Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Enigma in Law

A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Programs in Reducing Recidivism: A Global Perspective Syahwami, Syahwami; Hamirul, Hamirul
Enigma in Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Enigma in Law
Publisher : Enigma Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61996/law.v2i1.55

Abstract

Restorative justice (RJ) is a growing alternative to traditional punitive justice, emphasizing offender accountability, victim reparation, and community reintegration. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the effectiveness of RJ programs in reducing recidivism across diverse global contexts. A systematic search of electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO) from 2018-2024 was conducted, including studies that assessed the impact of RJ on recidivism using experimental or quasi-experimental designs. The primary outcome was recidivism (any reoffense), with secondary outcomes of violent and non-violent recidivism. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes. Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria (N = 18,654 participants). The overall pooled effect size for RJ on recidivism was -0.11 (95% CI -0.15, -0.07), indicating a small but statistically significant reduction in recidivism compared to traditional justice. Subgroup analyses revealed greater effects for youth offenders (-0.16) and for programs with high adherence to core RJ principles (-0.18). In conclusion, RJ programs demonstrate a modest but consistent effect in reducing recidivism. The findings support the continued implementation and expansion of RJ, particularly for young offenders and in settings with strong adherence to RJ philosophy.
The Erosion of Privacy in the Digital Age: A Constitutional Challenge in Indonesia Syahwami, Syahwami; Hamirul, Hamirul
Enigma in Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Enigma in Law
Publisher : Enigma Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61996/law.v2i2.56

Abstract

The digital age has revolutionized communication and information access, but it has also brought significant challenges to the fundamental right to privacy. In Indonesia, the legal framework struggles to keep pace with technological advancements, raising concerns about the erosion of privacy protections. This study examines the constitutional challenges and practical implications of digital privacy erosion in Indonesia. This study employs a mixed-methods approach. First, a comprehensive review of Indonesian constitutional law, privacy legislation, and relevant court decisions is conducted. Second, observational data is collected through a survey of Indonesian internet users (n = 500) to assess their privacy awareness, experiences with data breaches, and perceptions of legal protections. Data analysis involves both qualitative legal interpretation and quantitative statistical analysis. The study reveals a significant gap between constitutional guarantees of privacy and the reality of data collection and surveillance practices in Indonesia. Observational data highlights widespread concerns among Indonesian internet users about privacy violations, with a majority experiencing data breaches and feeling inadequately protected by existing laws. Legal analysis indicates that existing legislation is often vague, outdated, and fails to address the unique challenges posed by digital technologies. In conclusion, this study underscores the urgent need for comprehensive legal reforms in Indonesia to protect digital privacy. Constitutional challenges must be addressed through clear and enforceable legislation that aligns with international standards. Additionally, public awareness campaigns and educational initiatives are crucial to empower individuals to protect their personal information in the digital age.