Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.85
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal niara Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP) Journal of Governance Dinamika : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Academia Praja : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Pemerintahan dan Administrasi Publik Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA) Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Mamangan Social Science Journal Neo Journal of economy and social humanities Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies J-CEKI PESHUM
Wicaksana, Harits Hijrah
Universitas Esa Unggul
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Governance

 1 
Policy Analysis of Handling COVID-19: Experience China, South Korea, Italy, and Indonesia Leo Agustino; Harits Hijrah Wicaksana
Journal of Governance Volume 5 Issue 2
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v5i2.8683

Abstract

This article discusses and analyzes efforts to treat the coronavirus (also known as Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19)) by the governments of China, South Korea, Italy, and Indonesia.  To understand the approaches each country takes is very important to get a clear picture of the efforts, steps, strategies, and policies that are formulated and implemented. To analyze COVID-19 cases in the four countries, the governance analysis framework (GAF) approach from Hamza (in Putra and Sanusi 2019) was used. This approach analyzes four aspects: scope map, stakeholder map, process map, and governance map.  Articles utilizing a qualitative approach using descriptive analysis research methods. Data collection techniques used are library studies in the form of books, journal articles, online and conventional news, and the websites of authoritative institutions.  Several important findings are general and specific, including, first of all, the four countries have the same orientation in handling and controlling the spread of the coronavirus.  Secondly, various actors are actively involved in resolving a pandemic starting with the highest leadership of a country, medical staff and nurses, security agencies, researchers, and so on.  Third, the four countries take their respective ways in solving the COVID-19 problem, but generally, they do a lockdown in addition to the health approach. Fourth, China and South Korea are considered successful examples in handling COVID19, otherwise not with Italy and Indonesia.  The lack of success in Italy and Indonesia is caused by two factors, the lack of seriousness of the government and ignorance of citizens, resulting in slow handling of control and widespread of the deadly coronavirus.
Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: The Experience of The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Leo Agustino; Indah Fitriani; Harits Hijrah Wicaksana; Ahmad Daelami
Journal of Governance Volume 6 Issue 2: (2021) December
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v6i2.12126

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the discussion and analysis of corruption eradication attempts in Indonesia with the Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), The Corruption Eradication Commission) as its centre. As an activity, the commencement of the corruption eradication dates to the pre-Reformation Era. However, its presence is mainly in the form of the foundation of the anti-corruption body without playing real roles as a nominal anti-corruption institution. As a response towards pressure from the IMF, in 2002 the Corruption Eradication Commission was formed as a specialized institution to tackle chronic corruption issues strangling Indonesia in the era of Soeharto’s New Order. Unfortunately, since its inception, there has been no president who is committed to the eradication attempts and therefore sided with the KPK. It is due to the commission’s huge constitutional power (investigation, probing, tapping, arrest, and prosecution) and hence these frighten many corrupt officials. Numerous political elites have been arrested by the KPK such as ministers, governors, regents, mayors and law-enforcers top officials. Consequently, unsurprisingly the KPK faces multi-directional attacks attempting at its weakening through the arrests of its top leaders, iterating its ad-hock (can be dissolved at any time.) status, and the revision of KPK law. Therefore, the government should act firmly to provide protection and supports to the KPK against those potential threats aiming at weakening the commission, to block any legislation potentially lessening the functions of the KPK, and to make sure both KPK’s top leaderships and average personnel are impartial and free of vested interests.
Deliberative Policy Analysis of Green Open Spaces in Lebak Regency Banten Province Harits Hijrah Wicaksana
Journal of Governance Volume 9 Issue 1: (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v9i1.22670

Abstract

Increasing population growth in an urban area is the main factor in reducing space utilization. One of them is green open space. In response to this, the Regional Government of Lebak Regency issued a policy in the form of Regional Regulation Number 2 of 2011 concerning Green Open Space in the Urban Area of the Capital City of Lebak Regency. Researchers are interested in analyzing the policy planning process for the provision and use of green open space in the urban area of Lebak Regency from a deliberative perspective. The research results showed that population density resulted in the emergence of slum areas and low-income communities. Apart from that, the lack of public awareness of clean and healthy living behaviors is one of the contributing factors. Plans to provide and utilize green open space in the urban area of Lebak Regency have been hampered due to construction and development in the economic sector. Moreover, the importance and need for green open space to overcome disaster-prone areas such as landslide-prone and inundation-prone areas need to be resolved by the Lebak Regency Regional Government. Based on these conditions, it is necessary to create a resolution or development policy that can resolve two factors, namely economic development and the fulfillment of green open space. Therefore, one solution that can be provided is the Green City Development Program.
Dynamic Governance Model for Mass Rapid Transportation in Jakarta Amin, Chair; Wicaksana, Harits Hijrah
Journal of Governance Volume 10 Issue 1: (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jog.v10i1.30968

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the Dynamic Governance Model in Jakarta's Mass Rapid Transportation (MRT) system. The fundamental principle of Dynamic Governance is the integration of culture and capability to foster change that aligns with evolving societal needs in an era marked by uncertainty. Organizations must dynamically and flexibly adapt to effectively navigate the complexities they face. A qualitative approach was employed in this research, utilizing data collection methods such as interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that the implementation of the three pillars of Dynamic Governance is consistently preceded by preparatory processes. For example, research is conducted prior to the application of thinking ahead, internal reviews precede thinking again, and benchmarking is undertaken before implementing thinking across. Additionally, the study identifies interconnections among the three pillars, emphasizing their mutual reinforcement. Furthermore, culture is found to play a vital role in fostering work commitment and ensuring operational consistency in the field.
Co-Authors Abdul Haeba Ramli Agung Edi Rustanto Agus Romadhon Ahmad Daelami Almansuri, Anton Amin, Chair Amrullah, Dicky Anggraeni, Abellia Septri Anthonius Whisnu Perdana Widiputra Arif, Zaenal Ayunda Putri Bratakusuma, Deddy Supriadi Cahyani Desi Puriana Cholifihani, Muhammad Chronika S, Jeni Helen Deddy Supriady Deddy Supriady Bratakusumah, Deddy Supriady Diah Kartika Sari Endarsiwi, Sugeng Fajar Wengga, Nefan Satria Fauzi, Muhammad Fera, Yuliana Hendy Tannady Indah Fitriani Indradewa, Rhian Kusumapradja, Rokiah Leo Agustino Mairani, Nurhayu Mazzei, Micaela Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mohamad Nurpahdi Moiso, Valentina Muhmin, Andi Hidayat Munandar, Teguh Aris Nefianto, Tirton Parmanto, Chandra Putra Lodong, Agung Panglima Santi Meilan SITI MARIAM Surryanto Djoko Waluyo Sutawijaya, Hidayat Utami, Rina Nur Valentina, Febry Waluyo, Suryanto Djoko Wengga, Nefan Satria Fajar Yahya Rachman Hidayat Yahya Rachmana Hidayat