cover
Contact Name
Boni Saputra
Contact Email
bonisaputra@fis.unp.ac.id
Phone
+6281266851825
Journal Mail Official
publicness@ppj.unp.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Prof. Hamka, Kel. Air Tawar Barat, Kec. Padang Utara, Kota Padang, Prov. Sumatera Barat, 25132
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Publicness: Journal of Public Administration Studies
ISSN : 28301714     EISSN : 28300963     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/publicness.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
PUBLICNESS: Journal of Public Administration Studies ISSN 2830-1714 (Print) ISSN 2830-0963 (Electornic) is a peer-reviewed scientific and open access journal published by Universitas Negeri Padang. The journal is dedicated to disseminating the conceptual thoughts, ideas, and research results that have been achieved in the area of public administration, public policy and public service management – translating theory for practice and practice into theory. PUBLICNESS: Journal of Public Administration Studies is a truly global journal in scope, covering developed, emerging and transitional states, nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations, and all areas of public activity. We welcome theoretical, analytical, quantitative, qualitative, empirical, and practitioner-based, as well as individual country-based, region-based, and especially comparative works.
Articles 231 Documents
Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Reviu Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LKjIP) oleh APIP Kota Pekanbaru: Pendekatan Model Evaluasi CIPP Noviyanti, Aisyah; Heriyanto, Meyzi; As’ari, Hasim
PUBLICNESS: Journal of Public Administration Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): PUBLICNESS: Journal of Public Administration Studies
Publisher : Policy, Law and Political Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/publicness.v5i1.358

Abstract

The review of Government Agency Performance Reports (LKjIP) conducted by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) is a crucial instrument for ensuring the quality of public sector performance accountability. However, in practice, the implementation of LKjIP reviews is not always followed by substantive improvements in performance reporting quality. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of LKjIP reviews by APIP in Pekanbaru City using the CIPP Evaluation Model (Context, Input, Process, Product). The study adopts a qualitative evaluative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and limited observation. Informants were purposively selected from APIP officials and relevant stakeholders involved in the preparation and utilization of LKjIP. Data analysis was conducted interactively by categorizing findings according to the CIPP dimensions. The results indicate that, normatively, LKjIP reviews have been implemented in accordance with applicable regulations and have produced Review Result Reports as a form of limited assurance. Nevertheless, in terms of context, input, process, and product, the implementation of LKjIP reviews has not fully contributed to substantive improvements in performance accountability. Organizational readiness gaps, variations in APIP competencies, limitations in performance data quality, and weak follow-up mechanisms were identified as key factors constraining the effectiveness of the review process. This study concludes that a gap remains between normative compliance and the substantive impact of LKjIP reviews.