Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.679
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal Abdimas PHB : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Progresif Humanis Brainstorming JUSTISI Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ilmu Keguruan dan Pendidikan (JPM-IKP) JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Bakti Cendana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Berajah Journal Jurnal Abdimas Kartika Wijayakusuma AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bacarita Law Journal Jurnal Media Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (JM-PKM) Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Media Bina Ilmiah Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Vyavahara Duta Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (J-PeHI) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vidhisastya: Journal for Legalscholars Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Triwulandari, I Gusti Agung Ayu Mas
Universitas Pendidikan Nasional
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mechanical Engineering Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 46 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Pertangungjawaban Pidana atas Penyalahgunaan Profesi Wartawan dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Ni Kadek Fitri Noviani; Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari; I Made Wirya Darma; Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1709

Abstract

Freedom of the press in Indonesia is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution as a vital pillar of democracy and freedom of expression. However, this freedom is often misused by individuals posing as journalists to commit extortion, thereby undermining the integrity of the press. This study aims to analyze the form of criminal liability imposed on individuals who abuse the journalist profession to conduct extortion accompanied by threats, as regulated in Article 368 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Using a normative legal research method with a literature-based approach, this study examines legal doctrines, scholarly works, and relevant legislation, including the Press Law and the Criminal Code. The findings indicate that the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali cannot be applied to such cases because extortion is a general crime, not a press dispute. Therefore, criminal liability falls entirely under the jurisdiction of general criminal law, not the Press Law. The study concludes that the misuse of journalistic attributes as tools for extortion eliminates press privilege and must be prosecuted as an ordinary criminal offense to safeguard press integrity and uphold legal certainty.
Problematika Rekaman Tanpa Izin sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Perzinahan antara Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Privasi Aldo Rajendra Zufar Wahyu Aryaputra; Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari; I Made Wirya Darma; I Putu Edi Rusmana
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i2.2070

Abstract

This study examines the legal status of recordings obtained without consent as evidence in adultery cases, particularly in relation to the tension between legal certainty and the right to privacy. The main problem lies in the absence of clear legal standards governing the admissibility of such evidence, which creates uncertainty in judicial practice. This research aims to analyze the validity of unauthorized recordings as evidence and to assess their implications for privacy protection within the Indonesian legal framework. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, focusing on relevant regulations such as the Criminal Procedure Code, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and the Personal Data Protection Law, as well as constitutional court decisions. The findings indicate that although such recordings may be considered as supporting evidence under certain conditions, their use raises serious concerns regarding violations of privacy rights. The lack of consistent legal interpretation further complicates their admissibility in court. Therefore, clearer legal guidelines are necessary to balance evidentiary needs with the protection of fundamental rights.
Problematika Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Struktural dan Non Struktural Kaitannya dengan Asas Equality Before The Law Agung Mas Triwulandari
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 14 No 3 (2020): Edisi November
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.539-552

Abstract

Bantuan hukum struktural mengasumsikan bahwa kemiskinan masyarakat lebih dikarenakan kondisi struktural yang timpang. Apabila paradigma lama bantuan hukum hanya bertumpu pada bantuan hukum melalui jalur hukum saja, tanpa didukung oleh pendekatan yang bercorak struktural, maka gerakan bantuan hukum tidak akan efektif, maka strategi bantuan melalui jalur hukum wajib didukung oleh suatu gerakan yang meruntuhkan ketimpangan tersebut. Kajian ini membahas problematika pemberian bantuan hukum bagi masyarakat dan bagaimana refleksi asas equality before the law melalui pemberian bantuan hukum struktural dan non struktural. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif, metode pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan, dan teknis analisis data bersifat kualitatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa problematik pemberian bantuan hukum struktural dan non struktural dipengaruhi oleh kerangka hukum normative pemberian bantuan hukum yang tidak bekerja, dll, sedangkan refleksi asas equality before the law berkaitan dengan pemberian bantuan hukum struktural dan non struktural ini sudah dimuat dalam pasal 28D ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, yaitu bahwa setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan, perlindungan, dan kepastian hukum yang adil serta perlakuan yang sama di hadapan hukum. Asas ini sebagai prinsip yang sangat vital dalam pemberian bantuan hukum struktural dan non struktural, hal Ini juga merupakan konsekuensi Negara Indonesia sebagai negara hukum (pasal 1 ayat (3) UUD 1945 hasil perubahan ketiga). Ada tiga prinsip negara hukum (rechstaat), yaitu supremasi hukum (supremacy of law), kesetaraan di hadapan hukum (equality before the law), dan penegakan hukum dengan cara-cara yang tidak bertentangan dengan hukum (due process of law).
PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN DEEPFAKE ATAS HAK PRIVASI SESEORANG Putu Clarissa Taramitha Devi; I Made Wirya Darma; Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari; Bagus Gede Ari Rama
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i4.748

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has given rise to new forms of cybercrime, one of which is deepfake technology. Deepfakes involve the manipulation of videos, audio, or images to create fabricated content that may harm the dignity, reputation, and privacy of individuals. This study addresses two research questions: (1) What is the legal responsibility of perpetrators who misuse deepfake technology in ways that violate an individual's right to privacy under the Indonesian legal system? and (2) How are the human rights of victims of deepfake misuse that infringes upon the right to privacy protected? The objectives of this study are, first, to examine the enforcement of laws against perpetrators of deepfake pornography in Indonesia and, second, to analyze the legal protection available to victims of deepfake misuse from a human rights perspective. This research employs a normative legal research method based on library research, utilizing statutory regulations, books, scholarly journals, and other relevant legal sources. The findings indicate that individuals who create and disseminate deepfake content that violates another person's right to privacy must be held legally accountable for their actions. Furthermore, victims of deepfake misuse are entitled to legal protection grounded in the principles of human rights.
​Corporate Liability in Over-Dimension and Overloading (ODOL) Violations: A Civil Law Perspective I Made Doni Kusuma Raharja Putra; I Nyoman Budiana; Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari; I Made Wirya Darma
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 2 (2026): October
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v6.n2.p59-73.2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines corporate civil liability for losses resulting from Over-Dimension and Overloading (ODOL) violations under Indonesia's positive legal system and analyzes the application of Economic Analysis of Law (EAL) in developing an ideal liability model.Research Methodology: This normative legal research employs statutory and conceptual approaches. The statutory approach examines the Indonesian Civil Code and Law Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation. The conceptual approach analyzes the doctrines of corporate liability, vicarious liability, and economic analysis of law, particularly the concepts of the least-cost avoider and cost internalization.Results: Articles 1365 and 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code provide a normative basis for corporate civil liability through unlawful and vicarious acts. However, Law Number 22 of 2009 regulates ODOL only through administrative and criminal sanctions, without an explicit civil compensation mechanism. Consequently, external losses are largely borne by the state. From an economic analysis of law perspective, corporations are the least-cost avoiders and should therefore bear responsibility for preventing and compensating such losses.Conclusions: Indonesia's legal framework has not fully accommodated corporate civil liability for ODOL violations, resulting in inefficient loss allocation.Limitations: This study is limited to normative legal analysis and does not examine judicial practices or empirical implementation.Contributions: The study recommends adopting a limited strict liability regime supported by mandatory liability insurance to promote cost internalization, improve loss allocation, strengthen deterrence, and support future reform of Indonesian civil and transportation law.
​Euthanasia and Patient Self-Determination: Reconstructing Right to Die in Human Rights and Criminal Law Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari; Kadek Devi Kalfika Anggria Wardani; Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati; Putu Edi Rusmana
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 2 (2026): October
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v6.n2.p135-149.2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the legal friction surrounding active euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and patient self-determination within the framework of international human rights law and Indonesia's new National Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023). It aims to provide a juridical reconstruction of the "right to die with dignity" for terminally ill patients.Research Methodology: A normative legal research design is employed, using descriptive analysis through a statutory, doctrinal, and comparative approach. The primary legal materials include Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Supreme Court Regulations, and Constitutional Court Decisions.Results: Findings reveal that Article 461 of the new Criminal Code retains a rigid criminalization of mercy killing, conflicting with bodily autonomy principles guaranteed under international human rights frameworks. Reconstructing the right to die requires establishing tight statutory exceptions, objective medical protocols, and multi-layered judicial oversight.Conclusions: The strict punitive paradigm in Indonesian criminal law fails to address severe medical futility. Progressive legal reform, balancing autonomy and state protection, is imperative to avoid arbitrary suffering.Limitations: The analysis was limited to adult patients with decision-making capacity undergoing terminal illnesses and did not cover non-voluntary euthanasia or pediatric cases.Contributions: This research contributes to bioethical jurisprudence by offering a blueprint for legislative reform in developing legal systems that balance human rights and criminal codification.
Co-Authors AAA. Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda Adinda Trisya Anindia Putri Aldo Rajendra Zufar Wahyu Aryaputra Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Sri Rahayu Gorda Anak Agung Ngurah Eddy Supriyadinata Gorda Anak Agung Ngurah Juli Wardana Putra Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani Bagus Gede Ari Rama Claude Iguma Wakenge Desy Darmayanti Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana Dewa Ayu Susanti Dewi Fauzi, Shellby Sabrina I Gede Agus Kurniawan I Gede Agus Kurniawan I Gusti Agus Deni Diputra I Gusti Ayu Eviani Yuliantari I Gusti Ngurah Agung Dwi Putrawan I Komang Ary Dharma Putra I Made Doni Kusuma Raharja Putra I Made Wira Bhawa I Made Wirya Darma I Made Wirya Darma I Made Wirya Darma I Nyoman Budiana I Putu Edi Rusmana I Wayan Dharma Putra Jaya, Krisna Adi Kadek Devi Kalfika Anggria Wardani Kadek Devi Kalfika Anggria Wardani Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma Kadek Julia Mahadewi Ketut Arya Amanta Wiguna Komang Anisya Susiladevi Komang Arie Putri Triyandani Komang Gede Pramantara Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri Lusiana Putri, Putu Metta Maharani, Luh Arini Yulia Maharani, Sandrina Darma Mai Sila, Patricia Carmila Apriliana Ni Kadek Fitri Noviani Ni Kadek Fitri Noviani Ni Ketut Elly Sutrisni, Ni Ketut Elly Ni Komang Diah Afsari Devi Ni Komang Tria Ayumi Ni Made Dyah Sukasmini Merthada Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati Ni Nyoman Juwita Arswati Ni Putu Pritasya Prameswari Princess Alyssa Tee-anastacio Puspanegara, I Gusti Ngurah Dwi Putra, I Made Bagus Aldi Marantika Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Putri, Putu Siska Rudiana Putu Ayu Yukari Rantisari Putu Clarissa Taramitha Devi Putu Edi Rusmana Putu Sherly Chandra Sasmitha Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali Tajuddin, Hanifah Haydar Ali Trisnayanti, Ni Komang Kumala Wikantari, Ida Ayu Putu Withnall, Eric Gordon