Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.391
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal EKUIVALEN - Pendidikan Matematika Pendidikan Ekonomi AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Penelitian LPPM (Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) IKIP PGRI MADIUN JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains Jurnal Terapan Abdimas Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar JAST : Jurnal Aplikasi Sains dan Teknologi Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan Science Education and Application Journal Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Lemma: Letters of Mathematics Education JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Riset Keperawatan dan Kesehatan Journal on Mathematics Education Refleksi: Jurnal Riset dan Pendidikan
Tri Andari
Unknown Affiliation
Chemistry Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PBL DENGAN PENDEKATAN TARL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X-H SMA NEGERI 1 NGLAMES PADA MATERI FUNGSI KUADRAT Septiyani, Della Angge; Tri Andari; Esthiningtyas S.
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 9 No. 04 (2024): Volume 09, No. 04 Desember 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v9i4.19507

Abstract

This research aims to improve student learning outcomes by applying the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model and the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) approach. This research is a type of classroom action research that follows stages starting from planning, implementation, observation and reflection. The data obtained was analyzed by calculating the average class score obtained by students and the percentage of students completion. Based on the initial test results, it shows that the mathematics learning outcomes for class XH are still relatively low. Therefore, researchers collaborated with mathematics teachers to improve the learning outcomes of class XH students. The efforts made are by applying the PBL learning model and theTaRL approach to quadratic function material. Based on the results of data analysis, student learning outcomes have increased significantly.The percentage of student completion in the pre-cycle was 3,1%. Meanwhile on the first and second cycles experienced an increase, namely to 60% in the first cycle and 94% in the second cycle.
IMPLEMENTASI MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN TARL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA PADA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS IX DI SMPN 1 GEGER Maylinda Dwi Astuti; Tri Andari; Sri Hariyati
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 9 No. 04 (2024): Volume 09, Nomor 04, Desember 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v9i04.20134

Abstract

This study aims to improve the mathematics learning outcomes of grade IX students at SMPN 1 Geger through the application of the Discovery Learning model combined with the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) approach. The main problem faced is the low understanding of mathematical concepts by students. The Discovery Learning model was chosen because it can encourage students to find concepts independently through exploration, while the TaRL approach adjusts learning to students' abilities. This study is a classroom action research conducted in two cycles, with 32 students as subjects. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and learning outcome tests, using observation sheet instruments, post-test questions, and structured interviews. The results showed a significant increase in mathematics learning outcomes. The average score in cycle I was 73.5, while in cycle II it increased to 86.8. The percentage of learning completion also increased from 56% in cycle I to 84% in cycle II. These results indicate that the application of the Discovery Learning model combined with TaRL is effective in improving the mathematics learning outcomes of grade IX students.
Kemampuan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah sistem persamaan linier ditinjau dari brain dominance Lusiana, Restu; Andari, Tri
Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29407/jmen.v8i1.17493

Abstract

Students' creative thinking processes need to be developed to support them in solving complex mathematical problems, but this is not easy. This study aims to describe students' creative thinking skills in solving linear equation system problems based on brain dominance. This research is a qualitative descriptive research with a case study approach. Subjects were categorized into right brain dominance and left brain dominance by using a brain dominance questionnaire. The research instruments were in the form of tests and interview guidelines. Data validation uses method triangulation and data is analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, data verification, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the subject of right brain dominance in fluency gave 3 responses, in flexible thinking the subject gave 3 different ideas, in original thinking the subject gave a unique response, and in elaboration the subject did not show a coherent answer. While the left brain dominant subject in fluent thinking (fluency) gave 4 responses, in flexible thinking the subject gave 3 general ideas, in original thinking the subject did not show a unique response, and in detailed thinking (elaboration) the subject showed a flurry of answers.
COMPARING ILBIL, IBL, AND CONVENTIONAL MODELS: SELF-REGULATED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT Susanti, Vera Dewi; Maharani, Swasti; Andari, Tri; Wulandari, Rika
Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Volume 7 Number 1 (January 2026)
Publisher : Program Studi PGSD Universitas Flores

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37478/jpm.v7i1.6728

Abstract

Teaching models currently play a crucial role in enhancing educational quality and improving student learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three learning models—ILBIL (Inquiry Learning Based on Information Literacy), IBL (Inquiry-Based Learning), and conventional learning — on students’ mathematics learning outcomes in the topic of three-dimensional geometry. A quantitative approach was applied using a posttest control group design. The study population consisted of 143 students, and a cluster-random sampling technique was used to select 89 students from three classes. Data were collected through observations, questionnaires, and tests. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a 5% significance level, as performed in SPSS 25.00 for Windows. The results revealed: (1) a significance value of 0.000, which is less than 0.05, indicating that the ILBIL model was more effective than both the IBL and conventional models in terms of students’ learning outcomes; (2) a significance value of 0.196, which is greater than 0.05, suggesting that self-regulated learning did not significantly affect students’ learning outcomes; and (3) a significance value of 0.306, which is greater than 0.05, showing that the interaction between self-regulated learning and the learning model did not significantly influence students’ learning outcomes.
Co-Authors Affiah, Eva Nur Amalia Chofifatul Agung Prastyo Pambudi, Agung Prastyo Aisyah Rohmatin, Siti Ardiana Ardiana, Ardiana Astuti, Indra Puji Esthiningtyas S. Eva Komsiatun Fatriya Adamura Febita, Ferry Harenza, Angga Ihtiari Prastyaningrum, Ihtiari Ika Krisdiana Maylinda Dwi Astuti Merdiana Kesumawati Mirna Tanjung Natalia Desi A, Natalia Desi Nisa, Khoirotun Nur baity Pratama, Kharisma Restu Lusiana Rika Wulandari Rivatul Ridho Elvierayani Romandoni, Hendrisa Rizqie Sanusi Sanusi Sardulo Gembong, Sardulo Septiyani, Della Angge Sri Hariyati Suriadi Jais Swasti Maharani, Swasti Syaiful Huda Titin Masfingatin, Titin Vera Dewi Susanti Vera Dewi Susanti Wijayanti, Cicik Yolamalinda Yolamalinda Yuli Hardiana, Yuli