Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITY LEADERS FOR DEDUCTIONS OF PARTICIPANTS OF EMPLOYMENT SOCIAL SECURITY ORGANIZING AGENCY IN PEKANBARU CITY Silaen, Gabriel Francius; Afrita, Indra; Harahap, Irawan
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.32891

ABSTRACTArticle 55 of Law Number 24 of 2011 concerning the Social Security Administering Body regulates criminal sanctions in imprisonment and fines for business entities that do not pay and deposit their workers' BPJS employment membership contributions to the local BPJS employment. The purpose of the study is to analyze criminal liability; and to examine obstacles and efforts to overcome them. The research method is sociological legal research, legislative approach, and cases; the research location is the Pekanbaru BPJS Employment Branch Office; population and samples from relevant sources; data sources are primary, secondary, and tertiary; data collection techniques are observation, structured interviews, and document/literature studies; data analysis is qualitative with conclusions: inductive. The study results are that Article 55 of Law Number 24 of 2011 concerning BPJS has not been fully implemented, because of the 25 business entities in Pekanbaru City that have not paid and deposited membership contributions, only 2 business entities have been subject to criminal sanctions. The implementation of criminal sanctions against the leaders of the business entity has encountered obstacles. The obstacles and efforts to overcome the obstacles are legal factors/legislation, namely: Legal factors/legislation, namely the lack of regulations governing expert witnesses so that evidence is difficult, the police's efforts to allocate a budget to present expert witnesses; Criminal law enforcement procedures in regulations must go through long and multi-sector stages, efforts to improve coordination and cooperation between agencies. Law enforcement/government factors, namely the lack of coordination and cooperation between agencies for settlement through litigation, these agencies by improving coordination and cooperation to take the litigation route; police investigators' knowledge is still limited, investigators are taking Vocational Education; ultimatum remidium is prioritized by the police, efforts if it has been 2 times then the police must apply criminal penalties; The commitment to law enforcement that has not been fully implemented by the Riau Regional Police, efforts to enforce the law according to the law; Lack of socialization so that companies are not aware of the existence of criminal sanctions, efforts to increase the intensity of the approach in terms of coaching and supervision. Community factors, namely differences in worker positions make workers afraid to report their superiors, efforts are made so that workers have the courage to report; Low worker awareness to protect themselves from the risk of work accidents, efforts are made to organize education and training; uncooperative business entities and workers have complicated the handling process at the Riau Province Manpower and Transmigration Service, efforts are made to provide guidance by the agency to business entities. Keywords: Criminal Liability, BPJS Contributions, Pekanbaru ABSTRAKPasal 55 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial mengatur sanksi pidana penjara dan denda bagi badan usaha yang tidak membayar dan menyetorkan iuran kepesertaan BPJS kerenagakerjaan pekerjanya kepada BPJS kerenagakerjaan setempat. Tujuan penelitian ialah Untuk menganalisispertanggungjawaban pidananya; Untuk menganalisis hambatan dan upaya mengatasinya. Metode penelitiaan yaitu penelitian hukum sosiologis, pendekatan perundang–undangan dan kasus; lokasi penelitian yaitu Kantor Cabang BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Pekanbaru; populasi dan sampel dari narasumber–narasumber relevan; sumber data ialah primer, sekunder dan tersier; teknik pengumpulan data ialah observasi, wawancara terstruktur dan studi dokumen/kepustakaan; analisis datanya kualitatif dengan kesimpulan: induktif. Hasil penelitian yaitu belum terlaksana sepenuhnya dalam Pasal 55 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2011 tentang BPJS , dikarenakan dari 25 badan usaha di Kota Pekanbaru yang belum membayar dan menyetor iuran kepesertaan baru 2 badan usaha yang diterapkan sanksi pidananya. Penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap pimpinan badan usaha tersbeut mengalami hambatan. Hambatan dan upaya mengatasi hambatannya adalah Faktor hukum/peraturan perundang-undangan, yaitu: Faktor Hukum/peraturan perundang-undangan yaitu masih kurang regulasi yang mengatur saksi ahli sehingga sulitnya pembuktian, upayanya pihak Kepolisian mengalokasikan anggaran guna menghadirkan saksi ahli; Prosedur penegakan hukum pidana dalam regulasi harus melalui tahapan panjang dan multi sektor, upayanya meningkatkan koordinasi dan kerjasama antar instansi. Faktor aparat penegak hukum/pemerintah yaitu Kurangnya koordinasi dan kerjasama antar instansi untuk penyelesaian secara litigasi, para instansi tersebut dengan meningkatkan koordinasi dan kerjasama untuk menempuh jalur litigasi; pengetahuan penyidik kepolisian masih terbatas, penyidiknya mengikuti Pendidikan Kejuruan; ultimum remidium dikedepankan kepolisian, upayanya jika sudah 2 kali maka pihak kepolisian harus menerapkan pemidanaan; Komitmen penegakan hukum yang belum sepenuhnya oleh Kepolisian Daerah Riau, upayanya melaksanakan penegakan hukum sesuai undang-undang; Kurangnya sosialiasai sehingga perusahaan tidak mengetahui adanya sanksi pidana, upayanya meningkatkan intensitas pendekatan dalam hal pembinaan dan pengawasan. Faktor masyarakat yaitu perbedaan posisi pekerja membuat pekerja takut melaporkan pimpinannya, upayanya Agar pekerja mempunyai keberanian melaporkan; Rendahnya kesadaran pekerja untuk memproteksi diri dari resiko kecelakaan kerja, upayanya menyelenggarakan pendidikan dan pelatihan; badan usaha dan pekerjanya yang tidak kooperatif telah mempersulit proses penangannnya di Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi Provinsi Riau, upayanya dilakukan pembinaan oleh Dinas instansi tersebut terhadap badan usaha.Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Iuran BPJS, Pekanbaru

CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR FRAUD IN CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTS FOR LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani; Darmanata, Made Swarna
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.21943

Article 280 of Law Number 8 of 2012 concerning Reporting Campaign Fund Fraud obscures the norm that only legislative candidates are responsible and not political parties. This represents a country that operates a democratic system, and freedom of speech and writing is guaranteed by the state and the constitution. Freedom of expression is regulated in Article 1 (1) of Law Number 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom of Expression in Public. Campaign funds are the most important key to honest elections and reflect the ugliness of fraudsters who, if fraud occurs in campaign funds, lead to corrupt electoral practices, namely political corruption of the organizers. In 2019, there were allegations of fraud in the reporting of campaign funds for candidate BuIeeng Dapi from the BaII National Democratic Party in the 2019 general election. It was Somvir who reported the campaign funds. The results of this research show that responsibility for fraud is based on the principle of vicarious responsibility and administrative sanctions. And the types of sanctions given are criminal sanctions and fines in accordance with Article 334 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and/or paragraph (3) and Article 335 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and/or paragraph (3 ) Law Number 7 of 2017. Keywords: Inconsistency, Position, CorruptionKeywords: Fraud, CriminaI, General EIection

THE GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN OVERCOMING AIR POLLUTION CAUSED BY STEAM POWER PLANT IN JAKARTA Syarif, Soultan; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad; Sanjaya, Suyono
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.35008

ABSTRACTThe environment is a place for humans to live, actively and have an important role to achieve and improve their prosperity. However, the main challenges for the environment come from two main sources: unsustainable use of natural resources and environmental pollution, especially by pollution. Air pollution caused by Steam Power Plant (PLTU) in Jakarta is a serious problem affecting air quality and public health. The role of the government is very important in addressing the negative impact of PLTU on the environment and public health. Strict supervision and regulations of the Power Plant are governed under various regulations, such as Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management and Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control. In addition, the Governor Regulation of Jakarta No. 66 Year 2019 also provides a framework of supervision of air pollution in Jakarta. The impact of air pollution produced by the PLTU includes environmental pollution and a wide range of public health problems. Greenhouse gas emissions and harmful particulates from PLTU can disrupt ecosystems, cause extreme climate change, and cause respiratory disorders and other diseases in humans. Therefore, resolute and sustainable actions are required, including increased use of clean technology and effective enforcement, to reduce the negative impact of air pollution by the PLTU in Jakarta. Keywords: Air Pollution, Government Role, PLTU ImpactABSTRAK Lingkungan adalah suatu tempat untuk manusia tinggal, beraktifitas dan mempunyai peranan yang penting untuk mencapai dan meningkatkan kemakmurannya. Namun, tantangan utama bagi lingkungan berasal dari dua sumber utama yaitu penggunaan sumber daya alam secara tidak berkelanjutan dan pencemaran lingkungan, khususnya oleh polusi. Polusi udara yang disebabkan oleh Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap (PLTU) di Jakarta menjadi masalah serius yang mempengaruhi kualitas udara dan kesehatan masyarakat. peran pemerintah sangatlah penting dalam mengatasi dampak negatif dari PLTU terhadap lingkungan dan kesehatan Masyarakat. Pengawasan dan regulasi yang ketat terhadap PLTU diatur dalam berbagai peraturan, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Pengendalian Pencemaran Udara. Selain itu, Peraturan Gubernur DKI Jakarta Nomor 66 Tahun 2019 juga memberikan kerangka pengawasan terhadap polusi udara di Jakarta. Dampak dari polusi udara yang dihasilkan oleh PLTU mencakup pencemaran lingkungan dan berbagai masalah kesehatan masyarakat. Emisi gas rumah kaca dan partikulat berbahaya dari PLTU dapat mengganggu ekosistem, menyebabkan perubahan iklim ekstrem, dan menyebabkan gangguan pernapasan serta penyakit lainnya pada manusia. Oleh karena itu, tindakan tegas dan berkelanjutan diperlukan, termasuk peningkatan penggunaan teknologi bersih dan penegakan hukum yang efektif, untuk mengurangi dampak negatif polusi udara oleh PLTU di Jakarta Kata kunci: Polusi Udara, Peran Pemerintah, Dampak PLTU

POSITION OF THE DECREE OF THE PEOPLE'S CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY (TAP MPR) IN THE HIERARCHY OF LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA Akbar, Aryo; Ibnususilo, Efendi; Taufiqurrahman, Faishal
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.29743

The reinsertion of the People's Consultative Assembly Decree (Tap MPR) into the hierarchical system of Indonesian statutory regulations through Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislative Regulations, has caused several problems, namely: 1) The position of the MPR Tap in the hierarchy of statutory regulations. Invitation; and 2) Which state institution should be given the authority to test the MPR Decree. The research results show that the position of the MPR Decree in the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia is in a "grey" position because after the amendment to Article 3 of the 1945 Constitution, the MPR no longer has the authority to form Decrees containing regulations that come into force. Where initially the Decree was a second-degree statutory regulation, but after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution, the Decree could no longer be issued as a statutory regulation. Meanwhile, in terms of the authority to review the MPR Decree, the authority for such review can be given to the Constitutional Court. If this has to be done, it can be done by making changes to the limitative formulation in the 1945 Constitution. This change could be in the form of adding the authority to review the MPR Decree on the 1945 Constitution by the Constitutional Court through legislative interpretation and/or judicial interpretation.Keywords: Hierarchy, Position of Tap MPR, Laws and Regulations.

FULFILLMENT OF THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW IN THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN SERVICE UNIT OF THE ROKAN HULU RESORT POLICE BASED ON LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2012 CONCERNING THE JUVENILE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Hutabarat, santa Delima; Fahmi, Fahmi; Pardede, Rudi
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.31778

ABSTRACTArticle 33 paragraph (5) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, states that: "In the event that there is no Temporary Child Placement Institution, detention can be carried out at the local Social Welfare Organizing Institution." The aim of the research is to analyze the arrangements for fulfilling children's rights at the Rokan Hulu Resort Police based on these regulations; To analyze the fulfillment of children's rights at the Rokan Hulu Resort Police based on these regulations. The research method is sociological legal research, statutory and case approaches; the research location is the Rokan Hulu Resort Police; population and samples of relevant sources; data sources are primary, secondary and tertiary; Data collection techniques are observation, structured interviews and document/library study; Data analysis is qualitative with inductive conclusion drawing. The results of the research are that these regulations have not been implemented in the Women and Children Protection Unit of the Rokan Hulu Resort Police for children in conflict with the law. The results of the research are, First, the arrangements for fulfilling children's rights in the Women's and Children's Services Unit of the Rokan Hulu Resort Police are based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, with jurisdiction the provisions in Article 33 paragraph (5) of the regulation apply. Second, the fulfillment of the children's rights in the Unit based on these regulations was not implemented, they were instead left in the detention cells of the Rambah Sector Police and mixed in one cell with adult prisoners. This is due to several factors, namely legal/legislative factors, non-regulation of sanctions, namely inadequate legal products to overcome the problem of the absence of LPSK buildings; There are no regional regulations that further regulate the obligations for the development/provision of LPSK. The law enforcement/government apparatus factor, namely the local regional government, in the APBD it prepares, never budgets for the establishment and implementation of LPSK in Rokan Hulu Regency. Facilities/facilities factor, namely people who do not understand the law and therefore do not know that children detained in the investigation process at the police level have the right to be detained at the LPSK. Community factors; namely LPSK does not exist in Rokan Hulu Regency; For the purposes of investigations at the police level it can only be carried out within a maximum of 7 (seven) days so that it is not time and cost efficient if carried out.Keywords: LPSK, Children, Rokan Hulu ABSTRAKPasal 33 ayat (5) Undang–Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, bahwa: Dalam hal tidak terdapat Lembaga Penempatan Anak Sementara, penahanan dapat dilakukan di Lembaga Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial setempat.” Tujuan penelitian ialah Untuk menganalisis pengaturan pemenuhan hak Anak tersbeut di Kepolisian Resor Rokan Hulu berdasarkan regulasi tersebut; Untuk menganalisis pemenuhan hak Anak tersebut di Kepolisian Resor Rokan Hulu berdasarkan regulasi tersebut. Metode penelitiaan ialah penelitian hukum sosiologis, pendekatan perundang–undangan dan kasus; lokasi penelitian yaitu Kepolisian Resor Rokan Hulu; populasi dan sampel dari narasumber–narasumber yang relevan; sumber data ialah primer, sekunder dan tersier; teknik pengumpulan data ialah observasi, wawancara terstruktur dan studi dokumen/kepustakaan; analisis data ialah kualitatif dengan penarikan kesimpulan induktif. Hasil penelitian yaitu regulasi tersebut belum terlaksana di Unit Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak Kepolisian Resor Rokan Hulu terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum. Hasil penelitian ialah, Pertama, Pengaturan pemenuhan hak Anak tersebut di Unit Pelayanan Perempuan dan Anak Kepolisian Resor Rokan Hulu berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak secara yurisdiksi berlaku ketentuan dalam Pasal 33 ayat (5) regulasi tersebut. Kedua, Pemenuhan hak Anak tersebut di Unit itu berdasarkan regulasi tersebut tidak terlaksana, mereka justru di titipkan di sel tahanan Kepolisian Sektor Rambah dan berbaur satu sel dengan tahanan dewasa. Hal tersebut disebabkan beberapa faktor, yaitu Faktor hukum/peraturan perundang-undangan, tidak diaturnya sanksi yaitu Produk hukum yang tidak memadai untuk mengatasi permasalahan tidak adanya bangunan LPSK; Tidak adanya peraturan daerah k yang mengatur lebih lanjut mengenai kewajiban pembangunan/ penyediaan LPSK. Faktor aparat penegak hukum/pemerintah yaitu Pemerintah daerah setempat dalam APBD yang disusunnya tidak pernah menganggarkan pendirian dan penyelenggaraan LPSK di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. Faktor sarana/fasilitas, yaitu masyarakat yang tidak paham hukum sehinga tidak mengetahui bahwa anak yang ditahan dalam proses penyidikan di tingkat kepolisian mendapatkan hak penahanan di LPSK. Faktor masyarakat; yaitu LPSK tidak ada di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu; untuk kepentingan penyidikan di tingkat kepolisian hanya boleh dilakukan paling lama 7 (tujuh) hari sehingga tidak efisiensi waktu dan biaya jika dilakukan.Kata Kunci: LPSK, Anak, Rokan Hulu

DEVELOPMENT OF OMNIBUS LAW ON MARINE SECURITY AND ITS INFLUENCE IN REGULATION OF AUTONOMOUS MARINE VEHICLE (AMV) Silviani, Ninne Zahara; tianto, Agus; Rahayu, Putri
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 1 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i1.27082

Technology cannot be separated from the maritime sector with the discovery of unmanned vessels or AMVs as a use option for various purposes. AMV technology is considered capable of providing various benefits commercially and for the security of a region. However, its development has not been followed by specific regulations, including in Indonesia. In line with this, Indonesia still has overlapping issues related to maritime security law. So a solution is needed to handle this. The method for writing this research uses a normative legal method with a conceptual and regulatory approach. The research results show that the maritime security omibus law is the government's solution in synchronizing overlapping regulations between applicable agencies with the formation of PP Number 13 of 2022 concerning maritime security. The maritime security omnibus law is still being developed until it will eventually touch on statutory regulations. In line with this, AMV technology is expected to be part of this arrangement.

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PLACEMENT OF INDONESIAN MIGRANT WORKERS IN RIAU PROVINCE BASED ON LAW NUMBER 18 OF 2017 ON PROTECTION OF INDONESIAN MIGRANT WORKERS Maesyarifah, Agesti Absah; Fahmi, Sudi; Ardiansah, Ardiansah
EKSEKUSI Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v7i1.35255

ABSTRACT Pasal 81 Undang–Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2017 tentang Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia, mengatur sanksi hukum bagi orang perseorangan yang melaksanakan penempatan Pekerja Migran Indonesia dengan pidana maksimal 10 tahun dan denda maksimal Rp. 15.000.000.000,00. Metode penelitiaan ialah penelitian hukum sosiologis dengan pendekatan perundang–undangan, kasus dan analitis lokasi penelitian: Kepolisian Daerah Riau; populasi dan sampel dari narasumber relevan; sumber data: primer, sekunder dan tersier; teknik pengumpulan data: observasi, wawancara terstruktur dan studi dokumen/kepustakaan; analisis data: kualitatif dengan kesimpulan induktif. Hasil penelitian adalah penegakan hukum yang dimaksudkan belum terlaksana dengan baik Kesimpulannya adalah Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku penempatan Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Provinsi Riau berdasarkan regulasi tersebut belum terlaksana dengan baik tahun 2021 sampai 2023 karena beberapa pelaku belum tertangkap. faktor penghambatnya ialah faktor aparat penegak hukum/ pmerintah, faktor sarana/ fasilitas dan faktor masyarakat.Kata Kunci: TPPO, Pekerja Migran Indonesia, Riau ABSTRAK Article 81 of Law Number 18 of 2017 on the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers regulates legal sanctions for individuals who engage in the placement of Indonesian Migrant Workers, with a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment and a fine of up to IDR 15,000,000,000. The research method employed is sociological legal research using statutory, case-based, and analytical approaches. The research location was the Riau Regional Police; the population and sample consisted of relevant resource persons. Data sources included primary, secondary, and tertiary data. Data collection techniques included observation, structured interviews, and document/library studies. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively, with conclusions drawn inductively. The research findings reveal that law enforcement as intended has not been effectively implemented. The conclusion is that law enforcement against individuals involved in the placement of Indonesian Migrant Workers in Riau Province based on the stated regulations has not been adequately carried out from 2021 to 2023, as several offenders have yet to be apprehended. The inhibiting factors include law enforcement/government personnel, inadequate infrastructure/facilities, and societal factors. Kata Kunci: TIP, Indonesian Migrant Workers, Riau

DISPARITY OF JUDGES' DECISIONS AGAINST CLASS I NARCOTIC DISTRIBUTORS IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PEKANBARU DISTRICT COURT BASED ON LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2009 ON NARCOTICS Ariyanto, Yuli; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Harahap, Irawan
EKSEKUSI Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v6i2.34380

ABSTRACT Article 114 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, which states that it regulates sanctions for people who without rights or against the law offer for sale, sell, buy, receive, act as intermediaries in buying and selling, exchange, or hand over Class I Narcotics.” Research objectives: to analyze the disparity in judges' decisions against Class I Narcotics dealers in the Pekanbaru City area based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, to formulate the causal factors; to find efforts to overcome it. Research methods: sociological legal research, legislative approach and case approach; research location: Pekanbaru Police; population and samples from relevant sources; data sources are primary, secondary and tertiary; data collection techniques are observation, structured interviews and document/literature studies; data analysis is qualitative; the conclusion is inductive. The results of the study are that the implementation of the intended disparity has not been carried out properly. The conclusion is First, the implementation has not been good, proven by the disparity in 6 court decisions for perpetrators who are distributors of methamphetamine narcotics from 2021 to 2023 where the disparity cannot be justified. Second, the factors causing the disparity are from the legislative factors, law enforcement officers, facilities/facilities and the community. Efforts to overcome this are From the legislative factors, the disparity in judges' decisions that are not oriented towards achieving justice and legal benefits for the wider community, should not be carried out by judges so that there are no complaints; conduct socialization of the Criminal Code which regulates the Classification of Perpetrators (Dader); judges also refer to the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1386 K/Pid.Sus/2011 dated August 3, 2011 to avoid disparity in decisions that do not provide justice. From the law enforcement factor, the Public Prosecutor takes legal action; the judge also issues a verdict based on the facts of the indictment prepared by the Public Prosecutor based on the facts that occurred; splitting (splitting of case files) is done if the role or weight of the evidence is different in a case. From the facility factor, namely the advocate with the local court conducting legal socialization regarding the importance of the presence of an advocate. From the community factor, namely the community finds out about each role of the perpetrator; the community is given legal socialization regarding matters that affect the severity of the crime in the judge's verdict; the judge is really careful in analyzing the consequences caused by the perpetrator; The defendant presents mitigating witnesses at the trial; The defendant/defendant's legal advisor takes legal action. Keywords: Dealers, Narcotics, Disparity ABSTRAK Pasal 114 ayat (1) Undang–Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, yang menyatakan bahwamengatur sanksi bagi orang yang tanpa hak atau melawan hukum menawarkan untuk dijual, menjual, membeli, menerima, menjadi perantara dalam jual beli, menukar, atau menyerahkan Narkotika Golongan I.” Tujuan penelitian: untuk menganalisis disparitas putusan hakim terhadap pelaku pengedar Narkotika Golongan I di wilayah Kota Pekanbaru berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, untuk merumuskan faktor penyebabnya; untuk menemukan upaya mengatasinya. Metode penelitiaan: penelitian hukum sosiologis, pendekatan perundang–undangan dan pendekatan kasus; lokasi penelitian: Polresta Pekanbaru; populasi dan sampel dari narasumber relevan; sumber data adalah primer, sekunder dan tersier; teknik pengumpulan data adalah observasi, wawancara terstruktur dan studi dokumen/kepustakaan; analisis data adalah kualitatif; kesimpulannya induktif. Hasil penelitian adalah Implementasi disparitas yang dimaksud belum terlaksana dengan baik. Kesimpulannya adalah Pertama, implementasinya belum baik dibuktikan terdapat disparitas terhadap 6 putusan pengadilan bagi pelaku yang merupakan pengedar dalam Narkotika jenis sabu– sabu tahun 2021 sampai 2023 dimana disparitas tidak tidak dapat dibenarkan. Kedua, Faktor penyebab disparitas dari faktor perundang-undangan, aparat penegak hukum, sarana/ fasilitas dan amsyarakat. Upaya mengatsinya ialah Dari faktor perundang-undangan, disparitas putusan hakim yang tidak berorientasi pada tercapainya keadilan dan kemanfaatan hukum bagi masyarakat luas, jangan dilakukan oleh hakim supaya tidak ada komplain; melakukan sosialisasi hukum KUHP yang mengatur mengenai Klasifikasi Pelaku (Dader); hakim juga mengacu putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 1386 K/Pid.Sus/2011 tanggal 3 Agustus 2011 untuk menghindari disparitas putusan yang tidak memberikan keadilan. Dari faktor aparat penegak hukum, Jaksa Penuntut Umum melalukan upaya hukum; hakim menjatuhkan vonis juga berdasarkan fakta dakwaan yang disusun oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum berdasarkan fakta yang terjadi; splitzing (pemecahan berkas perkara) dilakukan jika peran maupun berat barang bukti berbeda dalam suatu tindak perkara. Dari faktor sarana fasilitas yaitu yaitu advokat dengan pengadilan setempat melakukan sosialisasi hukum terkait pentingnya kehadiran advokat. Dari faktor mayarakat yaitu masyarakat mencari tahu tentang masing-masing peran pelaku; masyarakat diberikan sosialiasi hukum terkait hal-hal yang mempengaruhi berat ringannya pidana dalam vonis hakim; hakim benar-benar cermat dalam menganalisis akibat yang disebabkan oleh pelaku; Terdakwa mengadirkan saksi yang meringankan di persidangan; Terdakwa/ penasehat hukum terdakwa melakukan upaya hukum.Kata Kunci: Pengedar, Narkotika, Disparitas

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VERZET LEGAL REMEDIES IN PROTECTING THE DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS AGAINST A VERDICT OF VERSTEK AFTER PERMA NUMBER 7 OF 2022 Amalia, Ardina Nur
EKSEKUSI Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v7i1.37327

The implementation of the principles of speedy, simple, and low cost justice in civil cases is often hampered by administrative obstacles, especially in the process of summoning the parties. Responding to these problems, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 7 Year 2022 as a form of digital transformation of the judiciary, which replaces most conventional processes with an electronic system (e-Court). This research examines the effectiveness of the verzet legal remedy in protecting the defendant's rights against a verdict after the implementation of the PERMA. The focus of the discussion includes changes in the summoning mechanism, its impact on the verstek verdict, and the extent to which the e-Court system is able to contribute to access to justice. Although electronic summons provides efficiency and legal certainty, there are challenges faced by defendants, such as technological limitations, digital literacy, and various other technical obstacles that have the potential to reduce the effectiveness of verzet as an instrument of legal protection. It is important to ensure that the e-Court system is truly inclusive, easily accessible, and accompanied by adequate socialization so that the rights of the defendants are protected fairly and proportionally in the modern judicial process.Keywords: Verzet; Verstek Decision; Electronic Court System; Access to Justice.

REGENT’S LIABILITY FOR RECEIVING BRIBERY OF PROCUREMENT OF GOODS/SERVICES Tanjung, Ahmad Feri; Sianturi, Ronald Hasudungan; Christian Naldo, Rony Andre
EKSEKUSI Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Eksekusi : Journal Of Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/je.v7i1.37462

This article aims to examine the application of criminal liability to the Regent because he received bribes related to the procurement of goods/services. The act of receiving bribery is an action that is contrary to the law, especially the provisions of Article 12 B of Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The problem is focused on the application of the criminal liability of the Labuhan Batu Regent because he received bribes related to the procurement of goods/services. The theory used in analyzing the problem approach is the Theory of Criminal Liability put forward by Dwidja Priyatno. According to Dwidja Priyatno, criminal liability was born with an objective reproach against actions stated as criminal acts based on applicable criminal law, and subjectively to perpetrators who meet the requirements to be criminalized because of their actions. Data are collected through primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, as well as tertiary legal materials, and are analyzed qualitatively. This study concluded that the criminal liability applied to the Labuhan Batu Regent because receiving bribes related to the procurement of goods and services is in the form of imprisonment, criminal fines, additional crimes paying replacement money, and additional crimes in the form of revocation of the right to be elected

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
M. Alpi Syahrin

Contact Email
eksekusi.journaloflaw@gmail.com

Phone
+6285271930852

Journal Mail Official
eksekusi.journaloflaw@gmail.com

Editorial Address
http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/eksekusi/about/editorialTeam

Location
Kab. kampar,

Riau

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name M. Alpi Syahrin

Contact Email eksekusi.journaloflaw@gmail.com

Phone +6285271930852

Journal Mail Official eksekusi.journaloflaw@gmail.com

Editorial Address http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/eksekusi/about/editorialTeam

Location Kab. kampar, Riau INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
M. Alpi Syahrin

Contact Email
eksekusi.journaloflaw@gmail.com

Phone
+6285271930852

Journal Mail Official
eksekusi.journaloflaw@gmail.com

Editorial Address
http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/eksekusi/about/editorialTeam

Location
Kab. kampar,

Riau

INDONESIA