cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,862 Documents
 339   340   341   342   343 
Dualisme Pengaturan Perkawinan Beda Agama Assyifa Rachmat, Lavita; Ahmad Yani, Encep
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1863

Abstract

This research was motivated by the marriage of couples with different beliefs, called interfaith marriages. This type of marriage was originally permitted based on Law Number 24 of 2013, amendment to Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration, then it was not permitted (prohibited) based on the Supreme Court Circular. (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023. The aim of this research is to determine the dualism of interfaith marriage arrangements. This research uses descriptive analytical methods with a normative juridical approach. The research results show that this inconsistency occurs because it is explicitly stated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and Article 44 of the Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning the Compilation of Islamic Law which states that marriage between different religions is prohibited. The Surabaya District Court has decided case No.916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby and has been confirmed by Supreme Court Decision Number 1400K/PDT/1986, the essence of the decision is to allow interfaith marriage between Rizal Adikara who adheres to Islam and Eka Debora Sidauruk who adheres to Christianity. The results of the research concluded that after the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023, all interfaith marriages were prohibited.
Analisis Putusan Kumulasi Perkara Perceraian Dan Harta Bersama Di Hubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama Nabila, Gina; Bunyamin, Bunyamin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1864

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact that resolving disputes regarding joint property in the household which can no longer be maintained is to resolve them peacefully by making a deed of agreement between the disputing parties, that would be better and fair. The purpose of this research is to determine the analysis of cumulative decisions on divorce cases and joint property linked to Law Number 50 of 2009 concerning amendments to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts. This research uses descriptive analytical methods with a normative juridical approach. The results of the research show that after developing resources, infrastructure and technology, the court needs to provide education and training for the parties involved in the lawsuit accumulation process so that they understand the legal process that will be taken in order to increase the quality of management and the ability to analyze appropriately so that errors do not occur so there must be process delays, and most importantly the court must carry out continuous evaluation and revision to create fast, simple and low-cost principles. The entire authority of the Religious Courts is determined by Law Number 50 of 2009 regarding the revision of Law Number 7 of 1989 regarding Religious Courts. Among them are marriage, divorce due to divorce, contested divorce, inheritance, wills, grants, endowments, zakat, infaq, alms, and sharia economics. Regarding what is included in the scope of marriage, the settlement of divorce lawsuits and joint property is included in it, especially in the explanation of points 9 and 10.
Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Pasca Perjanjian Pinjam Nama (Nominee Arrangement) Dianggap Batal Demi Hukum Febrina, Dwi Tiara; Sudiro, Amad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1865

Abstract

Due to the fast-paced population increase, land, a valuable natural resource, is becoming more and more scarce. A societal crisis could be sparked by land, which is equally susceptible. Consequently, it is critical that the State equitably regulates land ownership. The right to utilize and profit from land is granted to the possessor. Land might have primary or secondary rights, depends on the terms of the agreement between the landowner and the potential secondary right holder. Land rights are transferred through buy and sale agreements. The acquisition of land rights is governed by national land law, which places limitations on foreign nationals. Their ownership rights are not granted; only the right to use the land is. Nominee agreements with Indonesian citizens are used by some foreign nationals to own. To stop foreigners from gaining control, the Indonesian government gives priority to land owned by Indonesian nationals. Criminals also conceal assets through the employment of nominees. Therefore, Indonesian law forbids foreign nationals from owning land. Under the guise of Indonesian citizens, foreign nationals can lawfully smuggle land into Indonesia through nominee arrangements. An agreement between a foreign national and an Indonesian national is involved in this.
Pengawasan Perdagangan Ilegal Terhadap Trenggiling oleh Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Sumatera Barat Aulia Khairi, Fidela; Syofiarti, Syofiarti; Andora, Hengki
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1870

Abstract

The Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA) has one function, namely monitoring the illegal trade in wild animals, especially protected wild animals. The implementation of monitoring of illegal trade in protected wild animals by the West Sumatra BKSDA aims to protect protected wild animals from the danger of extinction and prevent trade in protected animals. However, the implementation of this function has not gone well, judging from temporary observation data showing that there is still a lot of trade in protected wild animals, especially pangolins. So, based on this, the author is interested in conducting research with the title Monitoring the Illegal Trade in Pangolins by the West Sumatra Natural Resources Conservation Agency (BKSDA).
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kewenangan Kementrian Energi Sumber Daya Mineral Dalam Pelaksanaan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Dikaitkan Dengan Pemanfaatan Mineral Ikutan Berdasarkan Perundang-Undangan Pertambangan di Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Manfaat Raissa Hamdani, Kirana; Andersen, Christian
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1871

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with abundant natural resources, especially minerals and coal. The country is among the top 10 largest mining producers in the world. Mineral mining activities, both metal and non-metal, generally produce main minerals and associated minerals. However, the important thing that needs to exist in the granting of mining business licenses is based on the mining object or based on the mining process area. This is what is disputed or ambiguous, especially compared to legislation starting from the law and its derivative regulations. According to article 2 letter e of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, Indonesia's environment must be protected and managed properly based on 14 (fourteen) principles, one of which is the principle of benefit. When associated with the principle of benefits, associated minerals can be a source of benefits because they become a new source of income for local communities. Based on Law 3 of 2020, 10% (ten percent) of the net profit of mining sales in business entities that have a Special Mining Business License (IUPK) is the right of the government, with details of 4% (four percent) for the central government and 6% (six percent) given to local governments. This research uses a type of normative legal research method that focuses on positive law and interviews.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Sewa-Menyewa Satelit Kemenhan RI Dengan Avanti Communications Secara Arbitrase Ichsan Fadillah, Farhan; Riza, Faisal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1872

Abstract

This research discusses the resolution of the breach of lease dispute regarding satellite rental between the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia and Avanti Communications through international arbitration, with a focus on analyzing the procedures conducted based on relevant regulations. The chosen research method is a normative approach utilizing primary legal sources from literature studies. The research aims to discuss dispute resolution strategies through international arbitration mechanisms in accordance with applicable laws. Arbitration is an option stipulated in a written agreement between parties aimed at resolving disputes outside conventional court processes. In the context of the case between Avanti Communications Limited and the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia, it was proven that the Ministry of Defense committed a breach of contract and is required to compensate the losses incurred by Avanti Communications Ltd. The law on damages specifies the details that can be included. There is a potential for the cancellation of a legal agreement due to negligence that leads to a breach of contract, where the cancellation of the agreement can occur if it causes harm to the relevant parties.
Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Jual Beli Tiket Konser Coldplay Secara Online Andhryani Hasibuan, Saskia; Faisal, Faisal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1873

Abstract

In this modern era, the interest of Indonesian society, especially the younger generation, in music concerts is increasing. Many consumers prefer to purchase tickets online due to its convenience, but frequent concert ticket cancellations leave them disappointed and at a loss. The normative research method is used to analyze the relevant laws, with Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code serving as a guide for online buying and selling agreements. Breach of contract often occurs in online concert ticket sales, leading to legal consequences under Article 1243 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Buyers have the right to demand contract fulfillment and compensation for losses due to the seller's negligence.
Pengaturan Hukum Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK) Sebagai FIU (Financial Inteligence Unit) di Indonesia BR, Wahyudi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1874

Abstract

Establishment of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in order to prevent and eradicate money laundering crimes in Indonesia. PPATK is an independent institution which in carrying out its duties and authority is directly responsible to the President. In this case, PPATK carries out an analysis of reports received from Financial Service Providers or other parties. Based on the results of the analysis, if indications of a criminal act of money laundering are found, the results of the analysis are submitted to law enforcement officials as financial intelligence information for follow-up. PPATK also plays a role in assisting law enforcers in dealing with other criminal acts by using various information they have or the results of analyzes carried out. PPATK has the task of preventing and eradicating the crime of money laundering. In an effort to effectively prevent and eradicate the crime of money laundering, the government has played a real role and has a high commitment, including by handling the crime of money laundering in Indonesia since the enactment of Law Number 15 of 2002 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering as amended by Law. - RI Law Number 25 of 2003 concerning amendments to Republic of Indonesia Law Number 15 of 2002 concerning the Crime of Money Laundering. Even though these two laws have shown a positive direction, they are not yet optimal. For this reason, Republic of Indonesia Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering (UU TPPU) was formed.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Keabsahan Akta Otentik Yang Memakai Surrogate Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan Richard Angling Wibisono
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1876

Abstract

Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has responsibility for the deed, an authentic deed made by and before a notary after being read out is then signed by the faces, witnesses, and notary. The problem arises when the confronter is unable to affix his signature due to either physical limitations, the confronter cannot read or write, or also the confronter has a signature that changes. For this problem, for those who cannot affix their signatures, the signatures can be replaced where at the end of the deed the notary provides a statement called a surrogate. This writing uses normative juridical research methods by conducting library research to obtain various legal materials and applicable laws and regulations. This writing aims to obtain the fact that notaries must be able to be responsible for the authentic deeds they make, whether it is affixed with signatures by the confronters or those who use surrogates as a substitute for signatures. It is hoped that through the use of surrogates in the deed, the confrontants will not experience differential treatment between one another so as to get the same sense of legal certainty and justice.
Keabsahan Perjanjian Nominee sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Prinsip Privity of Contract Ansa, Ferdi; Wicaksana, Akbar Maulana; Eklesia, Aura; Camilla K, Isabella Vania; Gracia M, Verene Praysy
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1878

Abstract

Indonesia sebagai negara yang memiliki kekayaan alam berlimpah dan membuat perusahaan asing ingin bekerja sama dengan menanamkan modal. Namun kenyataanya bukan hanya menanamkan modal tetapi ingin menguasai tanah dengan cara melakukan perjanjian pinjam nama yang dikenal dengan perjanjian nominee. Dalam prakteknya perjanjian nominee sangat dilarang karena dianggap sebagai penyelundupan hukum. Pasal 1320 dan Pasal 1338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata menjadi pertentangan dengan praktek perjanjian nominee di masyarakat. Prinsip privity of contract hanya dapat berlaku bagi para pihak yang mengikatnya

Page 341 of 387 | Total Record : 3862

 339   340   341   342   343 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue