JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
664 Documents
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN DAERAH PROVINSI BALI NO 5 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PRAMUWISATA DI KABUPATEN BADUNG ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Anggia Paramesthi Fajar]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (411.598 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i02.p14
<![CDATA[Tour guide has an important role toward the tourism business in Bali, they take care the guests since they arrive until they depart from Bali. Therefore a tour guide should be able to give the best quality of service and also improve it if to provide better service in the future. In order to achieve the best quality of service, the government should create a rule which regulate how a tour guide can be a profession in order to provide a better quality of service to the guests who visit Bali. Bali Regional Rule no 5 year 2008 about Tour Guides is a kind of regulation established by Bali Government as a foundation for a Tour Guide in doing their profession. However, in fact there are so many irrelevant services given by a Tour Guide and it was not based on the regulation and it caused the problems in this thesis. Are there any factors that generate a specific license for a tour guide based on Bali Regional Rule no 5 year 2008 about Tour Guides could not be released? How is the application of punishment ofthose tour guides who did not obey the regulation based on Bali Regional Rule no 5 year 2008 about Tour Guides? This research used empiric approach which means that we are doing an approach by solving the problem that we face during the research. In relation with the regulations and law and also the law theories which relevant applied in this research e.g. theory of obeying the law, theory of authority and theory of product quality. In order to show the government’s authority to apply the law and how the regulation is able to guarantee the law and also to ensure that the government regulation can guarantee the tour guide quality to provide the best quality of services.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK AKIBAT PERCERAIAN ORANG TUA ]]>
<![CDATA[Putu Sauca Arimbawa Tusan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (358.704 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2017.v06.i02.p05
<![CDATA[Legal protection is the right of every citizen including the right for children. All citizens are equal before the law and government and shall abide by the law and the government without any exception. The state should make laws as commander in safeguarding the implementation of national and state life. Every child has the right to live, grow and develop and are entitled to protection and violence and discrimination. Divorce cases in particular Denpasar Bali every year showed an increase. It is necessary to get the attention of the parties concerned, because of the impact of divorce experienced by children can be felt directly by the children themselves. Children become victims direct result of his parents' divorce. The judiciary has an important role to ensure the rights of children through a court decision. Judges who hear cases of divorce may consider in its decision to regulate the rights of children whose parents did divorce. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to provide a clear picture of the setting and the role of judges in providing legal protection for child victims of divorce. Perlindungan hukum merupakan hak bagi setiap warga negara termasuk juga hak bagi anak. Segala warga negara bersamaan kedudukannya di dalam hukum dan pemerintahan dan wajib menjunjung hukum dan pemerintahan itu dengan tidak ada kecualinya. Negara harus menjadikan hukum sebagai panglima dalam mengawal penyelenggaraan kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Setiap anak berhak atas kelangsungan hidup, tumbuh dan berkembang serta berhak atas perlindungan dan kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Kasus perceraian di Bali khususnya kota Denpasar setiap tahunnya memperlihatkan adanya peningkatan. Hal ini perlu mendapatkan perhatian oleh pihak terkait, karena dampak perceraian yang dialami anak dapat dirasakan langsung oleh anak itu sendiri. Anak menjadi korban langsung akibat perceraian orang tuanya. Lembaga peradilan mempunyai peranan penting untuk menjamin hak-hak anak lewat putusan pengadilan. Hakim yang memeriksa perkara perceraian misalnya dapat mempertimbangkan dalam putusan nya untuk mengatur tentang hak-hak anak yang orang tuanya melakukan perceraian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran yang jelas tentang pengaturan dan peranan hakim dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi anak korban akibat perceraian.]]>
<![CDATA[Do The Foreign Workers Need To Speak Indonesian? ]]>
<![CDATA[I Made Udiana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Sarjana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (349.486 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i02.p02
<![CDATA[The foreign workers are one of the important asset supporting business activities in the globalization era. However, an easy requirement for a foreign worker who works in Indonesia such as dropping language requirement tends to decrease local worker opportunity. The aim of this study to elaborate on the impact of cutting language requirement for foreign workers in new Indonesian regulation. This study uses a comparative approach. The study indicates that Article 36 of the Minister of Manpower Regulation Number 16 of 2015 is contrary to the higher legal norm, namely Article 33 of Law Number 24 of 2009. Based on Stufenbau Theory concerning the Act No. 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Law and Regulation, the lower level will be not applicable. Therefore, revision for the Decree of Manpower Regulation is needed to legal certainty and fairly opportunity for local workers.]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENGALIHAN SAHAM PERUSAHAAN PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK ENERGI PANAS BUMI MELALUI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE ASING (SIAC) ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (397.829 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i01.p03
<![CDATA[Arbitration is one of popular means to solve disputes arise between parties in international business nowadays. Arbitration characteristics such as: confidentiality; “party autonomy” (principle which gives both parties freedom to agree on arbitration institution or ad hoc arbitration, to appoint an arbitrator, arbitration procedure, place of arbitration, governing law) and also international enforceability due to the New York Convention 1958 are regarded as part of the main advantages of arbitration. This research is a normative law using concept analysis approach legal, regulatory approaches undertaken by examining legislation relevant to the issues of law and experiences to approach a case of transfer of shares Bali Power Corporate. Sources of legal materials used in this study are such as related literature, journals, articles and thesis that are relevant to the subject matter. The results of this study indicate that partial award (SIAC) has a binding force for the parties to the dispute. Legal implications arising from this decision that the party whose breach the contract has an obligation to replace the damage of PT. Bali Tenaga Corporate since the contract was signed.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISA YURIDIS PENCABUTAN HAK MEMILIH DAN DIPILIH SEBAGAI PIDANA TAMBAHAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA PADA PUTUSAN RATU ATUT CHOSIYAH ]]>
<![CDATA[I Wayan Dharma Na Gara]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (394.588 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i01.p13
<![CDATA[Ide dari jurnal ini adalah menganalisa mengenai peraturan terkait pencabutan hak memilih dan dipilih sebagai pidana tambahan dalam perspektif perlindungan HAM pada putusan Ratu Atut Chosiyah, yang mana di dasari atas adanya konflik norma antara UU No. 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang HAM (UU HAM) jo., UU No. 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan ICCPR (UU ICCPR) terhadap KUHP jo., UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU PTPK). Metode penulisan pada penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dikarenakan terdapat konflik norma sebagaimana disebutkan di atas, sehingga putusan pidana tambahan yang mana diberikan oleh Majelis Hakim pada tingkat kasasi masih cenderung prematur/cacat hukum jika ditinjau dari perspektif pengaturan HAM di Indonesia. Agar putusan pidana tambahan pencabutan hak memilih dan dipilih tersebut tidak prematur/cacat hukum maka suatu syarat diwajibkan oleh UU ICCPR yaitu pengumuman resmi darurat korupsi oleh pemerintah mesti dipenuhi.]]>
<![CDATA[KONSEP-KONSEP YANG TERKAIT DENGAN KOTA LAYAK ANAK DI KOTA DENPASAR ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Duwi Putri Kamayani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (366.373 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i03.p14
<![CDATA[The objective of this research is to reveal the concepts related to child-friendly city as perceived by parents in Denpasar City. The research method was normative research with conceptual approach and statute approach. The date collected by library research while the analysis data done by descriptive method. The research result indicated that the concepts related to child-friendly city are explored and grouped through a factor analysis. From the process of factor analysis, four measures of ideal urban environment related to child-friendly city can be identified. They are policy, protection, environment and planning for children. The first three concepts are well suited with the Indonesian national policy on child-friendly city. Whereas the last concept, planning for children, needs special attention as a part of the existing concept of policy, or it should be an independent concept that needs to be accomodated in planning norms, standards, procedures and manuals in an urban environment.Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui konsep terkait Kota Layak Anak sebagaimana dipersepsikan orang tua di Kota Denpasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Data dikumpulkan melalui penelitian kepustakaan, sedangkan analisis data dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep terkait Kota Layak Anak digali dan dikelompokan melalui analisis dari faktornya. Dari proses faktor analisis ini, empat pengukuran lingkungan perkotaan yang ideal terkait dengan Kota Layak Anak dapat diidentifikasi. Faktor itu adalah kebijakan, perlindungan, lingkungan dan perencanaan untuk anak-anak. Tiga dari konsep pertama sangat sesuai dengan kebijakan Nasional Indonesia tentang Kota Layak Anak. Sedangkan konsep yang terakhir, perencanaan untuk anak-anak, membutuhkan perhatian khusus sebagai bagian dari konsep yang ada dari kebijakan saat ini atau harus dijadikan konsep yang bebas yang perlu ditampung dalam ketentuan-ketentuan perencanaan, standard, prosedur dan manual pada lingkungan perkotaan.]]>
<![CDATA[Dualisme Judicial Review Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Nanang Al Hidayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Mela Sari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (590.975 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i03.p04
<![CDATA[Based on the provisions of Article 24A paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution and Article 24C paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution, there is a dualism of judicial institutions authorized to decide the judicial review of conflict of laws and regulations, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. This study aims to find out how to regulate the judicial review of legislation in Indonesia. The research method used in this paper is the normative juridical. The results of the study showed that the dualism of statutory regulatory bodies resulted in inconsistencies in providing decisions related to the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. Whereas legislation is arranged hierarchically and has a proportion of certain content material that must be tested consistently in one institution only to provide a legal certainty for the community. Berdasarkan ketentuan dalam Pasal 24A ayat 1 UUD 1945 dan Pasal 24C ayat 1 UUD 1945 terjadi dualisme lembaga kehakiman yang berwenang memutus judicial review konflik peraturan perundang-undangan yaitu Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan judicial review peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan dualisme lembaga pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan menyebabkan inkonsistensi dalam memberikan putusan terkait permasalahan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Padahal peraturan perundang-undangan itu tersusun secara hirarkis dan mempunyai proporsi materi muatan tertentu sehingga harus diuji secara konsisten dalam satu lembaga saja agar memberikan suatu kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat.]]>
<![CDATA[PRINSIP-PRINSIP KEPEMILIKAN SAHAM PEMERINTAH DALAM PERUSAHAAN MILIK NEGARA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN SINGAPURA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Wayan Desi Aryanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (98.114 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i01.p05
<![CDATA[This journal entitled “Comparative Study Concerning The Principles of Government’s Shares in State Owned Enterprise”. Problems being research in this thesis are, first: the legal standing of the state’s equity in Persero according to Indonesian corporate law and its comparison to Singapore corporate law. The second problem, what are legal implications of the government’s shares in Persero. The method being used is normative legal research through legislation and regulation approach and comparative approach. Legal materials used are primary legal materials, legal materials and secondary and tertiary legal materials, the analysis done by descriptive, evaluative, interpretative, analytical and argumentative. This research shows that according to Indonesian corporate law, the state’s equity being placed in Persero belongs to Persero and according to Singapore Law, the government’s equity being placed in Persero as the Government Linked Company belongs to the said company. Legal consequences of the government equity in Persero are: the management of the said equity is no longer subject to state budget’s principals but to good corporate government principals; contracts made by Persero binds Persero and not the government, hence compliance and liability arising from the said contracts are Persero’s liability only and therefore Persero’s claim arising from contracts belong to the said Persero. However, in practical level, there are still some inconsistency in Persero’s equity treatment (i.e. financial audit and Persero’s inability to act as the guarantor to another company). On the other side, the Government of Singapore’s equity in Temasek is managed by corporate mechanism and almost without government intervention (except for past reserves). Therefore Temasek is free to make any contract with third parties and can act as the guarantor for its subsidiary.]]>
<![CDATA[SIKAP MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT BALI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MK NO. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERKAIT KEDUDUKAN ANAK LUAR KAWIN ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Nyoman Sukerti]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gst. Ayu Agung Ariani]]>;
<![CDATA[I Ketut Sudantra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (383.901 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i03.p15
<![CDATA[This study aimed to determine the knowledge of indigenous people of Bali against theConstitutional Court No.46 / PUU-VII / 2010, meaning the Constitutional Court rulingrelated to the child outside the mating position, to identify and analyze the attitudes ofindigenous communities Bali on the discharge of the Constitutional Court. This study is anempirical law with non-doctrinal approach (socio legal research).The results showed that indigenous people in general do not yet know Bali Court DecisionNo.46 / PUU-VII / 2010 was. Meaning beyond mating gives children the same rights aschildren born within marriage. Balinese people’s attitudes related to this decision, can beclassified into two: 1. Most accept the decision of the reason; children outside the matingstatus to clear, the mother can claim responsibility for the biological father of the child,the child is no longer despised in the family and society. 2. small Sebagain reject reason;children outside mating can cause problems in inheritance in biological father, contraryto the customary law of Bali, girls may prefer not to marry. The attitude of the indigenouspeoples of Bali pros and cons of the legal culture of society.Conclusion: Its meaning is to give children the right to marry outside the same as childrenborn within marriage. Balinese customary law community in general have not been awareof the Constitutional Court. Balinese people’s attitudes towards the Constitutional Courtruling pro and cons.]]>
<![CDATA[INDEPENDENSI DAN IMPARTIALITAS HAKIM PERSPEKTIF TEORITIK – PRAKTIK SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Winartha Indra Bhawana]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (406.266 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i01.p17
<![CDATA[Lembaga pengadilan berfungsi memeriksa dan memutus terdakwa dalam perkara pidana melalui hakim yang diberi kewenangan atributif oleh undang-undang. Hakim dalam memutus memiliki otoritas kemandirian dan ketidakberpihakan oleh siapapun. Hakim dalam fungsi menegakkan hukum bertujuan tegaknya keadilan, terwujudnya kemanfaatan bagi semua pihak, serta adanya kepastian hukum. Dalam proses peradilan pidana secara prosedural dan faktual tidak berfungsi sendirian, proses mekanisme peradilan pidana dikerjakan oleh penegak hukum lain seperti penyidik, penuntut, pembina oleh pemasyarakatan dan advokat selaku pendamping pencari keadilan. Peradilan pidana Indonesia berpola secara terpadu dalam tujuan sama untuk memerangi kejahatan. Proses hukum yang adil menjadi harapan dan sasaran dalam penegakan hukum, terbebas dari mafia praktek peradilan, dengan ditunjang kemandirian, kebebasan dan kenetralan hakim dalam memutus. Menjadi masalah lembaga peradilan melalui hakimnya sudahkah berperan sesuai teori sistem peradilan yang benar dan ideal ? Serta adakah batas-batas kebebasan bagi hakim dalam mengambil putusan ? Secara teoritik akan terjawab melalui penelitian normatif hukum lewat tulisan karya ilmiah ini, yang pada simpulan awal bahwa terkadang hakim dalam memutus cenderung subyektif dan mengabaikan prinsip-prinsip teori keilmuan sistem peradilan pidana, serta cenderung membawa misi kebebasan tanpa batas.]]>
