Desi Erawati
Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Interpreting “Urgent Reasons” in Marriage Dispensation Cases: A Socio-Legal Study at the Pangkalan Bun Religious Court Jumrotunisak; Desi Erawati; Masdar Hilmy
Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah
Publisher : ​Institute for Researches and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/jhm.v13i2.12465

Abstract

The phrase “urgent reasons” in Indonesian marriage dispensation law is normatively open yet operationally undefined, creating interpretive space that contributes to disparities in judicial decisions. While prior studies explain these disparities through regulatory weakness or judicial discretion, they rarely examine how such normative ambiguity is socially reproduced through judicial practice. Addressing this gap, this study analyses how judges construct the meaning of “urgent reasons” in pregnancy-related marriage dispensation cases and how this process reflects the interaction between legal structure and local social norms. Using a socio-legal approach, the research examines 43 decisions (2020-2025) from the Pangkalan Bun Religious Court and in-depth interviews with three judges.Drawing on Anthony Giddens’ Structuration Theory, the study argues that normative ambiguity does not merely generate discretion but operates as a structuration mechanism through which judges reproduce and negotiate legal meaning inconcrete cases. The findings reveal three dominant interpretive patterns: (1) urgency as moral restoration and protection of family honour, (2) urgency as safeguarding the best interests of the child, and (3) urgency as maintaining religious and social stability. These patterns demonstrate that judicial disparities stem not from inconsistency but from the activation of different normative orientations when judges confront ambiguous legal structures within a specific socio-cultural context.Theoretically, this study contributes to socio-legal scholarship by showing how vague legal norms function as institutional media for the reproduction of legal pluralism through judicial agency. Practically, the findings highlight the need for clearer operational guidelinessuch as minimum age thresholds, psychological assessment standards, and child protection recommendations, to balance legal certainty, judicial discretion, and child rights protection in marriage dispensation policy.
Sedekah Digital Berbasis QRIS dalam Crowdfunding Masjid: Analisis Modal Simbolik Perspektif Pierre Bourdieu Muhammad Rayya Akmal; Ahmad Rayhan; Shafa; Desi Erawati
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Digital Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study is motivated by the rapid digitalization of Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia, marked by the emergence of QRIS-based mosque crowdfunding as an innovation in religious fundraising. The main problem addressed is how digital transformation influences Islamic philanthropic practices and the role of technology in increasing public participation. The research aims to identify the development of digital philanthropy, analyze QRIS-based crowdfunding practices in mosques, and examine the relevance of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory to this phenomenon. The method employed is a qualitative approach through literature review and case studies. The findings indicate that digital philanthropy enhances efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of donations while encouraging broader participation, particularly among younger generations. Furthermore, these practices involve not only economic aspects but also social, cultural, and symbolic dimensions. The study concludes that the success of QRIS-based crowdfunding depends on the integration of technology with trust and the social legitimacy of religious institutions.
DINAMIKA INKLUSIVITAS DI PESANTREN: STUDI TENTANG MODAL BUDAYA DAN IDENTITAS SOSIAL Ushansyah Ushansyah; Desi Erawati; Masdar Hilmy
Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama (JISA) Vol 9, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sociology of Religion Study Program, Faculty of Social Sciences, North Sumatra State Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/jisa.v9i1.29002

Abstract

This article is motivated by the need for pesantren to strengthen inclusive attitudes amid diverse student backgrounds and contemporary social dynamics that may foster exclusivity. It examines how cultural capital and social identity function as conceptual foundations for creating a more open and harmonious pesantren environment. Using a library research with a conceptual approach, this article draws on peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and relevant prior studies. Literature was collected through systematic searches using the keywords “cultural capital,” “social identity,” and “pesantren” in databases such as Scopus, Web Of Scene, Ebsco, Doaj, Google Scholar, with sources selected based on relevance and credibility. Data were analyzed through content analysis, including data reduction, thematic classification, interpretation of conceptual relationships, and the formulation of theoretical conclusions. The study proposes a comprehensive model explaining social dynamics and strategies for strengthening inclusivity in modern pesantren. Validity was ensured through careful source selection, theoretical triangulation, and verification of original texts. The findings indicate that pesantren values, norms, and traditions can foster solidarity when aligned with students’ social identity formation; however, misalignment may generate social distance and group dominance. Therefore, strengthening inclusivity requires character development, effective social interaction management, and the cultivation of an adaptive and moderate institutional culture.