Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.841
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Halu Oleo Law Review MIZAN Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Case Law AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA) SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanitis ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Jurnal Global Ilmiah Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum
Chandra, Tofik Yanuar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DARIPERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA Akbar, Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Ismed, Mohamad
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1738

Abstract

Indonesia, as a state based on the rule of law as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, obliges every citizen to uphold the law without exception. In the context of criminal law, the principle of legality as stated in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) establishes that an act can only be punished if it is regulated by law. One of the most common criminal offenses is embezzlement in office as regulated in Article 374 of the KUHP, which constitutes an aggravated form of ordinary embezzlement under Article 372 of the KUHP. This offense is often committed by individuals holding positions or employment relations, both in the private and public sectors, who abuse their authority to unlawfully control goods or money. This research aims to analyze the criminal act of embezzlement in office and the criminal liability of its perpetrators from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. The study employs a normative juridical research method with statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Data were obtained through library research consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and analyzed using grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. The findings show that the application of Article 374 of the KUHP in practice often encounters sentencing disparities, where court verdicts tend to be lighter than the prosecutors’ demands. This disparity is evident in several court decisions examined, in which sentence reductions were based on subjective considerations such as the defendant’s cooperative attitude, restitution of losses, and social background. Normatively, the criminal liability of perpetrators of embezzlement in office must be based on the principle of legality, conformity with statutory elements, and evidentiary processes in court. However, in practice, there is a gap between the theoretical framework of criminal law and its implementation, indicating the need for consistent law enforcement to ensure legal certainty and justice
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris atas Pembuatan Akta yang Memuat Keterangan Palsu dan Akibat Hukumnya Aktanotaria, Ade; Halim, Anriz Nazaruddin; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v5i3.1651

Abstract

Notarial deeds are designed to serve as strong legal evidence, ensuring certainty and preventing disputes. However, in practice, deeds sometimes contain false statements, raising questions about their legal consequences and the extent of notary liability. This study aims to examine the criminal liability of notaries who intentionally include false information in authentic deeds and to analyze the resulting legal impacts. The research applies a normative juridical method, using a legislative and case approach. Legal materials were collected through statutory analysis, literature, academic journals, and relevant judicial decisions, then examined by grammatical and systematic interpretation. The findings reveal that deeds containing false information are legally null and void. If proven to have acted intentionally, notaries may be held criminally liable under the Indonesian Penal Code, particularly Articles 263 and 266, with penalties including imprisonment. In addition to criminal sanctions, notaries may also face civil liability for unlawful acts and administrative sanctions such as suspension or dismissal imposed by supervisory authorities. This research highlights the importance of strengthening prudential principles, ethical compliance, and supervisory mechanisms to safeguard the integrity of the notarial profession and ensure legal certainty.
Legal Protection for Buyers for the Purchase of Inheritance Land Which the Master Certificate Has Not Been Split Suryana, Cece; Marniati, Felicitas Sri; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v4i3.15354

Abstract

Land is a significant asset with economic, social, and legal value. This study examines the purchase of inherited land whose parent certificate has not been subdivided and the legal protection available to buyers. The research applies a normative legal method with a qualitative juridical approach, using literature studies, case analysis, and interviews with relevant parties such as land deed officials, notaries, and buyers. The study highlights that such transactions carry legal risks due to unclear object definitions under Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for buyers is possible if conducted in good faith, administrative obligations are fulfilled afterward, and officials perform professionally. Proper legal procedures are strongly recommended to ensure legal certainty.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Anggota TNI Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Menyebabkan Kematian Ananta, Dinur Wikra; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Marpaung, Berlian
ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisplin, Maret 2024
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/armada.v2i3.1244

Abstract

Bidang pertahanan bertugas menjaga kedaulatan, keutuhan wilayah, serta keselamatan dan martabat Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang- Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Indonesia. Militer Indonesia, atau Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI), memiliki fungsi tersebut. Meski demikian, anggota TNI, dalam pelaksanaan tugasnya, dapat melanggar aturan. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi penegakan hukum terhadap anggota TNI yang terlibat dalam tindak pidana penganiayaan fatal, seperti kasus Jusni (Putusan Perkara No. 161-K/PM II- 08/AD/VIII/2020). Rumusan masalah mencakup mekanisme penegakan hukum dan sanksi pidana terhadap anggota TNI yang terlibat dalam tindak pidana penganiayaan fatal. Penelitian ini mengadopsi teori penegakan hukum dan teori pemidanaan sebagai alat analisis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu dengan pendekatan hukum yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian Undang-Undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach) yang pada prinsipnya bersumber dari bahan hukum primer terdiri dari undang-undang dan putusan hakim, bahan hukum sekunder terdiri buku-buku, hasil-hasil penelitian, artikel serta bahan hukum tersier perpustakaan, artikel dan website. Teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan teknik interpretasi gramatikal. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penegakan hukum terhadap anggota TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana penganiayaan fatal tidak berbeda jauh dengan proses hukum berdasarkan KUHAP. Meskipun diatur oleh Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1997 tentang peradilan militer, tindak pidana penganiayaan masih merujuk pada KUHP karena tidak diatur dalam KUHPM. Sanksi pidana bagi anggota TNI pelaku penganiayaan tidak melebihi ancaman hukuman Pasal 351 KUHP, sejalan dengan tujuan pembinaan militer yang lebih menekankan rehabilitasi daripada hukuman balasan. Hukuman diberikan untuk efek jera, mencegah ulangan tindakan, dan memungkinkan kembalinya pelaku ke dinasnya setelah pembebasan.
Co-Authors Abu Taher, Mohammad Akbar, Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah Aktanotaria, Ade Ananta, Dinur Wikra Andayani, Rizki Ardiyansah Barus, Artanta Basuki , Candra, Mardi Diana, Anisa Roshda Halim, Anriz Nazaruddin Hasibuan, Rando Vittoro Herdiana, Fransisca Hossain, Mohammad Belayet Ismed, Mohamad Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto Kurniawan, Yulianus Soni Kuspermadi, Raghil Abdul Muqsith Marniati, Felicitas Sri Marpaung, Berlian Maryano, Maryano Mau, Hedwig Adianto Megawaty, Octavia Rouli Novita Lestari, Novita Pangestika, Meitri Widya Paparang, Sanrawan Paparang, Santrawan T. Pratama, Dimas Satriawan Syah Purwanto, Eko Joko Riyadi, Trisno Saputro, Heri Joko Saragih, Handa Yusico Setiyawan, Aldi Rizky Shodiq, M. D. Siahaan, Pangihutan Sihombing, Finiel Handani Tumalona Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina Suryana, Cece Sutanto, Audrey Lucretia Tubalawony, Agnasia Marliana Yolanda, Berlian Yolanda, Moch Andre Zakhiri Md. Nor, Mohd