cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ekasatya Aldila Afriansyah
Contact Email
ekafrian@gmail.com
Phone
+628979550972
Journal Mail Official
mosharafajournal@institutpendidikan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung B, Lantai 2, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Indonesia (IPI) Garut Jalan Pahlawan No. 32 Sukagalih, Garut, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. garut,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Institut Pendidikan Indonesia Garut
ISSN : 20864280     EISSN : 25278827     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics Other
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (p-ISSN: 2086-4280 & e-ISSN: 2527-8827) mempublikasikan artikel ilmiah hasil penelitian dalam bidang pendidikan matematika yang belum pernah dipublikasikan. Penulis dapat berasal dari berbagai level, seperti mahasiswa (S1, S2, S3), guru, dosen, praktisi, maupun pemerhati pendidikan matematika. Mosharafa terbit tiga kali dalam satu tahun, yaitu pada bulan Januari, Mei, dan September. Penerbit Mosharafa adalah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 1,006 Documents
 97   98   99   100   101 
Fostering Students’ Critical Mathematical Thinking on Linear Equations through STEAM-Based Water Filtration Projects Pramasdyahsari, Agnita Siska; Alisya, Camelia; Wulandari, Dewi
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v15i1.3605

Abstract

Penerapan Project-Based Learning (PjBL) berpotensi mengembangkan berpikir kritis, namun integrasi masalah nyata seperti mitigasi bencana masih jarang dilakukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji keefektifan proyek mitigasi filter air berbasis STEAM dalam menumbuhkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Menggunakan desain eksperimen murni posttest-only control group, penelitian ini melibatkan 58 siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Kembang Jepara yang dipilih melalui cluster random sampling. Kelompok eksperimen menerapkan proyek STEAM, sementara kelompok kontrol menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes hasil belajar dan angket respons, lalu dianalisis menggunakan uji independent t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada kelompok eksperimen secara signifikan lebih baik dibandingkan kelompok kontrol. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa proyek mitigasi filter air berbasis STEAM efektif mengembangkan berpikir kritis serta keterampilan abad ke-21 (kreativitas, kolaborasi, dan komunikasi). Integrasi matematika dalam konteks dunia nyata melalui proyek STEAM menjadi strategi krusial untuk menumbuhkan kepedulian siswa terhadap isu mitigasi bencana. While Project-Based Learning (PjBL) is recognized for its potential to develop students' critical thinking, the integration of real-world contexts, particularly disaster mitigation, remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a STEAM-based water filter mitigation project in fostering students' critical thinking skills. Employing a true experimental posttest-only control group design, the study involved 58 seventh-grade students from SMP Negeri 3 Kembang Jepara, selected via cluster random sampling. The experimental group implemented the STEAM project, while the control group received teacher-centered conventional instruction. Data were collected through achievement tests and student response questionnaires, followed by independent t-test analysis. The findings reveal that students engaged in the STEAM-based project demonstrated significantly higher critical thinking skills than those in the conventional group. This study confirms that STEAM-based water filter mitigation projects effectively develop critical thinking and reinforce 21st-century skills, including creativity, collaboration, and communication. Furthermore, integrating mathematics into real-world contexts through STEAM serves as a crucial strategy to enhance students' awareness of disaster mitigation issues.
The Effectiveness of the Math Expert Application in Improving Students’ Mathematical Reasoning in Trigonometry Nurniawati, Devi; Yaniawati, Poppy; Firmansyah, Eka
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v15i1.3607

Abstract

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan penalaran matematis adalah aspek krusial dalam pembelajaran matematika. Namun, ketergantungan siswa pada teknologi dalam menyelesaikan soal justru memicu penurunan kemampuan penalaran tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMK menggunakan aplikasi Math Expert. Melalui metode campuran (mixed method) tipe embedded design, penelitian ini melibatkan 86 siswa kelas X SMK di Cianjur yang terbagi ke dalam kelas eksperimen dan kontrol. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner, observasi, wawancara, dan instrumen tes penalaran matematis berdasarkan standar NCTM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan pada enam indikator penalaran NCTM, yang meliputi kemampuan: justifikasi kesimpulan; pengujian dugaan matematis; evaluasi argumen; variasi metode solusi; pengorganisasian data masalah; serta penilaian terhadap hasil kerja orang lain. Secara keseluruhan, penggunaan aplikasi Math Expert terbukti efektif meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMK, meskipun tingkat peningkatan pada setiap indikator bervariasi. Problem-solving and mathematical reasoning are crucial aspects of mathematics education. However, students' over-reliance on technology for problem-solving has triggered a decline in these specific reasoning abilities. This study aims to analyze the mathematical reasoning skills of vocational high school (SMK) students through the implementation of the Math Expert application. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach with an embedded design, the research involved 86 tenth-grade students in Cianjur, divided into experimental and control groups. Data were collected via questionnaires, observations, interviews, and mathematical reasoning tests based on NCTM standards. The findings indicate significant differences across six NCTM reasoning indicators, including the ability to: justify conclusions; test mathematical conjectures; evaluate arguments; employ diverse solution methods; organize situational problem data; and assess the work of others. Overall, the results demonstrate that the Math Expert application effectively enhances students' mathematical reasoning skills, although the degree of improvement varies across the specific indicators.
From Linearity to Iteration: Navigating Polya's Problem-Solving Stages in an e-PBL Geometry Environment Haqq, Arif Abdul; Wahid, Sirojudin; Izzati, Nurma; Riyanto, Onwardono Rit; Alves, Dionisio Aquino; Sulistiawati, Sulistiawati; Nugraha, Aditiya Eka
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v15i1.3613

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana mahasiswa mengalami dan memaknai tahapan pemecahan masalah Polya saat mengerjakan tugas geometri dalam lingkungan electronic Problem-Based Learning (e-PBL) yang diimplementasikan melalui sistem manajemen pembelajaran berbasis Moodle yang dikustomisasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain deskriptif kualitatif dengan sumber data berupa artefak pemecahan masalah tertulis, wawancara semi-terstruktur, dan jejak digital selama e-PBL. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik Braun dan Clarke dengan pengodean deduktif berdasarkan empat tahap Polya dan pengodean induktif untuk menangkap pola penalaran yang muncul. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemecahan masalah berlangsung secara dinamis dan rekursif. Tahap memahami dan merencanakan melibatkan penafsiran ulang representasi multimodal, sedangkan tahap pelaksanaan ditandai oleh pergeseran representasi yang memperjelas konsep. Prompt reflektif dalam e-PBL mendukung deteksi kesalahan dan penguatan konsep, serta menegaskan peran tahap evaluasi. This study examines how students experience and interpret Polya’s problem-solving stages while working on geometry tasks in an electronic Problem-Based Learning (e-PBL) environment implemented through a customized Moodle based learning management system. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected from written problem-solving artefacts, semi-structured interviews, and digital traces generated during e-PBL activities. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke, combining deductive coding based on Polya’s four stages with inductive coding to capture emerging reasoning patterns. The findings indicate that problem-solving is enacted as a dynamic and recursive process rather than a linear sequence. Understanding and planning involve repeated reinterpretation of multimodal representations, while execution is characterized by representational shifts that support conceptual clarity. Reflective prompts in e-PBL facilitate error detection and conceptual consolidation, highlighting the importance of the evaluative stage.
The Effectiveness of The Mathematics in Context Approach on Students’ Problem-Solving Ability Aras, Irianto; Turmudi, Turmudi; Herman, Tatang; Mutaqin, Ejen Jenal
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v15i1.3615

Abstract

Pembelajaran matematika memerlukan pendekatan relevan untuk mengembangkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah kompleks. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi efektivitas pendekatan Mathematics in Context (MiC) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa kelas V di tiga sekolah dasar Kabupaten Pinrang. Penelitian dilakukan sebanyak 17 pertemuan menggunakan bahan ajar dan panduan guru yang telah divalidasi ahli. Data dikumpulkan melalui instrumen pretes dan postes yang mengukur lima aspek pemecahan masalah: analisis, desain, eksplorasi, implementasi, dan verifikasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan adanya perbedaan rata-rata kemampuan siswa yang signifikan sebelum dan sesudah perlakuan di ketiga sekolah. Berdasarkan skor N-Gain, pendekatan MiC terbukti cukup efektif meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa; aspek analisis, desain, dan eksplorasi berada pada kategori sedang, sementara aspek implementasi dan verifikasi berada pada kategori rendah. Temuan ini menyimpulkan bahwa pendekatan MiC efektif dalam membantu siswa memahami dan merancang strategi penyelesaian, namun kurang optimal dalam meningkatkan kemampuan prosedur penyelesaian (implementasi) dan verifikasi jawaban. Mathematics education aims to cultivate students' ability to solve complex mathematical problems, necessitating the use of relevant pedagogical approaches. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Mathematics in Context (MiC) approach on the mathematical problem-solving skills of fifth-grade students across three elementary schools in Pinrang Regency. The intervention was conducted over seventeen sessions using MiC-based instructional materials and teacher guides validated by experts. Data were collected via pre-test and post-test instruments measuring five dimensions of problem-solving: analysis, design, exploration, implementation, and verification. Analysis revealed a significant difference in mean problem-solving scores before and after the MiC intervention across all schools. N-Gain analysis results indicate that the MiC approach is moderately effective in enhancing student performance; specifically, the analysis, design, and exploration aspects reached the "medium" category, while implementation and verification remained in the "low" category. These findings suggest that while the MiC approach effectively supports students in understanding and designing problem-solving strategies, it is less optimal in improving procedural execution and solution verification.
Needs Analysis: Developing Scratch Media with Sumedang Local Wisdom to Enhance Students' Computational Thinking Rosita, Neneng Tita; Putra, Beni Yusepa Ginanjar; Suhendar, Yusup
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v15i1.3623

Abstract

Transformasi digital menuntut penguasaan berpikir komputasional (computational thinking/CT) sebagai fondasi utama pendidikan matematika. Namun, keterampilan penalaran logis siswa di Kabupaten Sumedang masih rendah karena pembelajaran belum mengoptimalkan kearifan lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis profil awal kemampuan CT siswa pada aspek dekomposisi, pengenalan pola, abstraksi, dan algoritma, serta mengidentifikasi kebutuhan terhadap media interaktif berbasis Scratch. Menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE yang dibatasi pada tahap analisis, penelitian ini melibatkan 32 siswa kelas VIII dan tiga guru matematika di sebuah SMP Negeri di Sumedang. Data dihimpun melalui tes CT, kuesioner, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Temuan menunjukkan kemampuan CT siswa masih rendah, terutama pada aspek abstraksi (18,98%) dan algoritma (16,01%). Hasil analisis kebutuhan menunjukkan tingkat urgensi yang sangat tinggi (83%) bagi pengembangan media berbasis Scratch terintegrasi kearifan lokal Sumedang sebagai sarana penguatan penalaran komputasional dan motivasi belajar siswa. Digital transformation necessitates the mastery of computational thinking (CT) as a fundamental pillar of mathematics education. However, students' logical reasoning skills in Sumedang Regency remain underdeveloped, largely because instructional methods have yet to optimize the use of local wisdom. This study aims to analyze the initial CT profiles of students, focusing on decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithms, and to identify the necessity for Scratch-based interactive learning media. Adopting the ADDIE development model, limited to the analysis phase, the study involved 32 eighth-grade students and three mathematics teachers at a public junior high school in Sumedang. Data were gathered through CT competency tests, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. The findings reveal that students' CT skills are low, particularly in abstraction (18.98%) and algorithms (16.01%). Furthermore, the needs analysis indicates a high level of urgency (83%) for developing Scratch-based media integrated with Sumedang’s local wisdom as a cognitive tool to strengthen computational reasoning and enhance student motivation.
Mathematical Thinking Processes of Junior High School Students in Solving Contextual Problems Based on Learning Styles Setiyani, Setiyani; Bakar, Marwia Tamrin; Karimah, Nurul Ikhsan; Sumarwati, Sri
Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education Program IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/mosharafa.v15i1.3626

Abstract

Masalah kontekstual menuntut proses berpikir matematis yang runtut, logis, dan reflektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis proses berpikir matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual berdasarkan kerangka Mason (tahap entry, attack, dan review) ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini melibatkan siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri di Kota Cirebon. Tiga subjek dipilih secara purposif untuk mewakili gaya belajar visual, auditori, dan kinestetik. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes, angket gaya belajar, dan wawancara mendalam. Hasil menunjukkan perbedaan karakteristik berpikir: siswa visual memenuhi seluruh indikator pada semua tahapan; siswa auditori mampu pada tahap entry dan attack namun terbatas dalam mengembangkan solusi pada tahap review; sedangkan siswa kinestetik hanya memenuhi sebagian indikator dan kesulitan dalam justifikasi serta refleksi. Temuan ini menegaskan pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap kualitas proses berpikir matematis. Implikasinya, pembelajaran matematika perlu dirancang secara adaptif untuk memperkuat penalaran dan refleksi siswa sesuai karakteristik belajarnya. Contextual problems in mathematics require a mathematical thinking process that is coherent, logical, and reflective. This study aims to analyze students' mathematical thinking processes in solving contextual problems based on Mason’s framework—comprising the entry, attack, and review phases—viewed through learning styles. Utilizing a descriptive qualitative approach, the study involved seventh-grade students at a state junior high school in Cirebon. Three subjects were purposively selected to represent visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Data were gathered through mathematical thinking tests, learning style questionnaires, and in-depth interviews. The results reveal distinct characteristics: visual learners met all indicators across all phases; auditory learners succeeded in the entry and attack phases but struggled with developing alternative solutions during the review phase; while kinesthetic learners only met partial indicators and faced difficulties in providing justification and reflection. These findings underscore the influence of learning styles on the quality of mathematical thinking. Consequently, mathematics instruction should be adaptively designed to strengthen student reasoning and reflection according to their learning characteristics.

Page 101 of 101 | Total Record : 1006

 97   98   99   100   101 

Filter by Year

2012 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 14 No. 4 (2025): October Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): January Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): July Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): April Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): January Vol. 12 No. 4 (2023): October Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): July Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): April Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): January Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): September Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Mei Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): Januari Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2021): September Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): Mei Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021): Januari Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2020): September Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020): Mei Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020): Januari Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2019): September Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019): Mei Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019): Januari Vol. 7 No. 3 (2018): September Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018): Mei Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018): Januari Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017): September Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017): Mei Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Januari Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2016): September Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): Mei Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016): Januari Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2015): September Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015): Mei Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015): Januari Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2014): September Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2014): Mei Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014): Januari Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2013): September Vol. 2 No. 2 (2013): Mei Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2013): Januari Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): September Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012): Mei More Issue