cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 366 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)" : 366 Documents clear
The Position of Digital Signatures in Notarial Practice According to The Principle of Tabelionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo Supanji, Supanji; Adjie, Habib
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1769

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the role of digital signatures in notarization, focusing on their implementation and impact. Against the backdrop of developments in information technology, the use of digital signatures by Notaries is becoming increasingly relevant but also poses challenges in the process of making notarial deeds. The implementation of digital signatures can increase efficiency and security in making notarial deeds, but there are still obstacles related to certainty of time, place of deed making, and the need for more specific regulations related to cyber notary in Indonesia. The results of this study provide an in-depth understanding of the role of digital signatures in notaries and provide a basis for further development in integrating information technology in notarial practice.
Implementasi dan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Pengampunan Pajak Dan Program Pengungkapan Sukarela Amin, Muhammad; Machmud, Aris
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1771

Abstract

The principle of taxation must fulfill the element of justice for all taxpayers including in the tax amnesty program. The elimination of taxes that should be owed and tax sanctions for taxpayers who participate in the tax amnesty program and the Voluntary Disclosure Program (PPS) is done by paying ransom. However, the small amount of ransom payment is allegedly not fulfilling the element of legal justice. The purpose of this study is to determine the implementation and effectiveness of the Tax Amnesty Law and PPS. The method used in this research is the normative juridical law study method, using a statutory approach in studying, examining and exploring the problems in this study. The conclusion is that the elimination of taxes that should be payable does not fulfill the principle of justice, while the exemption of tax sanctions has fulfilled the principle of justice. The implementation of the tax amnesty program is ineffective due to the insignificant tax revenue and compliance of tax return submission after tax amnesty and PPS, as well as the increase in tax ratio which tends to stagnate and even still below neighboring countries in ASEAN.
Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Terhadap Penerbitan Covernote Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Putra, Restu Adi; Rato, Dominikus; Dwi Anggono, Bayu; Cahyo Setiono, Gentur
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1772

Abstract

A covernote is a statement letter containing the notary's ability to carry out what the debtor wants. The notary has full responsibility for the contents contained in a cover note. Covernotes are not textually part of the authority of a Notary, this is interesting to study in more depth regarding the form of notary responsibility for the covernote that has been made. The research method used in this research is a normative juridical method. The conclusion obtained is that covernotes are not part of the authority of a notary as regulated in the Law on the Position of Notaries, but are a habit that grows and develops in society and is made into customary law. So that the notary's responsibility regarding the covernote that is made can be called for criminal, civil or moral sanctions imposed by the community.
Kajian Hukum Waris Islam Tentang Diyat Korban Meninggal Dunia Terhadap Ahli Waris Korban Rahman, Irham; Rato, Dominikus; Dwi Anggono, Bayu; Mafazi, Agung
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1773

Abstract

The criminal law paradigm has begun to change since the emergence of the new Criminal Code (KUHP), where criminal punishment is emphasized not only as retaliation but also as recovery. Diyat punishment is one solution to restore victims. By giving property to the victim, you can make the victim's life easier financially. However, it is different from the diyat punishment for perpetrators of murder, not torture, which in this case has a perspective from the view of Islamic inheritance law. How is the diyat punishment given to the victim who is the heir of the murder victim from the perspective of Islamic inheritance law? This research uses normative legal research methods, namely by examining legal norms regarding diyat punishment from the perspective of Islamic inheritance law. Meanwhile, this research approach uses a statutory approach and a case approach related to diyat punishment. The results of research into the diyat punishment which should be the victim's right will be transferred to the victim's heirs considering that the victim has died as a result of murder. The concept of diyat punishment from the perspective of Islamic inheritance law is one of the appropriate solutions and is in accordance with the principles of the new Criminal Code.
Restorative Justice, Kejahatan, Hukuman, dan Peradilan Pidana: Sebuah Analisis Kesejarahan, Peluang dan Tantangan Sihombing, Lasmin Alfies
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1777

Abstract

Restorative justice merupakan pendekatan alternatif dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang menekankan pada pemulihan dan rekonsiliasi antara pelaku kejahatan, korban, dan komunitas. Pendekatan ini menyoroti pentingnya memperbaiki dampak sosial dan emosional dari kejahatan, selain sekadar menghukum pelaku. Dalam konteks kesejarahan, restorative justice menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang bagaimana pendekatan ini berkembang dari waktu ke waktu, serta bagaimana hal ini berhubungan dengan perubahan dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis sejarah, peluang, dan tantangan restorative justice dalam konteks kejahatan dan peradilan pidana. Tujuan utama adalah untuk memahami perkembangan konsep kejahatan, restorative justice, serta untuk mengeksplorasi peluang dan tantangan dalam penerapannya dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Analisis dilakukan dengan memeriksa literatur historis dan kontemporer tentang restorative justice, kejahatan, dan peradilan pidana. Metode penelitian melibatkan peninjauan artikel, buku, dan dokumen-dokumen terkait yang membahas topik tersebut. Artikel ini menggambarkan perkembangan restorative justice, kejahatan, dan peradilan pidana, dari perspektif sejarah, mulai dari akarnya dalam tradisi lintasan sejarah manusia hingga penerapannya dalam sistem peradilan pidana modern. Peluang restorative justice dalam memperbaiki hubungan antara pelaku, korban, dan masyarakat dijelaskan, sementara tantangan seperti resistensi dari sistem peradilan yang mapan dan kekurangan sumber daya diperhatikan. Restorative justice menawarkan pendekatan yang berpotensi untuk memperbaiki ketidakadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana dengan menekankan pada pemulihan, rekonsiliasi, dan tanggung jawab yang bersama-sama. Namun, penerapannya masih dihadapkan pada sejumlah tantangan, termasuk resistensi dari lembaga-lembaga tradisional dan kebutuhan akan dukungan dan sumber daya yang memadai. Meskipun demikian, dengan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang sejarah, peluang, dan tantangan restorative justice, ada kemungkinan untuk mengembangkan sistem peradilan pidana yang lebih inklusif dan adil di masa depan.
Peniadaan Pemidanaan Terhadap Perbuatan yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Negara dalam Kegiatan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Indonesia Hamonangan, Alexsander Roy Happy; Sibuea, Hotma P; Sartika Saimima, Ika Dewi; Hasibuan, Edi Saputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1778

Abstract

Corruption crimes committed by civil servants or state apparatus are thoroughly correlated to the abuse of authority and state losses. The authority given to organize and carry out burdens and errands for the assistance of the public is misused by enriching oneself or personal groups. However, there is an alteration in the mistakes made by civil servants or state apparatus which can cause losses to the public, specifically in the field of civic administration, in this case the gaining of goods and facilities. This error is referred to as an administrative error. This study discusses the differences in legal responsibility for state losses in acts of corruption with state losses in state administration law and regarding the return of state losses by goods and services procurement officials to be able to remove punishment. The difference between state losses in acts of corruption is intentional losses to enrich oneself or a group, while state losses in state administrative law are carried out without any element of intentional committing a crime. Returning state losses within a period of 10 (ten) days for administrative errors committed by bureaucrats for the obtaining of goods and facilities can remove the punishment that was originally classified as a illegal turn of corruption because this was done as part of an unintentional mistake and not to augment oneself or a particular assembly.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Jual Beli Perumahan dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan di Kota Medan Lizty, Sheilla; Warman, Kurnia; Rosari, Anton
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1779

Abstract

Pada praktiknya jual beli perumahan dengan KPR sering menimbulkan permasalahan, baik konflik yang bersumber dari pelaku pengembang, dimana banyak terjadi sengketa disebabkan oleh pelaku pengembang yang tidak menepati janjinya sehingga konsumen dirugikan oleh pelaku pengembang akibat buruk dari komitmen yang diajukan saat menawarkan produk tidak diindahkan oleh pelaku pengembang tersebut. Hal ini tentu menyalahi ketentuan Pasal 42 ayat 2 Undang – Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perumahan Dan Kawasan Permukiman tersebut. Adapun rumusan masalah dalam penulisan ini adalah: Bagaimana perlindungan terhadap konsumen (pembeli) dalam hal pengembang ingkar janji (wanprestasi) atas kewajibannya berdasarkan PPJB di Kota Medan? Dan bagaimana proses penyelesaian jual beli tanah dan rumah melalui KPR berdasarkan PPJB di Kota Medan, sehingga konsumen (pembeli) dapat memperoleh tanah dan rumahnya serta sertipikat hak atas tanahnya?.Adapun metode penelitiannya adalah metode pendekatan yuridis empiris (emphrical legal research), sifat penelitian ini bersifat deskriftif analitis. Adapun kesimpulannya Ketidaksesuain tersebut meliputi ketidakjelasan informasti yang diberikan tentang identifikasi dan deskripsi tentang prasarana, sarana dan utilitas umum yang ada. dengan realita pembangunan dan keterlambatan waktu proses pembangunan. Penyelesaian sengketa konsumen dapat ditempuh melalui pengadilan atau di luar pengadilan berdasarkan pilihan sukarela para pihak yang bersengketa. Usaha mempercepat penyelesaian sengketa konsumen, khususnya melalui BPSK, yang putusannya dinyatakan final dan mengikat namun UUPK masih membuka kemungkinan pihak yang keberatan atas putusan tersebut, untuk mengajukan keberatan kepada Pengadilan Negeri, hanya saja pihak yang tidak puas atas putusan Pengadilan Negeri tersebut, tidak dapat lagi mengajukan upaya hukum banding ke Pengadilan Tinggi.
Urgensi Check and Balance oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Judicial Activism dalam Praktik Demokrasi di Indonesia Abdur Rozaq, Muhammad; Batara, Surya Daniel; Ramdan Jaya, Muhamad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1780

Abstract

The mechanism of checks and balances in a democratic system is intended to avoid the use of hegenomic, tyrannical, and centralization of power, as well as provide performance monitoring activities between state institutions. However, the mechanism of checks and balances by the Constitutional Court related to the doctrine of Judicial Activism is faced with the issue of the independence of the Constitutional Court. This study aims to identify and analyze the mechanism of Checksand Balances by the Constitutional Court by applying Judicial Activism in democratic practices in Indonesia. The research is a doctrinal research and applies the statues approach and deductive analysis methods. The results of the study showed that to ensure the fair exercise of each individual as the fundamental basis of democratic values, the law and politics as an inseparable unit so that the court can use its political power to create a new norm provided for a noble purpose based on the doctrine of judicial activism by developing constitutional texts to create a social change so that the fundamental values in the Constitution can be applied progressively according to progressive legal theory. Judicial Activism is related to the judicial power that serves to check and balance. However, the freedom of judges in Indonesia is limited by the Grundnorm of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, legislation, public order and morality, government/political system, economic system, culture.
Administrative Errors With Potential to Harm State Finances Based on Legal Audit By The State Prosecutor Pribadi, R. Iman; Widhiana Suarda, I Gede; Efendi, Aan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1781

Abstract

Corruption crimes in government procurement of goods and services, such as bribery, price mark-ups, and manipulation of bidding processes, can disrupt good governance, cause financial losses to the state, and diminish public trust in the government. Therefore, legal audits by the State Prosecutor play a crucial role in preventing financial losses to the state and identifying administrative errors that potentially harm state finances based on the results of such legal audits. The research findings indicate that the legal audit by the State Prosecutor in avoiding financial losses to the state through the Prosecution is governed by the Cooperation Agreement between the Ministry of Home Affairs, the State Prosecutor, and the Indonesian National Police. This audit involves receiving reports or complaints from the public, verifying with supporting evidence, providing written notices of handling outcomes, and protecting the identity of the reporters. The steps of the legal audit include ensuring objectives, planning, data confidentiality, document collection and analysis, report preparation, result exposition, and result delivery to the applicants. These stages also involve auditing findings analysis, compliance evaluations, decision feasibility assessments, and considerations for further legal actions, all aimed at maintaining integrity and accountability in governance. The State Prosecutor uses legal audits to ensure legal compliance and identify errors that could harm state finances. They determine indications of criminal acts or legal violations and assess sufficient evidence to support allegations of violations. During the audit process, the State Prosecutor looks for irregularities or legal non-compliance related to public fund management, financial misconduct, and other administrative violations involving state finances.
Penerapan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Ridwan Syafaat Yori; Aria Zurnetti; Nani Mulyati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1782

Abstract

Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Selanjutnya ditulis Perja No.15 Tahun 2020) memberikan kewenangan kepada Jaksa untuk menghentikan penuntutan terhadap perkara tindak pidana berdasarkan restorative justice dengan tujuan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula bukan berorientasi pada pembalasan. Penerapan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice yang dilakukan Jaksa Penuntut Umum di Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Selatan dalam perkara tindak pidana pencurian dengan pemberatan yang diatur Pasal 363 ayat (1) ke 5 KUHP diancaman dengan pidana penjara paling lama 7 tahun tidak sesuai dengan syarat batas ancaman pidana maksimal penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan restorative justice dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf B Perja No.15 Tahun 2020 yang menyatakan bahwa ancaman penjara tidak lebih dari 5 tahun.

Page 10 of 37 | Total Record : 366

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue