cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
pandecta@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
pandecta@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Law Journals Development Center, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang. K 3 Building 1st Floor, UNNES Sekaran Campus, Jln. Kampus Timur, Sekaran Gunungpati, Semarang 50229, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : 19078919     EISSN : 23375418     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Pandecta Research Law Journal is a scientific legal publication dedicated to exploring contemporary legal issues in Indonesia. Specializing in Indonesian law, this journal consistently publishes a diverse array of articles across various legal domains. With a firm commitment to fostering international collaboration and knowledge exchange, Pandecta Research Law Journal serves as a prominent platform for disseminating legal research findings and facilitating discussions on the dynamic developments in the Indonesian legal landscape. Indonesia, as a developing country, offers a rich and fascinating landscape for legal development studies. Its extensive jurisdiction encompasses a diverse array of factors, including social politics, culture, ethnicity, religion, and local wisdom. These multifaceted influences contribute to the complexity and diversity of legal developments in Indonesia, rendering them both captivating and highly relevant to the international community. The unique interplay of these elements makes legal studies in Indonesia not only interesting but also invaluable for gaining insights into the broader global context and understanding the dynamics of legal systems worldwide.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 41 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Questioning the Validity of the New York Convention 1958 on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Indonesia Roosdiono, Anangga W.; Taqwa, Muhamad Dzadit
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.4099

Abstract

This article questions the legal validity of the New York Convention of 1958 ("NYC 1958") on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. A critical review is conducted based on the principle of lex posterior derogat lex priori when the provisions of NYC 1958 are compared with Articles 65 to 69 concerning the enforcement of international arbitral awards in Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (Law 30/1999), which emerged approximately 18 years after (posteriori to) the ratification of NYC 1958 through Presidential Decree No. 34 of 1981. There appears to be—from the perspective of legal scholars—a paradigmatic difference between the two, namely that NYC 1958 places greater value on foreign arbitral awards, while Law 30/1999 is less appreciative of them, leading to the presumption that Law 30/1999 nullifies the legal validity of NYC 1958. Can this perception be justified? The answer to this question shapes the judicial paradigm when faced with applications for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. This article, doctrinally, compares and links the paradigmatic nuances between NYC 1958 and Law 30/1999 with regard to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards by closely examining the textual provisions of each regulation.
Model of Supervision of Unregistered Community Organisations in Order to Realise Legal Certainty in Indonesia Dyanata, Nandu; Budiono, Abdul Rachmad; Anshari, Tunggul; Djatmika, Prija
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.4179

Abstract

As social creatures, humans have a tendency to live in society and organise their lives, which is guaranteed by the constitution, which provides guarantees for association and organisation. This freedom has implications where currently there are many community organisations that exist with various objectives, the existence of community organisations themselves in the country has been far more advanced in its work to empower the community. The problem is that CSOs currently have two forms, namely registered and unregistered, so there are problems in supervision. The variety of mass organisations gave birth to various groups, one of which was based on religious ideology, such as Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) which was dissolved on 19 July 2017. The Law on Mass Organisations affirms the principles that must be used in the establishment of mass organisations, one of the prohibitions is that mass organisations must not conflict with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. However, there is no definite formulation regarding the indicators of being contrary to Pancasila or Anti- Pancasila. Various restrictions are displayed in the form of prohibitions that show the existence of the existence of a mass organisation law. However, the application of the law should have a balance of inherent matters, namely between rights and obligations.
The Urgency of Amending the Balikpapan City Regulation on License to Open State Land Rahmatika, Nur Auliya; Safa'at, Muchamad Ali; Hadiyantina, Shinta
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.4599

Abstract

Through the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency, the central government has established a national priority program called the Acceleration of Systematic Complete Land Registration (PTSL). The program is a first-time land registration process undertaken synchronously in all parts of Indonesia. The PTSL is a form of legal certainty guaranteed by the central government related to land rights to the citizens. However, as part of its regional authority, Balikpapan City regulated the ownership of a License to Open State Land (IMTN) as one of the requirements for PTSL. In the end, it creates a problem in implementing PTSL in Balikpapan City due to the time-consuming process of IMTN letter registration. Although it is disadvantageous for citizens, the requirement of an IMTN letter is in accordance with the Regional Regulation of Balikpapan City. This research is aimed to determine the legal certainty of land rights registration for Balikpapan City people. The research method used in the research is normative juridical, with a statutory approach. The research data is obtained through a literature study for primary data and obtained by direct research in 2021 for secondary data. The research shows that local regulations of Balikpapan City that require IMTN ownership as a condition for PTSL submission are, in fact, in conflict with the Regulation of the Minister of ATR / BPN. Therefore, to achieve legal certainty related to land management in Balikpapan City, it is necessary to adjust the Regional Regulation of Balikpapan City Number 1 Year 2014 on IMTN.
Can Dual-Class Shares Thrive in Indonesia’s Capital Market? A Legal Comparison with Asia’s Financial Powerhouses Pati, Umi Khaerah; Pratama, Anugrah Muhtarom
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.4978

Abstract

The introduction of dual-class shares (DCS) in Indonesia, particularly for technology startups, aims to foster innovation and enhance market competitiveness by allowing firms to retain control while accessing capital. This study investigates the implementation of multiple voting shares (MVS) within the DCS framework as outlined in POJK Number 22/POJK.04/2021, analyzing its effectiveness in Indonesia compared to other Asian financial hubs like Hong Kong and China, and offering a comparative legal analysis with the United States and Singapore. The findings reveal that despite the potential of DCS, Indonesia’s capital market faces challenges, including the reluctance of companies to adopt this structure due to stringent requirements such as market capitalization and audited revenue, which often impede startups from going public. In contrast, countries like the United States and Singapore have adopted a more flexible approach, omitting such requirements, making the DCS model more attractive. The research underscores the urgency for Indonesia to reconsider its regulatory approach to technology startups and capital market access. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative analysis across diverse jurisdictions, identifying legal and regulatory barriers to the successful adoption of DCS in Indonesia. This study contributes to the discourse by proposing a hybrid regulatory approach, suggesting that market capitalization and audited revenue should only be considered when sustainability points cannot be quantified, as practiced in the United States and Singapore. Such a shift could help Indonesia foster a more dynamic and inclusive capital market, encouraging the growth of technology startups while maintaining investor protection and market stability.
Law Responsible in the Development of Local Rules on the Tourism Health in Magelang City Suwandoko, Suwandoko; Winanta, Rizza Arge; Perdana, Bonifasius Endo Gauh; Hardyati, Desty Puteri Hardyati; Kusuma , Trisma Arindhita
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.5681

Abstract

The right to health in tourism places is very necessary to guarantee the right to health for tourists. Health insurance at tourist attractions aims to prevent and overcome unexpected events that will have a negative impact on tourists' health. Tourism management in Magelang City does not have regulations related to tourism health. So, the Magelang City Government needs to prepare regional regulations regarding health tourism, which have a responsive legal character, namely according to community needs and there is community participation in every drafting process. This research aims to analyze the urgency of forming regional regulations on tourism health in Magelang City and the role of responsive law in forming regional regulations on tourism health in Magelang City. The type of research is empirical juridical research, the data sources are primary data and secondary data, the data analysis technique is the interaction analysis model. Research results the urgency of forming regional regulations regarding tourism health in Magelang City is in line with the right to health at tourist attractions based on philosophical, sociological and juridical aspects to guarantee the right to health for tourists, the community around tourist attractions, and tourist attraction managers. The role of responsive law in the formation of regional regulations on tourism health in Magelang City refers to the importance of the community participating in the formation of regional regulations on tourism health, in which case the regional regulations formed have a responsive character.
Failure Of Diversion And Fulfillment Of The Best Interests Of Children In Conflict With The Law Waluyadi; Muslikhah; Mariana, Montisa
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.5972

Abstract

This study critically examines the failure of diversion programs in fulfilling the best interests of children in conflict with the law. Diversion, which aims to redirect juvenile offenders from the formal justice system toward rehabilitation, has been a key principle in juvenile justice systems. However, its failure to achieve effective outcomes—particularly in safeguarding children’s rights and welfare—remains a pressing concern. This research aims to identify the factors contributing to the failure of diversion, associating these with the broader endeavor to protect and promote the best interests of children. The study reveals several factors leading to the failure of diversion: the lack of consensus between victims and offenders or their families, the non-implementation of agreements, and differing interpretations of key legal provisions under Article 3 of Perma No. 4 of 2014 and Article 7 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (SPPA). These factors have contributed to inconsistencies in the application of diversion measures. Despite these failures, the study finds that the law still offers avenues for protecting the best interests of children, particularly when diversion is successful. Achieving effective diversion can lead to faster, simpler, and lower-case examinations, promoting rehabilitation and reintegration over punishment. The study contributes to the national and global discourse on juvenile justice by highlighting the challenges of implementing diversion programs and offering insights for reform.
Optimization of E-Litigation in the Settlement of Divorce Cases at the Bangkinang District Court Hanifah, Mardalena; Pascadinianti, Meidana; Triyananda, Maulidya; Firmanda, Hengki; Lestari, Rika; Putra, Setia
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.6434

Abstract

The presence of E-Litigation, a Supreme Court innovation to merge procedural law with technology, reflects Indonesian judicial administration in the digitalization era. The existence of E-Litigation as a practical application of the principle of simplicity, speed, and cheap cost is not yet optimal. The Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 on Electronic Court Case Administration regulates e-litigation proceedings. Improvements have been made to the legislation. Based on the foregoing, it is judged necessary and urgent to investigate optimizing e-litigation in the settlement of divorce cases at the Bangkinang District Court. The study sought to explain the effectiveness of e-litigation in resolving divorce cases at the Bangkinang District Court. Sociological legal research is an empirical study that seeks to uncover theories about the incidence of law in society. The data was gathered through interviews with judges Syofia Nisra, Ersin, and Aulia Fhatma Whidhola. Not only are the rules for e-litigation processes being reviewed, but so are the hurdles to e-litigation settlement of divorce cases at the Bangkinang District Court. This study is likely to make a significant contribution to legal innovation in the subject of civil procedure law. The settlement of divorce cases through e-litigation will alter the practice of litigating in court. The notion of complicating divorce is analogous to an emergency door on an airplane that should not be utilized unless necessary to overcome a problem. E-litigation processes at the Bangkinang Court have not gone smoothly because the parties do not comprehend and lack suitable electronic gadgets, even though the Court already possesses all of the necessary equipment and facilities.
Indonesia's Accountability as a State That Did Not Ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention on the Rohingya Ethnic Group in the Perspective of International Human Rights Ahmad Lukman Hadi; Kholifatul Muna; Fanisa Mayda Ayiliani
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.6680

Abstract

of Rohingya ethnic refugees who come to Indonesia where Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention so that it poses its own challenges in dealing with Rohingya refugees, so human rights aspects and various moral and empathetic efforts are still needed. The study uses a normative legal approach to analyze legal frameworks relevant to the Rohingya ethnic situation, highlighting the human rights protections provided by international legal instruments such as the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The ongoing conflict in Myanmar shows the allegations/assumptions of systematic human rights violations, showing the need for joint action in upholding human rights principles. Although Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention, the state has a moral and legal obligation to respect human rights, including in addressing the problem of the arrival of the Rohingya in terms of seeking asylum and shelter. The protection of refugees, including the Rohingya, is a fundamental moral and legal responsibility of the international community, which includes the Indonesian government. The Indonesian government has also taken steps to provide protection to refugees, including working with UNHCR in finding solutions for Rohingya refugees in Aceh. In the absence of Indonesia ratifying the refugee convention, moral and legal efforts are still needed to ensure proper protection for Rohingya refugees and uphold human rights principles at the international level.
The Urgency of Anti-SLAPP Regulatory Renewal in Indonesian Environmental Law Kamal, Ubaidillah; Masyhar, Ali; Fikri, Muhammad Adymas Hikal; Rajib, Rayi Kharisma; Idris, Siti Hafsyah
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.7237

Abstract

Indonesian Environmental Law has regulated Anti-Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (Anti-SLAPP) which guarantees protection to everyone who fights for the right to a good and healthy environment, not to be criminally prosecuted or sued civilly, as stipulated in Article 66 of the UUPPLH. Hope is still far from reality, because data shows that many communities and/or environmental warriors are victims of SLAPPs as part of the backlash from those they report or oppose when they participate and defend people's right to a good and healthy environment. This article aims to discuss; (1) Problems of Anti-SLAPP Regulation and Application in Indonesia and (2) The Urgency of renewal Anti-SLAPP Regulations in Indonesian Environmental Law. The research method uses normative juridical methods. The results of the discussion showed that (1) the problems of regulating and implementing Anti-SLAPP include three elements, namely legal substance problems, legal structure problems and problems in legal culture: and (2) There are at least 7 reasons that cause the urgency of renewal of Anti-SLAPP Regulations in Indonesian environmental law to be able to realize the protection of society participation in environmental protection and management.
Toward Equal Access to Justice: Can Regulating Attorney Fees Ensure Fairness and Broaden Legal Access in Indonesia? Utami, Nurani Ajeng Tri; Sudrajat, Tedi; Wahyudi, Setya; Pati, Umi Khaerah
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.8316

Abstract

In Indonesia, the role of attorneys in resolving legal issues is indispensable, yet the absence of standardized attorney fee regulations has led to significant barriers in accessing legal services. Despite attorneys' rights to receive fees for their services, the lack of clear guidelines has resulted in public perception that hiring legal representation is a luxury, with many unable to afford it. This study explores the urgent need for state regulation of attorney fees to ensure fairness and broaden access to justice for all segments of society. The findings indicate that the lack of fee standardization contributes to inequities in the legal system, creating barriers for lower-income individuals to access legal assistance. Furthermore, it reveals that establishing a clear regulatory framework would provide legal certainty, protect consumers, and promote a more equitable system for all citizens. The novelty of this research lies in its exploration of attorney fees as a critical element in improving access to justice in Indonesia, framing the issue beyond economics and highlighting its social justice implications. By addressing the urgency of regulating attorney fees, the study contributes to the ongoing legal reform discourse, providing policy recommendations for creating a fee structure that balances fairness with professional responsibility. The research emphasizes that deliberative processes, considering factors such as case complexity, impact, and operational costs, should guide the determination of fees. Ultimately, the study presents a compelling argument for rethinking how attorney fees are regulated to ensure that justice is accessible to all, not just the wealthy.

Page 2 of 5 | Total Record : 41

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025): June, 2025 Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024 Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024