Lentera Negeri
Lentera Negeri welcomes submissions across a comprehensive range of academic disciplines, spanning the social sciences, humanities, natural sciences, applied sciences, and technology. Within the social sciences, the journal considers research in sociology, psychology and mental health, counseling studies, education and educational innovation, curriculum and assessment, communication studies, political science, public administration, economics, development studies, law and governance, social policy, and community development. Studies addressing social behavior, institutional dynamics, policy implementation, and community transformation are particularly relevant. In the humanities, the journal embraces scholarly works in philosophy, ethics, cultural studies, history, language and literature, religious studies, and arts and creative inquiry. Contributions that explore intellectual traditions, cultural identities, normative frameworks, and interpretative analyses of social phenomena are welcomed as part of the journal’s commitment to advancing critical and reflective scholarship. The journal also accommodates research in the natural sciences, including environmental sciences, biological sciences, physical sciences, and earth and climate studies, especially when these fields intersect with sustainability, ecological resilience, public welfare, and global environmental challenges. Empirical and experimental studies that contribute to scientific understanding with societal implications are within the journal’s purview. In the domain of applied sciences and technology, Lentera Negeri welcomes research in engineering, applied technology, digital innovation, information systems, health sciences, public health, entrepreneurship, innovation management, sustainable technology, and green development. Studies addressing technological advancement, digital transformation, health systems, and innovation-driven solutions for societal needs are considered integral to the journal’s multidisciplinary orientation. Furthermore, the journal actively encourages cross-disciplinary and thematic research that integrates multiple fields of inquiry to address sustainable development, human well-being, environmental resilience, governance and public policy, digital transformation, coaching and mentoring practices, volunteerism, philanthropy, and community empowerment. Submissions from any academic field are considered, provided they clearly demonstrate scholarly relevance and articulate meaningful implications for society, policy, professional practice, or interdisciplinary advancement.
Articles
176 Documents
<![CDATA[A symmetric enforcement of good faith provisions: a systematic review of contractual remedies for weaker parties in common law systems ]]>
<![CDATA[Nurarafah Nurarafah]]>;
<![CDATA[Sulaiman Sulaiman]]>;
<![CDATA[Husni Husni]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992510
<![CDATA[This study aims to deconstruct the paralysis of the corrective function of objective good faith when confronted with exploitative boilerplate clauses. To distinguish its contribution from decades of conventional, descriptive-sociological research on contractual imbalance, this doctrinal-conceptual inquiry anchors its analytical structure by integrating Ian Macneil’s Relational Contract Theory to dissect the social dimensions of contracts, alongside John Rawls’s Theory of Distributive Justice to evaluate the moral legitimacy of contractual exchanges. Moving beyond generic literature reviews, this study employs a rigorous Meta-Doctrinal Thematic Synthesis, selecting legal literature and jurisprudence based on strict inclusion criteria: the evolution of the abuse of circumstances doctrine within civil law systems, and Indonesian Supreme Court precedents on the invalidation of exculpatory clauses over the past decade (2016–2026). Based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria targeting the implied covenant of good faith, unconscionability, and algorithmic duress, a definitive legal corpus of 42 specialized sources (33 peer-reviewed journal articles and 9 landmark appellate precedents) was extracted and analyzed. The analytical synthesis uncovers a highly specific doctrinal gap: contemporary common law jurisprudence suffers from systemic stagnation by restricting the operability of good faith to a passive interpretive rule or binding unconscionability to a rigid, formation-stage audit. Crucially, the evidentiary basis demonstrating the weak implementation and judicial paralysis of these remedies is derived directly from a structural analysis of Appellate Case Law across Key Common Law Jurisdictions, exposing a fragmented judiciary that routinely retreats into formalistic positivism and prioritizes literal text over substantive equity. As a distinct theoretical intervention, this paper proposes a Model of Progressive Judicial Intervention Based on Asymmetric Equity, providing the necessary dogmatic legitimacy for common law judges to look past formal compliance, penetrate unconscionable exculpatory terms, and actively reconstruct remedies to restore relational equilibrium during the contractual performance stage]]>
<![CDATA[Materiality conflicts in dual suistanability-reporting regimes: indonesia’s transition from impact-based OJK rules to ISSB financial materiality ]]>
<![CDATA[Chandra Erick Manaek Pandapotan Lumban Gaol]]>;
<![CDATA[Tarsisius Murwadji]]>;
<![CDATA[Beniadi Setiawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992520
<![CDATA[The contemporary architecture of corporate sustainability reporting is undergoing an unprecedented epistemological rupture, transitioning from a localized, impact-oriented paradigm under the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) toward a globally standardized, financial-materiality framework promulgated by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). This paradigm shift, culminating in the ratification of PSPK 1 and PSPK 2 effective January 1, 2027, precipitates a profound jurisprudential paradox regarding regulatory compliance and corporate fiduciary duties within emerging markets. Traditional orthodox normative legal research has systematically failed to decode the sociological frictions inherent in this dual-regime landscape, often falsely dichotomizing the frameworks as either mutually exclusive or seamlessly harmonized (Abhayawansa, 2022; Adams & Mueller, 2022). Eradicating these archaic theoretical lacunae, this research operationalizes a cutting-edge methodological fusion, integrating Socio-Legal Analysis with Project-Based Legal Epistemology. By dissecting the "asymmetrical incomplete overlap" between POJK No. 51/POJK.03/2017's mandatory economic, social, and environmental disclosure floor and the ISSB’s investor-centric financial-materiality overlay, this study confronts the realities of symbolic compliance and governance-washing within the extractive and corporate sectors (Correa-Mejía et al., 2024; Dragomir et al., 2025). As a tangible project-based output, this manuscript engineers a highly prescriptive, four-step conflict-resolution protocol materialized through a concrete Academic Compliance Matrix. This matrix structurally reconciles dual-tagging mechanisms, value-chain boundary delimitations, and board-level accountability escalations, thereby establishing an indisputable, interoperable legal blueprint for transnational corporate governance and integrated compliance sustainability.]]>
<![CDATA[Artificial intelligence integration and self-regulated learning in English as a foreign language: Scaffold or substitute ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuliana Friska]]>;
<![CDATA[Widodo Widodo]]>;
<![CDATA[Merry Lapasau]]>;
<![CDATA[Syahfitri Purnama]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992530
<![CDATA[Artificial intelligence integration has increasingly been positioned as a mechanism for supporting self-regulated learning (SRL) among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, yet the empirical evidence remains scattered across tool types and contexts. This systematic review synthesized 22 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2026, comprising 13 experimental or quasi-experimental, 6 mixed-methods, and 3 qualitative designs, examining what AI tools and frameworks characterize the literature, how AI integration affects SRL dimensions, and what factors moderate the AI-SRL relationship. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies meeting seven inclusion criteria, spanning population, design, document type, language, timeframe, and validated SRL measurement, were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, screened with substantial inter-rater agreement (kappa = .83 abstract stage, .79 full-text), and appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, whose single framework accommodates all three design types. The AI tool landscape has shifted markedly. Generative AI platforms, particularly ChatGPT and its derivatives, now account for 64% of studies, compared to 18% for earlier automated writing evaluation tools. AI integration most consistently supported goal-setting, self-monitoring, and metacognitive strategy use, while motivational regulation proved less stable, with five of 22 studies reporting reduced autonomous motivation among high-AI-use learners. AI functions as an effective regulatory scaffold within structured pedagogical sequences, though benefits depend on tool type, learner profile, and EFL context. Future research should examine motivational regulation and metacognitive cycles longitudinally, particularly in underrepresented Asian EFL settings.]]>
<![CDATA[Dampak fluktuasi suku bunga terhadap profitabilitas pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk ]]>
<![CDATA[Ennis Sarenah Kriekhoff]]>;
<![CDATA[Victor Amanusa Talakua]]>;
<![CDATA[Johanis M. Tetelepta]]>;
<![CDATA[Albertus Lalaun]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992580
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini merevisi dan memperkuat analisis hubungan fluktuasi suku bunga kebijakan dengan profitabilitas PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (BBRI) selama 2023Q1-2026Q1. Penelitian menggunakan data sekunder triwulanan aktual sebanyak 13 observasi (n=13), bukan data proyeksi; periode dipilih karena mencakup fase suku bunga tinggi pascapandemi, penurunan BI Rate pada 2025, serta ketersediaan laporan keuangan BRI sampai 31 Maret 2026. Variabel independen adalah BI Rate rata-rata triwulanan, sedangkan profitabilitas utama diukur dengan ROA setelah pajak. ROE, NIM, BOPO, NPL gross, dan LDR digunakan sebagai indikator pendukung; BOPO, NPL gross, dan LDR dimasukkan dalam model kontrol terbatas. Analisis dilakukan melalui statistik deskriptif, korelasi Pearson, regresi linier sederhana, regresi kontrol parsimonious, uji Shapiro-Wilk, Breusch-Pagan, Breusch-Godfrey/Durbin-Watson, VIF, bootstrap confidence interval, permutation test, dan uji sensitivitas lag satu kuartal. Hasil regresi sederhana menunjukkan koefisien BI Rate sebesar 0,4098 (p=0,0107), R-square 0,461, dan adjusted R-square 0,413. Hubungan positif ini tidak ditafsirkan sebagai kausalitas tunggal, tetapi sebagai hubungan empiris eksploratoris yang dapat terjadi ketika repricing aset produktif, struktur dana murah, dan pengendalian biaya memungkinkan pendapatan bank lebih cepat menyesuaikan dibandingkan biaya dana. Model kontrol menunjukkan BOPO menjadi variabel internal paling dominan, sehingga profitabilitas BRI selama periode pengamatan lebih tepat dipahami sebagai hasil interaksi antara kanal suku bunga dan faktor idiosinkratik bank.]]>
<![CDATA[The impact of the indonesian nickel industry downstreaming policy especially ]]>
<![CDATA[Ali Martin]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismiyatun Ismiyatun]]>;
<![CDATA[Saadatul Musthoifiyah]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992590
<![CDATA[This study examines the impact of Indonesia's nickel industry downstreaming policy, focusing on Morowali Regency, Central Sulawesi. Employing a qualitative library research method, the study analyzes Foreign Direct Investment theory regarding market access, raw material utilization, and technology transfer to explain both positive and negative consequences of the policy. Findings reveal that downstreaming generates a substantial multiplier effect, including employment absorption, regional economic growth, and MSME expansion, particularly through companies such as PT GNI. Conversely, the policy produces severe negative impacts, including environmental damage, discharge of nickel waste into coastal waters, and landscape transformation. The study concludes that government and stakeholders must prioritize environmental protection, waste management, reforestation, and local worker employment, rather than focusing solely on mining profits, to ensure sustainable and balanced industrial development in nickel-producing regions.]]>
<![CDATA[50-meter freestyle performance: a systematic review of upper limb strength, lower limb explosive power, and swimming technique determinants (2020–2026) ]]>
<![CDATA[Sintiara Sintiara]]>;
<![CDATA[Roma Irawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Syarastani Syarastani]]>;
<![CDATA[Zulbahri Zulbahri]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992600
<![CDATA[The review followed the PRISMA 2020 framework and was conducted using Scopus as the primary information source, applying a Boolean strategy combining swimming, strength, explosive-power, and technique constructs within title, abstract, and keyword fields. The search returned 183 records, which were screened against predefined eligibility criteria restricting inclusion to English-language original articles and reviews directly addressing strength, power, or technical determinants of swimming performance. After title and abstract screening and full-text assessment, 50 studies were retained for qualitative and thematic synthesis. Included studies were evaluated by the FICO framework (Focus, Information, Context, Outcome); As the designs and outcome measures of the studies were highly different, no meta-analyses effect sizes are reported and the findings are combined narratively. Three thematic findings emerged. First, upper limb and trunk strength, expressed through tethered force and dry-land resistance capacity, are consistently associated with stroke propulsion and sprint velocity, although the strength-performance relationship is moderated by competitive level. Second, lower limb explosive power, assessed through jump and force-plate measures, is a robust determinant of start and turn performance, phases that contribute disproportionately to total 50-m time. Third, technical variables, particularly stroke length and stroke-rate regulation, mediate the translation of physical capacity into measurable velocity. Across studies, maximal-strength, plyometric, and complex training emerged as the most effective dry-land modalities. The review indicates that sprint freestyle performance is best modelled as an integrated outcome of force production, explosive power, and technical efficiency rather than any single capacity. Practically, the findings support multimodal conditioning that couples heavy resistance and plyometric work with technique-focused practice. Methodological heterogeneity and a scarcity of longitudinal designs are identified as priorities for future research.]]>
<![CDATA[Shared principles of islamic-catholic dialogue: a comparative thematic analysis of theological documents ]]>
<![CDATA[Konstantinus Bahang]]>;
<![CDATA[David Dapi]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992610
<![CDATA[This study analyzes shared principles of interreligious dialogue in Islam and Catholicism using an interpretive qualitative design that combines library research, document study, qualitative content analysis, thematic analysis, and comparative interpretation. The corpus comprised five primary documents—the Qur'an, Nostra Aetate, Dialogue and Proclamation, A Common Word Between Us and You, and the Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together—and 38 secondary scholarly sources. Secondary literature was identified through Scopus with Sider Scholar support using keywords on Islam–Catholic dialogue, Muslim–Christian dialogue, interreligious dialogue, Nostra Aetate, A Common Word, human fraternity, and dialogue of life. Peer-reviewed publications from 2007–2026 were prioritized, while older foundational sources were retained when directly relevant. Units of meaning were coded deductively across theological foundation, human dignity, religious freedom, openness, identity honesty, rejection of violence, cooperation, justice, and peace, and inductively for emerging themes. Coding was conducted by one researcher; reliability was supported through repeated coding, an audit trail, source triangulation, and comparison of data, interpretation, and conclusions. Three findings emerged: both traditions connect faith with human dignity and peace; authentic dialogue requires freedom, equality, listening, and honest identity without mixing doctrines; and dialogue must extend into social cooperation, education, humanitarian service, advocacy, conflict resolution, and digital literacy. The shared ground is therefore ethical-relational rather than complete theological equivalence.]]>
<![CDATA[Debtor protection in fiduciary guarantee execution during force majeure: a justice analysis of indonesian banking practice ]]>
<![CDATA[Dermina Dalimunthe]]>;
<![CDATA[Nasruddin Khalil Harahap]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992630
<![CDATA[Research This aim for analyze suitability practice execution with principle justice contractual and protection modern law. The methods used is approach juridical normative and juridical empirical, with data sources in the form of regulation legislation, decisions Court Constitution Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, report performance of OJK and Bank BRI, as well as interview limited with MSME debtors and practitioners law local. This empirical single-case study utilizes a purposive sampling strategy to select a sample size of 15 key informants comprising PT Bank BRI credit risk managers (n=5), legal counsels (n=4), and affected debtors (n=6) to ensure a comprehensive, multi-stakeholder perspective on fiduciary execution disputes. To guarantee research reliability, data collection relied on a semi-structured interview protocol that was rigorously pre-tested and piloted with two legal experts prior to administration. The final sample size was methodologically justified by the attainment of data saturation, which was operationally defined and achieved when three consecutive interviews yielded no novel themes or legal insights. The empirical findings were subsequently evaluated alongside normative statutory materials using qualitative thematic analysis to critically assess the alignment of banking practices with the justice-based principles of modern contract law. In addition that, use contract standard put debtor in position that is not equal and eliminate room negotiation when happen condition force. The principle of renegotiation and hardship in UNIDROIT Principles, as well as draft remedial fairness in Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), offers solution normative going to system law contract more national equitable and adaptive. This article recommend strengthening regulations related execution guarantee fiduciary and improvement role supervision from authority finance in protect interest debtor.]]>
<![CDATA[A quasi-experimental study of augmented reality athletics learning on motor skills and motivation in elementary students ]]>
<![CDATA[Yan Indra Siregar]]>;
<![CDATA[Fredrik Alfrets Makadada]]>;
<![CDATA[Fadli Ihsan]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992640
<![CDATA[Fundamental movement skills (FMS) and learning motivation are essential for children’s physical development and participation in physical activity. However, many elementary school students demonstrate low motor competence and limited engagement in physical education due to conventional instructional approaches that are often repetitive and less interactive. Augmented Reality (AR) technology has emerged as a promising tool to enhance learning experiences and increase student motivation. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of AR-based athletics learning on FMS and learning motivation among elementary school students. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was employed involving 60 students aged 9–11 years. Participants were assigned to either an experimental group receiving AR-based athletics instruction or a control group receiving conventional instruction. The intervention was conducted over eight weeks. FMS were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3), while learning motivation was measured using a validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed using paired-sample and independent-sample t-tests and Cohen’s d effect size analysis. The results showed significant improvements in both FMS and motivation among students in the experimental group. FMS scores increased from 61.47 ± 6.28 to 78.53 ± 5.91, while motivation scores increased from 63.84 ± 5.74 to 82.15 ± 5.38 (p < 0.001). Large effect sizes were observed for FMS (d = 1.42) and motivation (d = 1.58). These findings indicate that AR-based athletics learning is an effective and innovative strategy for improving motor skills and learning motivation in physical education.]]>
<![CDATA[The mosaik model: an expert-validated model integrating toulmin argumentation and multimodal literacy for vocational writing instruction ]]>
<![CDATA[Regina Fitrie]]>;
<![CDATA[Andoyo Sastromiharjo]]>;
<![CDATA[Khaerudin Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/992650
<![CDATA[This study develops and validates the MOSAIK Model, a five-phase digital-literacy-based learning model for argumentative multimodal writing among vocational high school students. Named after the Indonesian word for “mosaic,” the model integrates verbal, visual, and digital elements into coherent, evidence-based arguments. Using the ADDIE framework, the study covered the analysis, design, development, and implementation stages, with data collected through writing tests, questionnaires, expert validation, and classroom observations. The analysis of 373 students showed a generally good baseline writing ability (M = 14.60, 73.0%), although evidence-based argumentation was the weakest component. This indicated the need for a structured instructional model rather than remedial teaching. A digital-literacy self-efficacy questionnaire demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.849). Expert validation of the MOSAIK instructional products yielded a mean feasibility score of 86.5% (“Highly Feasible”), with inter-rater agreement ranging from weak to good (ICC = 0.32–0.66). The model was implemented in limited (n = 67) and broad (n = 306) trials. The broad trial revealed significant differences in implementation across study programs, F(2, 303) = 20.44, p < .001, η² = 0.12, while multimodal production remained the weakest phase. Overall, the findings indicate that the MOSAIK Model is a feasible and structurally valid instructional model, although further refinement is needed to strengthen multimodal production support and standardize group assessment procedures.]]>
