cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 802 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
Upaya Pembuktian Oditur Militer dan Pertimbangan Hakim Memutus Tindak Pidana Desersi dalam Waktu Damai dengan Pemberatan Bisma Cahya Raditya
Verstek Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i1.30042

Abstract

     This research examines the issues regarding what the attempts to verify the Military Oditur against the crime of desertion in peacetime with a denunciation have used valid evidences pursuant to Article 172 of the Military Justice Act and whether the considerations of the Military Court Judge decide upon the desertion in peace with the objections are in accordance with Article 171 jo Article 190 Military Justice Law jo Article 26 of the Military Criminal Code. This research is the normative legal research that is both prescriptive and applied. The approach is used that is the approach the case. Type and source material primary law is law and secondary law materials obtained by means of the study of librarianship. Legal materials analysis techniques with the method of deductive syllogisms that connects the major premise and minor premise further drawn the conclusion.     The results derived from this study on the suitability of the verifcation of the Military Oditur against the desertion in peace with the objections of using the lawful evidence according to Article 172 of the Military Justice Act. Legal evidence is the testimony of witnesses, expert information, defendant’s statements, letters, and instructions. And the consideration of the Judge of the Military Tribunal to decide the crime of desertion in peace with the objections has been in accordance with Article 171 jo Article 190 of the Military Justice Law jo Article 26 of the Military Criminal Code by stating that the Defendant is proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a crime of desertion in peace with a denunciation and imprisonment for 10 months and was dismissed from military service.Keywords: Proof, Military Oditur, Judge Consideration, Crime Desertion In Peaceful Time With Obstacles
Pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung Mengadili Perkara Memperdagangkan Barang Hasil Pelanggaran Merek Yunus Della Amartha
Verstek Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i2.34312

Abstract

    Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengadili perkara memperdagangkan barang hasil pelanggaran merek. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Diketahui bahwa pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengadili perkara memperdagangkan barang hasil pelanggaran merek pihak lain telah sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 256 jo Pasal 193 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Mahmakah Agung berpendapat bahwa Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung tidak tepat menerapkan hukum berupa ketidakcermatan judex factie menilai fakta yang meringankan yakni ketidaktahuan Terdakwa atas kondisi barang yang diterimanya adalah barang palsu. Berdasar pada pertimbangan tersebut, Mahkamah Agung kemudian membatalkann putusan Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 39/PID.Sus Merek/2015/PT.BDG tanggal 17 Maret 2015 dan menjatuhkan menjatuhkan pidana oleh karena itu terhadap Terdakwa dengan pidana penjara selama 4 (empat) bulan, menetapkan bahwa pidana tersebut tidak perlu dijalani kecuali jika dikemudian hari ada putusan Hakim yang menentukan lain, karena Terdakwa melakukan suatu tindakan pidana sebelum masa percobaan selama 8 (delapan) bulan.    Kata Kunci: Pertimbangan Hakim, Tindak Pidana Merek 
Putusan Lepas (Onslag Van Alle Rect Vervolging) Dengan Alasan Judex Factie Mengabaikan Ahli BPKP Dalam Perkara Korupsi Jeelyke Nilaria Suki Putri
Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38784

Abstract

    This study aims to determine the prosecutor's building laws, in asking the reason the reason in order to appeal against the decision off Judex factie and legal argument Judge Appeals to consider the reason the appeal of the Public Prosecutor in the Supreme Court No.1036.K/Pid.Sus/2010.     This research is a normative prescriptive law, USING case approach. The type of material used is a source of law primary legal materials in the form of  Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Code), Act No. 5 of 2004 on amendments to the Law No. 14 year 1985 on the Supreme Court, Law Number 31 of 1999 on the eradication of corruption, as amended and supplemented by Act 20 of 2001 Number. Secondary sources of legal materials in the form of books, papers, papers, articles, source of internet-related, and other legal materials in the form of tertiary Big Indonesian Dictionary, law dictionary. Technical analysis of the legal materials is to use deductive analysis is to draw conclusions from things that are common to the problems faced concrete.Keywords: Reason Cassation, Expert BPKP, Argument Supreme Court Judges, Corruption. 
Upaya Hukum Kasasi Terhadap Pengabaian Alat Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Judex Factie Dalam Perkara Pemalsuan Surat Fadly Raiz Vergadinata
Verstek Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i2.34291

Abstract

     Penelitian ini mengkaji permasalahan mengenai alasan permohonan Kasasi Penuntut Umum terhadap Pengabaian Alat Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Judex Factie Dalam Perkara Pemalsuan Surat telah sesuai Pasal 184 ayat (1) huruf d jo Pasal 197 ayat (1) huruf d dan f jo Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP dan mengkaji mengenai Pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan permohonan Kasasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Sumber bahan hukum diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.Studi kasus menjadi pendekatan penulisan hukum ini. Pengajuan Kasasi oleh Penuntut Umum yang menyatakan Judex Factie menerapkan hukum dengan salah yaitu tidak menerapkan ketentuan Pasal 185 Ayat (6) KUHAP serta tidak menerapkan ketentuan Pasal 188 Ayat (1), (2) KUHAP dalam pengambilan keputusan, hal tersebut telah sesuai dengan Pasal 253 ayat (1) KUHAP. Alasan Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan menjelaskan bahwa Pengadilan Negeri tidak menerapkan hukum sebagaimana mestinya dalam penerapan alat bukti petunjuk, sehingga Mahkamah Agung mengabulkan alasan Kasasi Penuntut Umum, membatalkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri, dan mengadili sendiri dengan menyatakan bahwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana “Pemalsuan Surat”.        Kata Kunci: Kasasi, Alat Bukti Petunjuk, Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat  
Pertimbangan Hukum Mahkamah Agung Memutus Perkara Penipuan Secara Berlanjut dan Pencucian Uang Achmad Mirza Fahlevi
Verstek Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i1.30032

Abstract

     This study aims to determine the consideration of the Supreme Court adjudicating the Cassation appeal to the case of continuous fraud and money laundering. The research method used is normative legal research. The approach used is the approach of law and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. It is known that the Supreme Court’s consideration granted the Cassation appeal to the case of continuous fraud and money laundering with Defendant Masjaya bin Nurdin proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act “Continuous Fraud and Money Laundering” and imposing a penalty on the Defendant therefore by criminal imprisonment for 8 (eight) years and a fne of Rp. 1,000,000,000 (one billion rupiah), provided that if the fne is not paid, the Defendant shall be subject to a fve-month imprisonment based on the error of judex facti considering the element of deceit or lies from the actions of the Defendant, CV business. GDC from Makassar RegionalGovernment is to trade herbal medicine, but in fact CV. GDC does not do herbal medicine, but collects funds from the community. therefore, the balance of the Supreme Court is in conformity with the provisions contained in Article 256 jo of Article 193 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Keywords: Judge Consideration, Money Laundering Crime, Crime Fraud.
Analisis Pengajuan Kasasi Atas Alasan Pengabaian Alat Bukti Petunjuk Perkara Pencurian Dalam Keadaan Memberatkan Satrio Anugrah Perdana
Verstek Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i2.34307

Abstract

    Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung dalam memutus kasasi penuntut umum dalam perkara pencurian dalam keadaan memberatkan telah sesuai dengan Pasal 197 ayat (1) huruf d KUHAP. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Judex Facti keliru dalam cara mengadili dengan tidak melaksanakan menurut ketentuan undang-undang, yaitu dalam melakukan pemeriksaan dan mengadili perkara a quo dengan tidak didasarkan pada Surat Dakwaan Penuntut Umum. Majelis Hakim telah keliru menafsirkan istilah yang disebut dalam Pasal 363 Ayat (1) KUHP, terhadap unsur mengambil sesuatu barang, Hakim perkara a quo telah keliru memenggal unsur mengambil barang sesuatu tanpa mempertimbangkan unsur secara melawan hukum tanpa mempertimbangkan keterangan para saksi.     Kata kunci : Kasasi, Pertimbangan Hakim, Pengabaian Alat Bukti, Pencurian
Tinjauan Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana Pokok dan Tambahan Dalam Perkara Melanggar Kesusilaan di Depan Orang Lain Pindo Asmara Tungga Deva
Verstek Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i1.30064

Abstract

      This research examines the issues regarding the reason of application for Cassation against the Military ignored his judge advocate elements in the allegations in the trial in the case violated decency and reviewing about consideration Judex Juris grant petition for cassation and your imprisonment and dismissal from military service. This research is the normative legal research is both prescriptive and applied. The source of the legal materials obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. Case study into approaches to the writing of this law.Legal materials collection techniques in this research is the study of the literature. Legal material obtained is then processed using the method of deductive syllogisms. In this study, has been known to excuse the military judge advocate submits Remedy of Cassation on the basis of careful not Factie Judex in considering the elements that allegations the trial that resulted in the main Military Court judges had been wrong in applying the law in an award has freed the defendant of all charges of the military judge advocate in criminal acts of Decency in accordance with condition of article 239 paragraph (1) letter a Act No. 31 of the year 1997 concerning Military Justice explain what a true rule of law is not applied or not applied as it should be. As well as suitability Considerations Judex Juris grant reason of Cassation judge advocate of the military, the military High Court ruling cancelling, and judge themselves by stating that based on considerations of the above Supreme Court the defendant is argues has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing criminal acts as didakwakan by a military judge advocate in the impeachment Article 281 paragraph (2) the book of the law of criminal law Criminal Code (KUHP) saying that anyone who deliberately and in front of other people who are there are there contrary to his will, breaking decency.Keywords: Cassation, elements in the indictmen, Criminal act of Decency
Alasan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Kekeliruan Judex Factie Tidak Menerapkan Hukum Pembuktian Pada Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Dan Penganiayaan Berat Eva Pranata Br Dolok Saribu
Verstek Vol 7, No 3 (2019): DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i3.38270

Abstract

    Penelitian ini membahas mengenai alasan permohoan Kasasi yang diajukan Penuntut Umum terhadap putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 55/Pid/2015/PT.Bdg yang memperkuat putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sumedang Nomor 200/Pid.B/2014/PN.Smd atas dasar Judex Factie salah menerapkan hukum dalam perkara pembunuhan berencana dan penganiayaan luka berat, dengan Terdakwa Hadi Sucipto sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 253 KUHAP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Alasan pengajuan Kasasi oleh Penuntut Umum terhadap kekeliruan Judex Factie tidak menerapkan hukum pembuktian pada Pasal 188 ayat (1) KUHAP yaitu keterangan saksi, surat dan keterangan Terdakwa pada tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana dan penganiayaan luka berat sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 253 ayat (1) Huruf a KUHAP tentang pemeriksaan dalam tingkat Kasasi dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung, karena Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung yang menguatkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sumedang atas dasar Judex Factie salah menerapkan hukum dalam pertimbangan yang menyatakan tidak menetapkan atau menetapkan peraturan hukum sebagaimana mestinya.    Kata Kunci: Kasasi, Pertimbangan Hakim, Pembunuhan Berencana Dan Penganiayaan Berat.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Agung Dalam Mengadili Permohonan Kasasi Penggelapan Betty Kusumaningrum; Edy Herdyanto., S.H., M.H
Verstek Vol 5, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v5i1.33408

Abstract

      This research aims to find out what is the basis for consideration of Supreme Court for granted and rejected an cassation in the case of embezzlement in the decision of the Supreme CourtNumber: 373 K/Pid/2015, wasin accordance with the requirements of formal and the terms material of the Criminal Procedure Code.      This research is a study of doctrinal in a way to the law primary and secondary. The technique of collecting material law in this paper is the study of literature that is the collection of legal materials through material written law. The analysis of the legal materials conducted by the deductive method and drawn the conclusion to construct arguments.     Based on the results of research and discussions are produced, it can be concluded that in the case of embezzlement of trademark righta committed by the defendant Soeharso, consideration of the Supreme Court in examining and deciding an cassation by prosecutors against the verdict free from any lawsuits High Court of Semarang on appeal in compliance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code.     (Keyword : Legal Considerations, The Supreme Court, Embezzlement)
Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan Maya Hildawati Ilham
Verstek Vol 7, No 3 (2019): DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v7i3.38286

Abstract

    Penulisan ini mengkaji permasalahan mengenai asas peradilan cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan memberikan pengaruh terhadap praktik pencarian keadilan dan idealitas asas tersebut agar dapat berlaku efektif dalam penegakan hukum. Penelitian hukum ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Jenis bahan hukum sekunder meliputi bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah studi kepustakaan dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, instrumen penelitian ini berupa KUHAP, Undang-Undang No 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, dan Putusan MA Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017. Hasil penelitian ini diketahui bahwa asas peradilan cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan pada kasus Putusan Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017 tidak memberikan pengaruh pencarian keadilan dan idealitas dari asas ini adalah sebagai sebuah rambu di dalam proses penegakan hukum sehingga tidak terjadi penyimpangan asas demi untuk pemenuhan upaya hukum yang dipaksakan oleh penegak hukum.    Kata Kunci: Asas Peradilan Cepat, Pencari Keadilan

Page 55 of 81 | Total Record : 802

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

2013 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 4: OKTOBER - DESEMBER 2024 Vol 12, No 3: JULI - SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol 11, No 4 (2023) Vol 11, No 3: 2023 Vol 11, No 2: 2023 Vol 11, No 1: JANUARI - APRIL 2023 Vol 11, No 1: 2023 Vol 10, No 4: 2022 Vol 10, No 3: 2022 Vol 10, No 2: 2022 Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI - APRIL Vol 10, No 1: 2022 Vol 9, No 4: 2021 Vol 9, No 3: 2021 Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 2: 2021 Vol 9, No 1: 2021 Vol 9, No 2: MEI - AGUTUS Vol 8, No 3 (2020): DESEMBER JURNAL VERSTEK VOL. 8 NO. 3 ( SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER 2020 ) Vol 8, No 2 (2020): AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1 (2020): APRIL Vol 8, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 8, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 7, No 3 (2019): DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019): APRIL Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword Vol 7, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018): DESEMBER Vol 6, No 2 (2018): AGUSTUS Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 3 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 3 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue