cover
Contact Name
Ruslaini
Contact Email
lpkdgeneration2022@gmail.com
Phone
+6287770009246
Journal Mail Official
lppm@stiekasihbangsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl Dr. Kasih No. 01 Kebon Jeruk Jakarta Barat
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communication & Green Economics (IJBGE)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30481392     DOI : https://doi.org/10.70142/ijbge.v2i3
Core Subject : Economy, Science,
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communication & Green Economics (IJBGE) is a peer-reviewed international journal published by STIE Kasih Bangsa Institute of Research and Community Services/Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. The journal serves as an academic platform which integrates four critical domains within the business context: business law, business ethics, business communication, and green economics. The primary objective of the journal is to present contemporary research, analysis, and innovative concepts which enhance the understanding of how business law can function efficiently, with social responsibility, and in an environmentally sustainable manner. The articles published within this journal encompass a broad spectrum of topics, including current legal issues in the business context, ethical dilemmas encountered by corporations, effective business communication strategies, and economic analyses related to sustainable development and environmental conservation. This publication is issued quarterly in (March, June, September and December).
Articles 50 Documents
The Ethics of Influence: A Review of Nudging Applications in Corporate Ethics and Their Role in Combating Organizational Misconduct Mohammad Chaidir; Novrizal Novrizal
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): March: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communic
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i1.424

Abstract

This qualitative literature review explores the role of behavioral nudging as a tool for enhancing corporate ethics and curbing organizational misconduct. Drawing on empirical and theoretical studies from behavioral ethics, organizational psychology, and compliance management, the review examines how subtle interventions—such as reminders, social norm cues, and visual prompts—can influence ethical decision-making in the workplace. The findings suggest that nudges are effective in reducing ethical fading, improving compliance, and reinforcing ethical culture when aligned with organizational values and context. However, concerns regarding manipulation, cultural adaptability, and long-term efficacy remain. This review highlights the importance of integrating nudging within a broader ethical infrastructure and calls for future research on scalable, transparent, and culturally sensitive applications of ethical influence in diverse organizational settings
Moral Legitimacy and Joint Purpose: A Literature Review on the Ethical Foundations of Collaborative Organizations Grace Yulianti; Dadang Irawan
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): March: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communic
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i1.425

Abstract

This qualitative literature review explores the ethical foundations of collaborative organizations by examining the interplay between moral legitimacy and joint purpose. Drawing from recent scholarship in organizational ethics, stakeholder theory, and virtue ethics, the review highlights how organizations achieve moral legitimacy through shared values, inclusive governance, and ethically anchored missions. Joint purpose emerges as a unifying force that fosters trust, identity, and stakeholder commitment across complex collaborations. The synthesis reveals that organizations sustaining both moral legitimacy and joint purpose are more adaptive, ethically resilient, and capable of creating long-term value. The review also identifies theoretical gaps and suggests directions for future research on moral agency and collective value creation within hybrid organizational forms
Strategic Intermediation in Corporate Asset Markets: A Qualitative Literature Review on the Role of Non-Venture Private Equity Firms Ria Wulandari; Mohammad Chaidir
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): March: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communic
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i1.426

Abstract

This qualitative literature review explores the strategic role of non-venture private equity (PE) firms as intermediaries in corporate asset markets. Distinct from venture capitalists, these PE firms specialize in acquiring, restructuring, and reallocating mature corporate assets, thereby enhancing market efficiency and value creation. By synthesizing recent studies, this review highlights how non-venture PE firms facilitate resource redeployment, drive operational improvements, and influence corporate governance. Comparative analysis reveals their unique ability to exploit inefficiencies through carve-outs, platform building, and targeted acquisitions. The review also examines emerging ESG considerations and critiques regarding short-termism and stakeholder impact. While the literature acknowledges the transformative role of these firms, it also identifies limitations in theoretical integration and empirical coverage. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how non-venture PE firms shape firm boundaries, market structures, and the evolving logic of strategic intermediation.
Strategic Communication and Investor Persuasion in Syndicated Capital Raising: A Qualitative Literature Review A. Sigit Pramono Hadi; tanti sugiharti
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): March: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communic
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i1.427

Abstract

This qualitative literature review examines the role of strategic communication and persuasive signaling in syndicated capital raising. Drawing from interdisciplinary sources in finance, economics, and organizational behavior, the review synthesizes how lead investors utilize narrative framing, information asymmetry reduction, and trust-based messaging to influence co-investor commitment. The findings reveal that persuasion in syndication is not only a matter of financial signaling but also a communicative process that shapes collective investment decisions. Furthermore, the review highlights the critical role of communication strategies in aligning investor interests, mitigating uncertainty, and facilitating decision-making under bounded rationality. Implications for investor coordination, capital structuring, and future research directions are discussed
Designing Optimal Whistleblowing Mechanisms: A Qualitative Literature Review on Bounty Size, Strategic Thresholds, and Regulatory Effectiveness Ahembang; Selvi Agustina
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): March: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communic
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i1.437

Abstract

This qualitative literature review explores how bounty size, strategic thresholds, and regulatory effectiveness shape the design and outcomes of whistleblowing mechanisms. By synthesizing empirical and theoretical insights from leading accounting and finance journals, the study identifies three interrelated findings: first, that larger bounty rewards increase reporting volume but may reduce signal quality; second, that insiders’ reporting thresholds are influenced by retaliation risk, compensation incentives, and perceived enforcement credibility; and third, that regulatory backlogs and discretion can distort the intended deterrent effect of whistleblowing policies. The review highlights the need for a holistic design approach that integrates incentive alignment with institutional capacity and protection mechanisms. Limitations in jurisdictional generalizability, demographic heterogeneity, and the evolving role of digital reporting platforms are also discussed. Recommendations for future research include examining whistleblowing in non-U.S. contexts, integrating organizational culture, and assessing the role of emerging technologies
Agency Costs, Voting Divergence, and Corporate Governance: A Qualitative Synthesis of Dual-Class Stock and Sunset Clause Mechanisms Benardi; Eri Kusnanto
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communica
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i2.455

Abstract

This qualitative literature review synthesizes contemporary research on how dual-class share structures shape agency costs, voting divergence, and corporate governance outcomes. The review finds that disproportionate voting rights increase managerial entrenchment risks and weaken shareholder oversight, thereby amplifying agency costs across diverse institutional settings. However, governance safeguards particularly time bound and event-based sunset clauses emerge as effective mechanisms for moderating the long-term risks of control disproportionality. While dual class firms may benefit from strategic insulation that fosters innovation and long-term value creation, the absence of sunset provisions is consistently associated with reduced firm valuation, diminished accountability, and persistent divergence between control and ownership. Overall, this synthesis highlights that dual-class structures are not universally harmful, but their sustainability depends on the presence of robust governance constraints designed to restore alignment over time.
Balancing Transparency and Innovation in the Global Litigation Finance Market: A Qualitative Synthesis of Risks, Regulation, and Policy Debates Novrizal; Ria Wulandari
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communica
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i2.456

Abstract

This qualitative literature review examines how global litigation finance markets manage the tension between transparency requirements and innovation dynamics. Drawing on academic scholarship, policy reports, court decisions, and industry analyses, the review synthesizes evidence on disclosure obligations, funder influence, national security concerns, and emerging regulatory models. Findings show that while transparency enhances judicial integrity and mitigates conflicts of interest, excessive disclosure may undermine commercial confidentiality and inhibit investment in complex claims. Across jurisdictions, regulatory debates converge on the need for proportionate, court directed mechanisms such as limited in camera disclosure, provenance checks, and funder conduct safeguards. The review concludes that transparency and innovation are not mutually exclusive; instead, balanced regulatory frameworks can preserve market efficiency while protecting due process values and preventing geopolitical misuse. The study highlights significant data gaps and calls for deeper empirical research to guide evidence based policy making.
Climate Risk, Legal Liability, and Portfolio Strategy: A Qualitative Review of Brown Assets as Hedging Instruments in High-Carbon Scenarios Seger Santoso; Farah Qalbia
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communica
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i2.457

Abstract

This qualitative literature review synthesizes current evidence on how investors navigate climate risk, legal liability, and portfolio strategy by reassessing the financial role of brown assets in high carbon transition contexts. The review finds that carbon intensive assets, traditionally viewed as stranded or declining, may provide conditional hedging value when policy trajectories remain uncertain, green technologies are not yet fully scalable, and transition risks are uneven across sectors. Legal liability emerges as a powerful driver of portfolio decisions, as fiduciaries face increasing scrutiny regarding climate disclosure, risk governance, and alignment with net zero commitments. The synthesis reveals that the strategic value of brown assets is dynamic rather than static, depending on regulatory convergence, technological maturity, and institutional investor risk preferences. Overall, the review highlights the interplay between climate related litigation pressures and investment strategy, emphasizing the need for adaptive risk assessment frameworks in a rapidly evolving transition landscape.
Designing Effective Insolvency Frameworks for Multinational Corporations: A Literature Review on Reform Priorities and Value Foundations in Developing Countries Cahyatih Kumandang; Mia Christy Patricia
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communica
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i2.458

Abstract

This study conducts a qualitative literature review to examine how insolvency frameworks in developing countries can be designed to effectively accommodate multinational corporations (MNCs). Drawing on interdisciplinary legal, economic, and policy oriented scholarship, the review analyses why MNCs frequently avoid initiating insolvency proceedings in host developing jurisdictions and instead engage in forum shopping toward developed economies. The findings indicate that institutional weaknesses, limited judicial and professional capacity, inadequate group-insolvency coordination, and low procedural predictability significantly reduce the attractiveness of domestic insolvency regimes. The review further identifies core value foundations legal certainty, transparency, efficiency, stakeholder balance, and enterprise value preservation as essential elements of effective insolvency law reform. The study contributes by synthesising reform priorities that move beyond formal legislative change toward strengthening institutional credibility and normative legitimacy, offering policy relevant insights for developing countries seeking to retain multinational insolvency cases and enhance economic resilience.
Humanity, Resilience, and Equity in Corporate Failure: A Literature Review on Developing Fairness Metrics for Inclusive Insolvency Systems Grace Yulianti; Sigit Pramono Hadi
International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Comunication & Green Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Business Law, Business Ethic, Business Communica
Publisher : LPPM STIE Kasih Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70142/ijbge.v3i2.459

Abstract

Corporate insolvency regimes have long been designed around efficiency, creditor recovery, and procedural certainty, frequently marginalizing the human, social, and distributive consequences of corporate failure. This qualitative literature review seeks to reconceptualize insolvency as a multidimensional institutional process by integrating the principles of humanity, resilience, and equity, with the objective of developing fairness metrics for more inclusive insolvency systems. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship from insolvency law, corporate governance, economic sociology, and normative political theory, this study systematically synthesizes peer reviewed literature published between 2000 and 2024 using a structured qualitative thematic analysis. The review identifies three interrelated dimensions shaping inclusive insolvency outcomes. First, humanity-oriented approaches emphasize stakeholder vulnerability, dignity preservation, and procedural justice, particularly for employees, involuntary creditors, small suppliers, and local communities affected by corporate collapse. Second, resilience based perspectives frame insolvency not merely as an endpoint of failure but as an adaptive governance mechanism that enables organizational recovery, institutional learning, and broader systemic stability. Third, equity focused frameworks highlight the importance of proportional and context sensitive loss allocation, stakeholder participation, and intertemporal fairness in distributing the economic and social costs of insolvency. By integrating these dimensions, the study develops a conceptual framework of fairness metrics that extends beyond traditional efficiency-driven indicators, offering normative and analytical tools for evaluating insolvency systems in a more holistic manner. The findings contribute to insolvency scholarship by bridging fragmented theoretical strands and advancing a human-centered and resilience oriented understanding of corporate failure. The review further suggests that insolvency regimes embedding humanity, resilience, and equity are more likely to enhance institutional legitimacy, stakeholder trust, and long term economic sustainability, thereby providing a robust foundation for future empirical research and policy reform.