linearity. The results showed that students' learning interest was in the very high category, while their science process skills were in the moderate category. The correlation test results showed a positive and significant relationship between learning interest and science process skills among fourth-grade students. These findings indicate that the higher the students' learning interest, the better their science process skills. This study implies that developing students' learning interest needs to be a primary concern in science education in elementary schools.
Studi Komparatif Metode Demonstrasi dan Eksperimen terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sekolah Dasar Rajata, Reiki Bobby; Suryani, Ela
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 1 (2026): (Issue in progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study compares the impact of demonstration and experimental methods on the science process skills of elementary school students, covering abilities such as observing, classifying, and communicating. Using a sample of 74 students divided into two equal groups, data were collected through evaluation tests, questionnaires, and observations. Research instruments measured skills before and after the intervention, with data analyzed via statistical tests. Results from the independent t-test yielded a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.675 ($p > 0.05$), indicating no significant difference in science process skills between students taught using the demonstration method versus the experimental method. Despite the lack of statistical significance, the demonstration method produced slightly higher average scores, with a mean difference of 0.34. Both methods offer distinct advantages depending on student learning styles. In conclusion, while both approaches effectively support science process skills, the demonstration method showed a marginal superiority in this specific context.
Studi Komparasi Model Problem-Based Learning (PBL) dan Project-Based Learning (PjBL) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Sekolah Dasar Cucini, Cucini; Suryani, Ela
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 1 (2026): (Issue in progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.16159

Abstract

The modern educational paradigm currently emphasizes various essential competencies, with creative thinking capacity being a primary element in the learning process. Nevertheless, empirical evidence in the field suggests that the development of creativity among fifth-grade students still encounters several obstacles, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. Consequently, this study was conducted to analyze and compare the effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL) models in optimizing students' creative thinking dimensions, while identifying the instructional intervention that yields the most significant impact.The methodology applied in this research is quantitative, utilizing a pre-experimental design with an intact-group comparison framework. The findings indicate that the implementation of the PjBL model produces superior outcomes compared to the PBL model. This is evidenced by the mean posttest score of the PjBL group, which reached 85.90 (categorized as excellent), whereas the PBL group attained a mean score of 80.54 (categorized as good). The disparity in these results was validated by a differential test showing a significance value of 0.003 ($< 0.05$). Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the PjBL model possesses a higher level of efficacy than PBL in accelerating the creative thinking proficiency of students.