Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Praktik Manajemen Kurikulum : Rendahnya Daya Literasi Peserta Didik pada Sekolah Dasar Mashun, Mashun
Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Mataram University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/goescienceed.v6i3.1326

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze curriculum management practices related to the low literacy levels of elementary school students in terms of content, approach, and implementation. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection techniques included: observations of teaching and learning activities to directly examine the integration of literacy into the learning process; in-depth interviews with principals and teachers to gather information on curriculum implementation and literacy activities; and documentation studies such as lesson plans (RPP), textbooks, students’ literacy assessment results, and curriculum documents. The data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Data validity was ensured through triangulation of sources and techniques by comparing the results of interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results showed that in terms of content: curriculum changes were not accompanied by extensive teacher training, there was a lack of textbooks that promoted literacy activities, and support from the school was insufficient. In terms of approach: teachers tended to use lecture methods, and learning strategies were no longer student-centered. In terms of implementation: planning for the integration of literacy programs into the school curriculum was inadequate, teacher training on literacy-based learning strategies was rarely implemented, and evaluation and follow-up activities on students’ literacy results were minimal. These were the main factors that contributed to low literacy achievement. This study recommends strengthening the planning, implementation, and evaluation functions of a literacy-based curriculum as a strategy to improve students’ literacy skills at the elementary school level.
Dynamics of Strengthening Character Education for Students at SMA Negeri 1 Aikmel East Lombok Badarudin, Badarudin; Tohri, Ahmad; Mashun, Mashun; Hairi, Husnul
Jurnal Humanitas: Katalisator Perubahan dan Inovator Pendidikan Vol 11 No 1 (2025): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/jhm.v11i1.29492

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the planning, implementation, and evaluation process on strengthening the character education of students at SMAN 1 Aikmel, East Lombok. This research uses a qualitative approach, with a descriptive qualitative type. The research site was at SMAN 1 Aikmel, East Lombok, with the subject of the research being the principal and the research informants being the student affairs and teachers. While the data collection technique uses observation, interview and documentation techniques, the data validation technique is carried out by triangulation, namely the triangulation technique of data sources and methods, then the data analysis technique is carried out in several stages, namely data collection, data reduction, data display and conclusions drawing or verifying. The results of this study obtained an overview that: first, planning has been carried out as best as possible starting from the program planning meeting of goal formulation, strategy preparation, policy determination, procedure mapping, and program improvement involving all components of the school, deputy principal for curriculum, student affairs, infrastructure, public relations, treasurer, educators and education staff and school committees.; Second, the implementation of strengthening the character of students runs well through organizing activities and actions focusing on the character values of students; Third, the evaluation of the process of strengthening students' character education through activities to supervise the implementation of activities, reflect, analyze and follow up.