Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.177
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-'Adalah Jurnal Cita Hukum SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Meta-Yuridis MIZAN WIDYA LAKSANA PROFICIO: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Jurnal Fuaduna: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Farmers: Journal of Community Services Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Adhha, Nurul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implementation of Rehabilitation for Narcotics Addicts in Positive Legal Perspective and Islamic Law Analisa, Lisa; Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana; Adhha, Nurul
Al-Risalah Vol 22 No 1 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1122

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of rehabilitation of addicts at BABESREHAB BNN Lido West Java so that obstacles and challenges in the implementation of rehabilitation for narcotics addicts can be identified with the help of empirical normative analysis. This research also aims to analyze the actualization – in social rehabilitation, especially the mental coaching room. This research was a legal research with an interdisciplinary socio-legal study. The author uses this study model in order to describe legal issues more meaningfully from both a theoretical and practical point of view. This research was conducted at the Rehabilitation Center of the National Narcotics Agency (BABESREHAB BNN Lido West Java) Lido because this rehabilitation institution is a large rehabilitation center directly owned by the government, which was suspected to have made a major contribution to the success of rehabilitation in accordance with applicable laws and policies. This study also uses a mixed methodology consisting of reviewing legal documents and government policies and institutions under it, focus group discussions, and semi-structured interviews. This study also uses an ethnographic content analysis approach known as Ethnographic Content Analysis (ECA). Research informants consisted of 7 practitioner staff and 4 informants from rehabilitation residents. This study concludes that rehabilitation in Indonesia still requires attention from all parties, government, private, and family in solving all obstacles and challenges in its implementation. The allegation that the Lido National Narcotics Agency Rehabilitation (BABESREHAB BNN Lido West Java) which is directly controlled by the government, has contributed greatly to the success of rehabilitation in accordance with the law, applicable policy, as well as - not yet fully confirmed. This study found several problems in the implementation of rehabilitation, namely, (1) there is no reach out for prospective rehabilitation residents, (2) there are still dilemmas in forced rehabilitation, resident motivation, and vocational training (3) limited number of functional personnel, (4) lack of awareness legal and policy context, (5) Islamic mental development curriculum is not yet comprehensive.
Actualization of the Maqsid Al-Shar'ah in Indonesia: A Case Study of the Spiritual Counting of Prisoners in Judicial Institutions Humaira, Aida; Sujoko, Imam; Syarif, Edwin; Adhha, Nurul; Hazmi, Raju Moh
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v7i2.7366

Abstract

Correctional institutions are undergoing a transformative shift from punitive spaces to acknowledging the humanity of inmates. This study delves into Indonesian correctional facilities' religious-based coaching programs prioritizing inmate protection, reintegration, and dignity. Analyzing these through Islamic law and Maqasid al-sharahprinciples, it explores personality development models and identifies limitations in current approaches. While initial findings showcase positive outcomes—behavioural changes and reduced distress—the study highlights the predominance of lecture-based programs, signalling the need for more comprehensive Islamic law-based models. Different inmate categories, especially those in serious crimes, display varying spiritual indicator weights. Spiritual development correlates positively with behavioural adjustments. Overcapacity issues in certain facilities, like Salemba and Jakarta Women's Correctional Institutions, pose severe challenges—from limited resources to inadequate staff ratios and hindrances in providing proper medical and psychological support, notably impacting drug abuse victims. The study underscores the urgency of restorative justice in sentencing, emphasizing rehabilitation and societal reintegration.
Construction of Legal Justice, Certainty, and Benefits in the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018 Jahar, Asep Saepudin; Hazmi, Raju Moh; Adhha, Nurul
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i1.11583

Abstract

The philosophical discourse on legal justice, certainty, and benefits paradigm in the reality of Indonesian law reflect a strong indication of legal positivism in the Supreme Court decision. It causes a loss in the sense of justice and the hope for the community to meet legislative candidates with a clean track record and full of integrity. This study is normative-philosophical legal research applying the theory of justice developed by John Stuart Mill and John Rawls in highlighting the concept of legal justice, certainty, and benefits. The construction of justice in this decision applies the concept of justice as fairness as seen in the court consideration focusing on individual freedom (political rights to vote and to be elected). This is taken to protect the natural rights which are irreplaceable by any other rights. Meanwhile, the use of legal benefits and certainty is to reinforce the legal positivism paradigm. As the result, the study shows the three legal values (justice, certainty, and benefits) share equal positions in the country’s legal framework.Keywords: Legal Justice; Legal Certainty; Legal Benefits; Law; Supreme Court Decision Konstruksi Keadilan, Kepastian, dan Kemanfaatan Hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 46P/HUM/2018 Abstrak Wacana filosofis paradigma keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan hukum dalam realitas hukum Indonesia mencerminkan indikasi kuat positivisme hukum dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung. Hal tersebut menyebabkan hilangnya rasa keadilan dan harapan masyarakat untuk bertemu calon legislatif dengan rekam jejak yang bersih dan penuh integritas. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normative-filosofis yang menerapkan teori keadilan yang dikembangkan oleh John Stuart Mill dan John Rawls dalam menyoroti konsep keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan hukum. Konstruksi keadilan dalam putusan ini menggunakan konsep keadilan sebagai fairness yang terlihat dalam pertimbangan pengadilan yang menitikberatkan pada kebebasan individu (hak politik untuk memilih dan dipilih). Hal ini dijadikan pertimbangan untuk melindungi hak alami yang tidak dapat digantikan oleh hak lainnya. Sedangkan kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum dijadikan pertimbangan untuk memperkuat paradigma positivisme hukum. Hasilnya, studi ini menunjukkan bahwa ketiga nilai hukum (keadilan, kepastian, dan manfaat) memiliki kedudukan yang sama dalam kerangka hukum negara. Kata Kunci: Keadilan hukum, kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan hukum, hukum, putusan Mahkamah Agung. Конструирование справедливости, определенности и преимущества закона в Постановлении № 46P/HUM/2018 Верховного суда АннотацияПостановление Верховного суда № 46P/HUM/2018 вызвало раскол в правовой парадигме в Индонезии. Философский дискурс между справедливостью, определенностью и преимуществами закона в реальности индонезийского законодательства отражает сильные симптомы правового позитивизма в постановлении Верховного суда. Это приводит к потере чувства справедливости и надежды сообщества на получение репутации чистых и порядочных кандидатов. Данное исследование является нормативно-философским правовым исследованием. Подход, основанный на теории справедливости Джона Стюарта Милля и Джона Ролза, был использован для понимания концепции справедливости, преимущества и правовой определенности в постановлении. Конструирование справедливости в постановлении использует концепцию справедливости как равенства (справедливость как честность), что можно увидеть из соображений судей, подчеркивающих индивидуальную свободу (политические права, право быть избранным и голосовать) как форму попытки отстоять либертарианские права или естественные права, которые не могут быть отменены свободой других людей. Между тем аспекты преимущества и определенности подчеркивают позитивную парадигму закона. В этом исследовании сделан вывод о том, что три юридические значимости (определенность, преимущество и справедливость) занимают не менее важное место в рамках правовой системы страны.Ключевые Слова: Справедливость; определенность; преимущество закона; закон; постановление Верховного суда.
Co-Authors Ahmad Fahmi Analisa, Lisa Andi Yaqub Anisa, Hida Arliani Nur Azzahwa, Taufik Baharuddin, A. Zamakhsyari Edwin Syarif Hazmi, Raju Moh Hazmi, Raju Mohammad Humaira, Aida Hutapea, Alfon Imam Sujoko Imaniar, Lisana Husna Kamarusdiana, - Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana Khairurrijal Khairurrijal Muh. Fudhail Rahman, Muh. Fudhail Mulyana, Jeane Siswitasari Novriadi Novriadi, Novriadi Nur Hidayah Rahmi, Latifa Saepudin, Asep Sari, Dian Anggria Sattia, Ana Yanti Ariyanti, Yanti