Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation

PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE INSTRUMENTS IN GRADE IV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Widiastiningsih, Ni Luh Putu; Yudiana, Kadek; Widiana, I Wayan
Journal of Education Research and Evaluation Vol 5, No 4 (2021): November
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v5i3.34338

Abstract

The assessment process is not far from using the instrument as a tool in measurement. Some schools have not been able to use instruments to measure the ability of students' knowledge dimensions, one of which is procedural knowledge. Many factors influence such as the lack of teacher motivation in assessing students' procedural knowledge and there is no procedural knowledge instrument. This study aims to produce a valid and reliable procedural knowledge instrument on Theme 6 grade IV Elementary School. This research is development research conducted in ten stages, according to Brog & Gall, namely: Researching and collecting information, reading literature, making observations, and preparing reports on development needs; Planning prototype components to be developed, defining, formulating goals, determining the sequence of activities; Develop initial products; Conduct expert team test; Revise the initial based on the results of product trials; Conduct main field trials; Revise the product based on the results of field trials; Conduct operational field trials; Carry out final revision of field test products, and Conduct dissemination and implementation. The subjects in this study were 5 material expert lecturers, 22 students in small groups, and 141 students in large groups. In this study, data collection was carried out by interviews, observation, documentation, questionnaires, validity tests, reliability tests, discriminatory tests, level tests. the difficulty, and distractor analysis. From the results of this study we found that the prototype of the procedural knowledge instrument development was carried out in four stages, the procedural knowledge instrument was declared valid with the criteria pbi > rtable 5%, the procedural knowledge instrument was declared to have reliability (0.934). Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the procedural knowledge instrument for fourth-grade elementary school students has met the valid and reliable criteria.
Procedural Knowledge Instruments for Grade IV Elementary School Widiastiningsih, Ni Luh Putu; Yudiana, Kadek; Widiana, I Wayan
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 5 No 4 (2021): November
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (281.034 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v5i3.34338

Abstract

The assessment process is not far from using the instrument as a tool in measurement. Some schools have not been able to use instruments to measure the ability of students' knowledge dimensions, one of which is procedural knowledge. Many factors influence such as the lack of teacher motivation in assessing students' procedural knowledge and there is no procedural knowledge instrument. This study aims to produce a valid and reliable procedural knowledge instrument on Theme 6 grade IV Elementary School. This research is development research conducted in ten stages, according to Brog & Gall, namely: Researching and collecting information, reading literature, making observations, and preparing reports on development needs; Planning prototype components to be developed, defining, formulating goals, determining the sequence of activities; Develop initial products; Conduct expert team test; Revise the initial based on the results of product trials; Conduct main field trials; Revise the product based on the results of field trials; Conduct operational field trials; Carry out final revision of field test products, and Conduct dissemination and implementation. The subjects in this study were 5 material expert lecturers, 22 students in small groups, and 141 students in large groups. In this study, data collection was carried out by interviews, observation, documentation, questionnaires, validity tests, reliability tests, discriminatory tests, level tests. The difficulty, and distractor analysis. From the results of this study we found that the prototype of the procedural knowledge instrument development was carried out in four stages, the procedural knowledge instrument was declared valid with the criteria pbi > rtable 5%, the procedural knowledge instrument was declared to have reliability (0.934). Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the procedural knowledge instrument for fourth-grade elementary school students has met the valid and reliable criteria.
Co-Authors Alexander Hamonangan Simamora Ananda, Vadila Nurista Andayana, I Komang Agus Andika, I Putu Widya Antara, I Gede Wahyu Suwela Apriliani, Putu Ayu Shelia Aprilianita, Kadek Ayu Ardithayasa, I Wayan Ari Putri, Ni Nyoman Chintya Arianti, Ni Kadek Lilik Arini, Ni Putu Piki Pia Artawati, Ni Nyoman Depi astra arsiana, kadek evan Bagaskara, I Made Yuda Baskara, Gede Weda Cokorda Dalem Dahana Damayanti, Ni Putu Sri Damayanti, Risma Desak Putu Parmiti Dewa Nyoman Sudana Dewa Putu Ramendra Dewi Mirayanti, Ni Luh Dewi, Ni Ketut Ratmita Drs. I Nyoman Murda,M.Pd. . Drs. Ndara Tanggu Renda . Gede Wira Bayu Gusti Ayu Made Mia Arisandhi Gusti Ayu Putu Sukma Trisna I Dewa Ayu Made Budhyani I Gede Ferry Eka Putra I Gede Margunayasa I Gede Wawan Sudatha I Gusti Ngurah Japa I Kadek Hera Wirawan I Kadek Suranata I Ketut Puspayoga Ariana I Komang Sudarma I Made Citra Wibawa I Made Hendra Sukmayasa I Made Suarjana I Nengah Suarmanayasa I Nengah Suharta I Nyoman Laba Jayanta I Pt Rian Nugraha Wiraharta I Wayan Ardithayasa I Wayan Kertih I Wayan Lasmawan I Wayan Widiana Ida Ayu Gede Purna Astiti Ilyas, Muhammad Ilyas Indrawan, I Kadek Ari Indrawan, I Ketut Ogik Indrawati, I Gusti Ayu Sri Bintang Juni Pratama, I Gede Dendy Kadek Dwi Padmawati Kadek Icahayati Kadek Merita Kadek Mona Qristyaningsih Ketut Cindy Pratini Komang Rizky Aditya Wiguna Kusumayani, Ni Kadek Mila Kusumayani, Ni Kadek Mila Liniasari, Anak Agung Ayu Made M.Pd Drs. I Ketut Dibia,S.Pd . Made Dewanda Sulaksana Ni Kadek Santa Kristianingsih Ni Kadek Yuniasih Ni Ketut Desia Tristiantari Ni Ketut Suarni Ni Luh Puspa Handayani Ni Luh Putu Fitriani Ni Made Nindi Ambarwati Ni Nyoman Kusmariyatni Ni Nyoman Sugihartini Ni Putu Ayu Winaastari Ni Putu Sri Damayanti Ni Putu Tiarini Ni Putu Winda Purnamayani1 Ni Wayan Arini Ni Wayan Rati Nyoman Dantes Nyoman Sutrana, Kadek Erik Apriliawan Pratama, I Kadek Wahyu Prawira, Mas Arya Natha Purnamayani1, Ni Putu Winda Purnami, Komang Diah Putri, Made Diah Prabaswari Putri, Ni Kadek Rossita Cahyani Putri, Ni Made Sinta Ariayu Putri, Ni Nyoman Chintya Ari Putrini Mahadewi, Luh Putu Putu Adi Krisna Juniarta Putu Aditya Antara Putu Juwita Cahyanti Putu Nanci Riastini Putu Nanci Riastini, Putu Nanci Putu Rahayu Ujianti Raditia, I Gede Parmita Riastini, Ni Putu Nanci Riastini, Ni Putu Nanci Rismayani, Putu Rismayani, Putu Sanjaya, Gede Edo Wahyu Sanjiwani, Ida Ayu Ulan Nindika Sariawan, Made Kembar Nesa Setiawati, Gusti Ayu Kade Yeni Sitepu, Shella Febina Br Sugiantara, I Komang Sukiyati, Nengah Sukmadewi, Ni Kd. Novi Sumantara, I Nengah Swadnyana, Ida Bagus Yoga Tiarini, Ni Putu Triana Putri, Ni Nyoman Trisna , Gusti Ayu Putu Sukma Utami, Ni Putu Dewina Putri Viqi Izzatul Muhlisoh Wibisana, I Kadek Wibisana, I Kadek Widiastiningsih, Ni Luh Putu Widiawati, Ni Kadek Mega Winaastari, Ni Putu Ayu Wirabrata, Dewa Gede Firstia Wiraharta, I Pt Rian Nugraha Yundari, Yundari Yuniasih, Ni Kadek