Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : USU LAW JOURNAL

ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM (THE LAST RESORT PRINCIPLE) TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM DALAM RANGKA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 125/PID/A/2012/PN.GS) Beby Suryani Fithri; Muhammad Hamdan; Madiasa Ablisar; Jelly Leviza
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (594.718 KB)

Abstract

The philosophy of juvenile justice system is to emphasize the rehabilitation of children in conflict with law as a person who has restrictions compared with adults. Children need the protection of the state and the society in the next period. It is necessary to seek a minimum intervention of the juvenile justice system against the children in conflict with law as a good strategy to protect them. The ultimum remedium/the last resort principle aims to protect the children in conflict with law in order to get their brighter future by keeping them away of the formal juvenile justice system and put it as the last choice to solve their cases. The ultimum remedium/the last resort principle is also useful to help the children in conflict with law by giving them warn and chance so that, they can find their identity and be the man in charge for themselves, their family, their society and their country. There will no presecution against the children in conflict with law and also they wont known as convict by applying the ultimum remedium/the last resort principle. It is why the juvenile judges need to really understand the principles of law and regulations relating to the disposal of the child so as to produce a wise judgment for the children in conflict with law.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM PERADILAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENCABUTAN PERKARA DELIK ADUAN ( STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 1600 K/PID/2009) Muhammad Yusuf Siregar; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi; Utary Maharany Barus
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (464.92 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTArrangement complaint about a crime has been arranged expressly in the Book of the Law of Criminal Law Article 72-75 of the Criminal Code. Complaints that have been filed may be withdrawn if still within the grace period of 3 ( three ) months after the complaint is filed ( Article 75 of the Criminal Code). The practice of the law in the Supreme Court decision No. 1600 K/PID/2009. Supreme Court Justice existing legal provisions in the Criminal Code with the advanced legal purpose of restoring the balance that occurs due to a crime and restorative justice teachings that conflict is not simply a crime as a violation of state and public interest but a conflict also represent disrupted and broken relationship between two or more individual in public relations . The panel of judges who handle cases in the decision No.1600 K/PID/2009 has given consideration First Objective of criminal law that is to restore the balance that occurs between the perpetrator and the victim because of the criminal act ; Second : It has been done for peace between the perpetrator and the victim ; Third : To maintain individual relationships within social relationships , especially parties to the conflict are bound family relationship is between the law and the law; Fourth : that the teaching of restorative justice that the judge must be able to facilitate conflict resolution satisfactory to unite the parties to the dispute.