Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.33
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Rechtsidee JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ius Constituendum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law IBLAM Law Review Administrative and Environmental Law Review International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Yuridika Ta'zir: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Sugiri, Bambang
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

 1   2 
NON-PENAL POLICY IN PROSECUTION TERMINATION (RECONSTRUCTING CRIMINAL LAW THROUGH RESTORATIVE JUSTICE) Marasabessy , Fauzy; Sugiri, Bambang; Ratnohadi, Heru
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v5i2.605

Abstract

The idea of non-penal policies prioritizing rehabilitation and social reintegration rather than mere incarceration is a more humane approach in sentencing systems. However, in practice, Indonesia's criminal justice system is still dominated by retributive paradigms emphasizing vengeance. This research examines the application of restorative justice as the basis for the prosecution termination by public prosecutors. It finds that although internal regulations exist within law enforcement institutions such as the police and prosecutor's office, restorative justice implementation remains suboptimal due to structural and cultural barriers. Using a normative juridical approach, this study concludes that non-penal policies can provide solutions to prison overcapacity, enhance victim protection, and strengthen the integrated criminal justice system.
UNEQUAL RESTORATIVE JUSTICE THE PROBLEM OF NEGLECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE REPORTED PARTY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Marasabessy , Fauzy; Sugiri, Bambang; Ratnohadi, Heru
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v5i1.607

Abstract

Restorative justice has been adopted as an alternative approach within the criminal justice system, with the primary aim of restoring relationships between offenders, victims, and the community. However, in practice in Indonesia, the implementation of restorative justice tends to prioritize victim recovery while failing to provide balanced legal protection for the reported party. This imbalance raises serious concerns, particularly in relation to the principle of presumption of innocence and the constitutional rights that should be upheld for every individual involved in legal proceedings. This article aims to analyze the unequal treatment faced by reported parties within restorative justice mechanisms in the criminal justice system. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the study examines existing regulations and case studies of restorative justice implementation by law enforcement authorities. The findings indicate that the absence of robust procedural standards to safeguard the rights of the reported party renders restorative justice practices vulnerable to abuse, including coercion into settlement or undue pressure. Therefore, regulatory reinforcement and supervisory mechanisms are needed to ensure that restorative justice not only prioritizes victims' interests but also guarantees equal legal protection for reported parties, thereby contributing to a fair and balanced criminal justice system.  
Law Enforcement of Cybercrime: Tracking Digital Footprints of Cross-Border Hackers Nusa, Idham Qrida; Sugiri, Bambang; Yuliati, Yuliati; Sulistio, Faizin
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i2.475

Abstract

This journal analyzes the procedural criminal law (KUHAP) in dealing with cybercrime within formal legal law. The analysis highlights the use of cloud storage as a media to store the proceeds of crime, in the form of data privacy. As a case study to show how cyber criminals commit cyber crimes by using computer networks, investigators still face difficulties in conducting searches and seizures to obtain evidence. The results of data theft crimes which are stored in cloud storage, make digital evidence difficult to be seized, nothing can be used as evidence. As a result, digital evidence from crimes remains accessible and can be reused in subsequent crime, while, hackers remain uncaptured. What strategies can the Indonesian government implement to overcome and prevent cyberbcrime attacks in the future? This requires reformulating legal provisions as amendments and improvements to Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), with reference to the Budapest Convention. This research examines the main problem using a normative juridical approach, statutory approach, case approach, and comparative legal methods, combined with qualitative analysis approach. It philosophically examines the principle of legal certainty and analyzes legal theories of punishment and confiscation. Thus, a formal procedural legal system is applied to regulate the seizure and search of intangible electronic, enabling the electronic evidence stored in cloud to be seized or taken down from cyberspace, declared valid in court, fulfilling the principle of legal certainty to trace the footsteps of hackers across countries/internationally.
The Forfeiture of Corruption Assets and the Legal Position of Innocent Third Parties: Normative Challenges and Policy Gaps Syauqi Huda, Kholilah Delvi; Yuliati, Yuliati; Sugiri, Bambang
Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/invest.v5i1.10546

Abstract

The asset forfeiture of corruption proceeds is essential for recovering state losses and preventing criminals from benefiting economically from their crimes. However, this policy raises legal challenges when assets are in the hands of third parties acting in good faith. This study aims to explore the economic rights of such third parties and examine the legal protection of their rights during the seizure of assets derived from corruption. This study employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case analyses. The findings reveal an imbalance between asset forfeiture policies and the principle of justice for third parties who acquire assets legally. Although regulations govern objections from good-faith third parties, practical implementation still faces difficulties in terms of proof and legal interpretation. Thus, this study suggests the need for more detailed regulatory reforms to ensure the fair protection of the economic rights of good-faith third parties while facilitating the recovery of state assets.
PHYLOSOPHICAL AND CONSTITUSIONAL PROTECTION TOWARDS RELIGION IN INDONESIA Silfiah, Rossa Ilma; Luth, Thohir; Sugiri, Bambang; Aprilianda, Nurini
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016): Contemporary Indigenous and Constitutional Issues: Transnational Perspective
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.003.02.04

Abstract

Legal protection on religion is certainty for a state with Pancasila principle. The first principle the Divinity of the Only God has been spirit of the following points, as living guidance for Indonesian country. The believing of the Divinity of the Only God shows that the Indonesian Republic is religious based country by protecting freedom to have religion for its people. This regulation has implication in governmental circle, that the country makes Religion Ministry as one of ministries that its existence has the same position to other state institutions. The implementation of legal protection toward religion needs legitimating in the field of civil law, showed in issuing President Decree No. 1 of 1965 on the Preventing of Misuse and/or Religion Staining. The existence of this Decree in Old Order has been legitimated newly as a Law  by issuing the Law No. 5 of 1969, thus the President Decree has been added to the Criminal Code, Act 156a.
RADICALIZATION IN THE TEACHING RELIGION AND ITS RELATIONS WITH CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM Hasibuan, Hoiruddin; Sudarsono, Sudarsono; Nurjaya, I Nyoman; Sugiri, Bambang
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2017): Law and Sustainable Development
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.02.02

Abstract

The criminal act of terrorism is a crime against humanity, human civilization and constitute a serious threat to the integrity and sovereignty of a nation. In fact, terrorism can be a threat to a state security and sovereignty as well as world peace.It is argued that one of the main causes of criminal acts of terrorism is radicalization. Thus, this paper seeks to analyze the casual link between radicalization and terrorism. This paper determines to what extent does the radicalization affected the criminal acts of terrorism. This research uses a juridical normative method by analyzing legal instruments relating to terrorism and seeks to analyze the reason behind the provided rules.This paper submitted that while radicalization affected terrorism, de-radicalization is urgent in responding to terrorism. This paper also proposes how de-radicalization works in preventing terrorism.
Sovereignty and Human Rights: Examining Sustainable Plantation Enterprises in Indonesia Hairan, Hairan; Negara, Tunggul Anshari Setia; Koeswahyono, Imam; Sugiri, Bambang
Administrative and Environtmental Law Review Vol 5 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/aelr.v5i1.3415

Abstract

The Sovereignty Principle in the Plantations Law legalizes dynamics that disproportionately empower plantation companies while disenfranchising indigenous peoples. Under this principle, plantation permits are granted to companies, not indigenous communities, limiting the latter's involvement in mandatory deliberations set by the law. Consequently, indigenous peoples are coerced into relinquishing their lands in exchange for compensation, leading to the erosion of their collective land rights. This practice is at odds with the protections intended under Article 28D Paragraph (1) and Article 28H Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, which safeguard collective rights to property. The lack of political will to recognize and protect these rights suggests a troubling disregard for the existence and sovereignty of indigenous peoples.
Reformulasi Pengaturan Hakim Ad Hoc untuk Pemerataan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Kabupaten/Kota Lanita, Tiara; Sugiri, Bambang; Afandi, Fachrizal; Tilman, Aquelino da Costa
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.663

Abstract

Pengaturan hakim ad hoc dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi masih bersifat sentralistik dan belum sepenuhnya mampu menjawab kebutuhan keadilan di tingkat daerah. Pola rekrutmen yang terpusat menyebabkan konsentrasi hakim ad hoc di kota-kota besar, khususnya ibu kota provinsi, sehingga menimbulkan ketimpangan distribusi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor). Kondisi ini berdampak pada terbatasnya akses keadilan bagi masyarakat di kabupaten/kota yang jauh dari pusat pemerintahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kelemahan pengaturan hakim ad hoc dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 yang menghambat pemerataan pembentukan Pengadilan Tipikor di daerah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme rekrutmen hakim ad hoc yang bersifat nasional belum mendukung prinsip desentralisasi peradilan Tipikor. Reformasi pengaturan diperlukan melalui penerapan rekrutmen berbasis kebutuhan daerah dengan mempertimbangkan jumlah perkara, tingkat kerawanan korupsi, dan ketersediaan sumber daya manusia lokal. Selain itu, dibutuhkan model kelembagaan yang lebih fleksibel, transparan, dan akuntabel guna memperkuat pemerataan akses keadilan.
ARAH CAMPUR TANGAN URUSAN PERADILAN PASAL 3 AYAT (2) UU No. 48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN SEBAGAI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA Subarkah, Ibnu; Nurjaya, I Nyoman; Sugiri, Bambang; Ruba i, Masruchin
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v4i2.4188

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi ketidakjelasan   makna larangan campur tangan urusan peradilan dalam Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang berimplikasi pada arah makna tersebut, dimana dalam prakteknya telah banyak kasus-kasus   dalam tingkat ketatanegaraan dan peradilan yang nota bene dapat diselaraskan dengan Contempt ofCcourt/CoC.   yang mempengaruhi kewibawaan hakim dan badan peradilan. Metode yang digunakan melalui penelitian hukum bahan-bahan hukum, dengan analisis preskriptif. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis hubungan campur tangan dalam Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU No., 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman berkaitan dengan Contempt of Court, dan diperlukannya kebijakan hukum pidana ke depan.Adapun hasil dan pembahasan ditemukan bahwa antara makna campur tangan urusan peradilan pada Pasal 3 ayat (2) undang-undang di atas hakekatnya tidak berbeda dengan perbuatan penghinaan pengadilan (contempt of court) dimana terdapat sebagian masyarakat yang memandang hal tersebut berbeda, misalnya adanya upaya untuk menyusun pengaturannya melalui RUU CoC dan perubahan KUHP yang mengatur Tindak Pidana dalam Penyelenggaraan Peradilan. Kebijakan hukum pidana yang mengadopsi hukum sebagai satu kesatuan sistem sangat kompeten dalam mengatur implikasi atas norma Pasal 3 ayat (3) undang-undang di atas dengan cara mengusulkan perubahan undang-undang tersebut sebagai hukum pidana khusus ke depan. Kesimpulannya bahwa terdapat hubungan antara Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman dengan perbuatan penghinaan pengadilan untuk menentukan arah perubahan UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasan Kehakiman melalui Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU tersebut yang hasilnya sebagai kebijakan hukum pidana (hukum pidana khusus).
Co-Authors ansori ansori Aziz, Siti Nur Afifah Dunggio, Haklainul Fachrizal Afandi Fadila, Ilham Zain Faizin Sulistio Hairan, Hairan Hartadi, Hanif HASIBUAN, HOIRUDDIN I Nyoman Nurjaya Ibnu Subarkah Imam Koeswahyono Lanita, Tiara Lucky MH SH. Endrawati Luth, Thohir Marasabessy , Fauzy Maria Nova, Maria Maulidi, Thoriq Jinan Milda Istiqomah Nurini Aprilianda Nusa, Idham Qrida Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto Rachmi Sulistyarini Ratnohadi, Heru Ruba i, Masruchin Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Setiawan Silfiah, Rossa Ilma Sudarsono Suhariningsih Sukarmi Syafa'at, Rachmad Syauqi Huda, Kholilah Delvi Tata Wijayanta Tilman, Aquelino da Costa Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Widyaningsih, Aryana Sekar Wisnuwardhani, Diah Aju Yonatan Yuliati - Zham-Zham, Lelly Muridi