cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Andalas Journal of International Studies
Published by Universitas Andalas
ISSN : 23018208     EISSN : 23559500     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Social Sciences Other
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) is a journal published by Andalas Institute of International Studies (ASSIST) which contain research and analytical platform dedicated to a better understanding of International issues and aims to craft the alternatives in International Studies. AJIS focuses on publishing the original research articles related to International Studies, International Development, Internatinal Relations, Global Studies, Global political studies, Global Political Economy, diplomacy, global and local relations and others related topic to International Studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 163 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
Failure of Securitizing the Climate Change Issue at the United Nations Security Council (2007-2019) Murni Kemala Dewi
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.2.168-184.2020

Abstract

Abstract         This paper describes the dynamics of debates on the securitization of climate change issue at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which took place from 2007 to 2019. Although there have been four open debates on this issue at the UNSC, until 2019, the process of the securitization of climate change issue has failed. Prior studies discussing the same concern has only explained some of the reasons proposed in the debates, such as relating to the mandate of the UNSC, the division of work in the UN units, and whether the issue of climate change could be considered as a security issue. By applying the Externalist School of Securitization theory, this paper analyzes the relationship between sociolinguistics and socio-politics in the dynamics of the debates on the securitization of climate change issue at the UNSC and the roles of the permanent members in the debates. The main argument in this research is spotted on the existing rejection against the framing of climate change as a security issue by several UNSC permanent members, hence no mitigation policy can be mutually agreed upon. This has resulted in a failure in the process of securitizing the climate change issue at the UNSC (2007-2019). Keywords:The Security Council, Climate Change, Securitization
@KemluRI :Diplomasi Digital? Erna Kurniawati; Iva Rachmawati; Machya Astuti Dewi
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 1 May 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.1.83-99.2020

Abstract

Sejalan dengan ide mengenai pentingnya penggunaan teknologi digital pada pratek diplomasi maka Kementrian Luar Negeri melalui Direktorat Informasi dan Diplomasi Publik menginiasi upaya untuk menyelenggarakan praktis diplomasi publik melalui sejumlah media sosial termasuk facebook. Artikel ini menyoal pemaknaan diplomasi digital oleh Kementrian Luar Negeri Indonesia melalui Facebook yang sudah mulai diselenggarakan semenjak tahun 2010. Melalui metode intepretif atas berita unggahan pada facebook Kementrian Luar Negeri antara tahun 2018-2019 dan dan respon yang diberikan atas komentar netizen, maka artikel ini mengajukan asumsi bahwa Kementrian Luar Negeri masih memaknai diplomasi digital sebagai alat diplomasi yang sederhana, yaitu sebagai diseminasi informasi publik. Tujuan diplomasi digital sebagai bagian dari diplomasi publik guna memengaruhi persepsi publik belum sepenuhnya diakomodasi.
Penyelundupan Narkoba di Perbatasan Entikong Indonesia dan Malaysia Elyta Elyta
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.2.100-115.2020

Abstract

Permasalahan penyelundupan narkoba merupakan kejahatan lintas batas yang menjadi permasalahan yang krusial bagi negara Indonesia. Penyelundupan narkoba marak terjadi di perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia dan khususnya di Entikong Indonesia dan Tebedu Malaysia, kasus tersebut cenderung mengalami kenaikan di setiap tahunnya. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut maka penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor penyebab penyelundupan narkoba di perbatasan Entikong Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam perspektif kejahatan lintas batas. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori Cross Border Crime dan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif untuk melihat analisis mendalam terhadap hasil penelitian. Data pada penelitian ini diperoleh melalui wawancara dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa penyelundupan narkoba yang merupakan kejahatan lintas batas di perbatasan Entikong Indonesia dan Malaysia masih terjadi yang disebabkan tetap berjalannya koordinasi yang dilakukan oleh sindikat penyelundup narkoba di penjara sekalipun, minimnya fasilitas pendeteksi terhadap jalur-jalur di perbatasan, masih lemahnya pengawasan dan penindakan hukum, adanya benturan kebijakan antara Indonesia dengan Malaysia, terdapat modus operandi yang baru dalam penyelundupan narkoba tingkat internasional, serta digunakannya jalan tikus di perbatasan Entikong Indonesia dan Malaysia sebagai jalur penyelundupan narkoba.
Changes and Continuities in the Global Health Governance of Coronaviruses Sukmawani Bela Pertiwi
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.2.185-202.2020

Abstract

This paper aims to examine changes and continuities in terms of actors and policies in the global health governance on coronaviruses in order to understand the available tools, the characters and the extent they meet the required responses of a pandemic. In doing so, this paper examines actors and policies in the governance of three occurrences of coronaviruses, i.e. SARS, MERS, and the COVID-19. Actors and policies are mapped based on its function in a pandemic: (a) surveillance and knowledge dissemination, (b) material and financial assistance both for emergency and long term purposes, and (c) rule-making behavior. This paper found that the larger scale of the COVID-19 pandemic has led more actors involved in the global governance of COVID-19 than during MERS and SARS. WHO still dominates the surveillance and knowledge dissemination as well as rule making leadership. It also leads in providing material assistance to affected countries. Yet, with the significant impacts to global economy, global financial institutions dominate the provision of financial assistance both for short term and long term commitment. This imbalanced crowd in this last aspect, therefore, causes a changing dominant approach of the GHG on coronaviruses from the previously dominating evidence-based scientific approach to economic approach.
Keberhasilan Bantuan Luar Negeri di Asia Timur Laut: Sebuah Pembelajaran Bagi Negara Berkembang Ardila Putri; Silvia Dian Anggraeni; Radika Ayu A
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 1 May 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.1.1-15.2020

Abstract

After the second world war, Northeast Asian countries such as Japan, South Korea, China and Taiwan, were recipient countries of foreign aid. Then, the countries changed its status from the recipient countries to the donor countries. This paper aims to explain the factors that led to the success of Northeast Asian countries to change their status from foreign aid recipient to foreign aid providers. This research departs from the tradition of empiricism and is a qualitative research using descriptive-analytical methods. This research shows that good governance, the close relations between donor countries and recipient countries, as well as huge investments in infrastructure and human resources are the key to the success of foreign aid in Northeast Asian countries. This study concludes that the country's enormous role (ownership) in the management of foreign aid is the most influencing factor.
Analysis of Russia's Approach to Kyoto Protocol: Russia's Withdrawal from Second Commitment Period (2013-2020) Nur Yasmin Ghafiel; Paramitaningrum Paramitaningrum
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.2.116-130.2020

Abstract

In 2004 Russia ratified Kyoto Protocol, one of the international agreements which focuses on climate change mitigation. Kyoto Protocol was established as a framework for countries to mitigate climate change globally by reducing their greenhouse gas emissions accordingly to their respective targets. Russia officially participated in the first commitment period of Kyoto Protocol in 2005 after ensuring the benefits by doing so. Entering the second commitment period, in 2011 Russia decided to withdraw. In consideration of Russia’s position as the largest fossil fuel energy exporter and as a country whose economy is in restoration, Russia’s approach to Kyoto Protocol is based on its interests and benefits which it gains from the framework. This paper analyzes the factors behind Russia’s withdrawal from the second commitment period of Kyoto Protocol through the perspective of offensive realism with qualitative methodology. The thesis finds that Russia’s reasoning of withdrawal was an act to protect its national interest, which is economic security, specifically its energy sector.
Bencana dan Konflik: Pelajaran dari Aceh dan Sri Lanka Anita Afriani Sinulingga; Abdul Halim; Putiviola Elian Nasir
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.1.203-217.2020

Abstract

Several academic studies have given birth to the notion that natural disasters and conflicts have a close relationship. Under certain conditions, the disaster functions to bring peace in conflict areas. However, it has not explained how the peace process can affect the dynamics of conflict. This paper aims to analyze the factors that cause conflict in a disaster area to transform into peace or vice versa. The prolonged social conflicts in the Indonesian provinces of Aceh (1976–2005) and Sri Lanka (1983–2009) are examples of cases where the tsunami disaster in December 2004 led to a peace agreement in Aceh, which was not long in the future while failing to bring peace to Sri Lanka. The research conduct with descriptive qualitative methods and internet-based literature study techniques. This paper finds that disaster is a catalyst for the peace process, not determining peace. The transformation of conflict into peace influence by four factors: poverty, state capacity, negotiations, and internationalization of conflicts. These factors that can create peace also depend much on pre-disaster and post-disaster peace efforts.
Globalisasi Society 5.0 Jepang: Studi Kasus Hasil Pencarian Google di Luar Jepang Tahun 2019 Muhammad Fikry Anshori
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 1 May 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.1.61-82.2020

Abstract

This article seeks to describe the spread of Japan's Society 5.0 topic outside Japan based on Google's search results in 2019. Japan's Society 5.0 needs to be discussed because the global aspect of Japan's Society 5.0, namely the spread via the internet and Google, has not been researched widely. Even though, the Government of Japan committed as a role model for the world with Society 5.0. The method used in this article is a case study with data from Google Trends. The concept used is the globalization from Thomas Friedman. The results of this article show that the topic of Japan's Society 5.0 has attracted foreign public attention in several countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, India, and the United States. Then, the public in these countries also used Google to find out topics related to Japan's Society 5.0. For example, the topics of society, industry, the industrial revolution, and Industry 4.0. The spread of Japan's Society 5.0 topic in various countries can be stated in line with Thomas Friedman's argumentation on globalization which is centered on Information and Communications Technology (ICT) development.Artikel ini berupaya untuk mendeskripsikan penyebaran topik Society 5.0 Jepang di luar Jepang berdasarkan hasil pencarian Google pada tahun 2019. Society 5.0 Jepang perlu untuk dibahas karena aspek global dari Society 5.0 Jepang yaitu penyebaran melalui internet dan Google belum terlalu dikaji secara luas. Padahal, Pemerintah Jepang memiliki komitmen untuk menjadi percontohan bagi dunia dengan Society 5.0. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah studi kasus dengan data dari Google Trends. Konsep yang digunakan adalah globalisasi dari Thomas Friedman. Hasil artikel ini memperlihatkan topik Society 5.0 Jepang menjadi perhatian publik asing di beberapa negara seperti Indonesia, Malaysia, India, dan Amerika Serikat. Lalu, publik di negara-negara tersebut juga menggunakan Google untuk mencari tahu topik yang terkait dengan Society 5.0 Jepang. Contohnya adalah topik masyarakat, industri, revolusi industri, dan Industry 4.0. Penyebaran topik Society 5.0 Jepang di berbagai negara dapat dinyatakan sejalan dengan argumentasi globalisasi dari Thomas Friedman yang berpusat pada perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK).
Kerja Sama G20 dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi Global dari COVID-19 Wiwiek Rukmi Dwi Astuti
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.2.131-148.2020

Abstract

This study reveals the institutional performance of the G20 in order to help global economy recovery because of COVID-19. This study uses qualitative methods, providing in-depth descriptions through internet-based research as data-based techniques. This study indicates that G20 has proven its performance in carrying out a multilateral cooperation system through collective responses, which contain six dimensions, namely yaitu domestic political management; deliberation; direction setting; decision making; and development of global governance. G20's coordination creates a global network that includes interactions between international institutions, namely the IMF, WTO, and World Bank, as well as regional organizations and informal partnerships in the arena of international cooperation.
Capacity Building and Market Intervention for Refugees: A Study of Current and Future Direction towards Sustainable Refugee Management Fauzan Fauzan; Helmi Helmi; Zulkifli Harza; Sri Oktavia
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 1 May 2020
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.9.1.48-60.2020

Abstract

The number of refugees has increased for a decade leading to seek an alternative approach to managing refugees globally. This research will explore the current management of refugees and future direction towards sustainably managing refugees. While the UNHCR has a role in particularly resettling refugees to developed countries, states also have the authority to integrate refugees with local people under the Refugee Convention in 1951. The methodology used is a quantitative study through a statistical descriptive analysis from secondary sources and literature reviews. The result shows that states are reluctant to have a new arrival of refugees into their territories, while the UNHCR currently faces difficulties in resettling refugees to third countries. As a result, refugees are waiting with uncertainty and without livelihood opportunities in transiting countries. In regards to this issue, it seems necessary to have a capacity building and market intervention for the future direction of sustainable refugee management through a partnership with private sectors under the SDGs and other global agenda. These will equip refugees with skill development to enhance self-reliance as well as labor opportunities entering the future market places.

Page 10 of 17 | Total Record : 163

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2015 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14, No 1 (2025): Published in May 2025 Vol 13, No 2 (2024): Published in November 2024 Vol 13, No 1 (2024): Published in May 2024 Vol 12, No 2 (2023): Published in November 2023 Vol 12, No 1 (2023): Published in May 2023 Vol 11, No 2 (2022): Published in November 2022 Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Published in May 2022 Vol 10, No 2 (2021): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 10 No 2 November 2021 Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Andalas Journal of International Studies, May 2021 Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 2 November 2020 Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Andalas Journal of International Studies, Vol 9 No 1 May 2020 Vol 8, No 2 (2019): Andalas Journal of International Studies Vol 8, No 1 (2019): Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 7, No 2 (2018): ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) Vol 7, No 1 (2018): ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) Vol 6, No 1 (2017): Andalas Journal of International Studies Vol 6 no 1 Vol 6, No 2 (2017): Andalas Journal of International Studies Vol 5, No 2 (2016): ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 5 NO 2 2016 Vol 5, No 1 (2016): ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 5 NO 1 2016 Vol 4, No 1 (2015): ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 4 NO 1 ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 4 NO 2 ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 3 NO 2 ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 3 NO 1 ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 2 NO 1 ANDALAS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (AJIS) VOL 1 NO 2 Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 1 No 1 More Issue