Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice Jurnal Riset Hukum, Ekonomi Islam, ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Neraca: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Rechtsvinding
Ambarwati, Mega Dewi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Disparity in Religious Court Decisions in Divorce Cases Due to Apostasy: Normative Analysis and Legal Construction Arifin, Rosyid; Ambarwati, Mega Dewi
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1297

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the disparity of Religious Court decisions in divorce cases caused by apostasy and to formulate an appropriate legal construction for such cases. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis focuses on three Religious Court decisions, namely Decision of the Bandung Religious Court No. 0166/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Bdg, Decision of the Palu Religious Court No. 0249/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Pal, and Decision of the Bandung Religious Court No. 147/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Bdg. Data were collected through document study of primary and secondary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively through inventory, classification, and systematization stages. The findings reveal a disparity in judicial reasoning regarding divorce due to apostasy. Some judges consider apostasy as the primary legal ground for divorce through fasakh, while others base their decisions on continuous disputes and marital disharmony resulting from apostasy. This disparity indicates inconsistency in the application of Article 116 letter (h) of the Compilation of Islamic Law, which requires apostasy to cause marital discord. Therefore, this study recommends a legal construction that recognizes apostasy as an independent ground for divorce without the necessity of linking it to continuous disputes, in order to ensure legal certainty and uniformity of decisions within the Religious Court system.
Co-Authors Arifin, Rosyid Azmita Kamila, Ghina Bevinda, Shifra Adline Cahyadewi, Bertha Fardayana, Taj Bahy Gilang Ramadhan Hariyono, Ramadhan Devo Hendartama, Alfi Marpaung, Hendry Mujahid, Mushofi Nahar pangestu, Ramadhani dwi Permadi, Rangga Setya Pratama, Ricko Putri Ayu Lestari Putri, Cecilia Aina Rindi, Tin Qadriana Anaway Risyanto, Hamdallah Alfarizky A P Rohmah, Siti Afidatul Rosa, Ellya Santoso, Joe Martin Setyawan, Arel Saputra Suhessyani, Anggrita Esthi Susanto, Asmara Nova Suzana, Merillyn Victoria Syahputra, Rendy Dwi Togatorop, Pricelia Anggita Wahyuni, Silvia Ika Nur Wijaya, Aditya Rizky