Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : wlrev

Analisis Hukum Terhadap Konsep Riba Dalam Transaksi Jual BeliOnline Menggunakan Shopee Pay Later Pada Perspektif KompilasiHukum Ekonomi Syariah Antony Charles; Wiwin Mochtar Wiyono; Ferryani Krisnawati; Eti Mul Erowati
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/wlr.jgg2fp19

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the mechanism for using Shopee PayLater in the Shopee applicationand the views of the compilation of sharia economic law on the mechanism of buying and selling contracts usingShopee PayLater. This research uses an empirical normative juridical approach and the type of research uses aqualitative approach which includes the results of online surveys and interviews, with various written informationthat explains the buying and selling mechanism using Shopee PayLater payments in the view of the ShariaEconomic Law Compilation. This data relates to Shopee PayLater service provisions, payment systems, billing anduser statements. The techniques used by the author are direct and online interviews as well as literature study. Theresults of this research are that the requirements for activating Shopee PayLater are that you must have a Shopeeaccount that has been verified by Shopee and must have an ID card to activate it. The payment system is ininstallments 2 times, 3 times, 6 times and 12 times per month. Bill payments can be made via m-banking, ATM,Indomart, Alfamart, or other payments. The use of Shopee PayLater is included in the qardh contract which hasbeen regulated in the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law in article 20 paragraph 36 which explains the meaningof Qard and the articles related to qard in the use of Shopee PayLater, namely in article 606, article 607, article 608,Article 609 and Article 611. According to several legal opinions, Shopee PayLater can be said to be usury when thereis an ziyadah or additional element required in advance by the paylater publisher for its consumers. Included in thetype of debt usury which is prohibited. However, if Shopee PayLater charges additional fees then it is not usury. Aslong as the additional costs are counted as services or ijarah.Keywords: Usury, Online Buying and Selling, Shopee PayLater, Compilation of Sharia Economic Law
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum BagiKonsumen Transaksi Jual Beli Online (Studi Jual BeliOnline Di Bengkel Knalpot Burnout Exhaust) Aldi Ferdiansyah; Eti Mul Erowati; Wiwin Mochtar Wiyono
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/fc8d1b12

Abstract

To find out how the form of Juridical Review of Legal Protection for Consumers Online Buy and SellTransactions, and to explore various aspects of issues that have been formulated in the formulation ofproblems. To achieve these objectives the author uses a normative juridical approach. The researchspecifications used are descriptive research. The data method is presented in the form of descriptions whichare arranged systematically. The condition of e-commerce on the one hand brings benefits mainly due toefficiency, but on the other hand brings doubt especially to legal issues regarding legal certainty of ConsumerProtection and the validity of business transactions. as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph 1 of Act No. 8 of 1999concerning Consumer Protection which states that "Consumer protection is any effort that guarantees legalcertainty to provide protection to consumers", in transactions that typically use paperbased economy, but intransactions through electronic media it turned into a digital electronic economy the need for special handlingin the eyes of the law itself. Article 1320 of the Civil Code should be based on the legal force owned byconsumers in conducting transactions. In the Electronic Information and Transaction Law Article 5 paragraph1 and 2 which states that "Electronic Information and / or Electronic Documents and / or their printouts arevalid legal evidence. And rather than consumer rights to obtain legal protection and can be a good start forlegal certainty for consumers.
Dispensasi Perkawinan Bagi Laki-Laki Dibawah Umur(Studi Penetapan No: 0122/Pdt.P/2018/Pa.Pwt) Mochamad Yunan Raenaldi; Eti Mul Erowati; Elly Kristiani Purwendah
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/sha07004

Abstract

To find out the legal reasoning of the judge in deciding the Marriage Dispensation Request in the decisionNumber: 0122 / Pdt.P / 2018 / PA.Pwt, To achieve this goal the author uses a Normative Juridical approach,Research specifications are Normative Data presentation methods are presented in the form of descriptionswhich are grouped and then arranged systematically. Based on the results of the research and discussion in thedecision Number: 0122 / Pdt.P / 2018 / PA.Pwt, it can be seen that the legal basis of judges in providingMarriage Dispensation is based on the reasons the two have long had a relationship, love each other, are veryfamiliar and have engaged even if the applicant's child has been pregnant for 2 months, then it has beenproven that the Petitioner's child is mature enough and mature to settle in. In addition, both of them are single,there is no relationship, not so that there are no barriers to marriage, and the applicant's family and parents ofprospective husbands have blessed the marriage plan. If the request for dispensation is not granted, it is fearedthat things will happen that are not desirable / violate religious norms, and for the good of prospectivechildren who are being conceived by the prospective bride. The provisions and principles of marriage law havebeen fulfilled as stipulated in Article 7 of Law No. 1/1974 Jo Article 15 up to Article 18 and Article 39Compilation of Islamic Law and in line with the Qaidah Fiqhiyah, (which in Indonesian means: "rejectingobedience takes precedence over priority"), which means that preventing evil must first sought before doinggood.
Analisis Pembatalan Perkawinan Poligami Liar Eti Mul Erowati; Wiwin Muchtar Wiyono; Prosawita Ririh Kusumasari
Wijayakusuma Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Wijayakusuma Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51921/wlr.bz2cwv45

Abstract

Correctional Institutions are places designed to accommodate and nurture inmates. Prisoner coaching is carried out This study examines the judge's considerations in deciding the case of annulment of marriage on the grounds of polygamy without permission from the court and the first wife, based on the study of decision Number  284/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sky in the Sekayu Religious Court. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal basis, arguments, and implications of the decision to annul a polygamous marriage without obtaining permission from the court and from the first wife (Wild polygamy) as regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). This study uses a normative legal approach and case study, by analyzing court decisions and literature reviews. The results of the study show that the legal position of a polygamous marriage (Wild) that does not have permission from the first wife and permission from the court but has been registered at the KUA is as follows: the marriage between Respondent I and Respondent II is an Illegal polygamous marriage because there is no permission from the Religious Court for polygamy. This is very contrary to the provisions of Article 20 and Article 21 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 in conjunction with. Article 6 paragraph (2) letter (f) of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, so the marriage of Respondent I and Respondent II is invalid and has violated the provisions of Islamic law and the provisions of applicable laws, so that the marriage and Marriage Certificate and extract of marriage certificate Number 1606011072023034 dated July 14, 2023 which was made by the Religious Affairs Office of Sekayu District, Musi Banyuasin Regency, must be declared invalid and have no legal force.