Lentera Negeri
Lentera Negeri welcomes submissions across a comprehensive range of academic disciplines, spanning the social sciences, humanities, natural sciences, applied sciences, and technology. Within the social sciences, the journal considers research in sociology, psychology and mental health, counseling studies, education and educational innovation, curriculum and assessment, communication studies, political science, public administration, economics, development studies, law and governance, social policy, and community development. Studies addressing social behavior, institutional dynamics, policy implementation, and community transformation are particularly relevant. In the humanities, the journal embraces scholarly works in philosophy, ethics, cultural studies, history, language and literature, religious studies, and arts and creative inquiry. Contributions that explore intellectual traditions, cultural identities, normative frameworks, and interpretative analyses of social phenomena are welcomed as part of the journal’s commitment to advancing critical and reflective scholarship. The journal also accommodates research in the natural sciences, including environmental sciences, biological sciences, physical sciences, and earth and climate studies, especially when these fields intersect with sustainability, ecological resilience, public welfare, and global environmental challenges. Empirical and experimental studies that contribute to scientific understanding with societal implications are within the journal’s purview. In the domain of applied sciences and technology, Lentera Negeri welcomes research in engineering, applied technology, digital innovation, information systems, health sciences, public health, entrepreneurship, innovation management, sustainable technology, and green development. Studies addressing technological advancement, digital transformation, health systems, and innovation-driven solutions for societal needs are considered integral to the journal’s multidisciplinary orientation. Furthermore, the journal actively encourages cross-disciplinary and thematic research that integrates multiple fields of inquiry to address sustainable development, human well-being, environmental resilience, governance and public policy, digital transformation, coaching and mentoring practices, volunteerism, philanthropy, and community empowerment. Submissions from any academic field are considered, provided they clearly demonstrate scholarly relevance and articulate meaningful implications for society, policy, professional practice, or interdisciplinary advancement.
Articles
176 Documents
<![CDATA[Governance functions in subak empowerment: a documentary case study ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Luh Ayu Gustina Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Ngurah Eddy Supriyadinata Gorda]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/993130
<![CDATA[This study examines village governance functions in Subak empowerment through a documentary qualitative case study of Mengwitani, Bali. The unit of analysis is each village program or decision concerning irrigation infrastructure, institutional participation, access to agricultural support, cultural continuity, and operational risk. The purposively selected corpus comprises the 2025 Mengwitani Village Profile, relevant legal instruments, and issue-based records from preliminary institutional notes. The available materials do not contain a complete interview register, so participant counts, saturation, and interview-based generalization are not claimed. Data were analyzed through directed qualitative content analysis using four operational categories: regulator, dynamizer, facilitator, and catalyst. Evidence was coded manually in a source matrix, compared across source types, and checked through an audit trail, negative-case review, and explicit separation of findings from recommendations. Facilitation is the most clearly documented function, reflected in farm-road improvement, irrigation retaining-wall reinforcement, granary rehabilitation, customary-facility support, and access to regency input programs. Representative participation appears through Pekaseh proposals, while structured training, a specific village regulation on land conversion, and a formal collaborative platform remain incomplete. The analysis identifies an emergent configuration that is infrastructure-centered, proposal-mediated, culturally embedded, and risk-conscious. This configuration is descriptive and context-specific, not a causal or generalizable model. Validation requires completed community interviews, longitudinal land-use data, and outcome indicators.]]>
<![CDATA[Model CIPP dalam evaluasi pembelajaran gerak berirama sekolah dasar ]]>
<![CDATA[Ranintya Meikahani]]>;
<![CDATA[Fadli Ihsan]]>;
<![CDATA[Anisa Herdiyana]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rayhan]]>;
<![CDATA[Pramusinta Putri Dewanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/993180
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan pembelajaran gerak berirama di sekolah dasar kelas bawah. Teknik pengambilan data menggunakan kuesioner untuk guru PJOK berdasarkan model evaluasi CIPP (context, input, process, product). Subjek penelitian ini adalah 43 guru PJOK tingkat sekolah dasar di area Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa skor yang diperoleh berdasarkan pemahaman dan pengelolaan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan metode evaluasi CIPP termasuk dalam kategori sedang dan mencapai persentase sebesar 88,62%, dengan rincian masing-masing aspek adalah sebagai berikut: (1) aspek context sebesar 84%; (2) aspek input sebesar 93,02%; (3) aspek process sebesar 89,19%; dan (4) aspek product sebesar 88,28%. Dari hasil evaluasi tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlunya upaya peningkatan dari masing-masing aspek agar pembelajaran gerak berirama dapat berjalan dengan maksimal.]]>
<![CDATA[Linking linguistic intelligence and speaking anxiety in foreign language learning: a systematic review and integrative conceptual synthesis ]]>
<![CDATA[Lanti Mustika Irtiani Irlan]]>;
<![CDATA[Merry Lapasau]]>;
<![CDATA[Widodo Widodo]]>;
<![CDATA[Sumaryoto Sumaryoto]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/993200
<![CDATA[Speaking anxiety is a major affective barrier to oral performance in foreign language learning, while linguistic intelligence provides cognitive resources for vocabulary use, language organization, and verbal communication. Previous reviews have largely examined speaking anxiety separately, with limited attention to its interaction with linguistic intelligence across learning contexts. Guided by Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences framework and an affective perspective on foreign language anxiety, this study systematically synthesizes evidence on their relationship. Following PRISMA 2020, 35 studies published between 2020 and 2025 were selected from international databases. Eligible studies addressed foreign language learning and examined linguistic intelligence or competence, speaking anxiety, or related cognitive-affective factors. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018. Study selection and thematic coding were conducted by a single reviewer, and themes were developed through comparison and grouping of recurring findings. The synthesis indicates that stronger linguistic competence generally supports communicative readiness and lower speaking anxiety, although the relationship is context-dependent. Three broader conditions emerged: learner-affective factors, instructional-social conditions, and technology-supported practice. This review offers an integrative conceptual synthesis in which linguistic intelligence supports cognitive readiness for speaking, while affective and contextual conditions influence how effectively these resources are translated into speaking performance, rather than functioning as independent determinants of oral communication outcomes.]]>
<![CDATA[Harmonizing famous trademark protection: brand dilution and recognition under trips and the madrid protocol ]]>
<![CDATA[Yusuf Gunawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Gatot Subroto Widagdo]]>;
<![CDATA[Vidi Galenso]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/993230
<![CDATA[This article examines whether the interaction between the TRIPS Agreement and the Madrid Protocol provides coherent international protection for well-known marks against dilution. The study uses normative doctrinal research and comparative document analysis. The corpus comprises six primary instruments and guidance texts - the Paris Convention, the TRIPS Agreement, the Madrid Protocol, the Regulations under the Protocol, the WIPO Joint Recommendation on Well-Known Marks, and the WIPO Madrid Guide - together with fifteen scholarly sources selected from official, publisher, and institutional repositories. Documents were coded according to legal status, fame threshold, scope of protection, treatment of dissimilar goods and services, procedural effect, and enforcement consequence. The analysis finds that TRIPS Article 16(3) establishes a minimum substantive extension for registered well-known marks where use on dissimilar goods or services indicates a connection and is likely to damage the owner's interests, but it does not define blurring, tarnishment, evidentiary thresholds, or remedies. The Madrid Protocol centralizes filing and administration while preserving national examination, refusal, and enforcement; therefore, international registration does not create a unitary substantive right. The WIPO Joint Recommendation supplies more detailed recognition and anti-dilution factors, but it remains non-binding. The principal gap is thus the absence of operational alignment between substantive standards and the administrative registration system. The article proposes a four-part alignment framework: common fame factors, an express and balanced dilution ground, reasoned and interoperable national decisions, and coordinated WTO-WIPO guidance with capacity support. The findings are doctrinal and do not claim uniform national implementation.]]>
<![CDATA[Timing over occurrence: a systematic literature review of how sexual activity and masturbation affect athletic performance ]]>
<![CDATA[Maxi Moleong]]>;
<![CDATA[Fredrik Alfrets Makadada]]>;
<![CDATA[Fadli Ihsan]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/993250
<![CDATA[The effects of sexual activity and masturbation before exercise or competition on athletic performance remain unclear. This systematic review examined their short and long-term effects on physical performance and physiological responses, proposed underlying mechanisms, and methodological limitations in the existing literature. A systematic search of the Scopus database was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, identifying 281 records. Following title and abstract screening and application of predefined eligibility criteria, 50 articles were included in the review. Of these, 10 directly investigated the relationship between sexual activity or masturbation and athletic performance. The relevant evidence was synthesized thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework. A meta-analysis was not performed because of substantial heterogeneity in study outcomes and measures. Overall, sexual activity or masturbation performed more than two hours before exercise or competition did not appear to significantly affect strength, endurance, physical performance, or reaction time. Findings for shorter intervals were inconsistent. Psychological readiness and sleep quality may influence performance, while testosterone fluctuations, autonomic arousal, and perceived exertion were the most frequently proposed physiological mechanisms. However, small sample sizes, reliance on self-reported data, and inconsistent definitions of sexual activity limited the interpretation of causal relationships. Current evidence does not support strict abstinence from sexual activity or masturbation before competition. Individualized, evidence-based recommendations may be more appropriate for athletes. Further research using larger and more diverse samples, standardized definitions, objective measurements, and rigorous study designs is needed to clarify the relationship across different sports and levels of competition.]]>
<![CDATA[Technical-locomotor proficiency gaps in youth badminton beginners: serve, net-drop, smash, and footwork ]]>
<![CDATA[Maulidia Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Eval Edmizal]]>;
<![CDATA[Tjung Hauw Sin]]>;
<![CDATA[Juanda Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29210/993310
<![CDATA[Technical competence is essential for long-term athlete development in badminton; however, the development of racket skills and court-movement abilities during the novice stage remains insufficiently examined. This study aimed to describe serve, net-drop, and smash accuracy, as well as footwork agility, and to examine their relationships with chronological age and sex. A descriptive quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed involving 23 novice athletes (16 boys and 7 girls) aged 11–15 years from a university-affiliated badminton academy in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Participants completed a standardized field-test battery consisting of a modified French-Scott-Fox serve accuracy test, net-drop and smash accuracy tests, and an 8-point footwork agility test. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, norm-referenced scoring, Spearman’s rank correlation, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Mean serve accuracy was 45.4% (SD = 22.3), while net-drop and smash accuracy scores were 21.52 (SD = 8.55) and 18.74 (SD = 9.66), respectively. Mean footwork time was 18.14 s (SD = 3.33), with 69.6% of athletes classified in the very slowest normative category. Racket skills demonstrated moderate-to-high intercorrelations (ρ = 0.60–0.69, p < 0.01), whereas footwork was significantly correlated only with smash accuracy (ρ = −0.49, p = 0.018). Boys outperformed girls across the four performance measures (p = 0.006–0.007; d = 1.10–1.19), despite no significant difference in age distribution (p = 0.397). Age showed moderate-to-strong associations with the measured skills (|r| = 0.47–0.57, p < 0.03). These findings indicate that racket-handling and locomotor skills represent relatively distinct domains of early technical development. Therefore, novice training programmes should place greater emphasis on footwork and multidirectional agility while considering age- and sex-related differences when grouping athletes for training.]]>
